Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Nov 2007:30 AM PST
-08:30 AM PST
Learn what truly sets the UC Riverside MBA apart and how it helps in your professional growth
Nov 2211:00 AM IST
-01:00 PM IST
Do RC/MSR passages scare you? e-GMAT is conducting a masterclass to help you learn – Learn effective reading strategies Tackle difficult RC & MSR with confidence Excel in timed test environment- Nov 23
11:00 AM IST
-01:00 PM IST
Attend this free GMAT Algebra Webinar and learn how to master the most challenging Inequalities and Absolute Value problems with ease. 
Nov 2510:00 AM EST
-11:00 AM EST
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors.
25 Oct 2016, 09:43
Kudos
Bookmarks
I stumbled upon a great explanation by "Ron". Sharing it for benefit of others
-----------------
There is really only one base structure here, which is "not ... but ..."
that's actually the only TRUE set of parallel markers here. "only" and "also" are adverbs, and so ultimately function as modifiers -- i.e., they aren't necessary to the structure.
Still, since "not only ... but also ..." is so common, you may want to memorize it separately -- but be aware that this is NOT the only correct form of this idiom.
The MOST reliable way to deconstruct this idiom is just to memorize "not ... but ...", and then ignore the adjectives "only" and "also" in deciding whether structures are grammatically parallel.
In deciding the MEANING of the structure, you can't dismiss "only" and "also" ... but that's a separate issue.
EXAMPLES: BE SURE YOU CAN UNDERSTAND WHY EACH OF THESE IS CORRECT OR INCORRECT
the writer was not only mortified by her mistake but determined to correct it in print.
--> CORRECT
the writer not only was mortified by her mistake but was determined to correct it in print.
--> CORRECT
the writer was not only mortified by her mistake but was determined to correct it in print.
--> INCORRECT
the small child was relieved to hear that the rustling under the bed was caused not by a ghost but by his pet cat.
--> CORRECT
the small child was relieved to hear that the rustling under the bed was caused not by a ghost but his pet cat.
--> INCORRECT
SO WHAT'S THE DIFFERENCE, THEN, WITH
"not only ... but also ..."
"not only ... but ..."
"not ... but ..."
?
The difference here is strictly one of MEANING.
The first two are pretty similar; the last one is TOTALLY different.
(1) "not only ... but also ..." is used to refer to two descriptions that REINFORCE each other (i.e., both have the same connotation -- two good things, two bad things, two helpful things, etc.), but are fundamentally independent.
ex:
this drug is not only an alertness aid, but also an antidepressant.
--> "alertness aid" and "antidepressant" are TWO GOOD THINGS that have basically NOTHING TO DO WITH EACH OTHER.
Therefore, "not only ... but also".
Wrong: The drug not only kills the bacteria but also kills white cells. (Doesn’t make sense as explained, one good, one bad -- so the context here is inappropriate)
[Correct Version can be written with just “but”: The drug kills the bacteria but also kills white cells.]
Correct: The drugs not only kills the bacteria but also alleviates joint pain. (Both effects described are positive)
(2) "not only ... but ..." is also used to refer to two descriptions that REINFORCE each other, but it's generally used when the second description EXPANDS or GOES BEYOND the first.
ex:
ryan not only competed in all the events, but won first prize in three of them.
--> Note that "won first prize in three of [the events]" is an EXTENSION of "compete[ing] in all the events". These are not independent.
The above difference between (1) and (2) is subtle, and is therefore not terribly important. However, you MUST be able to tell those from the next one:
(3) "not ... but ..." is used when the FIRST thing is EXPECTED, ASSUMED, or PREVIOUSLY THOUGHT, but is REFUTED / CONTRADICTED / DISPROVED by the SECOND thing.
ex:
the snacks known as "French fries" were invented not in France, but in Belgium.
--> The initial assumption, which is refuted, is that French fries are from France.
--> I was surprised to learn that Ella was not Clint's biological daughter but in fact his adopted daughter, since her facial features so closely resemble his.
(Here, since the girl looks so much like her dad, we EXPECT to find out that she's his biological daughter.)
[Other scenarios:
"not only....also..."
This could work, if there were some other transition signal (e.g. a semicolon) to replace the missing "but".
For instance:
The Acme Battery Corporation does not only make batteries; it also makes battery accessories, such as chargers.
In this case, the meaning is largely the same as that of "not only ... but also..."
