|
Author |
Message |
|
TAGS:
|
|
|
Senior SC Moderator
Joined: 14 Nov 2016
Posts: 1289
Location: Malaysia
|
Economist: Paying extra for fair-trade coffee—coffee labeled with the [#permalink]
Show Tags
 27 May 2017, 20:25
2
This post received
KUDOS
18
This post was
BOOKMARKED
D
E
Question Stats:
58% (01:44) correct 42% (02:09) wrong based on 868 sessions
HideShow timer Statistics
The Official Guide for GMAT Verbal Review 2018Practice QuestionQuestion No.: CR162 Page: 147 Economist: Paying extra for fair-trade coffee—coffee labeled with the Fairtrade logo—is intended to help poor farmers, because they receive a higher price for the fair-trade coffee they grow. But this practice may hurt more farmers in developing nations than it helps. By raising average prices for coffee, it encourages more coffee to be produced than consumers want to buy. This lowers prices for non-fair-trade coffee and thus lowers profits for non-fair-trade coffee farmers. To evaluate the strength of the economist's argument, it would be the most helpful to know which of the following? (A) Whether there is a way of alleviating the impact of the increased average prices for coffee on non-fair-trade coffee farmers' profits (B) What proportion of coffee farmers in developing nations produce fair-trade coffee (C) Whether many coffee farmers in developing nations also derive income from other kinds of farming (D) Whether consumers should pay extra for fair-trade coffee if doing so lowers profits for non-fair-trade coffee farmers (E) How fair-trade coffee farmers in developing nations could be helped without lowering profits for non-fair-trade coffee farmers
Official Answer and Stats are available only to registered users. Register/ Login.
_________________
"Be challenged at EVERY MOMENT."
“Strength doesn’t come from what you can do. It comes from overcoming the things you once thought you couldn’t.”
"Each stage of the journey is crucial to attaining new heights of knowledge."
Rules for posting in verbal forum | Please DO NOT post short answer in your post!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
Joined: 18 Aug 2016
Posts: 631
|
Re: Economist: Paying extra for fair-trade coffee—coffee labeled with the [#permalink]
Show Tags
28 May 2017, 00:46
hazelnut wrote: The Official Guide for GMAT Verbal Review 2018Practice QuestionQuestion No.: CR162 Page: 147 Economist: Paying extra for fair-trade coffee—coffee labeled with the Fairtrade logo—is intended to help poor farmers, because they receive a higher price for the fair-trade coffee they grow. But this practice may hurt more farmers in developing nations than it helpes. By raising average prices for coffee, it encourages more coffee to be produced than consumers want to buy. This lowers prices for non-fair-trade coffee and thus lowers profits for non-fair-trade coffee farmers. To evaluate the strength of the economist's argument, it would be the most helpful to know which of the following? (A) Whether there is a way of alleviating the impact of the increased average prices for coffee on non-fair-trade coffee farmers' profits (B) What proportion of coffee farmers in developing nations produce fair-trade coffee (C) Whether many coffee farmers in developing nations also derive income from other kinds of farming (D) Whether consumers should pay extra for fair-trade coffee if doing so lowers profits for non-fair-trade coffee farmers (E) How fair-trade coffee farmers in developing nations could be helped without lowering profits for non-fair-trade coffee farmers Note : Official answer will be provided once GMAT Official Guide 2018 Verbal Review released. (B) What proportion of coffee farmers in developing nations produce fair-trade coffee If the non-fair-trade coffee farmers are 0.0001% of the other part (fair-trade coffee farmers) Hence (B)
_________________
We must try to achieve the best within us
Thanks
Luckisnoexcuse
|
|
|
|
|
|
Verbal Forum Moderator
Status: Greatness begins beyond your comfort zone
Joined: 08 Dec 2013
Posts: 1962
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
GPA: 3.2
WE: Information Technology (Consulting)
|
Re: Economist: Paying extra for fair-trade coffee—coffee labeled with the [#permalink]
Show Tags
31 May 2017, 06:36
Economist: Paying extra for fair-trade coffee—coffee labeled with the Fairtrade logo—is intended to help poor farmers, because they receive a higher price for the fair-trade coffee they grow. But this practice may hurt more farmers in developing nations than it helpes. By raising average prices for coffee, it encourages more coffee to be produced than consumers want to buy. This lowers prices for non-fair-trade coffee and thus lowers profits for non-fair-trade coffee farmers. Type- evaluate Boil it down – Fair trade benefits farmers as they receive higher prices, but it does hurt non-fair trade farmers . Pre-thinking – Proportion of farmers in developing countries who produce fair- trade coffee to non-fair trade (B) What proportion of coffee farmers in developing nations produce fair-trade coffee - Correct
_________________
When everything seems to be going against you, remember that the airplane takes off against the wind, not with it. - Henry Ford
The Moment You Think About Giving Up, Think Of The Reason Why You Held On So Long
+1 Kudos if you find this post helpful
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intern
Joined: 21 Nov 2016
Posts: 18
|
Re: Economist: Paying extra for fair-trade coffee—coffee labeled with the [#permalink]
Show Tags
08 Jun 2017, 22:00
A this otion asks the question which seems genaralised..
