It is currently 17 Oct 2017, 23:16

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Some anthropologists believe that the genetic homogeneity

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

9 KUDOS received
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Affiliations: UWC
Joined: 09 May 2012
Posts: 393

Kudos [?]: 1612 [9], given: 100

Location: Canada
GMAT 1: 620 Q42 V33
GMAT 2: 680 Q44 V38
GPA: 3.43
WE: Engineering (Entertainment and Sports)
Reviews Badge
Some anthropologists believe that the genetic homogeneity [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 22 Jun 2012, 02:28
9
This post received
KUDOS
142
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  55% (hard)

Question Stats:

56% (01:14) correct 44% (01:17) wrong based on 4881 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

The Official Guide for GMAT Review 2017

Practice Question
Question No.: SC 736
Page: 695

Some anthropologists believe that the genetic homogeneity evident in the world's people is the result of a "population bottleneck"—at some time in the past our ancestors suffered an event, greatly reducing their numbers and thus our genetic variation.

A at some time in the past our ancestors suffered an event, greatly reducing their numbers
B that at some time in the past our ancestors suffered an event that greatly reduced their numbers
C that sometime in the past our ancestors suffered an event so that their numbers were greatly reduced
D some time in the past our ancestors suffered an event from which their numbers were greatly reduced
E some time in the past, that our ancestors suffered an event so as to reduce their numbers greatly,
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

Kudos [?]: 1612 [9], given: 100

20 KUDOS received
Retired Moderator
User avatar
P
Status: worked for Kaplan's associates, but now on my own, free and flying
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 4288

Kudos [?]: 7875 [20], given: 363

Location: India
WE: Education (Education)
Re: Some anthropologists believe that the genetic homogeneity [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 22 Jun 2012, 06:58
20
This post received
KUDOS
13
This post was
BOOKMARKED
A at some time in the past our ancestors suffered an event, greatly reducing their numbers ------ A hyphen is not the tool to connect two ICs.
B that at some time in the past our ancestors suffered an event that greatly reduced their numbers -------- ‘that ’ is the right connector ---correct choice.
C that sometime in the past our ancestors suffered an event so that their numbers were greatly reduced ------- altered notion; it looks as if the ancestors suffered a calamity in order to reduce their numbers.
D some time in the past our ancestors suffered an event from which their numbers were greatly reduced -------- conjugation of two ICs with hyphenation is wrong.
E some time in the past, that our ancestors suffered an event so as to reduce their numbers greatly, ------ same as in D

_________________

“Better than a thousand days of diligent study is one day with a great teacher” – a Japanese proverb.
9884544509

Kudos [?]: 7875 [20], given: 363

Expert Post
36 KUDOS received
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
User avatar
Joined: 28 Nov 2011
Posts: 303

Kudos [?]: 1226 [36], given: 2

Re: Some anthropologists believe that the genetic homogeneity [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 25 Jun 2012, 21:12
36
This post received
KUDOS
Expert's post
20
This post was
BOOKMARKED
In answer choice (A) there is a problem with modification. (A) is implying that our ancestors greatly reduced their own numbers (this is incorrect because it was the event that greatly reduced ancestors). When we have an independent clause followed by a participle phrase (one that starts with a gerund and serves as an adjective clause), the participle phrase modifies the subject of the sentence.

In non-grammarese: 'ancestors' is the subject of the independent clause, 'at some time...' and because of the comma after event, we have the incorrect meaning. It was not the ancestors but an event that 'reduced their numbers.'

Therefore, we want to make sure that it is clear that 'event' is 'greatly reducing the numbers.' One way to fix that is by using the relative pronoun 'that.' In (B), we have 'an event that greatly reduced their numbers' that does a good job of correcting the error in (A).