"not only ... also" doesn't make grammatical sense; the inclusion of the conjunction "but" is of the utmost importance. If you don't have this conjunction, then the sentence thus created becomes a run-on
"not....but also..."
Doesn't seem logical under any circumstances
"X but Y":
this just implies a contrast, but NOT any expectation.
e.g.,
I am not a mechanic, but can perform basic maintenance on non-hybrid cars.
]
--------------
Hope it can explain why C is correct
-----------------
There is really only one base structure here, which is "not ... but ..."
that's actually the only TRUE set of parallel markers here. "only" and "also" are adverbs, and so ultimately function as modifiers -- i.e., they aren't necessary to the structure.
Still, since "not only ... but also ..." is so common, you may want to memorize it separately -- but be aware that this is NOT the only correct form of this idiom.
The MOST reliable way to deconstruct this idiom is just to memorize "not ... but ...", and then ignore the adjectives "only" and "also" in deciding whether structures are grammatically parallel.
In deciding the MEANING of the structure, you can't dismiss "only" and "also" ... but that's a separate issue.
EXAMPLES: BE SURE YOU CAN UNDERSTAND WHY EACH OF THESE IS CORRECT OR INCORRECT
the writer was not only mortified by her mistake but determined to correct it in print.
--> CORRECT
the writer not only was mortified by her mistake but was determined to correct it in print.
--> CORRECT
the writer was not only mortified by her mistake but was determined to correct it in print.
--> INCORRECT
the small child was relieved to hear that the rustling under the bed was caused not by a ghost but by his pet cat.
--> CORRECT
the small child was relieved to hear that the rustling under the bed was caused not by a ghost but his pet cat.
--> INCORRECT
SO WHAT'S THE DIFFERENCE, THEN, WITH
"not only ... but also ..."
"not only ... but ..."
"not ... but ..."
?
The difference here is strictly one of MEANING.
The first two are pretty similar; the last one is TOTALLY different.
(1) "not only ... but also ..." is used to refer to two descriptions that REINFORCE each other (i.e., both have the same connotation -- two good things, two bad things, two helpful things, etc.), but are fundamentally independent.
ex:
this drug is not only an alertness aid, but also an antidepressant.
--> "alertness aid" and "antidepressant" are TWO GOOD THINGS that have basically NOTHING TO DO WITH EACH OTHER.
Therefore, "not only ... but also".
Wrong: The drug not only kills the bacteria but also kills white cells. (Doesn’t make sense as explained, one good, one bad -- so the context here is inappropriate)
[Correct Version can be written with just “but”: The drug kills the bacteria but also kills white cells.]
Correct: The drugs not only kills the bacteria but also alleviates joint pain. (Both effects described are positive)
(2) "not only ... but ..." is also used to refer to two descriptions that REINFORCE each other, but it's generally used when the second description EXPANDS or GOES BEYOND the first.
ex:
ryan not only competed in all the events, but won first prize in three of them.
--> Note that "won first prize in three of [the events]" is an EXTENSION of "compete[ing] in all the events". These are not independent.
The above difference between (1) and (2) is subtle, and is therefore not terribly important. However, you MUST be able to tell those from the next one:
(3) "not ... but ..." is used when the FIRST thing is EXPECTED, ASSUMED, or PREVIOUSLY THOUGHT, but is REFUTED / CONTRADICTED / DISPROVED by the SECOND thing.
ex:
the snacks known as "French fries" were invented not in France, but in Belgium.
--> The initial assumption, which is refuted, is that French fries are from France.
--> I was surprised to learn that Ella was not Clint's biological daughter but in fact his adopted daughter, since her facial features so closely resemble his.
(Here, since the girl looks so much like her dad, we EXPECT to find out that she's his biological daughter.)
[Other scenarios:
"not only....also..."
This could work, if there were some other transition signal (e.g. a semicolon) to replace the missing "but".
For instance:
The Acme Battery Corporation does not only make batteries; it also makes battery accessories, such as chargers.
In this case, the meaning is largely the same as that of "not only ... but also..."
"not only ... also" doesn't make grammatical sense; the inclusion of the conjunction "but" is of the utmost importance. If you don't have this conjunction, then the sentence thus created becomes a run-on
"not....but also..."
Doesn't seem logical under any circumstances
"X but Y":
this just implies a contrast, but NOT any expectation.
e.g.,
I am not a mechanic, but can perform basic maintenance on non-hybrid cars.