B the proportionate value of fair trade and non fairtrade coffee has to be known before arriving at the conclusion of the argument hence CORRECT.
C irrelavant as we are only concerned about faming of coffee and other kinds of farming is redundant here.
D A mere restatement of the question here... (disclaimer: if this question was of the EXCEPT kind.. then this will be the correct answer)
E Once again a generalised question similar to A ...
Hencce the correct answer is B
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intern
Joined: 03 Sep 2016
Posts: 25
Location: India
Schools: Booth '20, Johnson '18, Kelley '20 (S), Tepper '20 (S), McDonough '20, ISB '18, Georgia Tech '20, Boston U '20, Mays '20 (II), Foster '20 (S), Simon '20, Smith '20, ESADE '18, Terry '20, WP Carey" 20, Booth
GPA: 3
|
Re: Economist: Paying extra for fair-trade coffee—coffee labeled with the [#permalink]
Show Tags
09 Jun 2017, 08:00
Can someone please explain why A is wrong ?
As per A, if hoarding is a way, then there would not be much impact on the prices of non fair trade coffee and hence the profits of such coffee farmers could remain stable.
As per B, if only 2 out of 100 farmers grow fair trade coffee, and these 2 farmers maintain the large supply of fair trade coffee. I dont find a co-relation between this fact and the impact on profits of non-fair trade coffee farmers.
Many many thanks!
Posted from my mobile device
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intern
Joined: 18 Jul 2017
Posts: 16
|
Re: Economist: Paying extra for fair-trade coffee—coffee labeled with the [#permalink]
Show Tags
30 Jul 2017, 01:55
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
the same question, why A is wrong. At first, I chose B and then I was thinking that A seemed reasonable. And I changed my idea... 
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intern
Joined: 21 Dec 2014
Posts: 31
|
Re: Economist: Paying extra for fair-trade coffee—coffee labeled with the [#permalink]
Show Tags
31 Jul 2017, 04:27
1
This post received
KUDOS
katelyntanglu wrote: the same question, why A is wrong. At first, I chose B and then I was thinking that A seemed reasonable. And I changed my idea... In my opinion, A is wrong because it does not focus on the central argument of the conclusion: Conclusion is that: Paying extra for fair-trade coffee lowers prices for non-fair-trade coffee and thus lowers profits for non-fair-trade coffee farmers. choice A: Whether there is a way of alleviating the impact of the increased average prices for coffee on non-fair-trade coffee farmers' profits. this choices focus on the way to decrease the impact of Paying extra for fair-trade coffee. It accept the impacts of Paying extra for fair-trade coffee and does not help us to determine whether Paying extra for fair-trade coffee will lower the profits or not. Analogy for this: children who watch so much television reduce extracurricular activities. evaluate this: -choice A same as: are there any way to reduce the impact of watching too much television. Happy to share my idea 
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intern
Status: DA VERBAL OG
Joined: 21 Jun 2017
Posts: 13
Location: United States
|
Re: Economist: Paying extra for fair-trade coffee—coffee labeled with the [#permalink]
Show Tags
31 Jul 2017, 10:04
3
This post received
KUDOS
tushartiwari4u wrote: Can someone please explain why A is wrong ?
As per A, if hoarding is a way, then there would not be much impact on the prices of non fair trade coffee and hence the profits of such coffee farmers could remain stable.
As per B, if only 2 out of 100 farmers grow fair trade coffee, and these 2 farmers maintain the large supply of fair trade coffee. I dont find a co-relation between this fact and the impact on profits of non-fair trade coffee farmers.
Many many thanks!
