It is currently 17 Nov 2017, 13:06

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Coherent solutions for the problem of reducing health-care

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 16 Sep 2006
Posts: 405

Kudos [?]: 101 [0], given: 0

Coherent solutions for the problem of reducing health-care [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Nov 2006, 13:40
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 1 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Coherent solutions for the problem of reducing health-care costs cannot be found within the current piecemeal (done, made, or accomplished piece by piece or in a fragmentary way *piecemeal reforms in the system*) system of paying these costs. The reason is that this system gives health-care providers and insurers every incentive to shift, wherever possible, the costs of treating illness onto each other or any other party, including the patient. That clearly is the lesson of the various reforms of the 1980s: push in on one part of this pliable spending balloon and an equally expensive bulge pops up elsewhere. For example, when the government health-care insurance program for the poor cut costs by disallowing payments for some visits to physicians, patients with advanced illness later presented themselves at hospital emergency rooms in increased numbers.

7. The argument proceeds by
(A) showing that shifting costs onto the patient contradicts the premise of health-care reimbursement
(B) attributing without justification fraudulent intent to people
(C) employing an analogy to characterize interrelationships
(D) denying the possibility of a solution by disparaging each possible alternative system
(E) demonstrating that cooperation is feasible by citing an instance

Kudos [?]: 101 [0], given: 0

Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 28 Dec 2005
Posts: 915

Kudos [?]: 58 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Nov 2006, 16:03
Hmm, this is a tough one. I get A just by eliminating others. However am not sure because what "contradicts the premise of health-care reimbursement " is unclear in the passage.

Kudos [?]: 58 [0], given: 0

VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 25 Jun 2006
Posts: 1161

Kudos [?]: 203 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Nov 2006, 18:31
I got C though.

Kudos [?]: 203 [0], given: 0

Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 24 Aug 2006
Posts: 743

Kudos [?]: 207 [0], given: 0

Location: Dallas, Texas
 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Nov 2006, 18:36
This is a difficult one. A,B, D and E do not address the way argument is presented. There is a "balloon-analogy" so I'll pick C though I'm not 100% sure.
_________________

"Education is what remains when one has forgotten everything he learned in school."

Kudos [?]: 207 [0], given: 0

VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 21 Aug 2006
Posts: 1011

Kudos [?]: 39 [0], given: 0

Re: CR on piecemeal reforms ! [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Nov 2006, 20:10
jyotsnasarabu wrote:
Coherent solutions for the problem of reducing health-care costs cannot be found within the current piecemeal (done, made, or accomplished piece by piece or in a fragmentary way *piecemeal reforms in the system*) system of paying these costs. The reason is that this system gives health-care providers and insurers every incentive to shift, wherever possible, the costs of treating illness onto each other or any other party, including the patient. That clearly is the lesson of the various reforms of the 1980s: push in on one part of this pliable spending balloon and an equally expensive bulge pops up elsewhere. For example, when the government health-care insurance program for the poor cut costs by disallowing payments for some visits to physicians, patients with advanced illness later presented themselves at hospital emergency rooms in increased numbers.

7. The argument proceeds by
(A) showing that shifting costs onto the patient contradicts the premise of health-care reimbursement
(B) attributing without justification fraudulent intent to people
(C) employing an analogy (when the government health-care insurance program for the poor cut costs by disallowing payments for some visits to physicians, patients with advanced illness later presented themselves at hospital emergency rooms in increased numbers) to characterize interrelationships (between health-care providers and insurers)
(D) denying the possibility of a solution by disparaging each possible alternative system
(E) demonstrating that cooperation is feasible by citing an instance

_________________

The path is long, but self-surrender makes it short;
the way is difficult, but perfect trust makes it easy.

Kudos [?]: 39 [0], given: 0

VP
VP
avatar
Joined: 21 Mar 2006
Posts: 1124

Kudos [?]: 53 [0], given: 0

Location: Bangalore
 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Nov 2006, 20:36
B - out of scope. The intent of people is never mentioned.
D - The argument does not deny the possibility of a solution. It just says that the current approach is wrong.
E - This actually goes against the argument. The argument is saying that the various parties are in fact not cooperating (by passing the costs to each other)
A - Eliminating this was tough! The premise of health care reimbursement is never mentioned. The argument focuses on the solution for reducing medical expenses. So Out of scope.

Give me C!

Kudos [?]: 53 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 16 Sep 2006
Posts: 405

Kudos [?]: 101 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 Nov 2006, 00:39
kripalkavi wrote:
B - out of scope. The intent of people is never mentioned.
D - The argument does not deny the possibility of a solution. It just says that the current approach is wrong.
E - This actually goes against the argument. The argument is saying that the various parties are in fact not cooperating (by passing the costs to each other)
A - Eliminating this was tough! The premise of health care reimbursement is never mentioned. The argument focuses on the solution for reducing medical expenses. So Out of scope.

Give me C!


smart u.........poe actually helps......

Kudos [?]: 101 [0], given: 0

  [#permalink] 21 Nov 2006, 00:39
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Coherent solutions for the problem of reducing health-care

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  

Moderators: GMATNinjaTwo, GMATNinja



GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.