UB001
Namaste Studio, founded in 1974, is widely regarded as one of the most trusted places for yoga instruction on the West Coast of America. With over 50 instructors, Namaste is also one of the largest yoga studios in America. Although Angela has been teaching yoga at Namaste Studio for three years, her performance as an instructor is inconsistent. In a satisfaction survey, her Tuesday afternoon class rated her as the best teacher in the studio, while her Thursday morning class rated her fourth.
Which of the following, if true, most weakens the argument above?
A) The students in Angela's Thursday class are more advanced than those in her Tuesday class.
B) Angela is usually more tired in the mornings than in the afternoons.
C) Angela's Thursday class is bigger than her Tuesday class.
D) Most students in the Thursday class have studied yoga at the centre for five years, while most students in the Tuesday class are taking their first yoga class.
E) Angela tries experimental poses in her Thursday class, but not in her Tuesday class.
If we are weakening the assumption that she is an inconsistent yoga instructor. Then we are finding reasons either making her consistent or opening the possibility she cannot be definitively considered inconsistent simply on the basis of the presented evidence; not a question of if she is good or bad, her worst ranking is still 4th out of 50 teachers after all; more about consistency and specifically in explaining ostensively inconsistent student feedback between two classes.
In which case, it holds that
Option D is the only option which really does this: weakens any claims of inconsistencies in her teaching. It implicitly negates the ranking she receives on Tuesdays where she is often and mostly teaching students in their first yoga class, so naturally, as is the case she will receive the ranking of being the best yoga teacher as these students logically have not had any other yoga teacher before! So, essentially her Tuesday rank can now be totally discounted/tainted from being considered. Which means there is now only one set of objective rankings that can be considered which is the Thursday ranking and so clearly now also no possible inconsistency or paradox in her teaching quality/rank.
It is probably more simple than a 75% level question should be, but a little tricky still I guess.
Also in response to other comments on the validity/quality of the question. The fact that an answer states that on Tuesdays it is many of the student's first class is the key information here. It means the vote of her being the best teacher given on Tuesdays simply cannot hold any real weight, so on that basis, I think the question is not a bad / it is a fair question; Answer D, does just as it must do: it introduces a subtle detail which totally negates the paradox and the basis of any claim of inconsistency thus weakening the stem argument.