Last visit was: 18 Nov 2025, 17:34 It is currently 18 Nov 2025, 17:34
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,355
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 99,964
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,355
Kudos: 778,072
 [23]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
21
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,355
Own Kudos:
778,072
 [4]
Given Kudos: 99,964
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,355
Kudos: 778,072
 [4]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
ashminipoddar10
Joined: 14 Jun 2024
Last visit: 07 Jul 2025
Posts: 56
Own Kudos:
54
 [1]
Given Kudos: 26
Posts: 56
Kudos: 54
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
divi22
Joined: 03 Jul 2024
Last visit: 31 Aug 2024
Posts: 45
Own Kudos:
58
 [1]
Given Kudos: 4
Posts: 45
Kudos: 58
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The answer according to me is E, i.e. All professional athletes must undergo regular drug testing; hence, if someone has not undergone drug testing, they must not be a professional athlete.
User avatar
siddhantvarma
Joined: 12 May 2024
Last visit: 15 Nov 2025
Posts: 539
Own Kudos:
715
 [1]
Given Kudos: 196
GMAT Focus 1: 635 Q87 V82 DI75
Products:
GMAT Focus 1: 635 Q87 V82 DI75
Posts: 539
Kudos: 715
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
­Premise: Factories emitting pollutants above a certain level must install advanced filtration systems.

Conclusion: Any factory that has not installed such a system must be emitting pollutants below the required level.Let's do some pre-thinking to understand the flaw in the argument. It wrongly assumes that not installing a filtration system directly implies compliance with emission standards.

To match this flawed reasoning, we need an answer choice that makes a similar logical error. Let's examine each choice:

A. Any animal classified as a reptile must be cold-blooded, so if an animal is not cold-blooded, it cannot be classified as a reptile.
This is correct reasoning. If an animal is not cold-blooded, it cannot be classified as a reptile, following the given rule. A is out. 

B. All licensed drivers must pass a driving test, and since Jorge has passed a driving test, he must be a licensed driver.
This is incorrect reasoning, but not in the same way. Passing a driving test does not necessarily mean one is a licensed driver; they might have failed to meet other requirements. However, this is not the same logical flaw as in the original argument. We can rule out B. 

C. A person who is an elected official must reside in the district they represent, so anyone who does not reside in a particular district cannot be an elected official there.
This is correct reasoning. If someone does not reside in a district, they indeed cannot be elected officials following the given rule. C is out. 

D. Every person entering the country must go through customs; therefore, the increase in the number of customs agents will necessarily lead to a decrease in the number of people entering the country.
This reasoning is flawed but not in the same way. The conclusion about the decrease in people entering is not logically supported by the premise about customs agents. We can rule out D. 

E. All professional athletes must undergo regular drug testing; hence, if someone has not undergone drug testing, they must not be a professional athlete.
This mirrors the original argument's structure. Just as not installing a filtration system was taken to mean compliance with pollution standards, this statement incorrectly assumes that not undergoing drug testing means not being a professional athlete. Thus, the answer is E. 

 ­
User avatar
shivangi_31
Joined: 27 Nov 2023
Last visit: 11 Jun 2025
Posts: 41
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 14
Posts: 41
Kudos: 28
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
­In my opinion the correct option - E­
User avatar
sayan640
Joined: 29 Oct 2015
Last visit: 10 Nov 2025
Posts: 1,180
Own Kudos:
813
 [1]
Given Kudos: 783
GMAT 1: 570 Q42 V28
Products:
GMAT 1: 570 Q42 V28
Posts: 1,180
Kudos: 813
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Since new environmental regulations were enacted last year, factories emitting pollutants above a certain level must install advanced filtration systems. Therefore, any factory that has not installed such a system since last year must be emitting pollutants below the required level.

Both option C and E are close. But I rejected option C because it has 'can' in the conclusion.

E is stronger . Hence , E is my answer.
User avatar
tulee
Joined: 15 Jan 2024
Last visit: 15 Oct 2025
Posts: 66
Own Kudos:
53
 [1]
Given Kudos: 53
Concentration: Finance, Economics
Posts: 66
Kudos: 53
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
­Since new environmental regulations were enacted last year, factories emitting pollutants above a certain level must install advanced filtration systems. Therefore, any factory that has not installed such a system since last year must be emitting pollutants below the required level.

The reasoning above exhibits a flaw similar to one in which of the following?

A. Any animal classified as a reptile must be cold-blooded, so if an animal is not cold-blooded, it cannot be classified as a reptile.

B. All licensed drivers must pass a driving test, and since Jorge has passed a driving test, he must be a licensed driver.

