Bunuel
Analyst Claim: The sales and pre-orders of electric cars in urban areas will significantly increase this year. The primary reason for this increase is that ongoing improvements in battery technology have substantially lowered the cost of electric cars, making them more affordable for city dwellers.
Which of the following is an assumption made in drawing the conclusion above?
(A) Urban infrastructure, such as charging stations, will become more widely available in city areas this year.
(B) The performance of electric cars, in terms of speed and comfort, is on par with that of gasoline-powered cars.
(C) City dwellers are primarily motivated by cost savings when choosing a vehicle.
(D) The cost of gasoline will remain stable throughout the year.
(E) The production of electric cars will be sufficient to meet the increased consumer demand this year.
'The primary reason for the increase this year in sales and pre-orders' (X) is claimed to be their 'substantially lowered cost' (Y), we need to find the assumption made while claiming Y as the reason for X.
A. This option is easily eliminated, it is not a necessary assumption, only one that may raise doubt on the feasibility of Y.
B. While this bolsters Y, this still can't act as an assumption behind "X because Y".
C. This is the correct answer, if city- dwellers are primarily motivated by cost- effectiveness while chosing a car, and that cost has come down for eletric vehicles, the vehicles are now a good choice for the city- dwellers.
D. This tripped me a bit, but 'gasoline' is not the same as 'gasoline- powered vehicles', so that the latter's cost remains stable also could've been a possible assumption.
E. Production is irrelevant, see 'pre-orders' in the given argument.
Posted from my mobile device