Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 04:43 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 04:43
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
eyunni
Joined: 11 Jun 2007
Last visit: 25 Sep 2008
Posts: 251
Own Kudos:
3,344
 [47]
Posts: 251
Kudos: 3,344
 [47]
4
Kudos
Add Kudos
43
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
keats
Joined: 28 Nov 2014
Last visit: 08 Jun 2019
Posts: 739
Own Kudos:
1,361
 [27]
Given Kudos: 86
Concentration: Strategy
GPA: 3.71
Products:
Posts: 739
Kudos: 1,361
 [27]
24
Kudos
Add Kudos
3
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Skywalker18
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 08 Dec 2013
Last visit: 15 Nov 2023
Posts: 2,039
Own Kudos:
9,961
 [6]
Given Kudos: 171
Status:Greatness begins beyond your comfort zone
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
GPA: 3.2
WE:Information Technology (Consulting)
Products:
Posts: 2,039
Kudos: 9,961
 [6]
6
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
gixxer1000
Joined: 26 Jul 2007
Last visit: 05 Aug 2009
Posts: 359
Own Kudos:
419
 [3]
Concentration: Real Estate Development
Schools:Stern, McCombs, Marshall, Wharton
Posts: 359
Kudos: 419
 [3]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Question 1
E. applicable to single-parent families headed by women but not to single-parent families headed by men

Women make less than men so the government's policy of supplementing single family low wages would affect the woment who make less.

Question 2
E. A government provides large rent subsidies to single parents whose wages are less than half the average worker’s wage.

The analysts assert that even if women make what men make they will still be below poverty because men themselves are below poverty as well. They challenge the governments assumptions that family income should be based on wages and urge for housing allowances to all single families who's wages are low.

Question 3
A. equal pay laws were enforced more fully

'Some economists believe that rigorous
enforcement of existing equal pay
(10) laws would substantially decrease
this wage inequity.'
User avatar
johng2016
Joined: 19 Jan 2016
Last visit: 10 Jan 2019
Posts: 35
Own Kudos:
918
 [1]
Given Kudos: 176
Posts: 35
Kudos: 918
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hey guys, about the third question, why it is not C ?
It is quite clear with A, but I'm not satisfied.

In the passage:
"Some economists believe that rigorous enforcement of existing equal pay laws would substantially decrease this wage inequity.............................Since gender concentration exists......, other economists argue that a comparable worth standard , which..............., should be applied instead."
avatar
khv
Joined: 19 Jul 2016
Last visit: 22 Jan 2017
Posts: 7
Given Kudos: 8
Posts: 7
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
can anyone please explain question number 2?
regards,
Harsh Vardhan
avatar
ChongHK
Joined: 05 Sep 2016
Last visit: 12 Jun 2017
Posts: 4
Own Kudos:
4
 [2]
Given Kudos: 13
Posts: 4
Kudos: 4
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
khv
can anyone please explain question number 2?
regards,
Harsh Vardhan

Question is asking should these policy analysts were to create a action plan, what will it be?

policy analysts assert that, although comparable
worth would virtually equalize male and female wages, many single parent families headed by women would remain in poverty because many men earn wages that are below the poverty line. These policy analysts believe that the problem is not caused primarily by wage inequity but rather by low wages coupled with single parent hood, regardless of sex. As a
solution, they challenge the governent’s assumption that a family’s income should depend primarily on wages and urge the government to provide generous wage supplements
(child and housing allowances) to single parents whose wages are low.


They( Policy analysts) urge the government to provide supplements which complements Ans E
User avatar
keats
Joined: 28 Nov 2014
Last visit: 08 Jun 2019
Posts: 739
Own Kudos:
1,361
 [5]
Given Kudos: 86
Concentration: Strategy
GPA: 3.71
Products:
Posts: 739
Kudos: 1,361
 [5]
4
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
khv

Which of the following is most clearly an example of the policy ( regardless of sex, provide supplements so that they may not have to rely solely on wages) advocated by the policy analysts mentioned in the highlighted portion?