C. A person who is an elected official must reside in the district they represent, so anyone who does not reside in a particular district cannot be an elected official there.

D. Every person entering the country must go through customs; therefore, the increase in the number of customs agents will necessarily lead to a decrease in the number of people entering the country.

E. All professional athletes must undergo regular drug testing; hence, if someone has not undergone drug testing, they must not be a professional athlete.



­
 


This question was provided by GMAT Club
for the GMAT Club Olympics Competition

Win over $30,000 in prizes such as Courses, Tests, Private Tutoring, and more

 

­
­The flaw is defining the factory emitting pollution based on their installed filteration system which is something coming from a law, not its nature. E has the similar flaw since it's also defining professional athlete as someone who's undergone drug testing which is a requirement for someone who is already a professional athlete.
User avatar
cm291093
Joined: 02 Jul 2019
Last visit: 26 Oct 2025
Posts: 20
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 17
Posts: 20
Kudos: 12
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Apart from D every other answer is literally speaking in the same sense. So the answer must be D.
User avatar
meet459
User avatar
Goizueta / Scheller Moderator
Joined: 03 Jun 2024
Last visit: 29 May 2025
Posts: 85
Own Kudos:
95
 [1]
Given Kudos: 32
Location: India
GMAT Focus 1: 675 Q90 V81 DI79
GPA: 8.55
Products:
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Since new environmental regulations were enacted last year, factories emitting pollutants above a certain level must install advanced filtration systems. Therefore, any factory that has not installed such a system since last year must be emitting pollutants below the required level.

Line of thought: If A is happening, B must be true. Therefore if B is not true, A must not be happening

The reasoning above exhibits a flaw similar to one in which of the following?

A. Any animal classified as a reptile must be cold-blooded, so if an animal is not cold-blooded, it cannot be classified as a reptile. -> Here we have a two way correlation, different from our line of thought

B. All licensed drivers must pass a driving test, and since Jorge has passed a driving test, he must be a licensed driver. -> A bit different from our line of thought

C. A person who is an elected official must reside in the district they represent, so anyone who does not reside in a particular district cannot be an elected official there. -> Here we have a two way correlation, different from our line of thought

D. Every person entering the country must go through customs; therefore, the increase in the number of customs agents will necessarily lead to a decrease in the number of people entering the country. -> very different from the line of thought

E. All professional athletes must undergo regular drug testing; hence, if someone has not undergone drug testing, they must not be a professional athlete.­ -> This seems to be in line with our thought, hence the answer
User avatar
A_Nishith
Joined: 29 Aug 2023
Last visit: 12 Nov 2025
Posts: 455
Own Kudos:
199
 [1]
Given Kudos: 16
Posts: 455
Kudos: 199
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The reasoning in the given argument is flawed because it assumes that the only way for a factory to be compliant with pollution regulations is by not emitting pollutants above the required level, ignoring other possible reasons (such as the factory not being in operation or being below the threshold for other reasons).

The argument's structure can be summarized as follows:

Premise: Factories emitting pollutants above a certain level must install advanced filtration systems.
Conclusion: Any factory that has not installed such a system must be emitting pollutants below the required level.
The flaw is that it assumes there is only one reason (not emitting above the level) for not installing the filtration system, ignoring other potential reasons.

To identify a similar flaw in reasoning, we need to find an option that makes a similar incorrect assumption, where the conclusion is drawn based on a premise but ignores other possible explanations.

Let's analyze the options:

A. Any animal classified as a reptile must be cold-blooded, so if an animal is not cold-blooded, it cannot be classified as a reptile.

This option correctly concludes that if an animal is not cold-blooded, it cannot be a reptile, directly matching the premise without assuming other reasons. It is not the flawed reasoning we're looking for.
B. All licensed drivers must pass a driving test, and since Jorge has passed a driving test, he must be a licensed driver.

This option incorrectly concludes that passing a driving test means Jorge is a licensed driver, ignoring other reasons he might not be licensed. This is flawed reasoning but not in the same way as the original argument.
C. A person who is an elected official must reside in the district they represent, so anyone who does not reside in a particular district cannot be an elected official there.

This option correctly concludes that if someone does not reside in a district, they cannot be an elected official there, directly matching the premise without assuming other reasons. It is not the flawed reasoning we're looking for.
D. Every person entering the country must go through customs; therefore, the increase in the number of customs agents will necessarily lead to a decrease in the number of people entering the country.

This option incorrectly assumes a direct causal relationship without considering other factors, but this is not similar to the original argument's flaw.
E. All professional athletes must undergo regular drug testing; hence, if someone has not undergone drug testing, they must not be a professional athlete.

