Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 02:14 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 02:14
Home
GMAT
Messages
Tests
Schools
Events
Rewards
Chat
My Profile
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Go to My Error Log Learn more
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
Back to Forum
Create Topic
Poor Quality|      
User avatar
BillyZ
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 14 Nov 2016
Last visit: 03 May 2025
Posts: 1,143
Own Kudos:
22,214
 [13]
Given Kudos: 926
Location: Malaysia
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
Schools: Sloan '23 (D) Tuck '23 (D) Darden '23 (D) Ross '23 (D) Kellogg '23 (D) Wharton '23 (D) Booth '23 (D) Fuqua '24 (A) Harvard '24 (D) Stanford '24 (D)
GMAT 1: 750 Q51 V40 (Online)
GPA: 3.53
Products:
My Reviews
Schools: Sloan '23 (D) Tuck '23 (D) Darden '23 (D) Ross '23 (D) Kellogg '23 (D) Wharton '23 (D) Booth '23 (D) Fuqua '24 (A) Harvard '24 (D) Stanford '24 (D)
GMAT 1: 750 Q51 V40 (Online)
Posts: 1,143
Kudos: 22,214
 [13]
If you are buying a product by rounding up to a $1 digit, is the sum o 24 Feb 2017, 01:08
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
10
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
00:00
Start Timer
Pause Timer
Resume Timer
Show Answer
Hide
Show
History
B
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!

Difficulty:

95% (hard)

Question Stats:

13% (01:52) correct 87% (02:03) wrong based on 212 sessions

History

Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
If you are buying a product by rounding up to a $1 digit, is the sum of the differences between buying a product as its actual price and buying a product by rounding up to a $1 digit less than $12?

1) The sum of the differences in the total of 80% of the products bought is less than $10.

2) A total of 20 products were bought

This Question is Locked Due to Poor Quality
Hi there,
The question you've reached has been archived due to not meeting our community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Looking for better-quality questions? Check out the 'Similar Questions' block below for a list of similar but high-quality questions.
Want to join other relevant Problem Solving discussions? Visit our Data Sufficiency (DS) Forum for the most recent and top-quality discussions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
ShowHide Answer
Official Answer
B
User avatar
mikemcgarry
User avatar
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Last visit: 06 Aug 2018
Posts: 4,479
Own Kudos:
30,533
 [3]
Given Kudos: 130
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 4,479
Kudos: 30,533
 [3]
If you are buying a product by rounding up to a $1 digit, is the sum o 24 Feb 2017, 16:24
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
AustinKL
If you are buying a product by rounding up to a $1 digit, is the sum of the differences between buying a product as its actual price and buying a product by rounding up to a $1 digit less than $12?

1) The sum of the differences in the total of 80% of the products bought is less than $10.

2) A total of 20 products were bought
Show more
Dear AustinKL,

I'm happy to respond. :-)

My friend, the wording on this problem is truly atrocious. If the author was trying to write a GMAT Quant problem, then I would give the author a grade of an F for his efforts. It may well be that the author is a non-native speaker who doesn't understand the implications of different phrasing and how they impact the clarity and precision of the problem. The wording is exceptionally unclear.

Also, absolutely no official GMAT Quant question is addressed to "you." There are many ways this question gives evidence of absolutely no careful knowledge of the GMAT.

Here is a complete re-writing of the prompt, in an attempt to make clear what this flawed question is trying to ask
Samantha bought N of the same product, each at the same price. She estimated the total price of the set of N products by rounding the price of the individual product up to the nearest dollar, and multiplying this rounded price by N: call this estimate E. The actual total price of the set N products is the real unrounded price of each product times N: call this actual total price T. Is E - T < $12?

Statement #1: If Samantha had bought only 80% of N products, the difference between the same estimate and true price would be less than $10.
Statement #2: N = 20

Now, to solve this:
Statement #1: Everything is proportional, so if Samantha bought 80% of N, the difference in that case would be 80% of the total difference, E - T
.80(E - T) < 10
(4/5)(E - T) < 10
E - T < 10(5/4)
E - T < 5(5/2)
E - T < 25/2
E - T < 12.5
If something is less than 12.5, it could be less than 12, or it could be greater, that is, between 12 and 12.5. We cannot draw a conclusion for this statement. This statement is insufficient.

Statement #2: N = 20
Well, if the price of an individual item is $0.95, so the different for an individual item is $.05, so for twenty, the difference would be (0.05)*20 = $1, which of course is less than $12. This produces a "yes" answer to the prompt.

The prompt very specifically says that we are going to round UP, regardless of the actual price. Thus, the price could be, say $.20, and we would round up to $1, a different of $0.80. The difference for N = 20 would be 20*$0.80) = $16, which is more than $12.