A. A government provides training to women who wish to move out of occupations in which women are concentrated
the policy has nothing to do with the desires of anyone … moreover it is for both men and women WHO are single parents
B. A government supports research that analyzes the connection between wage inequality and poverty among single-parent families headed by women
the policy in the passage has everything to do with implementation and little to do with research
C. A government surveys wages annually to make certain that women and men in the same jobs receive the same pay
the policy is more about supplements rather than addressing inequity
D. A government analyzes jobs in terms of the education and responsibility they require and publishes a list of jobs that should be considered equivalent for wage purposes
again the policy is more about supplements rather than doing away with inequity … education as a measure of judging jobs to be equivalent wage wise is not confirmed from the passage which mentions ‘training and responsibility'
E. A government provides large rent subsidies to single parents whose wages are less than half the average worker’s wage …
a supplement (additional source of income) to single parents regardless of sex … perfect match … CORRECT
avatar
Titir
Joined: 09 Apr 2014
Last visit: 31 May 2017
Posts: 9
Own Kudos:
38
 [2]
Given Kudos: 42
GMAT 1: 680 Q49 V33
WE:Information Technology (Consulting)
GMAT 1: 680 Q49 V33
Posts: 9
Kudos: 38
 [2]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
1. The passage suggests that the United States government’s policy towards providing wage supplements to parents whose wages are low is
A. considered ill advised by most economists who have studied the issue
No such mention in the passage
B. based on assumptions about the appropriate sources of family income
"As a solution, they challenge the government's assumption that a family’s income should depend primarily on wages and urge the government to provide generous wage supplements
(child and housing allowances) to single parents whose wages are low."

C. under revision in response to criticism from some policy analysts
The passage mentions that Analysts have urged government to provide wage supplements. No mention whether givernment has already accepted the proposal and revising the policy.
D. capable of eliminating wage inequality but not of raising incomes for both women and men
" These policy analysts believe that the problem is not caused primarily by wage inequity but rather by low wages coupled with single parent hood, regardless of sex. As a
solution, they challenge the government's assumption that a family’s income should depend primarily on wages and urge the government to provide generous wage supplements
(child and housing allowances) to single parents whose wages are low."

E. applicable to single-parent families headed by women but not to single-parent families headed by men
"urge the government to provide generous wage supplements (child and housing allowances) to single parents whose wages are low."
avatar
ADiCR7
Joined: 28 Sep 2017
Last visit: 29 Mar 2018
Posts: 13
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 3
Location: India
GMAT 1: 590 Q46 V26
GPA: 3.9
GMAT 1: 590 Q46 V26
Posts: 13
Kudos: 1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The answer to Question 3 is option B, I think, because according to the passage more "rigorous enforcement of equal pay laws" means more stringent (of regulations, requirements, or conditions) strict, precise, and exacting.

Could you please clarify this?
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 7,445
Own Kudos:
69,783
 [2]
Given Kudos: 2,060
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,445
Kudos: 69,783
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
ADiCR7
The answer to Question 3 is option B, I think, because according to the passage more "rigorous enforcement of equal pay laws" means more stringent (of regulations, requirements, or conditions) strict, precise, and exacting.

Could you please clarify this?
Quote:
3.According to the passage, some economists believe that, in the United States, there would be smaller differences between the wages of women and men who do the same jobs if
A. equal pay laws were enforced more fully
B. more stringent equal pay laws were passed
C. a more rigorous comparable worth standard were developed and applied
D. more men entered the occupations in which women are concentrated
E. women received the same kind and amount of job training that men receive
We don't need to pass new laws to decrease this wage difference. We already have laws requiring that women and men doing the same jobs be paid the same. Thus, some economists believe that rigorous enforcement of EXISTING laws would substantially decrease this wage inequity. New laws are not needed.

I hope that helps!
User avatar
mrinal0308
Joined: 12 Feb 2015
Last visit: 02 Oct 2018
Posts: 94
Own Kudos:
181
 [3]
Given Kudos: 9
Location: India
Concentration: Technology, Operations
GMAT 1: 680 Q50 V31
GPA: 3.9
WE:Information Technology (Computer Software)
GMAT 1: 680 Q50 V31
Posts: 94
Kudos: 181
 [3]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Lets breakdown the passage:
Research data says that single headed families led by women are poor.
women's wages << men's
Some eco believe : inequality can be sorted if men=women=same jobs
But, other PA's view: wages should be regardless of gender bcz sometimes, men also earn less, so single headed families led by those men are also poor.


1. The passage suggests that the United States government’s policy towards providing wage supplements to parents whose wages are low is

A. considered ill advised by most economists who have studied the issue
--> passage mentiones some economists. Eliminate

B. based on assumptions about the appropriate sources of family income
--> Correct. See last few lines on assumption.

C. under revision in response to criticism from some policy analysts
--> PA's are not critising anything

D. capable of eliminating wage inequality but not of raising incomes for both women and men
--> Extreme. This is no where discussed concretely.

E. applicable to single-parent families headed by women but not to single-parent families headed by men
--> Extreme.



2. Which of the following is most clearly an example of the policy advocated by the policy analysts mentioned in line 8 ?
---> As per PA's. the wages should be irrespective of gender.

