Bunuel
Paleontologists at the Montbrook fossil dig typically find the isolated bones and teeth of prehistoric mammals buried at regular intervals; the location of these fossils is evidence
favoring the hypothesis of a prehistoric river fed by a nearby glacier that scattered the mammals’ remains after the decay of their soft tissue.
(A) favoring the hypothesis of a prehistoric river fed by a nearby glacier that
(B) that favors the hypothesis of a prehistoric river that was fed by a nearby glacier and that
(C) favoring the hypothesis that a prehistoric river fed by a nearby glacier
(D) in favor of the hypothesis that a prehistoric river was fed by a nearby glacier and that
(E) of favor for the hypothesis of a nearby glacier that fed a prehistoric river and
(A) favoring the hypothesis
of a prehistoric river fed by a nearby glacier that
The evidence favors hypothesis that something happened. Hence we need a connector here. What we have is a long chain of modifiers.
(B)
that favors the hypothesis of a prehistoric river that was fed by a nearby glacier and
thatDistorts the meaning. The meaning rendered by this version is that the evidence does two things
1) favors the hypothesis of a prehistoric river 2) scattered the mammals’ remains
This is illogical
(C) favoring the hypothesis that a prehistoric river fed by a nearby glacierCorrect !
(D) in favor of the hypothesis
that a prehistoric river was fed by a nearby glacier and
thatDistorts the meaning. The meaning rendered by this version is that the is hypothesis about two things
1) prehistoric river was fed by a nearby glacier 2) scattered the mammals’ remains
This is illogical
(E) of favor for the hypothesis of a nearby glacier
that fed a prehistoric river andIncorrect parallelism.
IMO E