Therefore (B) is the answer.
_________________

Christopher Lele
Magoosh Test Prep


Image

Image

Kudos [?]: 1226 [36], given: 2

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 15 Mar 2012
Posts: 69

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 20

Re: Some anthropologists believe that the genetic homogeneity [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 25 Sep 2012, 10:27
ChrisLele wrote:
In answer choice (A) there is a problem with modification. (A) is implying that our ancestors greatly reduced their own numbers (this is incorrect because it was the event that greatly reduced ancestors). When we have an independent clause followed by a participle phrase (one that starts with a gerund and serves as an adjective clause), the participle phrase modifies the subject of the sentence.

In non-grammarese: 'ancestors' is the subject of the independent clause, 'at some time...' and because of the comma after event, we have the incorrect meaning. It was not the ancestors but an event that 'reduced their numbers.'

Therefore, we want to make sure that it is clear that 'event' is 'greatly reducing the numbers.' One way to fix that is by using the relative pronoun 'that.' In (B), we have 'an event that greatly reduced their numbers' that does a good job of correcting the error in (A).

Therefore (B) is the answer.


Use of 'that' in 'that greatly reduced their numbers" sounds good as you explained but how's the use of 'that' in "that at some time in the past.." justified. Please explain.
If "that at some time in the past.." were parallel to "that the genetic homogeneity..", shouldn't the sentence rather look like:
Some people believe that X and that Y.
The sentence as it looks to me actually is like this:
Some people believe something population bottleneck - definition of population bottleneck.

I rejected option B because 'that' in 'that at some time in the past...' sounded awkward and I got the question wrong :(

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 20

1 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 31 Mar 2010
Posts: 130

Kudos [?]: 93 [1], given: 38

Re: Some anthropologists believe that the genetic homogeneity [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 25 Sep 2012, 23:21
1
This post received
KUDOS
divineacclivity wrote:
ChrisLele wrote:
In answer choice (A) there is a problem with modification. (A) is implying that our ancestors greatly reduced their own numbers (this is incorrect because it was the event that greatly reduced ancestors). When we have an independent clause followed by a participle phrase (one that starts with a gerund and serves as an adjective clause), the participle phrase modifies the subject of the sentence.

In non-grammarese: 'ancestors' is the subject of the independent clause, 'at some time...' and because of the comma after event, we have the incorrect meaning. It was not the ancestors but an event that 'reduced their numbers.'

Therefore, we want to make sure that it is clear that 'event' is 'greatly reducing the numbers.' One way to fix that is by using the relative pronoun 'that.' In (B), we have 'an event that greatly reduced their numbers' that does a good job of correcting the error in (A).

Therefore (B) is the answer.


Use of 'that' in 'that greatly reduced their numbers" sounds good as you explained but how's the use of 'that' in "that at some time in the past.." justified. Please explain.
If "that at some time in the past.." were parallel to "that the genetic homogeneity..", shouldn't the sentence rather look like:
Some people believe that X and that Y.
The sentence as it looks to me actually is like this:
Some people believe something population bottleneck - definition of population bottleneck.

I rejected option B because 'that' in 'that at some time in the past...' sounded awkward and I got the question wrong :(


I had thought on the same lines initially (that X and that Y) - but closely looking at these two choices you would notice there is a clear change of meaning in the second choice (C)

we can replace 2nd "that" in B with "which" and sentence makes same sense. so its not ( that X and that Y)
B that at some time in the past our ancestors suffered an event that greatly reduced their numbers

"so that" in this means "because of". It conveys as if the ancestors suffered an event to cause a reduction in their own numbers.
C that sometime in the past our ancestors suffered an event so that their numbers were greatly reduced

Hope it makes sense.
_________________

Push +1 kudos button please, if you like my post

Kudos [?]: 93 [1], given: 38

20 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 31 Aug 2011
Posts: 224

Kudos [?]: 254 [20], given: 56

Re: Some anthropologists believe that the genetic homogeneity [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 31 Oct 2012, 23:14
20
This post received
KUDOS
7
This post was
BOOKMARKED
COMMA + VERBing should refer to the SUBJECT of the preceding clause. In A, reducing seems to refer to our ancestors, implying that OUR ANCESTORS were greatly reducing their numbers. The intended meaning here is that an EVENT greatly reduced their numbers. Eliminate A.

