Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 23:54 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 23:54
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
AbdurRakib
Joined: 11 May 2014
Last visit: 08 Nov 2025
Posts: 465
Own Kudos:
42,852
 [39]
Given Kudos: 220
Status:I don't stop when I'm Tired,I stop when I'm done
Location: Bangladesh
Concentration: Finance, Leadership
GPA: 2.81
WE:Business Development (Real Estate)
Posts: 465
Kudos: 42,852
 [39]
5
Kudos
Add Kudos
32
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
daagh
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Last visit: 16 Oct 2020
Posts: 5,264
Own Kudos:
42,419
 [10]
Given Kudos: 422
Status: enjoying
Location: India
WE:Education (Education)
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 5,264
Kudos: 42,419
 [10]
10
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
Abhishek009
User avatar
Board of Directors
Joined: 11 Jun 2011
Last visit: 18 Jul 2025
Posts: 5,934
Own Kudos:
5,328
 [1]
Given Kudos: 463
Status:QA & VA Forum Moderator
Location: India
GPA: 3.5
WE:Business Development (Commercial Banking)
Posts: 5,934
Kudos: 5,328
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
KS15
Joined: 21 May 2013
Last visit: 25 Jul 2019
Posts: 536
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 608
Posts: 536
Kudos: 253
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
daagh
We need a plural verb ‘allow’ for the plural subject of the clause after the semicolon. Drop B, C, and D. There is no need to repeat the infinitive marker’ to’ in as done in E. Therefore A.


Daagh,

I chose E-Is it not more parallel-to X and to Y?
User avatar
abhimahna
User avatar
Board of Directors
Joined: 18 Jul 2015
Last visit: 06 Jul 2024
Posts: 3,514
Own Kudos:
5,728
 [2]
Given Kudos: 346
Status:Emory Goizueta Alum
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 3,514
Kudos: 5,728
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
KS15
daagh
We need a plural verb ‘allow’ for the plural subject of the clause after the semicolon. Drop B, C, and D. There is no need to repeat the infinitive marker’ to’ in as done in E. Therefore A.


Daagh,

I chose E-Is it not more parallel-to X and to Y?

You are not going into the meaning.

We are given

a narrow waist and a midsection :
1. allow us to swing our arms
2. prevent us from zigzagging on the trail
User avatar
BillyZ
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 14 Nov 2016
Last visit: 03 May 2025
Posts: 1,143
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 926
Location: Malaysia
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
GMAT 1: 750 Q51 V40 (Online)
GPA: 3.53
Products:
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
AbdurRakib
Humans are better adapted for running than are other primates; a narrow waist and a midsection that can turn allow us to swing our arms and prevent us from zigzagging on the trail.

A. allow us to swing our arms and prevent
B. allows us to swing our arms and prevent
C. allows us to swing our arms and prevents.
D. is what allows us to swing our arms and prevents
E. allow us to swing our arms and to prevent

Taken from New York Times. [LINK]

Springlike ligaments and tendons in the feet and legs are crucial for running. (Our close relatives the chimpanzee and the ape don’t have them.) A narrow waist and a midsection that can turn allow us to swing our arms and prevent us from zigzagging on the trail. Humans also have a far more developed sense of balance, an advantage that keeps the head stable as we run. And most humans can store about 20 miles’ worth of glycogen in their muscles.
User avatar
daagh
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Last visit: 16 Oct 2020
Posts: 5,264
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 422
Status: enjoying
Location: India
WE:Education (Education)
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 5,264
Kudos: 42,419
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Quote:
Humans are better adapted for running than are other primates; a narrow waist and a midsection that can turn allow us to swing our arms and prevent us from zigzagging on the trail.

If NYT reporters or even if their editors were to write GMAT, they may not have got beyond 500. Let me reproduce the relevant part from the horse's' mouth.

Quote:
Spring like ligaments and tendons in the feet and legs are crucial for running. (Our close relatives the chimpanzee and the ape don’t have them.) A narrow waist and a midsection that can turn allow us to swing our arms and prevent us from zigzagging on the trail.


1.The highlighted part does not look a sentence at all. It is no more than a bit (fragment) of a sentence, just a noun phrase enveloped between two periods. It is not also a modifier and since there seems to be no attached noun.

Keeping it aside these for a while, probably we can make some sense out of the phrase if we can parse it as follows.

1. The narrow waist and midsection(the doers of the three actions) can 1. Turn, 2. Allow us to swing our arms, and 3. prevent us from zigzagging.

If the above were a plausible interpretation, then the text has missed a comma after 'turn' and a comma before 'and'

There is no way we can take 'turn allow' us as a single verb.
It is also not tenable that 'prevent us' can be a full -fledged function.
User avatar
Nunuboy1994
Joined: 12 Nov 2016
Last visit: 24 Apr 2019
Posts: 558
Own Kudos:
124
 [1]
Given Kudos: 167
Location: United States
Schools: Yale '18
GMAT 1: 650 Q43 V37
GRE 1: Q157 V158
GPA: 2.66
Schools: Yale '18
GMAT 1: 650 Q43 V37
GRE 1: Q157 V158
Posts: 558
Kudos: 124
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
AbdurRakib
Humans are better adapted for running than are other primates; a narrow waist and a midsection that can turn allow us to swing our arms and prevent us from zigzagging on the trail.

