There is a leap to a conclusion in this example because of a step that was implemented or fulfilled. The question states that because of new regulations, advanced filtration systems must be installed unless emitting pollutants are below the required level. The conclusion is based on the assumpltion that everyone will promptly follow the new regulation update. The assumption is that they are following the rules either with a change or that they are already in the right.
Let's us go through the answers
A. I don't seen any flaws in this statement. It states that all reptiles must be cold-blooded and therefore if an animal is not cold-blood, it cannont be classified as a reptile. There is no assumption here
B. There is an assumption here that Jorge got a legal license to drive after passing a driving test. We don't know what test he passed and we cannot be sure that he actually has a license. Perhaps it was taken away or is no longer valid. The assumption is that he is within the confines of the law and operating lawfully, which is not a given.
C. Again, this statement does not really have an assumption, it is stating a fact. You can only become an elected official if you live in the district you represent. If you do not reside in that district, you cannot be an elected official.
D. This is a very extreme statement, that suggests that customs agents would deter people from visiting a country. Here the insinuation is that they are doing something illegal to begin with and that the presence of more law enforcement would discourage people from trying to enter a country. Not what the question was implying.
E. Again, another extreme example. A more fitting response would have been "Athletes can only compete if they do not take banned substances. There are regular checks to ensure that athletes comply with the rules. If an athlete is competing, that means that they do not take banned substances." In this case, there is an assumption that just because there are rules in place, they will undoubtedly be followed, which is not always the case. In this answer choice, it just states that if you haven't done a test then you cannot be an athlete. It is not opening up the possibility for operating in bad faith, like the question does.
The answer is B
Bunuel
Since new environmental regulations were enacted last year, factories emitting pollutants above a certain level must install advanced filtration systems. Therefore, any factory that has not installed such a system since last year must be emitting pollutants below the required level.
The reasoning above exhibits a flaw similar to one in which of the following?
A. Any animal classified as a reptile must be cold-blooded, so if an animal is not cold-blooded, it cannot be classified as a reptile.
B. All licensed drivers must pass a driving test, and since Jorge has passed a driving test, he must be a licensed driver.
C. A person who is an elected official must reside in the district they represent, so anyone who does not reside in a particular district cannot be an elected official there.
D. Every person entering the country must go through customs; therefore, the increase in the number of customs agents will necessarily lead to a decrease in the number of people entering the country.
E. All professional athletes must undergo regular drug testing; hence, if someone has not undergone drug testing, they must not be a professional athlete.