A. A government provides training to women who wish to move out of occupations in which women are concentrated.
--> talks only about women. Also, what training will do ?

B. A government supports research that analyzes the connection between wage inequality and poverty among single-parent families headed by women.
--> same as A. What the research will do ?

C. A government surveys wages annually to make certain that women and men in the same jobs receive the same pay.
--> this is "Some economists" view. Anyways, surveys will do no better.

D. A government analyzes jobs in terms of the education and responsibility they require and publishes a list of jobs that should be considered equivalent for wage purposes.
--> what after analysing ? :p

E. A government provides large rent subsidies to single parents whose wages are less than half the average worker’s wage.
--> an action is described here. Also it talks about single parents in general, which supports PA's view. Correct.



3.According to the passage, some economists believe that, in the United States, there would be smaller differences between the wages of women and men who do the same jobs if
A. equal pay laws were enforced more fully
--> passage talks about enforcing existing equal pay laws. Correct.

B. more stringent equal pay laws were passed
--> reasons explained in A. This means that new stringent laws to be passed, which is wrong.

C. a more rigorous comparable worth standard were developed and applied
D. more men entered the occupations in which women are concentrated
E. women received the same kind and amount of job training that men receive

C,D,E are irrelevant.


=========== Hit +1 Kudos if you like my reply================
User avatar
JS1290
Joined: 27 Dec 2016
Last visit: 04 Nov 2019
Posts: 236
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1,101
Posts: 236
Kudos: 266
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
GMATNinja GMATNinjaTwo

Hi GMATNinja,

Could you please explain what is the difference between option A and B for Q3? It took me a really long time to solve this question because I couldn't decide between A and B.
avatar
neetis5
Joined: 01 Apr 2017
Last visit: 26 Nov 2021
Posts: 31
Own Kudos:
129
 [2]
Given Kudos: 8
Posts: 31
Kudos: 129
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
csaluja
GMATNinja GMATNinjaTwo

Hi GMATNinja,

Could you please explain what is the difference between option A and B for Q3? It took me a really long time to solve this question because I couldn't decide between A and B.

Hi csaluja,

Let's take a look at Question 3:

According to the passage, some economists believe that, in the United States, there would be smaller differences between the wages of women and men who do the same jobs if

Choice A: equal pay laws were enforced more fully
Choice B: more stringent equal pay laws were passed

The main difference between choice A and B is that the first one talks about enforcing existing laws and the second one talks about passing new laws. If you look at the relevant portion of the passage, the economists do not talk about new laws at all. They are of the opinion that the current laws need to applied thoroughly/properly/fully.

Sentence 3:

Some economists believe that rigorous enforcement of existing equal pay laws would substantially decrease this wage inequity.

I hope the above analysis helps! :)

Cheers!

NS
User avatar
saurabh9gupta
Joined: 10 Jan 2013
Last visit: 28 Jul 2023
Posts: 264
Own Kudos:
177
 [1]
Given Kudos: 201
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
GRE 1: Q163 V155
GPA: 3.95
Products:
GRE 1: Q163 V155
Posts: 264
Kudos: 177
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
1. The passage suggests that the United States government’s policy towards providing wage supplements to parents whose wages are low is

(A) considered ill advised by most economists who have studied the issue
(B) based on assumptions about the appropriate sources of family income
(C) under revision in response to criticism from some policy analysts
(D) capable of eliminating wage inequality but not of raising incomes for both women and men
(E) applicable to single-parent families headed by women but not to single-parent families headed by men


For Q1.

I marked D because it is given in the passage but how is the answer B?

Passage
These policy analysts believe that <b> the problem is not caused primarily by wage inequity but rather by low wages coupled with single parent hood, regardless of sex.</b> As a solution, they challenge the government’s assumption that a family’s income should depend primarily on wages and urge the government to provide generous wage supplements (child and housing allowances) to single parents whose wages are low

Posted from my mobile device
avatar
neetis5
Joined: 01 Apr 2017
Last visit: 26 Nov 2021
Posts: 31
Own Kudos:
129
 [1]
Given Kudos: 8
Posts: 31
Kudos: 129
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
saurabh9gupta
1. The passage suggests that the United States government’s policy towards providing wage supplements to parents whose wages are low is

(A) considered ill advised by most economists who have studied the issue
(B) based on assumptions about the appropriate sources of family income
(C) under revision in response to criticism from some policy analysts
(D) capable of eliminating wage inequality but not of raising incomes for both women and men
(E) applicable to single-parent families headed by women but not to single-parent families headed by men


For Q1.

I marked D because it is given in the passage but how is the answer B?

