Last visit was: 15 Dec 2024, 01:39 It is currently 15 Dec 2024, 01:39
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
annusngh
Joined: 30 Jul 2013
Last visit: 24 Aug 2018
Posts: 16
Own Kudos:
58
 []
Given Kudos: 54
Location: India
Concentration: International Business, Strategy
GPA: 2.4
WE:General Management (Insurance)
Posts: 16
Kudos: 58
 []
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
3
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
0akshay0
Joined: 19 Apr 2016
Last visit: 14 Jul 2019
Posts: 203
Own Kudos:
584
 []
Given Kudos: 59
Location: India
GMAT 1: 570 Q48 V22
GMAT 2: 640 Q49 V28
GPA: 3.5
WE:Web Development (Computer Software)
GMAT 2: 640 Q49 V28
Posts: 203
Kudos: 584
 []
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
GOURAVRISHI
Joined: 13 Mar 2014
Last visit: 28 Jul 2019
Posts: 1
Given Kudos: 11
Posts: 1
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
chesstitans
Joined: 12 Dec 2016
Last visit: 20 Nov 2019
Posts: 992
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 2,562
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V33
GPA: 3.64
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V33
Posts: 992
Kudos: 1,844
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
this question how outside knowledge is never used in gmat.
Certainly, the best way for scientists is to observe the physics phenomenon by observing another galaxy. Nevertheless, in the context of this question, D weakens the premise, and hence weakens the argument.
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 14 Dec 2024
Posts: 97,877
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 88,271
Products:
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 97,877
Kudos: 685,950
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
annusngh
A quark-gluon plasma, a hypothesized phase of quantum chromodynamics of interest to physicists, is supposed to exist at conditions of extremely high temperature or density that never naturally occur on Earth. The conditions engendering quark-gluon plasma were thought to have occurred in the first hundred microseconds or so of the universe. It follows that physicists will never be able to observe quark-gluon plasma.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument above?


A. So-called quark stars are hypothesized to exist of extremely dense matter.

B. The temperature of quark-gluon plasma is believed to be 4 billion degrees Celsius.

C. The existence of the quark -gluon plasma was first hypothesized on the basis of observations by physicists.

D. High temperatures and densities not usually found on earth can be created in particle accelerators.

E. A quark-gluon plasm is thought to consist of asymptotically free quarks and gluons, which are several of the basic building blocks of matter.

OFFICIAL EXPLANATION:



Reading the question: the subject matter of this prompt can be daunting. However, the structure of this prompt is not so forbidding; it's a brief argument, and in fact it resembles some of the other pseudo-syllogistic arguments that we have seen, even Drivers Over 30. So we can analyze the argument and build a filter using term matching, even if we don't fully understand all the terms involved.



The key term mismatch is in the second row of this table. Saying these conditions "never naturally occur on Earth" is not quite the same as saying that these conditions will never be observed. Maybe these conditions could occur artificially. It's not a physics point: term matching can help you identify logical leaps in an argument even if you don't understand all the terms involved. For example, since we note that the argument is consistent in referring to "quark-gluon plasmas" in the evidence and in the conclusion, we don't worry about the definition of that term.

Applying the filter: In the answer choices, (D) hits right on the answer. The other answer choices give facts that don't have anything to do with how the pieces of the argument are connected; for example, they don't discuss high temperature or density. Actually, (A) does, and (A) is next best after (D). But (A) leaves open whether quark stars exist or not and whether physicists can observe what's going on in them.

Logical proof: We can confirm our answer with the negation test. If high temperatures and densities not usually found on Earth could not be created in particle accelerators, that fact would strengthen the argument considerably: in that case, it would appear more likely that scientists can't observe this phenomenon.

The correct answer is (D).


Attachment:
image008.jpg
image008.jpg [ 8.1 KiB | Viewed 1985 times ]
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7163 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
234 posts