Last visit was: 21 Apr 2026, 04:45 It is currently 21 Apr 2026, 04:45
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
Sub 505 (Easy)|   Humanities|   Short Passage|   Social Science|                     
avatar
betterscore
Joined: 11 Jul 2012
Last visit: 17 Dec 2012
Posts: 45
Own Kudos:
7,464
 [130]
Posts: 45
Kudos: 7,464
 [130]
32
Kudos
Add Kudos
98
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
avatar
saviofernanz
Joined: 09 Jan 2019
Last visit: 04 Mar 2020
Posts: 29
Own Kudos:
86
 [49]
Given Kudos: 284
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Finance
GPA: 3.13
WE:Business Development (Energy)
Posts: 29
Kudos: 86
 [49]
37
Kudos
Add Kudos
11
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
adkikani
User avatar
IIM School Moderator
Joined: 04 Sep 2016
Last visit: 24 Dec 2023
Posts: 1,223
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1,207
Location: India
WE:Engineering (Other)
Posts: 1,223
Kudos: 1,359
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 21 Apr 2026
Posts: 7,391
Own Kudos:
70,784
 [1]
Given Kudos: 2,126
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,391
Kudos: 70,784
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
adkikani
Can you please explain why OA for Q91 is E and not C ?
mynamegoeson did wonderfully here, but it's a good question, so here's another crack at it. :)

The answer to this question lies in the last sentence of the first paragraph: "Duverger’s research findings were that women voted somewhat less frequently than men (the difference narrowing the longer women had the vote)".

In other words, women voted less frequently than men, but the more time that had passed since women obtained the right to vote, the smaller the difference between the voting rate of men and the voting rate of women was in one of those countries. Thus, "the voting rates of women and men were most different in the country in which women had possessed the right to vote for the shortest time" (E).

The author makes no connection between levels of women's political activism and the difference in voting rates of women and men, so (A) can be eliminated.
User avatar
BillyZ
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 14 Nov 2016
Last visit: 24 Jan 2026
Posts: 1,135
Own Kudos:
22,607
 [4]
Given Kudos: 926
Location: Malaysia
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
GMAT 1: 750 Q51 V40 (Online)
GPA: 3.53
Products:
4
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
betterscore
In 1955 Maurice Duverger published The Political Role of Women, the first behavioralist, multinational comparison of women’s electoral participation ever to use election data and survey data together. His study analyzed women’s patterns of voting, political candidacy, and political activism in four European countries during the first half of the twentieth century. Duverger’s research findings were that women voted somewhat less frequently than men (the difference narrowing the longer women had the vote) and were slightly more conservative.

Duverger’s work set an early standard for the sensitive analysis of women’s electoral activities. Moreover, to Duverger’s credit, he placed his findings in the context of many of the historical processes that had shaped these activities. However, since these contexts have changed over time, Duverger’s approach has proved more durable than his actual findings. In addition, Duverger’s discussion of his findings was hampered by his failure to consider certain specific factors important to women’s electoral participation at the time he collected his data: the influence of political regimes, the effects of economic factors, and the ramifications of political and social relations between women and men. Given this failure, Duverger’s study foreshadowed the enduring limitations of the behavioralist approach to the multinational study of women’s political participation.
The author implies that some behavioralist research involving the multinational study of women's political participation that followed Duverger's study did which of the following?

(A) Ignored Duverger's approach
(B) Suffered from faults similar to those in Duverger's study
(C) Focused on political activism
(D) Focused on the influences of political regimes
(E) Focused on the political and social relations between women and men


Passage: Duverger

Question: Infer Behavioralist

The Simple Story


MD published a certain study that was the first to use both election data and survey data together. He looked at how women participated in various aspects of the political system and showed that there were some differences compared to how men voted.

The author calls MD’s work an early standard for analyzing women’s electoral behavior; in other words, the author thinks MD did do valuable work. However, the context in which MD worked has changed over time, so the author claims that his approach is more durable than his findings. In other words, MD’s scientific process was sound, but the actual research findings no longer apply to today’s women. The author also finds fault with MD for failing to consider certain factors important to women and concludes that MD’s overall behavioralist approach is limited in various ways. In other words, the author has mixed feelings about MD’s work: some positive and some negative.

