GMAT Changed on April 16th - Read about the latest changes here

It is currently 22 Apr 2018, 20:23

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

For members of the seventeenth century Ashanti nation in Africa,

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

1 KUDOS received
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 06 Jul 2004
Posts: 446
Location: united states
For members of the seventeenth century Ashanti nation in Africa, [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post Updated on: 30 Jan 2018, 20:03
1
This post received
KUDOS
10
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  25% (medium)

Question Stats:

65% (00:40) correct 35% (00:44) wrong based on 862 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

The Official Guide for GMAT Review, 10th Edition, 2003

Practice Question
Question No.: SC 39
Page: 659

The Official Guide for GMAT Review, 11th Edition, 2005

Practice Question
Question No.: SC 24
Page: 641

The Official Guide for GMAT Review, 12th Edition, 2009

Practice Question
Question No.: SC 30
Page: 663

For members of the seventeenth century Ashanti nation in Africa, animal-hide shields with wooden frames were essential items of military equipment, a method to protect warriors against enemy arrows and spears.

(A) a method to protect
(B) as a method protecting
(C) protecting
(D) as a protection of
(E) to protect
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

for every person who doesn't try because he is
afraid of loosing , there is another person who
keeps making mistakes and succeeds..


Originally posted by shoonya on 08 Jul 2007, 22:16.
Last edited by hazelnut on 30 Jan 2018, 20:03, edited 5 times in total.
Edited the question.
1 KUDOS received
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 30 Jun 2007
Posts: 756
Re: For members of the seventeenth century Ashanti nation in Africa, [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 18 Jan 2008, 23:51
1
This post received
KUDOS
The sentence has modifier issue

(A) a method to protect (“military equipment” cannot modify “a method” – Eliminate it)

(B) as a method protecting (“military equipment” cannot modify “as a method” – Eliminate it)

(C) protecting (“military equipment” can modify “protecting” – Hold it)

(D) as a protection of (“military equipment” cannot modify “as a protection” – Eliminate it)

(E) to protect (“military equipment” cannot modify “to protect” – Eliminate it)

Answer: C
3 KUDOS received
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 25 Nov 2006
Posts: 252
Re: For members of the seventeenth century Ashanti nation in Africa, [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post Updated on: 15 Jul 2008, 12:12
3
This post received
KUDOS
For members of the seventeenth-century Ashanti nation in Africa, animal-hide shields with wooden frames were essential items of military equipment, a method to protect warriors against enemy arrows and spears.

A. a method to protect
Shields are not methods....kung fu is a method :D
B. as a method protecting
Shields are not methods....kung fu is a method :D
C. protecting
they do not protect them now....it was in the 17th century.
D. as a protection of
Awkward use
E. to protect
Correct

lol...I got this correct earlier on...and forgot about my fundamentls...damn....here's the reasoing from my previous post...

"Honestly it took me more than a minute to answer this. Here's my reasoning

I chose C

D was the first option that i eliminated as

, as a protection of what?? warriors ??....well we never say as a protection of who...do we?? .....nonetheless both are not idiomatic...

A and B were out because weapons are forms of self - defense and not ways/methods of self-defense. We can say Karate is method but do we say knife/gun is a method??....errrr no...

I got stuck with E, cause 'to protect someone' is grammatically correct , such as 'I want you to protect him', but the issue now comes down to modifiers. So in our previous example we would not go about writing 'I want you, to protect him' but the usage of 'x, protecting him' where protecting modifies x is the right usage. Trust me the ',' makes the difference here.... "

Its C guys!!!

Originally posted by Ashwin_Mohan on 15 Jul 2008, 11:09.
Last edited by Ashwin_Mohan on 15 Jul 2008, 12:12, edited 1 time in total.
2 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 11 Mar 2008
Posts: 107
Location: Canada
Re: For members of the seventeenth century Ashanti nation in Africa, [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 Oct 2008, 09:42
2
This post received
KUDOS
To confirm:

so the participial phrase (protecting warriors against enemy arrows and spears) in our case modifies the independent clause (its subject) (animal-hide shields with wooden frames were essential items of military equipment) and not the noun (military equipment). Is that correct?