]
--------------
Hope it can explain why C is correct
07 Dec 2017, 04:46
Kudos
Bookmarks
By pressing a tiny amount of nitrogen between two diamonds to a pressure of 25 million pounds per square inch, scientists not only were able to transform the gas into a solid, but they also created a semiconductor similar to silicon.
(A) not only were able to transform the gas into a solid, but they also created -- Not only X , but also Y -- parallelism issue -- they in part after that
(B) not only were able to transform the gas into a solid but also creating -- parallelism issue
(C) were able not only to transform the gas into a solid but to create - Correct
(D) were able not only to transform the gas into a solid but also creating -- parallelism issue
(E) were not only able to transform the gas into a solid, but they were also able to create -- parallelism issue -- they in the part after but
Answer C
(A) not only were able to transform the gas into a solid, but they also created -- Not only X , but also Y -- parallelism issue -- they in part after that
(B) not only were able to transform the gas into a solid but also creating -- parallelism issue
(C) were able not only to transform the gas into a solid but to create - Correct
(D) were able not only to transform the gas into a solid but also creating -- parallelism issue
(E) were not only able to transform the gas into a solid, but they were also able to create -- parallelism issue -- they in the part after but
Answer C
23 Mar 2019, 23:57
Kudos
Bookmarks
Parallelism is the most fundamental error in all of GMAT SC! don't look at ANY other type of error until you've considered basic parallelism!
*****
IN ACTUALITY, there is really only one base structure here, which is "not ... but ..."
that's actually the only TRUE set of parallel markers here. "only" and "also" are adverbs, and so ultimately function as modifiers -- i.e., they aren't necessary to the structure.
still, since "not only ... but also ..." is so common, you may want to memorize it separately -- but be aware that this is NOT the only correct form of this idiom.
the MOST reliable way to deconstruct this idiom is just to memorize "not ... but ...", and then ignore the adjectives "only" and "also" in deciding whether structures are grammatically parallel.
in deciding the MEANING of the structure, you can't dismiss "only" and "also" ... but that's a separate issue. see below.
--
EXAMPLES:
BE SURE YOU CAN UNDERSTAND WHY EACH OF THESE IS CORRECT OR INCORRECT
the writer was not only mortified by her mistake but determined to correct it in print.
--> CORRECT
the writer not only was mortified by her mistake but was determined to correct it in print.
--> CORRECT
the writer was not only mortified by her mistake but was determined to correct it in print.
--> INCORRECT
the small child was relieved to hear that the rustling under the bed was caused not by a ghost but by his pet cat.
--> CORRECT
the small child was relieved to hear that the rustling under the bed was caused not by a ghost but his pet cat.
--> INCORRECT
--
SO WHAT'S THE DIFFERENCE, THEN, WITH
"not only ... but also ..."
"not only ... but ..."
"not ... but ..."
?
the difference here is strictly one of MEANING.
the first two are pretty similar; the last one is TOTALLY different.
(1) "not only ... but also ..." is used to refer to two descriptions that REINFORCE each other (i.e., both have the same connotation -- two good things, two bad things, two helpful things, etc.), but are fundamentally independent.
ex:
this drug is not only an alertness aid, but also an antidepressant.
--> "alertness aid" and "antidepressant" are TWO GOOD THINGS that have basically NOTHING TO DO WITH EACH OTHER.
therefore, "not only ... but also".
(2) "not only ... but ..." is also used to refer to two descriptions that REINFORCE each other, but it's generally used when the second description EXPANDS or GOES BEYOND the first.
ex:
ryan not only competed in all the events, but won first prize in three of them.
--> note that "won first prize in three of [the events]" is an EXTENSION of "compet[ing] in all the events". these are not independent.
the above difference between (1) and (2) is subtle, and is therefore not terribly important. however, you MUST be able to tell those from the next one:
(3) "not ... but ..." is used when the FIRST thing is EXPECTED, ASSUMED, or PREVIOUSLY THOUGHT, but is REFUTED / CONTRADICTED / DISPROVED by the SECOND thing.
ex:
the snacks known as "french fries" were invented not in france, but in belgium.
--> the initial assumption, which is refuted, is that french fries are from france.
********
grammatical elements that FOLLOW parallel signals (not including modifiers/adjectives/adverbs, which can be neglected in considering grammar unless they ARE the whole parallel structures) must be parallel.
example:
The author not only published her paper, but SHE also won a prize.
following the signal not is "published her paper" -- notice that you don't have to consider "only" in this analysis, since it's an adverb and is therefore grammatically disposable
following the signal but is "SHE (also) won..."
these aren't parallel.
a subject is clearly not a grammatically disposable element (modifier), so there's no way in which these constructions can be considered parallel.