This option assumes that not undergoing drug testing is the only reason for not being a professional athlete, similar to the original argument which assumes that not installing a filtration system means emitting pollutants below the required level, ignoring other possibilities.

Therefore, the option that exhibits a similar flaw to the original argument is:

E. All professional athletes must undergo regular drug testing; hence, if someone has not undergone drug testing, they must not be a professional athlete.
User avatar
SomeOneUnique
Joined: 17 Mar 2019
Last visit: 26 Dec 2024
Posts: 122
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 41
Location: India
Posts: 122
Kudos: 117
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
­IMO, we need to draw parallel reasoning for this argument.

Given argument:
producing pollutants above a certain level -> must install advanced filtration systems.
Conclusion: not installed advanced filtration system -> emitting pollutants below the required level
Here the assumption is nobody is paying the penalty, which is in their hand - whether to default willingly or not.

Out of all the options, only C presents an analogy where the defaulter is assumed to not default willfully.
Hence, C is the correct option.
Hence all other options are incorrect.
User avatar
busygmatbee1290
Joined: 27 Dec 2023
Last visit: 18 Mar 2025
Posts: 50
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 116
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Strategy
GMAT Focus 1: 755 Q87 V90 DI86
GPA: 10/10
GMAT Focus 1: 755 Q87 V90 DI86
Posts: 50
Kudos: 73
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
­Qs follows the logic that has a flaw - "since last year" - maybe there are factories which installed such systems earlier or voluntarily. 
B and D don't even follow the same reasoning of "If A, B. If not B, not A." Eliminate them. 
A. Any animal classified as a reptile must be cold-blooded, so if an animal is not cold-blooded, it cannot be classified as a reptile.
This is a fact. Not the same reasoning. 

C. A person who is an elected official must reside in the district they represent, so anyone who does not reside in a particular district cannot be an elected official there.
Here also, we assume that the condition given is sufficient and necessary. But, an elected official could be not residing in the ditrcit due to several reasons. Official assignments somewhere else, etc. 

E. All professional athletes must undergo regular drug testing; hence, if someone has not undergone drug testing, they must not be a professional athlete.
This seems similar but again this talks about "All" athletes and hence it doesn't have the flaw discussed. ­
User avatar
anish0953
Joined: 20 May 2024
Last visit: 13 Mar 2025
Posts: 86
Own Kudos:
49
 [1]
Given Kudos: 103
Location: United Kingdom
Concentration: Leadership, Entrepreneurship
GPA: 9.2
WE:Business Development (Finance)
Products:
Posts: 86
Kudos: 49
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
­Since new environmental regulations were enacted last year, factories emitting pollutants above a certain level must install advanced filtration systems. Therefore, any factory that has not installed such a system since last year must be emitting pollutants below the required level.

The reasoning above exhibits a flaw similar to one in which of the following?

A. Any animal classified as a reptile must be cold-blooded, so if an animal is not cold-blooded, it cannot be classified as a reptile.

B. All licensed drivers must pass a driving test, and since Jorge has passed a driving test, he must be a licensed driver.

C. A person who is an elected official must reside in the district they represent, so anyone who does not reside in a particular district cannot be an elected official there.

D. Every person entering the country must go through customs; therefore, the increase in the number of customs agents will necessarily lead to a decrease in the number of people entering the country.

E. All professional athletes must undergo regular drug testing; hence, if someone has not undergone drug testing, they must not be a professional athlete.



­
 


This question was provided by GMAT Club
for the GMAT Club Olympics Competition

Win over $30,000 in prizes such as Courses, Tests, Private Tutoring, and more

 

­
­The reasoning in the original argument is flawed because it assumes that if factories are required to install filtration systems if they emit pollutants above a certain level, then any factory that has not installed such a system must be emitting pollutants below the required level. This is a logical flaw because there could be other reasons why a factory hasn't installed the system, such as non-compliance or evasion of the regulations.

Let's analyze each option to find a similar logical flaw:

A. Any animal classified as a reptile must be cold-blooded, so if an animal is not cold-blooded, it cannot be classified as a reptile.
   - This reasoning is valid. It correctly follows that if being cold-blooded is a necessary condition for being a reptile, then not being cold-blooded means the animal cannot be a reptile.

B. All licensed drivers must pass a driving test, and since Jorge has passed a driving test, he must be a licensed driver.
   - This is flawed reasoning. Passing a driving test is a necessary condition for being a licensed driver, but it does not guarantee that someone who has passed the test is a licensed driver (they might not have applied for the license yet).