Sample Passage Map

Here is one way to map this passage. (Note: abbreviate as desired!)

P1. MD: W politics. 1st study use election + survey data. Some M/W diff.

P2. Early standard, some +
BUT times changed and MD failed to consider some stuff

Note: you might abbreviate failed to consider as FTC. This concept is common enough in RC passages that you may find yourself re-using this abbreviation in future.

Step 1: Identify the Question

The word implies in the question stem indicates that this is an Inference question. What does the passage imply about some other behavioralist research (not Duverger’s) that followed what Duverger had done?

Step 2: Find the Support

Most of the passage is about what Duverger did, but the end of the second paragraph extends to a broader group of researchers:

Given this failure, Duverger’s study foreshadowed the enduring limitations of the behavioralist approach to the multinational study of women’s political participation.”

If you don’t remember what this failure refers to, read the prior sentence to remind yourself:

Duverger’s discussion of his findings was hampered by his failure to consider certain specific factors important to women’s electoral participation at the time he collected his data: the influence of political regimes, the effects of economic factors, and the ramifications of political and social relations between women and men.”

Step 3: Predict an Answer

Duverger failed to consider certain factors and, according to the author, his work foreshadowed a general limitation of this type of research approach. Apparently, others also did not consider certain factors and this caused a general limitation in the validity or applicability of the research.

Step 4: Eliminate and Find a Match

(A) The passage implies that other behavioralists followed Duverger’s approach, not that they ignored it.

(B) CORRECT. The passage does imply that later researchers repeated some of the same faults.

(C) The passage does not indicate on what topic(s) the other researchers focused.

(D) The passage does not indicate on what topic(s) the other researchers focused.

(E) The passage does not indicate on what topic(s) the other researchers focused.
User avatar
anand.prakash90
Joined: 21 Mar 2015
Last visit: 11 Dec 2023
Posts: 40
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 57
Posts: 40
Kudos: 6
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
For the last question, why the answer could not be C?

(C) Focused on political activism.

Thanks
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 21 Apr 2026
Posts: 7,391
Own Kudos:
70,784
 [3]
Given Kudos: 2,126
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,391
Kudos: 70,784
 [3]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
For the last question, why the answer could not be C?

(C) Focused on political activism.

Thanks
Wait, what focused on political activism? To be clear on what this choice is saying, let's look at the question one more time:

Quote:
95. The author implies that some behavioralist research involving the multinational study of women's political participation that followed Duverger's study did which of the following?
This is quite specific. We're looking for a piece of the passage that tells us what was done by behavioralist research involving the multinational study of women's political participation that followed Duverger's study.

The first paragraph tells explicitly that Duverger's study analyzed political activism, among other patterns among women. But the question didn't ask about Duverger's study. Again, it asked us about behavioralist research involving the multinational study of women's political participation that followed Duverger's study.

The passage actually says next to nothing about this narrow category of research. The only place where the author gives us a hint about it is at the very end of the passage:

    "Given this failure, Duverger's study foreshadowed the enduring limitations of the behavioralist approach to the multinational study of women's political participation.

Here, the author names the specific type of research we were asked about. And by saying that Duverger's study foreshadowed enduring limitations of this approach, the author implies that this research followed Duverger's study... and ultimately faced limitations that endured from that previous study.

Choice (B) is a great match for this information because it tells us that behavioralist research involving the multinational study of women's political participation that followed Duverger's study "suffered from faults similar to those in Duverger's study."