*****
"The drug not only kills the bacteria but also kills white cells"
(note: no comma necessary) --> this doesn't make sense. the construction "not only ... but also" should only be used when the two things actually reinforce each other (i.e., have SIMILAR effects/contexts).
the key observation here is that killing the bacteria is GOOD, but that killing white blood cells is BAD. Those are opposites -- one good, one bad -- so the context here is inappropriate.
for instance,
The drugs not only kills the bacteria but also alleviates joint pain--> this one makes sense, since both effects described are positive.
This example would be better written with just "but":
"The drug kills the bacteria but also kills white cells"
that makes sense.
******
"The Acme Battery Corporation does not only make batteries; it also makes battery accessories, such as chargers."
in this case, the meaning is largely the same as that of "not only ... but also..."
*******
basically, as long as 2 parallel structures have the same basicform / grammatical role -- irrespective of add-ons like modifiers -- they're legitimately parallel structures.
e.g.
i have a truck and a bicycle.
--> parallel
i have a big, red, rusty old truck, which has been driven over 250,000 miles, and a bicycle.
--> still parallel.
********
basically, here's the difference:
• "not X but Y":
this construction implies that X is what's "normal" or "expected", and that Y is what's actually true.
e.g.,
I was surprised to learn that Ella was not Clint's biological daughter but in fact his adopted daughter, since her facial features so closely resemble his.
(here, since the girl looks so much like her dad, we EXPECT to find out that she's his biological daughter.)
• "X but Y":
this just implies a contrast, but NOT any expectation.
(in THIS PARTICULAR sentence—as already explained in this thread—the "X" part includes the word "not".)
e.g.,
I am not a mechanic, but can perform basic maintenance on non-hybrid cars.
__
this sentence DOES describe a contrast—these things aren't products of natural selection, BUT they ARE products of essentially random selection processes.
on the other hand, it DOES NOT describe any sort of situation with an "expected" or "predictable" result.
thus it should not use the first construction; it should use the second one.
to make this sentence into "X, but Y", we need to include the are on the right-hand side.
******
If you have a two-part parallel construction - such as "not only ... but also" - your detection of parallelism (or lack thereof) should be COMPLETELY mechanical. just look at the words that follow the first part, and look at the words that follow the second part (and DON'T ignore any words). if they don't have the same grammatical structure, then the parallelism is faulty. end of story.
choice (a):
not only were able to transform the gas into a solid, but they also created
the blue parts aren't parallel, because there's a subject in the second part but not in the first. and you are not, not, NOTallowed to ignore "they" in the second part.
and because "scientists" comes before "not only", you must ignore it.
Posted from my mobile device
*****
IN ACTUALITY, there is really only one base structure here, which is "not ... but ..."
that's actually the only TRUE set of parallel markers here. "only" and "also" are adverbs, and so ultimately function as modifiers -- i.e., they aren't necessary to the structure.
still, since "not only ... but also ..." is so common, you may want to memorize it separately -- but be aware that this is NOT the only correct form of this idiom.
the MOST reliable way to deconstruct this idiom is just to memorize "not ... but ...", and then ignore the adjectives "only" and "also" in deciding whether structures are grammatically parallel.
in deciding the MEANING of the structure, you can't dismiss "only" and "also" ... but that's a separate issue. see below.
--
EXAMPLES:
BE SURE YOU CAN UNDERSTAND WHY EACH OF THESE IS CORRECT OR INCORRECT
the writer was not only mortified by her mistake but determined to correct it in print.
--> CORRECT
the writer not only was mortified by her mistake but was determined to correct it in print.
--> CORRECT
the writer was not only mortified by her mistake but was determined to correct it in print.
--> INCORRECT
the small child was relieved to hear that the rustling under the bed was caused not by a ghost but by his pet cat.
--> CORRECT
the small child was relieved to hear that the rustling under the bed was caused not by a ghost but his pet cat.
--> INCORRECT
--
SO WHAT'S THE DIFFERENCE, THEN, WITH
"not only ... but also ..."
"not only ... but ..."
"not ... but ..."
?
the difference here is strictly one of MEANING.
the first two are pretty similar; the last one is TOTALLY different.
