Sorry I have missed all the good ideas from yesterday.... I think GMAC is making it sound like it is an interim solution and it is not here to stay. They will do it for as long as they have to but as soon as test centers reopen or there is a date when they will reopen, GMAC will likely cancel this interim idea. The test scores however will be valid and my guess they will remain valid for 5 years like the other previously taken tests. There is no reason to make them shorter validity.... I don't see any reason at least.
However, if one has been studying for the GMAT for a few months and they are ready to take it, I would take the Interim GMAT. I think waiting and idling will be frustrating and has a pretty chance eating into one's score. The reason GMAC is doing it is that:
1) there are large numbers of people who are ready and willing to take the test
2) they actually don't know how long the pandemic will last and this is the best interim solution they can think of. Worst case for them, the test centers reopen before they introduce this thing and they don't have to introduce it
Mayor
What are your predictions for the GMAT? Will GMAC give the same validity (5 years)? Will the B-schools see it any differently? (since missing AWA and Nomenclature of "Interim GMAT" will make it easier for the B-Schools to distinguish.)
To continue my argument (CR type analysis)
Which Test taker would buy such an inferior product from GMAC? Rather he/she would wait for his/her turn to attend the test centre-based test?
So, to compete with ETS in the market, what justifies GMAC's decision to offer an inferior "interim" product? I would call it an interim (inferior) product as it removes the AWA section which is still part of original GMAT, unless GMAC removes AWA from test centre exams too (wherever the exam is conducted in centres as of now).
So, unless GMAC makes this interim product stand up next to the original as indistinguishable, the goal of GMAC to capture or expand it's market will not materialize. It is like an MBA program offering an MBA degree with "ONLINE" tag on the diploma over an Online MBA program delivering the indistinguishable MBA (like it's full-time program) - always a more attractive proposition.
Any thoughts into the plan-goal framework mindset of GMAC???