Last visit was: 18 Nov 2025, 23:01 It is currently 18 Nov 2025, 23:01
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
mikemcgarry
User avatar
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Last visit: 06 Aug 2018
Posts: 4,479
Own Kudos:
30,531
 [2]
Given Kudos: 130
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 4,479
Kudos: 30,531
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
shalabhg27
Joined: 26 Mar 2016
Last visit: 02 May 2018
Posts: 14
Own Kudos:
5
 [3]
Given Kudos: 3
Posts: 14
Kudos: 5
 [3]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
mikemcgarry
User avatar
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Last visit: 06 Aug 2018
Posts: 4,479
Own Kudos:
30,531
 [1]
Given Kudos: 130
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 4,479
Kudos: 30,531
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
BillyZ
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 14 Nov 2016
Last visit: 03 May 2025
Posts: 1,143
Own Kudos:
22,214
 [1]
Given Kudos: 926
Location: Malaysia
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
GMAT 1: 750 Q51 V40 (Online)
GPA: 3.53
Products:
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
sandipchowdhury
Less than 35 years after the release of African honeybees outside Sao Paulo, Brazil, their descendents, popular known as killer bees had migrated as far north as Southern Texas.

A. Less than 35 years after the release of African honeybees outside Sao Paulo, Brazil,
B. In less than 35 years since releasing African honeybees outside Sao Paulo, Brazil,
C. In less than the 35 years since African honeybees had been released outside Sao Paulo, Brazil,
D. It took less than 35 years from the release of African honeybees outside Sao Paulo, Brazil, when
E. It took less than 35 years after the time that African honeybees were released outside Sao Paulo, Brazil, and then

"Less than 35 years" is just a modifier introducing the situation.

The sequence is:

* 35 years ago, some bees were released
* Over the next 35 years, the bees move north
* And now those bees are in Texas

Answer : A
avatar
himanshumalhotra1990
Joined: 11 Dec 2016
Last visit: 04 Jun 2017
Posts: 17
Own Kudos:
11
 [1]
Given Kudos: 38
Posts: 17
Kudos: 11
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
smanujahrc
Less than 35 years after the release of African honeybees outside Sao Paulo, Brazil, their descendants, popularly known as killer bees, had migrated as far north as southern Texas.

A) Less than 35 years after the release of African honeybees outside Sao Paulo, Brazil,

B) In less than 35 years since releasing African honeybees outside Sao Paulo, Brazil,

C) In less than the 35 years since African honeybees had been released outside Sao Paulo, Brazil,

D) It took less than 35 years from the release of African honeybees outside Sao Paulo, Brazil, when

E) It took less than the 35 years after the time that African honeybees were released outside Sao Paulo, Brazil, and then




please give KUDOS :)

In the correct choice, Less than 35 years after the release of African honeybees outside Sao Paulo, Brazil,, I believe the clause should start with in as in option B. Without the in, the opening modifier doesn't seem to appropriately modify their descendents
avatar
onkargm
Joined: 26 Jan 2016
Last visit: 19 Nov 2018
Posts: 48
Own Kudos:
10
 [1]
Given Kudos: 43
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Statistics
GMAT 1: 670 Q49 V31
GMAT 2: 730 Q49 V41
GPA: 3
WE:Information Technology (Computer Software)
GMAT 2: 730 Q49 V41
Posts: 48
Kudos: 10
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Can somebody please explain why "had migrated" is used here and , what is the sequence of events. According to MGMAT "had" is used only when you want to denote an action or event occurred prior to some past event.
User avatar
abhimahna
User avatar
Board of Directors
Joined: 18 Jul 2015
Last visit: 06 Jul 2024
Posts: 3,514
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 346
Status:Emory Goizueta Alum
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 3,514
Kudos: 5,728
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
onkargm
Can somebody please explain why "had migrated" is used here and , what is the sequence of events. According to MGMAT "had" is used only when you want to denote an action or event occurred prior to some past event.

Hi onkargm ,

I think you misread something here.

There are two uses of 'had'.

1. Used to denote an earlier action out of two actions in the past.
2. Simple past usage.

Here, in this question, the sentence is talking about the past event and its the simple past usage and not the one you are thinking.

It is saying: Their descendants had migrated as far north as southern Texas. --> Simple Past usage.

Does that make sense?
User avatar
adkikani
User avatar
IIM School Moderator
Joined: 04 Sep 2016
Last visit: 24 Dec 2023
Posts: 1,236
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1,207
Location: India
WE:Engineering (Other)
Posts: 1,236
Kudos: 1,343
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
GMATNinja egmat VeritasPrepKarishma

Is the opening phrase which includes - the release of - a modifier?
Is release treated as a noun or verb?
What is the earlier event that precedes -had migrated - in OA ?

I have clear verbs - took and were released - in (E) but even then we discarded it.Can you share the PoE?
User avatar
KarishmaB
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 16,266
Own Kudos:
76,983
 [1]
Given Kudos: 482
Location: Pune, India
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 16,266
Kudos: 76,983
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
adkikani
GMATNinja egmat VeritasPrepKarishma

Is the opening phrase which includes - the release of - a modifier?
Is release treated as a noun or verb?
What is the earlier event that precedes -had migrated - in OA ?