Posted from my mobile device OK. The argument that the economist is making here is that the practice of paying more for fair-trade coffee *could* hurt more farmers in developing nations than it helps. We want to determine if this is a good argument -- is what the economist is saying true? Could this practice hurt more farmers than it helps? What do we need to know in order to figure out if that's the case? Well, we need to figure out how many people are actually making fair-trade coffee -- if only 10% of farmers are making fair-trade coffee, then the inevitable price rise that the economist has detailed will, in fact, hurt more farmers (90%) than it helps (10%). But if 85% of farmers are making fair-trade coffee, the practice helps more farmers (85%) than it hurts (15%). Don't get me wrong, it still hurts the 15% of farmers who aren't making fair-trade coffee, but they're a minority. (A) isn't really relevant to the argument, which is that "the practice of paying more for fair-trade coffee could hurt more farmers in developing nations than it helps." (A) is a great question to ask if you already know the argument is strong, but we don't -- we're trying to evaluate the strength of the argument.
_________________
★ writer ★
married to ron
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 06 Jul 2016
Posts: 425
Location: Singapore
Concentration: Strategy, Finance
|
Re: Economist: Paying extra for fair-trade coffee—coffee labeled with the [#permalink]
Show Tags
31 Jul 2017, 10:41
hazelnut wrote: Economist: Paying extra for fair-trade coffee—coffee labeled with the Fairtrade logo—is intended to help poor farmers, because they receive a higher price for the fair-trade coffee they grow. But this practice may hurt more farmers in developing nations than it helps. Why would it only hurt farmers in developing nations? Is there an assumption that majority farmers in developing nations grow non-fair trade coffee?By raising average prices for coffee, it encourages more coffee to be produced than consumers want to buy. This lowers prices for non-fair-trade coffee and thus lowers profits for non-fair-trade coffee farmers. The economist has basically assumed that most farmers in developing nations grow non-fair trade coffee, and increasing the price for fair trade coffee will hurt their profits. So we should figure out the split between farmers that grow fair-trade Vs. non-fair trade coffee.
To evaluate the strength of the economist's argument, it would be the most helpful to know which of the following? Quote: (A) Whether there is a way of alleviating the impact of the increased average prices for coffee on non-fair-trade coffee farmers' profits
(C) Whether many coffee farmers in developing nations also derive income from other kinds of farming
(D) Whether consumers should pay extra for fair-trade coffee if doing so lowers profits for non-fair-trade coffee farmers
These 3 are irrelevant to the the argument stated by the economist. For e.g. (D) is good as a debate in real life, but in the case of this argument, it makes little sense to evaluate if the consumer should pay extra or not, and it certainly doesn't tie in with the economist's assumption. All 3 of them are OUT. Quote: (E) How fair-trade coffee farmers in developing nations could be helped without lowering profits for non-fair-trade coffee farmers
In my opinion, this doesn't not help address the economist's argument in any way. This is actually stating we look for an alternative strategy to help fair-trader farmers without hurting non-fair trade farmers. And this seem to be edging a little out of bounds for this argument. Quote: (B) What proportion of coffee farmers in developing nations produce fair-trade coffee This will exactly help us evaluate the economist's argument. If the majority of farmers produce fair-trade coffee in developing nations, then the price increase should help them. B is the answer.
_________________
Put in the work, and that dream score is yours!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intern
Joined: 11 Sep 2016
Posts: 5
|
Re: Economist: Paying extra for fair-trade coffee—coffee labeled with the [#permalink]
Show Tags
31 Aug 2017, 16:00
Even if the proportion is known, won't the profits of non-fair trade coffee farmers get affected?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 18 Jan 2017
Posts: 87
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Economics
|
Economist: Paying extra for fair-trade coffee—coffee labeled with the [#permalink]
Show Tags
31 Aug 2017, 19:34
If you deconstruct the argument into its premises (P), counter premise (CP) and conclusion (C) you get the following CP: Paying extra for fair-trade coffee—coffee labeled with the Fairtrade logo—is intended to help poor farmers, because they receive a higher price for the fair-trade coffee they grow. C (Author's Main Conclusion): But this practice may hurt more farmers in developing nations than it helps. P: By raising average prices for coffee, it encourages more coffee to be produced than consumers want to buy. P: This lowers prices for non-fair-trade coffee and thus lowers profits for non-fair-trade coffee farmers. To evaluate the strength of the economist's argument, We need to verify the conclusion i.e. whether this practices hurts more farmers in developing countries than it helps This is indicated in the correct answer B (B) What proportion of coffee farmers in developing nations produce fair-trade coffee- If fewer farmers produce fair trade coffee, then it does not hurt "more" farmers than it helpsThe other choices do not focus on the "How Many" (More or Less) aspect from this practice (A) Whether there is a way of alleviating the impact of the increased average prices for coffee on non-fair-trade coffee farmers' profits- Even if there was no way to help them, it does not address the conclusion "whether more farmers are affected or not"(C) Whether many coffee farmers in developing nations also derive income from other kinds of farming- does not focus on the practice in question, while other options might alleviate any negative impact on their income but it does not evaluate the how many are affected by this practice. (D) Whether consumers should pay extra for fair-trade coffee if doing so lowers profits for non-fair-trade coffee farmers- again does not address the conclusion(E) How fair-trade coffee farmers in developing nations could be helped without lowering profits for non-fair-trade coffee farmers- focusing on how they could be helped otherwise does not evaluate whether the practice is helpful or notHope this helps!