So that (in C) and so as (in E) imply PURPOSE. The result is a strange meaning: that our ancestors suffered for the PURPOSE of reducing their numbers. Not the intended meaning. Eliminate C and E.

In D, which seems to refer to an event, implying that our ancestors' numbers were reduced FROM an event -- a nonsensical meaning. Eliminate D.

The correct answer is B.
_________________

If you found my contribution helpful, please click the +1 Kudos button on the left, I kinda need some =)

Kudos [?]: 254 [20], given: 56

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 27 Jul 2011
Posts: 183

Kudos [?]: 287 [0], given: 103

Re: Some anthropologists believe that the genetic homogeneity [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 18 Apr 2013, 00:49
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Thanks a Lot PUNEETSCHDV :) U saved my day... this is the best explanation of the question available....

There are two pending items that need to be discussed in detail.
Usage of '--' and ' at some time'




Can some guru confirm if below points are correct:


some time: Unspecific time . I want to visit chicago sometime this year
At some time in the past : during some indefinite time in the past
at sometime in the past: same as above
some time: some is an adjective referring to time, quite a while
I’ve been spending some time thinking about income inequality for a piece I’m writing.
sometimes : occasionally

some time in the past -> is wrong ??


Regarding usage of '--':
Check the below link from grockit:
http://grockit.com/blog/gmat/2011/08/01/gmat-sentence-corrections-colons-and-dashes/
So if i interpret it correctly 'DASH'es quite flexible, so "-that at some time in the past " is same as "-at some time in the past"...
can some one confirm this..
_________________

If u can't jump the 700 wall , drill a big hole and cross it .. I can and I WILL DO IT ...need some encouragement and inspirations from U ALL

Kudos [?]: 287 [0], given: 103

Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 03 Aug 2012
Posts: 899

Kudos [?]: 885 [0], given: 322

Concentration: General Management, General Management
GMAT 1: 630 Q47 V29
GMAT 2: 680 Q50 V32
GPA: 3.7
WE: Information Technology (Investment Banking)
Premium Member
Re: Some anthropologists believe that the genetic homogeneity [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 09 May 2013, 22:32
ChrisLele wrote:
In answer choice (A) there is a problem with modification. (A) is implying that our ancestors greatly reduced their own numbers (this is incorrect because it was the event that greatly reduced ancestors). When we have an independent clause followed by a participle phrase (one that starts with a gerund and serves as an adjective clause), the participle phrase modifies the subject of the sentence.

In non-grammarese: 'ancestors' is the subject of the independent clause, 'at some time...' and because of the comma after event, we have the incorrect meaning. It was not the ancestors but an event that 'reduced their numbers.'

Therefore, we want to make sure that it is clear that 'event' is 'greatly reducing the numbers.' One way to fix that is by using the relative pronoun 'that.' In (B), we have 'an event that greatly reduced their numbers' that does a good job of correcting the error in (A).

Therefore (B) is the answer.


I would like to contradict your explanation of -ING modifiers:

-ING can be used as

(1). Progressive tense : Rita is PLAYING
(2). Gerund: SWIMMING is a good exercise
(3). Adjective: The CAT SLEEPING on the mat is ill
(4). Adverb: Rita failed in the exam,forcing her to commit suicide

In the sentence (4). -ING is used as an adverb which adds to VERB "Failed" an Action.Moreover, there lies no confusion between "Ancestors" or "event" as to what -ING is referring to.However, the problem here is solely with the "SUFFERING".

SUFFERING never caused => reducing in number

"which" would have been appropriate here.

Rgds,
TGC
_________________

Rgds,
TGC!
_____________________________________________________________________
I Assisted You => KUDOS Please
_____________________________________________________________________________

Kudos [?]: 885 [0], given: 322

Director
Director
User avatar
S
Joined: 27 Mar 2010
Posts: 736

Kudos [?]: 312 [0], given: 11

Location: Bangalore, India
Re: Some anthropologists believe that the genetic homogeneity [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 May 2013, 07:16
Sure no problem; when I had requested:

Can you see if you can post an official example where above kind of construct is valid.