Passage
These policy analysts believe that <b> the problem is not caused primarily by wage inequity but rather by low wages coupled with single parent hood, regardless of sex.</b> As a solution, they challenge the government’s assumption that a family’s income should depend primarily on wages and urge the government to provide generous wage supplements (child and housing allowances) to single parents whose wages are low

Posted from my mobile device

Hi saurabh9gupta

I can understand why choice D seems appealing initially and why B does not. Let's go through the passage quickly:

1. Problem = great deal of poverty in the US among families headed by single women
2. Possible cause of the above problem = wage disparity between men and women
3. Possible solution by some economists that might substantially reduce the cause = enforce current laws rigorously so that wage inequality is reduced significantly
4. HOWEVER, drawback of suggested solution in 3 = does not affect situation where gender concentration exists
5. Therefore, some other economists suggest another solution = comparable worth
6. HOWEVER, policy analysts point out a consideration against comparable worth = comparable worth though will virtually equalize the pays, BUT not address the original issue listed in point 1
7. Policy analysts' conclusion = real cause of problem mentioned in 1 is not what economists have been trying to address, but something else; real cause = low wages
8. Analysts' say government's assumption not correct; government's assumption = family's income should depend mostly on wages. In other words, the source of where the family income should primarily come from is disputed by the analysts.
9. Analysts solution = provide generous wage supplements to single parents whose wages are low


Question 1:

The passage suggests that the United States government’s policy towards providing wage supplements to parents whose wages are low is

(B) based on assumptions about the appropriate sources of family income

(D) capable of eliminating wage inequality but not of raising incomes for both women and men

As you can see from the passage map, wrt to wage-supplements, which is the focus of this question, there is nothing in the passage about how "wage-supplements" would address wage inequality, leave alone eliminating it. The idea of "wage-supplements" is floated after disregarding "wage-inequality" as the cause of the problem of great deal of poverty in the US among families headed by single women.

Yes, we do read about virtually getting rid of wage-inequality, but that was from the POV of how successful the whole "comparable-worth" solution would be. This is the point that one is likely to miss initially and hence likely to choose choice D.

As regards the validity of choice B, please refer to the last two points in the passage map and let me know whether there is still some confusion as to how we can infer it. Also, please keep in mind that choice B may not be perfectly worded (I feel so too), but the key to acing any section in Verbal is detaching oneself from the quest for perfection and surrendering many times to POE with logic. :)

Hope the above analysis helps! :)

Cheers!

NS
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Quote:
1. The passage suggests that the United States government’s policy towards providing wage supplements to parents whose wages are low is
(A) considered ill advised by most economists who have studied the issue
(B) based on assumptions about the appropriate sources of family income
(C) under revision in response to criticism from some policy analysts
(D) capable of eliminating wage inequality but not of raising incomes for both women and men
(E) applicable to single-parent families headed by women but not to single-parent families headed by men

GMATNinja How is B correct? The assumption is an independent one and the government's policy is not based on this assumption. Shouldn't the answer instead be D (I eliminated other four)?
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 7,445
Own Kudos:
69,783
 [1]
Given Kudos: 2,060
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,445
Kudos: 69,783
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
admission2020
Quote:
1. The passage suggests that the United States government’s policy towards providing wage supplements to parents whose wages are low is
(A) considered ill advised by most economists who have studied the issue
(B) based on assumptions about the appropriate sources of family income
(C) under revision in response to criticism from some policy analysts
(D) capable of eliminating wage inequality but not of raising incomes for both women and men
(E) applicable to single-parent families headed by women but not to single-parent families headed by men

GMATNinja How is B correct? The assumption is an independent one and the government's policy is not based on this assumption. Shouldn't the answer instead be D (I eliminated other four)?
Take another look at the relevant piece of the passage:
Quote:
[The policy analysts] challenge the government’s assumption that a family’s income should depend primarily on wages and urge the government to provide generous wage supplements (child and housing allowances) to single parents whose wages are low.
The phrase "the government's assumption" tells of that the government is, indeed, the entity assuming that "a family’s income should depend primarily on wages." Based on this assumption, the government currently does not provide generous wage supplements to single parents whose wages are low. While independent policy analysts are challenging this assumption, the assumption itself comes from the government and informs the government's current policy. (B) is the correct answer.

Now look at (D):
Quote:
(D) capable of eliminating wage inequality but not of raising incomes for both women and men
As stated above, the government currently does not provide generous wage supplements, so there is no evidence in the passage to support that the policy impacts either wage inequality or income level at all. In addition, such supplements would not necessarily be capable of eliminating wage inequality -- other measures, such as enforcing equal pay laws and shifting to the comparable worth standard, are noted in the passage as potential avenues toward that goal. The policy analysts are urging the government to provide wage supplements not to address wage inequality, but to solve the issue of "low wages coupled with single parenthood, regardless of sex."

