Last visit was: 11 Dec 2024, 11:40 It is currently 11 Dec 2024, 11:40
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
BillyZ
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 14 Nov 2016
Last visit: 20 Oct 2024
Posts: 1,158
Own Kudos:
21,369
 [5]
Given Kudos: 926
Location: Malaysia
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
GMAT 1: 750 Q51 V40 (Online)
GPA: 3.53
Products:
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
4
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
deepudiscover
Joined: 28 Apr 2017
Last visit: 30 Oct 2018
Posts: 30
Own Kudos:
33
 [1]
Given Kudos: 51
Posts: 30
Kudos: 33
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
Sprincejindal
Joined: 04 Sep 2017
Last visit: 15 Oct 2018
Posts: 11
Own Kudos:
9
 [5]
Given Kudos: 132
Posts: 11
Kudos: 9
 [5]
5
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
goforgmat
Joined: 09 Feb 2015
Last visit: 02 Nov 2019
Posts: 247
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 232
Location: India
Concentration: Social Entrepreneurship, General Management
GMAT 1: 690 Q49 V34
GMAT 2: 720 Q49 V39
GPA: 2.8
Products:
GMAT 2: 720 Q49 V39
Posts: 247
Kudos: 96
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Sprincejindal
nairaneesh
Please explain how C is a valid answer.
I am confused because MPC is applicable only when additional income comes in to play.
Read this line in the second paragraph - "Short-term decreases in income do not lead to reductions in consumption, because people reduce savings to stabilize consumption."
Earlier, if Income was $1000 and MPC was 0.72 (consumption 1000* 0.72 = $720), and now if the income falls to $800, the consumption remains same, then the MPC increases to 0.9 (720/800).

Hope this helps!

I agree with what you say but the very definition of MPC is that additional income that the family consumes. So if there is a decrease in income ,the MPC will be negative no ?

I think if the answer choice were to be rephrased, Decreases in income generally lead to short-run increases in propensity to consume. Choice c would be right.
:?
avatar
Sprincejindal
Joined: 04 Sep 2017
Last visit: 15 Oct 2018
Posts: 11
Own Kudos:
9
 [2]
Given Kudos: 132
Posts: 11
Kudos: 9
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
goforgmat
Sprincejindal
nairaneesh
Please explain how C is a valid answer.
I am confused because MPC is applicable only when additional income comes in to play.
Read this line in the second paragraph - "Short-term decreases in income do not lead to reductions in consumption, because people reduce savings to stabilize consumption."
Earlier, if Income was $1000 and MPC was 0.72 (consumption 1000* 0.72 = $720), and now if the income falls to $800, the consumption remains same, then the MPC increases to 0.9 (720/800).

Hope this helps!

I agree with what you say but the very definition of MPC is that additional income that the family consumes. So if there is a decrease in income ,the MPC will be negative no ?

I think if the answer choice were to be rephrased, Decreases in income generally lead to short-run increases in propensity to consume. Choice c would be right.
:?

MPC is not the additional income that a family consumes, but it is the proportion of that additional income that a family consumes. It is the ratio of changes in consumtion to changes in income. So when the income (Denominator) reduces, but the consumption (Numerator) remains the same, then the MPC (Ratio) increases.
avatar
Riturajj
Joined: 13 Feb 2017
Last visit: 28 Jul 2019
Posts: 4
Given Kudos: 53
Location: India
Schools: ISB '21
Schools: ISB '21
Posts: 4
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
nairaneesh
Please explain how C is a valid answer.
I am confused because MPC is applicable only when additional income comes in to play.
Read this line in the second paragraph - "Short-term decreases in income do not lead to reductions in consumption, because people reduce savings to stabilize consumption."
Earlier, if Income was $1000 and MPC was 0.72 (consumption 1000* 0.72 = $720), and now if the income falls to $800, the consumption remains same, then the MPC increases to 0.9 (720/800).

Hope this helps![/quote]

I agree with what you say but the very definition of MPC is that additional income that the family consumes. So if there is a decrease in income ,the MPC will be negative no ?

I think if the answer choice were to be rephrased, Decreases in income generally lead to short-run increases in propensity to consume. Choice c would be right.
:?[/quote]



But inst the MPC calculated on the additional income and not the total income. So if the current income is say, €1000, what can be calculated is the APC. If the income increases by say, €200, then, MPC would be calculable only in the €200 and not €1200. This is what I am inferring.

I understand this is not the learning from this GMAT question, but only curios to understand the solution. :)

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
dharam44
Joined: 03 Nov 2018
Last visit: 19 Mar 2021
Posts: 72
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 209
Location: India
Schools: LBS '21
GMAT 1: 580 Q44 V28
GPA: 3.44
Schools: LBS '21
GMAT 1: 580 Q44 V28
Posts: 72
Kudos: 118
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Please add more questions.
User avatar
GayatriS123
Joined: 03 Jan 2019
Last visit: 15 May 2021
Posts: 1
Given Kudos: 1
Location: India
Concentration: Leadership, Strategy
GMAT 1: 670 Q50 V30
GPA: 3.28
GMAT 1: 670 Q50 V30
Posts: 1
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I am confused among options B, C and D

Quote:
Read this line in the second paragraph - "Short-term decreases in income do not lead to reductions in consumption, because people reduce savings to stabilize consumption."
Earlier, if Income was $1000 and MPC was 0.72 (consumption 1000* 0.72 = $720), and now if the income falls to $800, the consumption remains same, then the MPC increases to 0.9 (720/800).
As said by Sprincejindal above, I understand why option C is correct.

Quote:
However, the distinction between permanent and temporary changes in income is often subtle in practice, and it is often quite difficult to designate a particular change in income as being permanent or temporary.
From the quote above, in option B, the passage suggests that it is quite difficult to designate a particular change, but doesn't say that it is the household that are unable to designate a change in income. Hence option B is also ruled out.

Quote:
This implies that the Keynesian multiplier – the measure of that consumption’s impact on additional consumption in the marketplace – should be larger in response to permanent changes in income than it is in response to temporary changes in income (though the earliest Keynesian analyses ignored these subtleties).
. But when it comes to option D, according to the sentence above, we see that the earlier Keynesian analyses did not account for differences in permanent changes in income and temporary changes in income. And these income changes affect the MPC. Hence shouldn't option D be right?

Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Reading Comprehension (RC) Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7153 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
234 posts
GRE Forum Moderator
14156 posts