-> Would the following structure be incorrect then?
For members of the seventeenth century Ashanti nation in Africa, animal-hide shields with wooden frames were essential items of military equipment that protected warriors against enemy arrows and spears

What do you guys think?
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 16 Nov 2010
Posts: 19
For members of the seventeenth century Ashanti nation in Africa, [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 01 Mar 2011, 08:32
Hi, could anyone please explain what participle phrases/clauses mean? I am not at all clear on that concept. It'll be great if anyone could help on this. Thanks.
13 KUDOS received
SVP
SVP
User avatar
S
Joined: 14 Apr 2009
Posts: 2170
Location: New York, NY
For members of the seventeenth century Ashanti nation in Africa, [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 13 Mar 2011, 11:17
13
This post received
KUDOS
2
This post was
BOOKMARKED
deepaksharma1986 wrote:

Hi, could anyone please explain what participle phrases/clauses mean? I am not at all clear on that concept. It'll be great if anyone could help on this. Thanks.


Hi deepak,

So participial phrases are basically -ING verb phrases that are separated with a comma (,) from the rest of the sentence.

So in this case, "protecting warriors against enemy arrows and spears" is the participial phrase.

What is this phrase describing? Structurally, it is positioned to describe "animal-hide shields."

If you're not sure, you can always flip it and read it like this:

"Protecting warriors against enemy arrows, animal-hide shields with wooden frames were essential items of military equipment."

Ask yourself if this makes sense.

Do "shields" "protect warriors against enemy arrows"? Sure! So you know this makes sense.

You can read more of a detailed explanation of this question here: http://www.gmatpill.com/practice-questi ... orrection/
1 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Status: what we want to do, do it as soon as possible
Joined: 24 May 2010
Posts: 94
Location: Vietnam
WE 1: 5.0
Re: For members of the seventeenth century Ashanti nation in Africa, [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 Mar 2011, 03:34
1
This post received
KUDOS
shoonya wrote:
For members of the seventeenth century Ashanti nation in Africa, animal-hide shields with wooden frames were essential items of military equipment, a method to protect warriors against enemy arrows and spears.

A) a method to protect
B) as a method protecting
C) protecting
D) as a protection of
E) to protect

Guys, I need to know why the wrong choices are really wrong. Could you please explain your reasons of eliminating an answer choice in this case? I mean all the wrong choices.

I appreciate your inputs.

thanks


C, The sentence test word choice.
"animal-hide shields" is not a method => eliminate A,B
(D)" as a protection of" is wordy unessarilly
(E):"to protect" we are not talking about the purpose so to-inf is not appropriate here.
_________________

Consider giving me kudos if you find my explanations helpful so i can learn how to express ideas to people more understandable.

SVP
SVP
User avatar
S
Joined: 14 Apr 2009
Posts: 2170
Location: New York, NY
Re: For members of the seventeenth century Ashanti nation in Africa, [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 24 May 2011, 08:31
prasforgmat wrote:
Is it universal rule that infinitives (to) cannot come just after comma?


No. There are certainly possibilities where this can be done.
"For lizards, organisms that inhabit the earth, to [X] is to [Y]."
"For lizards, organisms that inhabit the earth, to [die] is to [leave your remains for the rest of the ecosystem]."

In this example "to" is right after a comma.
2 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 09 Nov 2010
Posts: 64
Location: Paris, FRANCE
Re: For members of the seventeenth century Ashanti nation in Africa, [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 03 Nov 2011, 15:40
2
This post received
KUDOS
3
This post was
BOOKMARKED
miaojunmaggie wrote:
can anyone explain why we cannot use "to protect" here? the OG explanation is sort of strange. What does it mean by saying that "to protect" cannot act as a nonrestrictive adjectival phrase modifying items? What's nonrestrictive adj.?