(1) "not only ... but also ..." is used to refer to two descriptions that REINFORCE each other (i.e., both have the same connotation -- two good things, two bad things, two helpful things, etc.), but are fundamentally independent.
ex:
this drug is not only an alertness aid, but also an antidepressant.
--> "alertness aid" and "antidepressant" are TWO GOOD THINGS that have basically NOTHING TO DO WITH EACH OTHER.
therefore, "not only ... but also".
(2) "not only ... but ..." is also used to refer to two descriptions that REINFORCE each other, but it's generally used when the second description EXPANDS or GOES BEYOND the first.
ex:
ryan not only competed in all the events, but won first prize in three of them.
--> note that "won first prize in three of [the events]" is an EXTENSION of "compet[ing] in all the events". these are not independent.
the above difference between (1) and (2) is subtle, and is therefore not terribly important. however, you MUST be able to tell those from the next one:
(3) "not ... but ..." is used when the FIRST thing is EXPECTED, ASSUMED, or PREVIOUSLY THOUGHT, but is REFUTED / CONTRADICTED / DISPROVED by the SECOND thing.
ex:
the snacks known as "french fries" were invented not in france, but in belgium.
--> the initial assumption, which is refuted, is that french fries are from france.
********
grammatical elements that FOLLOW parallel signals (not including modifiers/adjectives/adverbs, which can be neglected in considering grammar unless they ARE the whole parallel structures) must be parallel.
example:
The author not only published her paper, but SHE also won a prize.
following the signal not is "published her paper" -- notice that you don't have to consider "only" in this analysis, since it's an adverb and is therefore grammatically disposable
following the signal but is "SHE (also) won..."
these aren't parallel.
a subject is clearly not a grammatically disposable element (modifier), so there's no way in which these constructions can be considered parallel.
*****
"The drug not only kills the bacteria but also kills white cells"
(note: no comma necessary) --> this doesn't make sense. the construction "not only ... but also" should only be used when the two things actually reinforce each other (i.e., have SIMILAR effects/contexts).
the key observation here is that killing the bacteria is GOOD, but that killing white blood cells is BAD. Those are opposites -- one good, one bad -- so the context here is inappropriate.
for instance,
The drugs not only kills the bacteria but also alleviates joint pain--> this one makes sense, since both effects described are positive.
This example would be better written with just "but":
"The drug kills the bacteria but also kills white cells"
that makes sense.
******
"The Acme Battery Corporation does not only make batteries; it also makes battery accessories, such as chargers."
in this case, the meaning is largely the same as that of "not only ... but also..."
*******
basically, as long as 2 parallel structures have the same basicform / grammatical role -- irrespective of add-ons like modifiers -- they're legitimately parallel structures.
e.g.
i have a truck and a bicycle.
--> parallel
i have a big, red, rusty old truck, which has been driven over 250,000 miles, and a bicycle.
--> still parallel.
********
basically, here's the difference:
• "not X but Y":
this construction implies that X is what's "normal" or "expected", and that Y is what's actually true.
e.g.,
I was surprised to learn that Ella was not Clint's biological daughter but in fact his adopted daughter, since her facial features so closely resemble his.
(here, since the girl looks so much like her dad, we EXPECT to find out that she's his biological daughter.)
• "X but Y":
this just implies a contrast, but NOT any expectation.
(in THIS PARTICULAR sentence—as already explained in this thread—the "X" part includes the word "not".)
e.g.,
I am not a mechanic, but can perform basic maintenance on non-hybrid cars.
__
this sentence DOES describe a contrast—these things aren't products of natural selection, BUT they ARE products of essentially random selection processes.
on the other hand, it DOES NOT describe any sort of situation with an "expected" or "predictable" result.
thus it should not use the first construction; it should use the second one.
to make this sentence into "X, but Y", we need to include the are on the right-hand side.
******
If you have a two-part parallel construction - such as "not only ... but also" - your detection of parallelism (or lack thereof) should be COMPLETELY mechanical. just look at the words that follow the first part, and look at the words that follow the second part (and DON'T ignore any words). if they don't have the same grammatical structure, then the parallelism is faulty. end of story.
choice (a):
not only were able to transform the gas into a solid, but they also created
the blue parts aren't parallel, because there's a subject in the second part but not in the first. and you are not, not, NOTallowed to ignore "they" in the second part.
and because "scientists" comes before "not only", you must ignore it.
Posted from my mobile device