|
|
|
|
|
|
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 20 Nov 2016
Posts: 266
|
Re: Economist: Paying extra for fair-trade coffee—coffee labeled with the [#permalink]
Show Tags
01 Sep 2017, 20:42
Thanks for all of the great replies! To post additional questions not already addressed in this thread, feel free to use the request verbal experts' reply button.
_________________
www.gmatninja.com
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 07 Jun 2017
Posts: 174
Location: India
Concentration: Technology, General Management
GPA: 3.6
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
|
Re: Economist: Paying extra for fair-trade coffee—coffee labeled with the [#permalink]
Show Tags
01 Sep 2017, 21:16
B is the answer, whether it is smaller portion or larger portion we need to figure, to evaluate. from- nkmungila
_________________
Regards,
Naveen
email: nkmungila@gmail.com
Please press kudos if you like this post
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intern
Joined: 20 Sep 2015
Posts: 21
|
Re: Economist: Paying extra for fair-trade coffee—coffee labeled with the [#permalink]
Show Tags
28 Sep 2017, 21:50
abhishekaqsais wrote: Even if the proportion is known, won't the profits of non-fair trade coffee farmers get affected? Not necessarily. In Choice B we get to know the proportion of fair-trade and non fair-trade coffee. Let's take a few cases to understand. CASE 1: Fair Trade Coffee: 1%; Non Fair Trade Coffee: 99% The higher priced Fair Trade Coffee has such low volume that it won't affect prices of Non Fair Trade Coffee. Hence profits for non-fair-trade coffee farmers aren't lowered and argument is weakened. CASE 2: Fair Trade Coffee: 60%; Non Fair Trade Coffee: 40% The higher priced Fair Trade Coffee has decent volume and will affect prices of Non Fair Trade Coffee. Hence profits for non-fair-trade coffee farmers are lowered and argument is strengthened.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 03 May 2017
Posts: 109
|
Economist: Paying extra for fair-trade coffee—coffee labeled with the [#permalink]
Show Tags
29 Sep 2017, 21:09
hazelnut wrote: The Official Guide for GMAT Verbal Review 2018Practice QuestionQuestion No.: CR162 Page: 147 Economist: Paying extra for fair-trade coffee—coffee labeled with the Fairtrade logo—is intended to help poor farmers, because they receive a higher price for the fair-trade coffee they grow. But this practice may hurt more farmers in developing nations than it helps. By raising average prices for coffee, it encourages more coffee to be produced than consumers want to buy. This lowers prices for non-fair-trade coffee and thus lowers profits for non-fair-trade coffee farmers. To evaluate the strength of the economist's argument, it would be the most helpful to know which of the following? (A) Whether there is a way of alleviating the impact of the increased average prices for coffee on non-fair-trade coffee farmers' profits (B) What proportion of coffee farmers in developing nations produce fair-trade coffee (C) Whether many coffee farmers in developing nations also derive income from other kinds of farming (D) Whether consumers should pay extra for fair-trade coffee if doing so lowers profits for non-fair-trade coffee farmers (E) How fair-trade coffee farmers in developing nations could be helped without lowering profits for non-fair-trade coffee farmers Of all the options, only B says something related to both fair trade and non-fair trade production. Notice the prompt mentions that one group of farmers may be hurt by the action of the other group of farmers. In order to evaluate the strength of this argument, one simply needs the proportion of one group to another. Options A, D, E are wrong as they offer recommendations/solutions to solve the problem and not evaluations, leading words are whether and should/could. Option C, on the other hand, is simply out of scope. Answer is obviously B
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intern
Joined: 09 Aug 2017
Posts: 18
Location: India
GPA: 3.71
|
Re: Economist: Paying extra for fair-trade coffee—coffee labeled with the [#permalink]
Show Tags
26 Oct 2017, 07:54
To those who are confused with A: Option A already assumes that the conclusion is valid. Whereas our purpose here is to evaluate the argument.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Economist: Paying extra for fair-trade coffee—coffee labeled with the
[#permalink]
26 Oct 2017, 07:54
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
close