Two different choices produce two different answers to the prompt. This statement is not sufficient.

I will not continue with the solution. Clearly, even my rewrite is not what the author of the question had it mind. I suspect that the problem is in the rounding. I think what the author was trying to say was that the individual item had such a price that would be rounded up rather than down. That is very different from what he actually said in the problem. There are a few more elegant ways to express this information, but clearly the language problems in the original question are many. This is a truly atrocious question.

Does all this make sense?
Mike :-)
User avatar
Pradeeps0013
User avatar
Joined: 09 Jan 2014
Last visit: 15 Jan 2019
Posts: 13
Own Kudos:
19
 [2]
Given Kudos: 45
Location: India
Schools: ISB '20 IIMB EPGP"20 IIMC PGPEX"20 XLRI"20
GMAT 1: 690 Q48 V37
GMAT 2: 730 Q50 V39
GPA: 4
WE:General Management (Manufacturing)
Schools: ISB '20 IIMB EPGP"20 IIMC PGPEX"20 XLRI"20
GMAT 2: 730 Q50 V39
Posts: 13
Kudos: 19
 [2]
If you are buying a product by rounding up to a $1 digit, is the sum o 11 Mar 2018, 08:18
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
mikemcgarry
AustinKL
If you are buying a product by rounding up to a $1 digit, is the sum of the differences between buying a product as its actual price and buying a product by rounding up to a $1 digit less than $12?

1) The sum of the differences in the total of 80% of the products bought is less than $10.

2) A total of 20 products were bought
Dear AustinKL,

I'm happy to respond. :-)

My friend, the wording on this problem is truly atrocious. If the author was trying to write a GMAT Quant problem, then I would give the author a grade of an F for his efforts. It may well be that the author is a non-native speaker who doesn't understand the implications of different phrasing and how they impact the clarity and precision of the problem. The wording is exceptionally unclear.

Also, absolutely no official GMAT Quant question is addressed to "you." There are many ways this question gives evidence of absolutely no careful knowledge of the GMAT.

Here is a complete re-writing of the prompt, in an attempt to make clear what this flawed question is trying to ask
Samantha bought N of the same product, each at the same price. She estimated the total price of the set of N products by rounding the price of the individual product up to the nearest dollar, and multiplying this rounded price by N: call this estimate E. The actual total price of the set N products is the real unrounded price of each product times N: call this actual total price T. Is E - T < $12?

Statement #1: If Samantha had bought only 80% of N products, the difference between the same estimate and true price would be less than $10.
Statement #2: N = 20

Now, to solve this:
Statement #1: Everything is proportional, so if Samantha bought 80% of N, the difference in that case would be 80% of the total difference, E - T
.80(E - T) < 10
(4/5)(E - T) < 10
E - T < 10(5/4)
E - T < 5(5/2)
E - T < 25/2
E - T < 12.5
If something is less than 12.5, it could be less than 12, or it could be greater, that is, between 12 and 12.5. We cannot draw a conclusion for this statement. This statement is insufficient.

Statement #2: N = 20
Well, if the price of an individual item is $0.95, so the different for an individual item is $.05, so for twenty, the difference would be (0.05)*20 = $1, which of course is less than $12. This produces a "yes" answer to the prompt.

The prompt very specifically says that we are going to round UP, regardless of the actual price. Thus, the price could be, say $.20, and we would round up to $1, a different of $0.80. The difference for N = 20 would be 20*$0.80) = $16, which is more than $12.

Two different choices produce two different answers to the prompt. This statement is not sufficient.

I will not continue with the solution. Clearly, even my rewrite is not what the author of the question had it mind. I suspect that the problem is in the rounding. I think what the author was trying to say was that the individual item had such a price that would be rounded up rather than down. That is very different from what he actually said in the problem. There are a few more elegant ways to express this information, but clearly the language problems in the original question are many. This is a truly atrocious question.

Does all this make sense?
Mike :-)
Show more

Hi Mike,

I guess, to know whether E-T is less than $12 or not we only require the number of products purchased.
For 1 product maximum value of E-T can be $0.50 (more than 0.50 it will round off to next dollar value). Therefore for 20 products maximum value of E-T can be 20x0.50= 10, which is less than 12. Thus IMO statement B is sufficient.
User avatar
amanvermagmat
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 22 Aug 2013
Last visit: 28 Mar 2025
Posts: 1,148
Own Kudos:
2,855
 [2]
Given Kudos: 480
Location: India
Posts: 1,148
Kudos: 2,855
 [2]
If you are buying a product by rounding up to a $1 digit, is the sum o 11 Mar 2018, 11:00
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Pradeeps0013
mikemcgarry
AustinKL
If you are buying a product by rounding up to a $1 digit, is the sum of the differences between buying a product as its actual price and buying a product by rounding up to a $1 digit less than $12?