First of all, in the original sentence, "a method," as a noun, seems most syntactically comparable to another noun. But syntactically it looks as though this "method" refers to "items of military equipment," since adjectives (with the sole exception of predicate adjectives) cannot be separated from the nouns they modify by conjugated verbs. Semantically, we WANT the "method" to be the shields. But that is ungrammatical. Furthermore, a "method" is not strictly speaking a tangible thing such as a shield, so semantically that seems a little bit weird.

It is better to use "protecting" rather than "a method to protect" or even "a method of protecting" since the gerundative phrase can be an adverb and therefore refer to the whole preceding clause.

Second, infinitive phrases tend to work best when they are used as nouns, not as modifiers. "A method to protect" would not be as good as "a method of protecting," particularly since "a method to protect" appears to imply that the method is DESTINED or FORCED to do the protecting.
_________________

Nicholas MOSES

GMAT/Academic Manager
c/o MBA Center Paris

Expert Post
3 KUDOS received
Retired Moderator
User avatar
P
Status: worked for Kaplan's associates, but now on my own, free and flying
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 4260
Location: India
WE: Education (Education)
Re: For members of the seventeenth century Ashanti nation in Africa, [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Dec 2012, 07:34
3
This post received
KUDOS
Expert's post
IMO, the approach to this topic would be

(A) a method to protect – Animal shields are not a method. They are just materials so drop this

(B) as a method protecting --- same as in A

(C) protecting --- protecting modifies the simple clause preceding it. Correct choice

(D) as a protection of --- shields are not[protection or protections

(E) to protect --- The tricky issue here is the that we cannot idiomatically use an infinitive after a comma.
_________________

Can you solve at least some SC questions without delving into the initial statement?

Narendran 98845 44509

2 KUDOS received
VP
VP
User avatar
Status: Been a long time guys...
Joined: 03 Feb 2011
Posts: 1278
Location: United States (NY)
Concentration: Finance, Marketing
GPA: 3.75
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member
Re: For members of the seventeenth century Ashanti nation in Africa, [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 09 Jan 2013, 12:11
2
This post received
KUDOS
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
targetgmatchotu wrote:
For members of the seventeenth-century Ashanti nation in Africa, animal-hide shields with wooden frames were essential items of military equipment, a method to protect warriors against enemy arrows and spears.

A. a method to protect

B. as a method protecting

C. protecting

D. as a protection of

E. to protect

Not convinced with the old discussions on this, plz throw some light and concepts

Hii Saurabh.
Logic of the sentence is:
1)For members of the seventeenth-century Ashanti nation in Africa
2) animal-hide shields with wooden frames were essential items of military equipment,
3) These military equipments were used to protect warriors.

Now error analysis:
A) The military equipments were not methods.
B) An ing verb without comma will modify just the preceding noun. Hence in this case, the implied meaning is that the method is protecting warriors. Without comma, the construction becomes very ambigous.
C) Correct choice. An verb-ing preceded by a comma modifies the entire preceding clause and hence implies that animal-hide shields with wooden frames is protectig the warriors.
D) Method as a protection- illogical
E) Infinitives are not preceded by a comma. Incorrect

+1C
Hope that helps.
_________________

Prepositional Phrases Clarified|Elimination of BEING| Absolute Phrases Clarified
Rules For Posting
www.Univ-Scholarships.com

VP
VP
avatar
S
Joined: 09 Jun 2010
Posts: 1222
Re: For members of the seventeenth century Ashanti nation in Africa, [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 09 Jan 2013, 22:56
this problem is in og10 and so maybe old to study

I find a problem

C is correct, I agree.

but

in A, "a method..." can modify the whole preceding clause and is correct. A is also correct

a similar example is

I learn gmat, a good thing many persons know.