I have clear verbs - took and were released - in (E) but even then we discarded it.Can you share the PoE?


Note the use of "the" before release. You cannot use an article before a verb. Release is a noun here.

The verb "had migrated" is in past perfect but here is the point - it is not underlined so we don't have to worry about it. Perhaps the sentences before or after it use simple past and here past perfect gives the context - for example, five years later, they were found in Louisiana too.

Mind you, past perfect often has a later event (not earlier as you mentioned) in simple past though it is not necessary. Check here: https://www.gmatclub.com/forum/veritas-prep-resource-links-no-longer-available-399979.html#/2015/0 ... questions/
User avatar
daagh
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Last visit: 16 Oct 2020
Posts: 5,264
Own Kudos:
42,417
 [1]
Given Kudos: 422
Status: enjoying
Location: India
WE:Education (Education)
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 5,264
Kudos: 42,417
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The problem with D is the use of the conjunction 'when'. We don't use 'when' to denote a 35-year span. When as a conjunction is used to pinpoint a specific point of time. If we ascribe 'when' to the entire period, then we are in effect saying that the bees had migrated at the beginning of 35 years, had completed the migration yet again in the middle of the course, and then finally had migrated at the end of the specified 35-year stint.
avatar
bottlebattle
Joined: 12 May 2018
Last visit: 04 Nov 2021
Posts: 1
Own Kudos:
1
 [1]
Given Kudos: 3
Posts: 1
Kudos: 1
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Can a pronoun point to a noun in a prepositional phrase?
For option (A), the main subject noun is "the release". I struck off (A) as the correct answer because I thought there is only a possible antecedent, which is "the release", but it does not match up with "their".

Your help would be greatly appreciated!
avatar
shubham1985
Joined: 16 Feb 2012
Last visit: 10 Oct 2019
Posts: 35
Own Kudos:
38
 [1]
Given Kudos: 16
Location: India
GMAT 1: 650 Q47 V33
GPA: 3
Products:
GMAT 1: 650 Q47 V33
Posts: 35
Kudos: 38
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Yes,it can If you understand the meaning of the sentence, 'their' has only one logical antecedent i.e 'honeybees'. Pronoun ambiguity should be last thing that you should consider to rule out any choice.

Thanks
Please press kudos if my response helped you in any way

bottlebattle
Can a pronoun point to a noun in a prepositional phrase?
For option (A), the main subject noun is "the release". I struck off (A) as the correct answer because I thought there is only a possible antecedent, which is "the release", but it does not match up with "their".

Your help would be greatly appreciated!
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 7,445
Own Kudos:
69,779
 [17]
Given Kudos: 2,060
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,445
Kudos: 69,779
 [17]
12
Kudos
Add Kudos
5
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Time-traveling bees will be mentioned in this post. You've been warned.

Quote:
1) First of all, I could not understand the difference between Less than and In less than split in the question. The first one sounded weird, that's why I ended up choosing Answer B.
First, we never want to eliminate an answer choice because it sounds weird! More on that in this article and this video.

The distinction here is one of meaning and tense. If I begin a sentence with "In less than 35 years," the expectation is that I'll follow this modifier with an action in the future. For example, "In less than 35 years, Tim hopes to be retired and living on a houseboat off the coast of Spain." Tim's not retired yet, but in the future, presumably, he will be.

In this problem, we're talking about a past event, so "in less than" is inappropriate. However, if we get rid of the "in" we can coherently describe a past action. For example, "Less than 5 years after she learned to walk, Tanya began demanding an iPad with better memory and a phone plan with unlimited data." Here, Tanya's demands are in the past, but they're after another action in the past -- when she learned to walk.

Quote:
2) Because of the usage of "had" in the underlined portion of the sentence, it appears that migration happened before the release of African honeybees. The point is, I'm unable to visualize the events on a timeline.
Excellent question! In effect, there are three time markers in this sentence. 1) When the bees were released; 2) 35 years after the bees were released; and 3) when the bees migrated to Southern Texas. We use the past perfect "had" for action #3 because it took place before time #2, which is also in the past. Put another way, imagine that the bees were released in 1900. We know that they had migrated to Texas before 1935, which is also in the past.

Quote:
3) Why exactly is the usage of since in the answer choices incorrect? - since releasing African honeybees - seems to be at a certain point in time [ since a specific event ] .
Take another look at the entire phrase you're referring to:

    "In less than 35 years since releasing African honeybees outside Sao Paulo, Brazil, their descendants..."

If you're willing to overlook the problem with the phrase "in less than 35 years," (and you shouldn't be!) there's also a modification error here. It sounds as though "releasing" is modifying "their descendants," meaning that the descendants of the bees somehow released their own ancestors! If someone wants to make a sci-fi movie about time-traveling bees that journey into the past to save their older relatives, I will certainly watch this movie, but on the GMAT, this is considered illogical, so (B) is wrong.