Choice (C), on the other hand, isn't supported by the passage at all. That's why we eliminate (C) and stick with (B).
avatar
parthgohel
Joined: 08 Oct 2017
Last visit: 17 Jul 2022
Posts: 12
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 7
Location: India
WE:Project Management (Non-Profit and Government)
Posts: 12
Kudos: 6
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Duverger???s research findings were that women voted somewhat less frequently than men (the difference narrowing the longer women had the vote) and were slightly more conservative.
What does the phrase within parentheses mean?
avatar
AndrewN
avatar
Volunteer Expert
Joined: 16 May 2019
Last visit: 29 Mar 2025
Posts: 3,490
Own Kudos:
7,660
 [1]
Given Kudos: 500
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 3,490
Kudos: 7,660
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
parthgohel
Duverger???s research findings were that women voted somewhat less frequently than men (the difference narrowing the longer women had the vote) and were slightly more conservative.
What does the phrase within parentheses mean?
Hello, parthgohel. The answer to your question would certainly help make sense of question 94, or the fifth question of the set. The main clause indicates that women voted somewhat less frequently than men. For the sake of simplicity, we can attach numbers to these words. Say that in Country X, 40 percent of eligible women voted, while 45 percent of eligible men voted. Now, moving into the parenthetical, the difference would be a 5 percent gap between voting women and men. According to the latter part of the parenthetical, the longer women had the vote—i.e. the right to vote—the more that gap started to close. Getting back to Country X, perhaps women had had the right to vote for, say, 20 years. By comparison, Country Y could have extended the right to vote to women for maybe 30 years. In Country Y, then, the voting gap would be expected to be less than 5 percent between women and men, even if the overall turnout was lower. To illustrate, we can say that in Country Y, 20 percent of eligible women voted, while 23 percent of eligible men voted. The gap in question would now be 3 percent and would conform to the information in the parenthetical.

I hope that helps answer your question. Good luck with your studies.

- Andrew
avatar
Foi2Evei2
Joined: 21 Aug 2018
Last visit: 06 May 2022
Posts: 16
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 57
Posts: 16
Kudos: 1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi GMATNinja egmat

I would like to ask about Q#1

P1: What is the MD's research, his methodology and result
P2: Starting with good point of his research, then I feel like author is trying to give the information to reader that MD's finding is not good one because blah blah

So I was thinking between (1) evaluate or (2) reinterpret and ended up with (2) reinterpret which is the wrong one.
Could you help to clarify the difference between these 2 words?
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 21 Apr 2026
Posts: 7,391
Own Kudos:
70,784
 [1]
Given Kudos: 2,126
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,391
Kudos: 70,784
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post

Question 1


Foi2Evei2
Hi GMATNinja egmat

I would like to ask about Q#1

P1: What is the MD's research, his methodology and result
P2: Starting with good point of his research, then I feel like author is trying to give the information to reader that MD's finding is not good one because blah blah

So I was thinking between (1) evaluate or (2) reinterpret and ended up with (2) reinterpret which is the wrong one.
Could you help to clarify the difference between these 2 words?
BLTN is on the right track! Here are our two cents, in case it's useful to hear it another way:

The question asks us about the primary purpose of the passage. In other words, why did the author write the passage as a whole?

In the first paragraph, the author introduces the work of a researcher. In the second paragraph, the author discusses what was good about that work (the approach), and what was bad about that work (the actual findings).

Which answer choice captures this purpose?
Quote:
(A) evaluate a research study
Yup, the author discusses the good and bad bits of a research study. This fits perfectly with the word "evaluate," which means "to judge or assess."

Keep (A).

Quote:
(D) reinterpret old research findings
Hmm. To "interpret" something is to to explain the meaning of that thing. So, to "re interpret" something, there would need to be an initial interpretation, and then the author would have to disagree with that interpretation and offer his/her own thoughts.

That's not really what happens in this passage. In the first paragraph, the author explains the approach/findings of the researcher -- but doesn't really provide an initial interpretation of those results. So, we can't say that the second paragraph offers a reinterpretation.

In addition, the author's purpose isn't the "explain the meaning" of the researcher's work. Instead, the author discusses the validity of that work -- which pieces were good, and which were not so good? "Evaluate" is just a much better word to describe this purpose.

(D) is out, and (A) is the correct answer to question 1.