am I correct, pls help. i am confused.
VP
VP
User avatar
Status: Been a long time guys...
Joined: 03 Feb 2011
Posts: 1278
Location: United States (NY)
Concentration: Finance, Marketing
GPA: 3.75
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member
Re: For members of the seventeenth century Ashanti nation in Africa, [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 Jan 2013, 00:43
thangvietnam wrote:
this problem is in og10 and so maybe old to study

I find a problem

C is correct, I agree.

but

in A, "a method..." can modify the whole preceding clause and is correct. A is also correct

a similar example is

I learn gmat, a good thing many persons know.

am I correct, pls help. i am confused.


Unless the phrase is an Absolute Phrase, it cannot modify the preceding clause.
The preceding clause can be entirely modified by:
1) Absolute Phrase
2) ", verb-ing"
Apart from this, I don't think that the preceding clause can me modified.
_________________

Prepositional Phrases Clarified|Elimination of BEING| Absolute Phrases Clarified
Rules For Posting
www.Univ-Scholarships.com

Board of Directors
User avatar
V
Status: Stepping into my 10 years long dream
Joined: 18 Jul 2015
Posts: 3355
Premium Member Reviews Badge CAT Tests
Re: For members of the seventeenth century Ashanti nation in Africa, [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 12 Mar 2017, 02:07
As per the meaning of the sentence, shields were important for them as these shields protect then from something.

Clearly, C maintains the meaning and this the correct answer.
_________________

How I improved from V21 to V40! ?


How to use this forum in THE BEST way?


New --> How ApplicantLab made me reach my 10 years long MBA dream?

Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 01 Aug 2016
Posts: 28
Schools: ISB '18
Re: For members of the seventeenth century Ashanti nation in Africa, [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 12 Mar 2017, 04:38
abhimahna wrote:
As per the meaning of the sentence, shields were important for them as these shields protect then from something.

Clearly, C maintains the meaning and this the correct answer.


I'm still not getting the answer. I studied "to verb vs for verb-ing notes" also but this question is still confusing

Here if you want to go with "to verb" then you should have a purpose in the passage. Here in the main question the soldiers hide their weapons to protect from enemies.

They hide weapons is the context. Purpose is to protect them from enemies.

But the answer is "for protecting". According to you if i replace "to protect" in the actual sentence the meaning will change. Can you help me in this?

abhimahna egmat
Board of Directors
User avatar
V
Status: Stepping into my 10 years long dream
Joined: 18 Jul 2015
Posts: 3355
Premium Member Reviews Badge CAT Tests
Re: For members of the seventeenth century Ashanti nation in Africa, [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 12 Mar 2017, 05:33
sai897 wrote:
I'm still not getting the answer. I studied "to verb vs for verb-ing notes" also but this question is still confusing

Here if you want to go with "to verb" then you should have a purpose in the passage. Here in the main question the soldiers hide their weapons to protect from enemies.

They hide weapons is the context. Purpose is to protect them from enemies.

But the answer is "for protecting". According to you if i replace "to protect" in the actual sentence the meaning will change. Can you help me in this?

abhimahna egmat


I understand your point but here as per the question the meaning is certain tools are important items and then we are told why are they important/how are they useful. They are important because they protect warriors against enemies.

Also, answer is not 'for protecting' but 'protecting'. Meaning tools are essential as they have a consequence of protecting.

Take these examples:

I want to give GMAT to get an admit in Harvard. Here the purpose/intend is given.

I woke up late in the morning, missing my GMAT exam. Here the consequence is given.
_________________

How I improved from V21 to V40! ?


How to use this forum in THE BEST way?


New --> How ApplicantLab made me reach my 10 years long MBA dream?

Re: For members of the seventeenth century Ashanti nation in Africa,   [#permalink] 12 Mar 2017, 05:33
Display posts from previous: Sort by

For members of the seventeenth century Ashanti nation in Africa,

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.