1) The sum of the differences in the total of 80% of the products bought is less than $10.

2) A total of 20 products were bought
Dear AustinKL,

I'm happy to respond. :-)

My friend, the wording on this problem is truly atrocious. If the author was trying to write a GMAT Quant problem, then I would give the author a grade of an F for his efforts. It may well be that the author is a non-native speaker who doesn't understand the implications of different phrasing and how they impact the clarity and precision of the problem. The wording is exceptionally unclear.

Also, absolutely no official GMAT Quant question is addressed to "you." There are many ways this question gives evidence of absolutely no careful knowledge of the GMAT.

Here is a complete re-writing of the prompt, in an attempt to make clear what this flawed question is trying to ask
Samantha bought N of the same product, each at the same price. She estimated the total price of the set of N products by rounding the price of the individual product up to the nearest dollar, and multiplying this rounded price by N: call this estimate E. The actual total price of the set N products is the real unrounded price of each product times N: call this actual total price T. Is E - T < $12?

Statement #1: If Samantha had bought only 80% of N products, the difference between the same estimate and true price would be less than $10.
Statement #2: N = 20

Now, to solve this:
Statement #1: Everything is proportional, so if Samantha bought 80% of N, the difference in that case would be 80% of the total difference, E - T
.80(E - T) < 10
(4/5)(E - T) < 10
E - T < 10(5/4)
E - T < 5(5/2)
E - T < 25/2
E - T < 12.5
If something is less than 12.5, it could be less than 12, or it could be greater, that is, between 12 and 12.5. We cannot draw a conclusion for this statement. This statement is insufficient.

Statement #2: N = 20
Well, if the price of an individual item is $0.95, so the different for an individual item is $.05, so for twenty, the difference would be (0.05)*20 = $1, which of course is less than $12. This produces a "yes" answer to the prompt.

The prompt very specifically says that we are going to round UP, regardless of the actual price. Thus, the price could be, say $.20, and we would round up to $1, a different of $0.80. The difference for N = 20 would be 20*$0.80) = $16, which is more than $12.

Two different choices produce two different answers to the prompt. This statement is not sufficient.

I will not continue with the solution. Clearly, even my rewrite is not what the author of the question had it mind. I suspect that the problem is in the rounding. I think what the author was trying to say was that the individual item had such a price that would be rounded up rather than down. That is very different from what he actually said in the problem. There are a few more elegant ways to express this information, but clearly the language problems in the original question are many. This is a truly atrocious question.

Does all this make sense?
Mike :-)

Hi Mike,

I guess, to know whether E-T is less than $12 or not we only require the number of products purchased.
For 1 product maximum value of E-T can be $0.50 (more than 0.50 it will round off to next dollar value). Therefore for 20 products maximum value of E-T can be 20x0.50= 10, which is less than 12. Thus IMO statement B is sufficient.
Show more

Hello

I think what you are saying makes sense IF the question had stated that "you are buying a product by rounding off to a $1 digit..." in that case we would have applied the rounding off method, and anything which ends in .5 or above would be rounded up to the nearest dollar, while anything that ends in lower than .5 would be rounded down to the nearest dollar

But the original question says, "you are buying a product by rounding up to a $1 digit".. This means regardless of the value, we always have to round up to the nearest dollar. So as per the question, 8.5 will be rounded up to 9, 8.1 will also be rounded up to 9.

I guess thats why what Mike said makes sense
User avatar
tetraneha
User avatar
Joined: 28 Apr 2020
Last visit: 24 Nov 2022
Posts: 24
Own Kudos:
5
Given Kudos: 124
GMAT 1: 640 Q45 V34
GMAT 1: 640 Q45 V34
Posts: 24
Kudos: 5
If you are buying a product by rounding up to a $1 digit, is the sum o 28 Sep 2020, 05:25
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
This is a very poorly written question:
1. The prompt does not mention that all items are identically priced.
2. It says rounding up which means that irrespective of the decimal, the price would be rounded up to next integer.
However you cant reach the solution using that method.
Bunuel I would request you to edit this question and then edit the OA accordingly. These type of questions makes one think that he/she is poorly prepared for the exam when does not get the answer right in one go.

This Question is Locked Due to Poor Quality
Hi there,
The question you've reached has been archived due to not meeting our community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Looking for better-quality questions? Check out the 'Similar Questions' block below for a list of similar but high-quality questions.
Want to join other relevant Problem Solving discussions? Visit our Data Sufficiency (DS) Forum for the most recent and top-quality discussions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
Moderators:
Bunuel
Math Expert
105379 posts
kingbucky
496 posts