Aman1012
Can u tell me why to prevent not required . in solution everyone said not required but didnt provide reason to support it
Hi...
Let’s break the sentence (after fitting choice E) and understand the intended meaning:
Humans are better adapted for running than are other primates;
a narrow waist and a midsection that can turn
allow us
to swing our arms
and to prevent us from zigzagging on the trail.
• So, “and” is supposed to join two clauses and the subject of both the clauses is same:
•
Subject(plural) : a narrow waist and a midsection that can turn (“that can turn” is a modifier for “midsection”). Now let's remove the modifier and see what happens to the sentence.
• Clause 1: a narrow waist and a midsection…… allow us to swing our arms
• and
• Clause 2: a narrow waist and a midsection……. to prevent us from zigzagging….
• Clearly , the “to prevent” is not a verb. So the part before “and” is a clause and the part after “and” is not a clause (since it has no verb). Thus, a parallelism error arises here.
• Without the “to”, the part after “and” becomes a clause and makes sense:
• “…
a narrow waist and a midsection …..prevent us from zigzagging
Hope this helps