I hope that helps!
User avatar
MukuDawra
Joined: 22 Nov 2021
Last visit: 29 Nov 2025
Posts: 16
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 24
Posts: 16
Kudos: 8
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi Experts
In question no. 4, I agree with option C but I am not able to eliminate D
D) Flawed because they are based on unsound data
"In addition, Duverger???s discussion of his findings was hampered by his failure to consider certain specific factors important to women???s electoral participation at the time he collected his data:"

This snippet from passage suggests us that the data had various issues because he didn't considered some specific issues while collecting data.
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 21 Apr 2026
Posts: 7,391
Own Kudos:
70,784
 [1]
Given Kudos: 2,126
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,391
Kudos: 70,784
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post

Question 4


MukuDawra
Hi Experts

In question no. 4, I agree with option C but I am not able to eliminate D

D) Flawed because they are based on unsound data

"In addition, Duverger???s discussion of his findings was hampered by his failure to consider certain specific factors important to women???s electoral participation at the time he collected his data:"

This snippet from passage suggests us that the data had various issues because he didn't considered some specific issues while collecting data.
Your analysis of (D) raises a good question: what does it mean to say that Duverger's findings were "based on unsound data," as described in question 4?

Quote:
4. The author implies that Duverger’s actual findings are

(D) flawed because they are based on unsound data
To answer that question, let's consider what actual data Duverger uses. According to the first paragraph, Duverger's research uses "election data and survey data together." So the question becomes -- was this data itself "unsound?" Or does the author have some other problem with Duverger's findings?

The second paragraph answers this question. In the third sentence of that paragraph, we learn that Duverger's "discussion of his findings" was "hampered by his failure to consider certain specific factors important to women’s electoral participation at the time he collected his data." Notice this doesn't suggest that the data itself was unsound exactly. In other words, it doesn't suggest that the "election data" and "survey data" were inaccurate. Rather, Duverger's discussion of the data failed to consider certain economic and political factors that were important at the time.

Overall, since the passage doesn't suggest that Duverger's data itself was flawed, we can eliminate (D).

I hope that helps!
User avatar
agrasan
Joined: 18 Jan 2024
Last visit: 20 Apr 2026
Posts: 671
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 6,431
Location: India
Posts: 671
Kudos: 170
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi experts KarishmaB GMATNinja DmitryFarber,

In question-4, I selected option A by referring to the below part of the passage on Duverger's findings with an understanding that he didn't include some factors, hence, his findings are limited.

"In addition, Duverger's discussion of his findings was hampered by his failure to consider certain specific factors important to women's electoral participation at the time he collected his data: the influence of political regimes, the effects of economic factors, and the ramifications of political and social relations between women and men."

Could you please help me understand why we can't look at this part and infer?


Also, I read some explanations referring to "However, since these contexts have changed over time, Duverger’s approach has proved more durable than his actual findings." to infer option C which is the correct answer.
My question is how can we say that his findings are not durable or out-dated as the passage just says that approach is more durable than actual findings which doesn't mean that actual findings are NOT durable at all.
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 21 Apr 2026
Posts: 7,391
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 2,126
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,391
Kudos: 70,784
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post

Question 4


agrasan
Hi experts url=[https://gmatclub.com:443/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&un=KarishmaB]KarishmaB[/url] url=[https://gmatclub.com:443/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&un=GMATNinja]GMATNinja[/url] url=[https://gmatclub.com:443/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&un=DmitryFarber]DmitryFarber[/url],

In question-4, I selected option A by referring to the below part of the passage on Duverger's findings with an understanding that he didn't include some factors, hence, his findings are limited.

"In addition, Duverger's discussion of his findings was hampered by his failure to consider certain specific factors important to women's electoral participation at the time he collected his data: the influence of political regimes, the effects of economic factors, and the ramifications of political and social relations between women and men."

Could you please help me understand why we can't look at this part and infer?

Also, I read some explanations referring to "However, since these contexts have changed over time, Duverger’s approach has proved more durable than his actual findings." to infer option C which is the correct answer.
My question is how can we say that his findings are not durable or out-dated as the passage just says that approach is more durable than actual findings which doesn't mean that actual findings are NOT durable at all.
The fact that the contexts used by Duverger have changed implies that those contexts are outdated, so (C) works. Sure, if you're being literal, the text does imply that there could be SOME level of durability to the findings. Regardless, the durability of the findings is called into question.

The author does not cite the NUMBER of countries in the study a as limitation of the Duverger's findings, so (A) is out.
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7391 posts
494 posts
358 posts