I hope that helps!
User avatar
LIBERTYRodP
Joined: 30 Jan 2019
Last visit: 01 Apr 2024
Posts: 127
Own Kudos:
78
 [1]
Given Kudos: 14
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 127
Kudos: 78
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
sandipchowdhury


(B) In less than 35 years since releasing African honeybees outside Sao Paulo, Brazil,



IMHO B is incorrect because since releasing is (or could be confused as) a NOUN MODIFIER.

In this sense, whenever we have a SUBORDINATOR + PARTICIPLE (either past or present), we are building a noun modifier - even though, in some cases, it could also be a verb modifier.


Example:

Although exhausted, JOE wanted to keep on playing. -------> "although exhausted" here needs "JOE" to make sense, and therefore needs to be next to that noun.



In conclusion, the "since releasing" phrase is touching "their descendants", and is incorrect because the descendants could not have released the older honeybees.




Rod,
User avatar
svasan05
User avatar
CrackVerbal Representative
Joined: 02 Mar 2019
Last visit: 24 Feb 2023
Posts: 269
Own Kudos:
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 269
Kudos: 302
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Less than 35 years after the release of African honeybees outside Sao Paulo, Brazil, their descendents, popularly known as killer bees, had migrated as far north as Southern Texas.

(A) Less than 35 years after the release of African honeybees outside Sao Paulo, Brazil, Correct answer - no apparent errors.

(B) In less than 35 years since releasing African honeybees outside Sao Paulo, Brazil, "since releasing..." incorrectly modifies "their descendents...", absurdly implying that the descendents released the bees. Eliminate.

(C) In less than the 35 years since African honeybees had been released outside Sao Paulo, Brazil, "the 35 years" implies that the present is 35 years since the release of honeybees. This is not the original meaning of the sentence. Also, if this is so, then usage of past perfect "had migrated" is incorrect. Eliminate.

(D) It took less than 35 years from the release of African honeybees outside Sao Paulo, Brazil, when "when..." implies that the descendents' migration occurred simultaneously with the release of the honeybees, which is illogical. Eliminate.

(E) It took less than the 35 years after the time that African honeybees were released outside Sao Paulo, Brazil, and then "after the time that African honeybees were released" is too wordy. Also, "and then" + past participle is incorrect. Eliminate.

Hope this helps.
User avatar
adityaganjoo
Joined: 10 Jan 2021
Last visit: 04 Oct 2022
Posts: 148
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 154
Posts: 148
Kudos: 32
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
sandipchowdhury
Source : GMATPrep Default Exam Pack

Less than 35 years after the release of African honeybees outside Sao Paulo, Brazil, their descendents, popularly known as killer bees, had migrated as far north as Southern Texas.


(A) Less than 35 years after the release of African honeybees outside Sao Paulo, Brazil,

(B) In less than 35 years since releasing African honeybees outside Sao Paulo, Brazil,

(C) In less than the 35 years since African honeybees had been released outside Sao Paulo, Brazil,

(D) It took less than 35 years from the release of African honeybees outside Sao Paulo, Brazil, when

(E) It took less than the 35 years after the time that African honeybees were released outside Sao Paulo, Brazil, and then

Migration had happened before "less than 35 years" passed. With this logic, past perfect makes sense
User avatar
gagan0303
Joined: 13 Sep 2020
Last visit: 17 Dec 2022
Posts: 110
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 413
Location: India
GMAT 1: 690 Q49 V34
GMAT 1: 690 Q49 V34
Posts: 110
Kudos: 14
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
GMATNinja There is just one event in this sentence and still past perfect tense is being used. Why? Is there an exception to the rule of the usage of past perfect?

Gagan
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 7,445
Own Kudos:
69,779
 [1]
Given Kudos: 2,060
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,445
Kudos: 69,779
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
gagan0303
GMATNinja There is just one event in this sentence and still past perfect tense is being used. Why? Is there an exception to the rule of the usage of past perfect?

Gagan
The past perfect is used to designate something that happened in the past before something else in the past. That something else could be an action. But it could also be a date.

For example:

    "By 2010, Tim had broken every bone in his body."

There are two elements in the past in this sentence. There's the date, 2010. And before that, Tim broke all of his bones. Because the action is taking place before something else in the past, the past perfect is appropriate, even through there's only one action here.

To see how it applies on this SC problem, try taking another look at our response to the second question here.

I hope that helps!
User avatar
thangvietnam
Joined: 29 Jun 2017
Last visit: 09 Mar 2023
Posts: 768
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 2,198
Posts: 768
Kudos: 418
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
in choice A, "less than ..." show a point of time. had done need a point of time, show choice A is good.

in choice B , "in less than..." show a period. past perfect dont need a period to be used. this is wrong

but there is a thing. "in" can go with past perfect in many problems in gmatprep pack.

in 2020, I had passed gmat. (this sentence is similar to our problem in that a point of time is given for past perfect)
by 2020, I had passed gmat

both above sentences are correct.
avatar
102030405060
Joined: 10 Oct 2012
Last visit: 29 Nov 2022
Posts: 1
Given Kudos: 4
Posts: 1
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
what is better: in less than 35 years after..... or less than 35 years since the release of...?
   1   2   3   
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7445 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
234 posts
188 posts