A. allow us to swing our arms and prevent
B. allows us to swing our arms and prevent
C. allows us to swing our arms and prevents.
D. is what allows us to swing our arms and prevents
E. allow us to swing our arms and to prevent

The construction is "X and Y are" or "X and Y have"

X and Y =compound subject + plural verb

A
avatar
Aman1012
Joined: 25 Sep 2016
Last visit: 11 Jun 2020
Posts: 23
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 433
Concentration: Finance, Accounting
GPA: 4
Posts: 23
Kudos: 6
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Can u tell me why to prevent not required . in solution everyone said not required but didnt provide reason to support it
User avatar
GMATWhizTeam
User avatar
GMATWhiz Representative
Joined: 07 May 2019
Last visit: 14 Oct 2025
Posts: 3,380
Own Kudos:
2,141
 [2]
Given Kudos: 69
Location: India
GMAT 1: 740 Q50 V41
GMAT 2: 760 Q51 V40
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 2: 760 Q51 V40
Posts: 3,380
Kudos: 2,141
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Aman1012
Can u tell me why to prevent not required . in solution everyone said not required but didnt provide reason to support it


Hi...




Let’s break the sentence (after fitting choice E) and understand the intended meaning:

Humans are better adapted for running than are other primates;
a narrow waist and a midsection that can turn allow us
to swing our arms
and to prevent
us from zigzagging on the trail.

• So, “and” is supposed to join two clauses and the subject of both the clauses is same:
Subject(plural) : a narrow waist and a midsection that can turn (“that can turn” is a modifier for “midsection”). Now let's remove the modifier and see what happens to the sentence.
• Clause 1: a narrow waist and a midsection…… allow us to swing our arms
• and
• Clause 2: a narrow waist and a midsection……. to prevent us from zigzagging….

• Clearly , the “to prevent” is not a verb. So the part before “and” is a clause and the part after “and” is not a clause (since it has no verb). Thus, a parallelism error arises here.
• Without the “to”, the part after “and” becomes a clause and makes sense:
• “…a narrow waist and a midsection …..prevent us from zigzagging


Hope this helps :)
User avatar
CrackverbalGMAT
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 03 Oct 2013
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 4,844
Own Kudos:
8,945
 [1]
Given Kudos: 225
Affiliations: CrackVerbal
Location: India
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 4,844
Kudos: 8,945
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Aman1012
Can u tell me why to prevent not required . in solution everyone said not required but didnt provide reason to support it

Hi Aman

Let us plug in option (E) into the sentence and read the whole thing.

Humans are better adapted for running than are other primates; a narrow waist and a midsection that can turn allow us to swing our arms and to prevent us from zigzagging on the trail.

If we structure the sentence this way, the "narrow waist" and "midsection that can turn" work such that they "allow us" to (what they "allow" must apply to both the below if we begin both with "to"):

a) to swing our arms
b) to prevent us from zigzagging

However, (b) does not make sense - the narrow waist and midsection that can turn do not "allow us to prevent us from zigzagging". They:

a) allow us to swing our arms
b) prevent us from zigzagging

Therefore, the "to" must appear only before "swing" and not before "prevent".

Hope this helps.
User avatar
Namangupta1997
Joined: 23 Oct 2020
Last visit: 05 Apr 2025
Posts: 145
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 63
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V38
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V38
Posts: 145
Kudos: 8
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Doesn't the word "that" points to just the midsection and hence shouldn't we use "has" ?
User avatar
ExpertsGlobal5
User avatar
Experts' Global Representative
Joined: 10 Jul 2017
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 5,198
Own Kudos:
4,768
 [1]
Given Kudos: 43
Location: India
GMAT Date: 11-01-2019
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 5,198
Kudos: 4,768
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Namangupta1997
Doesn't the word "that" points to just the midsection and hence shouldn't we use "has" ?

Hello Namangupta1997,

We hope this finds you well.

To answer your query, the intended meaning of the second clause is that both a narrow waist and a midsection that can turn, collectively, allow us to swing our arms and prevent us from zigzagging on the trail; thus, "that" does refer to just "midsection", but the prepositional phrase "that can turn" is simply part of the noun phrase "a narrow waist and a midsection that can turn", which is the subject of the second clause.

We hope this helps.
All the best!
Experts' Global Team
User avatar
anish777
Joined: 18 Feb 2021
Last visit: 09 Jan 2025
Posts: 108
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 143
Location: India
GMAT Focus 1: 635 Q88 V79 DI77
GPA: 7.98
GMAT Focus 1: 635 Q88 V79 DI77
Posts: 108
Kudos: 31
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
How can a narrow waist allow us to swing our arms ? it is more logical that the mid section that can turn allows us to swing our arms and both the narrow waist and the mid section prevent us from zigzagging on the trail. is it not or am i missing the point here ?
Furthermore, how can a narrow waist turn? ( if thought logically).
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7443 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
231 posts
189 posts