Statement (1) Alone
"Color V has a wavelength of 300 nanometers."
This statement provides information only about color V. It tells us nothing about the wavelength of color W. Therefore, statement (1) alone is insufficient.
Statement (2) Alone
"The wavelength of color W is twice that of color V."
This gives us a relationship: Wavelength(W) = 2 * Wavelength(V). However, without knowing the wavelength of V, we can't determine the wavelength of W.
Scenario 1: If V's wavelength is 200 nm, then W's is 400 nm. The parrot can detect it.
Scenario 2: If V's wavelength is 400 nm, then W's is 800 nm. The parrot cannot detect it.
Since we can't get a definite answer, statement (2) alone is insufficient.
Statements (1) and (2) Together
By combining the statements, we can find the exact wavelength of color W.
From statement (1), the wavelength of color V is 300 nm.
From statement (2), the wavelength of color W is twice that of V.
Therefore, the wavelength of color W is 2 * 300 nm = 600 nm.
Since 600 nm is less than the 620 nm threshold, we can definitively say yes, an African grey parrot can detect color W.
Because we can find a conclusive answer only by using both statements together, the correct choice is C.