C. A person who is an elected official must reside in the district they represent, so anyone who does not reside in a particular district cannot be an elected official there.
   - This reasoning is valid. If residing in the district is a necessary condition for being an elected official, then not residing there means one cannot be an elected official there.

D. Every person entering the country must go through customs; therefore, the increase in the number of customs agents will necessarily lead to a decrease in the number of people entering the country.
   - This reasoning is flawed but not in the same way. It incorrectly assumes a cause-and-effect relationship without evidence.

E. All professional athletes must undergo regular drug testing; hence, if someone has not undergone drug testing, they must not be a professional athlete.
   - This reasoning is flawed and similar to the original argument. It assumes that not undergoing drug testing means the person is not a professional athlete, ignoring other possible reasons for not undergoing the testing (e.g., evading the tests).

Therefore, the correct answer is:

E. All professional athletes must undergo regular drug testing; hence, if someone has not undergone drug testing, they must not be a professional athlete.
User avatar
bomberjack
Joined: 22 Nov 2023
Last visit: 17 Nov 2025
Posts: 67
Own Kudos:
73
 [1]
Given Kudos: 122
GMAT Focus 1: 635 Q84 V81 DI79
GMAT Focus 2: 675 Q88 V82 DI80
GMAT Focus 3: 715 Q88 V86 DI83
GMAT Focus 3: 715 Q88 V86 DI83
Posts: 67
Kudos: 73
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
 
Quote:
­Since new environmental regulations were enacted last year, factories emitting pollutants above a certain level must install advanced filtration systems. Therefore, any factory that has not installed such a system since last year must be emitting pollutants below the required level.
The reasoning above exhibits a flaw similar to one in which of the following?

A. Any animal classified as a reptile must be cold-blooded, so if an animal is not cold-blooded, it cannot be classified as a reptile.
- Incorrect. This is not completely parallel to the stem structure. The question structure is-> Something must -> If subject has not, then it must not.

B. All licensed drivers must pass a driving test, and since Jorge has passed a driving test, he must be a licensed driver.
- Incorrect. This is different from the stem structure. It says, something must-> subject has -> it must.

C. A person who is an elected official must reside in the district they represent, so anyone who does not reside in a particular district cannot be an elected official there.
- Incorrect. While this closely resembles the stem struct, notice the word of cannot at the end. Beware of this, can and must have different effects.

D. Every person entering the country must go through customs; therefore, the increase in the number of customs agents will necessarily lead to a decrease in the number of people entering the country.
- Incorrect. This is completely off the structure.

E. All professional athletes must undergo regular drug testing; hence, if someone has not undergone drug testing, they must not be a professional athlete.
- Correct. This closely resembles the stem struct as mentioned in A's explanation as well.
User avatar
Oppenheimer1945
Joined: 16 Jul 2019
Last visit: 14 Nov 2025
Posts: 784
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 223
Location: India
GMAT Focus 1: 645 Q90 V76 DI80
GPA: 7.81
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
New regulation:

Any Factory emitting high level of pollutants must install AF

Any Factory without AF must be emitting pollutants below the required level

Ar Structure:
Any A doing B must have C
=> if A doesnot have C, it must not be doing B

A) A= animal, B=classified as reptile, C-cold blooded
Correct

B) this is not the desired parallel structure

C) this is not the desired parallel structure

D) this is not the desired parallel structure

E) this is not the desired parallel structure
User avatar
CKHE
Joined: 11 Mar 2019
Last visit: 02 Jan 2025
Posts: 83
Own Kudos:
83
 [1]
Given Kudos: 199
Location: India
GMAT 1: 720 Q49 V39
GMAT 2: 690 Q49 V36
GMAT 2: 690 Q49 V36
Posts: 83
Kudos: 83
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Ans E

­Since new environmental regulations were enacted last year, factories emitting pollutants above a certain level must install advanced filtration systems. conclusion : Therefore, any factory that has not installed such a system since last year must be emitting pollutants below the required level.

The argument assumes that since regulation requires a certain action, whoever has not taken that action can't be liable under the regulation to do so


The reasoning above exhibits a flaw similar to one in which of the following?

A. Any animal classified as a reptile must be cold-blooded, so if an animal is not cold-blooded, it cannot be classified as a reptile. does not match the required assumption since being cold blooded is a feature rather than a required action

B. All licensed drivers must pass a driving test, and since Jorge has passed a driving test, he must be a licensed driver.this assumption is not a result of negation

C. A person who is an elected official must reside in the district they represent, so anyone who does not reside in a particular district cannot be an elected official there.
This statement discusses a pre-requisite and not an action to be undertaken

D. Every person entering the country must go through customs; therefore, the increase in the number of customs agents will necessarily lead to a decrease in the number of people entering the country. doesn't match the format

E. All professional athletes must undergo regular drug testing; hence, if someone has not undergone drug testing, they must not be a professional athlete.correct- states and incorrect logic that if a person who has not undergone a drug test is not a professional athlete.