For these reasons, we can eliminate (D).

I hope that helps!
User avatar
100mitra
Joined: 29 Apr 2019
Last visit: 06 Jul 2022
Posts: 714
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 49
Status:Learning
Posts: 714
Kudos: 629
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Paraphrasing:
1. Research data indicate that
Problem: poverty single parent families headed by women.
Could be reason: women’s wages are only 60 percent of men.

2. Some economists believe that
Promote : enforcement of existing equal pay laws
Equal Pay law claims: doing the same jobs be paid the same.

Other economists argue that
Promote: Comparable worth standard

3. Some policy analysts assert that,
Contrast view: many single parent families headed by women would remain in poverty
Reason: because many men earn wages that are below the poverty line.
Believes: the problem is not wage inequity but (low wages + single parenthood)

Solution by Policy Analysts:
challenge the government’s assumption that a family’s income should depend primarily on wages
and
urge the government to provide generous wage supplements to single parents whose wages are low.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

1. The passage suggests that
the United States government’s policy towards providing wage supplements to parents
whose wages are low is

Suggest that = Solution presented by Policy Analysts
Correct option B: (based on assumptions about the appropriate sources of family income)
as mentioned above, as it deals with single parents (irrespective of sex) whose wages are low and

(A) considered ill advised by most economists who have studied the issue
Wrong: government consider ill advise by most economist, is illogical to support the passage suggestion
(C) under revision in response to criticism from some policy analysts
Wrong: “under revision” – not mentioned in the passage, can be consider – OFS
(D) capable of eliminating wage inequality
but not of raising incomes for both women and men
Wrong: this is regarding some economist believe and some economist not, but does not support any to policy providing wage supplements to parents
(E) applicable to single-parent families headed by women
but not to single-parent families headed by men
Wrong: suggestion from policy analysist deals with single parent (irrespective of sex), not specifically to only women or men

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Which of the following is most clearly an example of the policy
advocated by the policy analysts mentioned in line 8?

Some policy analysts assert that,
Contrast view to other economists: many single parent families headed by women would remain in poverty
Reason: because many men earn wages that are below the poverty line.
Believes: the problem is not wage inequity but (low wages + single parenthood)

Correct option (E)
A government provides
large rent subsidies to single parents
whose wages are less than half the average worker’s wage.
Correct: Deals with low wages + single parenthood (irrespective of sex)


(A) A government provides training to women
who wish to move out of occupations in which women are concentrated.
Wrong: Deals only with Women
(B) A government supports research that analyzes
the connection between wage inequality and
poverty among single-parent families headed by women.
Wrong: Deals only with Women
(C) A government surveys
wages annually to make certain that
women and men in the same jobs receive the same pay.
Wrong: Promotes comparable worth pay, this is contrast to some policy analysts view
(D) A government
analyzes jobs in terms of the education and responsibility they require and
publishes a list of jobs that should be considered equivalent for wage purposes.
Wrong: Out of scope

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

3.According to the passage,
some economists believe that,
in the United States, there would be smaller differences between
the wages of women and men who do the same jobs if

“Some economists believe that rigorous enforcement of existing equal pay laws would substantially decrease this wage inequity.”
Correct Option:
(A) equal pay laws were enforced more fully



(B) more stringent equal pay laws were passed
Wrong: does not speaks about stringent or were passed
(C) a more rigorous comparable worth standard were developed and applied
Wrong: Stem has meaning error, this stem as mentioned in the passage
- does not believe but argue!
- Highlights about standards to be developed and applied, not about already available to be implement.
Other economists argue that
a comparable worth standard, which would mandate that women and men in any jobs that require comparable training and responsibility be paid the same,
should be applied instead

(D) more men entered the occupations in which women are concentrated
Wrong: Out of scope
(E) women received the same kind and amount of job training that men receive
Wrong: concentrates only on requirement of training for women, not about pay or policy implementation
User avatar
rashwiniyer
Joined: 18 Aug 2012
Last visit: 09 Jan 2024
Posts: 65
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 78
Posts: 65
Kudos: 6
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Referring to the line - "Since gender concentration exists (for example, 80 percent of clerical workers are women), other economists argue that a comparable worth standard, which would mandate that women and men in any jobs that require comparable training and responsibility be paid the same, should be applied instead"

what is wrong with option E of Q3?
 1   2   
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7445 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
234 posts
GRE Forum Moderator
17289 posts
188 posts