Quote:
A team of educational researchers at a University wanted to assess the relation between studying late at night with the performance of the students. Currently the classes at the University start very early in the morning, not encouraging the students to study late at night. However the researchers allowed a group of volunteer students to arrive for their classes late in the morning for a period of three months during which they studied late at night regularly. It was observed that their performance significantly improved.
Which of the following options, if true, would have the strongest grounds against deciding, on the basis of the above assessment, to implement late start of classes in the morning at the University to improve the performance of the students?
A. The late start of the classes would also require significant and inconvenient changes in the timing for the administrative staff.
B. Only a few students who were high performers during their high school days when they had the habit of studying late at night volunteered.
C. Implementing certain state of the art teaching methods would substantially increase the performance of the students, comparable to that observed in the assessment.
D. The Dean of the University is not in favor of changing the current timing of the classes.
E. Late start of the classes also means that it would be more inconvenient for the students to arrive at the University using the more crowded public transport.
Premise:> A team of educational researchers at a University wanted to assess the relation between studying late at night with the performance of the students.
> Currently the classes at the University start very early in the morning, not encouraging the students to study late at night.
> However the researchers allowed a group of volunteer students to arrive for their classes late in the morning for a period of three months during which they studied late at night regularly.
> It was observed that their performance significantly improved.
Suggested Plan:Implement late start of classes in the morning at the University to improve the performance of the students
Our job:Weaken the suggested plan
What should the answer have?If we say that the sample size is not a true representation of the class, then the plan falls apart because it won't really lead to an overall improvement in performance
Let's analyse the options:
Quote:
A. The late start of the classes would also require significant and inconvenient changes in the timing for the administrative staff.
This point doesn't address how the plan won't lead to the overall improvement. Hence, irrelevant.
Quote:
B. Only a few students who were high performers during their high school days when they had the habit of studying late at night volunteered.
This aligns with our pre-thinking that the volunteers were not a true representation of the whole class. So, it's possible that the overall improvement suggested will not be achieved. Let's hold on to it.
Quote:
C. Implementing certain state of the art teaching methods would substantially increase the performance of the students, comparable to that observed in the assessment.
But where is it mentioned that these two methods of improving performance are mutually exclusive? We can do both at once. Hence, incorrect.
Quote:
D. The Dean of the University is not in favor of changing the current timing of the classes.
This option speaks for itself, I guess. The Dean's convenience doesn't impact the viability of the plan. Incorrect.
Quote:
E. Late start of the classes also means that it would be more inconvenient for the students to arrive at the University using the more crowded public transport.
This is a good option because it says that it would be more inconvenient for the students to arrive, and it's possible that this affects their performance instead. But then, this would've been factored in the case of the volunteers right? If the study still shows improvement, then the effect of this option is negligible.
Hence,
option B is the right answer.