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
PranavVyas
Joined: 13 Aug 2020
Last visit: 11 Sep 2025
Posts: 97
Own Kudos:
107
 [1]
Given Kudos: 94
Concentration: Marketing, Operations
GMAT 1: 540 Q15 V29
WE:Operations (Manufacturing)
GMAT 1: 540 Q15 V29
Posts: 97
Kudos: 107
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
IMO Option E

Flaw

A. Any animal classified as a reptile must be cold-blooded, so if an animal is not cold-blooded, it cannot be classified as a reptile. - Reasoning is correct but not flaw- Incorrect

B. All licensed drivers must pass a driving test, and since Jorge has passed a driving test, he must be a licensed driver. - Getting flaw but in different scenario not same as given in question-Incorrect

C. A person who is an elected official must reside in the district they represent, so anyone who does not reside in a particular district cannot be an elected official there. - Given scenario is same but not flaw - Incorrect

D. Every person entering the country must go through customs; therefore, the increase in the number of customs agents will necessarily lead to a decrease in the number of people entering the country. - Relationship btwn customs agent & no. of people is not relatable- Incorrect

E. All professional athletes must undergo regular drug testing; hence, if someone has not undergone drug testing, they must not be a professional athlete. - Similar flaw as per passage. Correct
User avatar
Raxit85
Joined: 22 Feb 2018
Last visit: 02 Aug 2025
Posts: 767
Own Kudos:
1,177
 [1]
Given Kudos: 135
Posts: 767
Kudos: 1,177
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
­Since new environmental regulations were enacted last year, factories emitting pollutants above a certain level must install advanced filtration systems. Therefore, any factory that has not installed such a system since last year must be emitting pollutants below the required level.

Premise: Because of enactment of new environmental regulations last year, those factories which emits pollution above some predefined level need to install advance filtration systems.

Conclusion: Author concludes that ANY factory that has not installed such filtration system since last year, then such factories do not emit pollutants above certain level.

Above argument is flawed in a sense that author assumes the only way to emit pollution below some level is not by installing such filtration systems.


The reasoning above exhibits a flaw similar to one in which of the following? - Similar flaw (parallel reasoning) type of question.

A. Any animal classified as a reptile must be cold-blooded, so if an animal is not cold-blooded, it cannot be classified as a reptile. - This option seems the contrapositive kind of structure, which does not have any flaw.
Animal as a reptile (x) --> Cold blooded (Y), so Animal Not cold blooded (Not Y)--> Not reptile (Not X). Not similar flawed example. so incorrect


B. All licensed drivers must pass a driving test, and since Jorge has passed a driving test, he must be a licensed driver. - Passing driving test is one of the necessary condition for all licensed drivers. As Jorge has passed the test, he must be licensed driver. Here, he passed the driving test does not mean that he is licensed driver. There may be written exam or anything else. However, this flaw is not similar to author's flaw condition. so wrong.

C. A person who is an elected official must reside in the district they represent, so anyone who does not reside in a particular district cannot be an elected official there. - this option structure is same as option A, i.e. contrapositive. Elected officer (x) --> must live in the representative district (Y), so one who does not live in representative district (Not Y)--> Can't be elected officer. (Not X)

D. Every person entering the country must go through customs; therefore, the increase in the number of customs agents will necessarily lead to a decrease in the number of people entering the country. - This option indicates flawed condition. All immigrants entering into country must face customs. So, increasing no. of customs agents will discourage people entering the country. This flaw in reasoning is not similar to author's flawed reasoning. so wrong.

E. All professional athletes must undergo regular drug testing; hence, if someone has not undergone drug testing, they must not be a professional athlete. - this option seems flawed as per author's flaw. Here, this option ignores other possibilities and assumes that the only way to be professional athlete is to undergo regular testing. So correct.

IMO answer is E.­
User avatar
Varshachichu
Joined: 01 Jul 2020
Last visit: 25 Jul 2024
Posts: 15
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 57
Posts: 15
Kudos: 7
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
­C is probably the right answer. 
One important thing in the passage to notice is the mention of certainty (use of the word must)
New Environmental regulations--->installation of filteration systems---->x filteration system----> pollutants are below required level in factories
C also states a similar reasoning. Elected official----> Reside in the district they represent---> Not residing in a particular district---> not elected official
 1   2   3   4   5   
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7445 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
234 posts
188 posts