By official example I meant questions from Official guides, GMATPreps etc. (these are called "official sources"), not MGMAT guides.
_________________

Thanks,
Ashish (GMAT Faculty @ EducationAisle)
http://www.EducationAisle.com

Sentence Correction Nirvana available at Amazon.in and Flipkart

Now! Preview the entire Grammar Section of Sentence Correction Nirvana at pothi.com

Kudos [?]: 312 [0], given: 11

1 KUDOS received
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 19 Oct 2012
Posts: 1

Kudos [?]: 1 [1], given: 0

Re: Some anthropologists believe that the genetic homogeneity [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 Jun 2013, 05:40
1
This post received
KUDOS
ChrisLele wrote:
In answer choice (A) there is a problem with modification. (A) is implying that our ancestors greatly reduced their own numbers (this is incorrect because it was the event that greatly reduced ancestors). When we have an independent clause followed by a participle phrase (one that starts with a gerund and serves as an adjective clause), the participle phrase modifies the subject of the sentence.

In non-grammarese: 'ancestors' is the subject of the independent clause, 'at some time...' and because of the comma after event, we have the incorrect meaning. It was not the ancestors but an event that 'reduced their numbers.'

Therefore, we want to make sure that it is clear that 'event' is 'greatly reducing the numbers.' One way to fix that is by using the relative pronoun 'that.' In (B), we have 'an event that greatly reduced their numbers' that does a good job of correcting the error in (A).

Therefore (B) is the answer.


Hi,
I am bit confused about your explanation, I thought that a participle phrase (gerund) will modify the entire independent clause - in this case the fact that "our ancestors suffered an event"
Example (Taken from MGMAT just to make sure I don't introduce something estrange):
Crime has recently decreased in our neighborhood, leading to a rise in property values

I may be missing something in your explanation, so it will be great if you can expand a bit more on it.

I originally had chosen A, not thinking about the required parallelism: Anthropologist believed that x - that y. I didn't think it made sense to make those two clauses parallel because of the lack of 'and', and thus I figured that the clause after the dash ('=') was just emphasizing the definition of a 'population bottleneck'.

I hope this thread is not to old.

Thanks,

Kudos [?]: 1 [1], given: 0

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 15 Mar 2013
Posts: 22

Kudos [?]: 31 [0], given: 6

Location: Canada
Concentration: International Business, Finance
WE: Information Technology (Consulting)
Re: Some anthropologists believe that the genetic homogeneity [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 Dec 2013, 23:29
This question can be solved by identifying two easy splits:
- Believe X - Believe X: the two X's should be parallel - "That the genetic..." should be parallel with " that at some time..."
Eliminate A, D & E
- "at some time" vs. "some time": we require a definite period of time, at some time answers the question "when? at some time"; A would have been correct if we had "sometime" instead of "some time"
Eliminate C

Answer: B

Kudos [?]: 31 [0], given: 6

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 30 May 2013
Posts: 185

Kudos [?]: 87 [0], given: 72

Location: India
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, General Management
GPA: 3.82
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Some anthropologists believe that the genetic homogeneity [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 24 Mar 2014, 09:08
macjas wrote:
Some anthropologists believe that the genetic homogeneity evident in the world's people is the result of a "population bottleneck"-at some time in the past our ancestors suffered an event, greatly reducing their numbers and thus our genetic variation.

A at some time in the past our ancestors suffered an event, greatly reducing their numbers
B that at some time in the past our ancestors suffered an event that greatly reduced their numbers
C that sometime in the past our ancestors suffered an event so that their numbers were greatly reduced
D some time in the past our ancestors suffered an event from which their numbers were greatly reduced
E some time in the past, that our ancestors suffered an event so as to reduce their numbers greatly,



This sentence have two error 1) Hypen - Always add additional information but here its not
2) Greatly reducing ... is not modifying the previous class or its the results of previous clause

For modifiers to make sense it should associate with the subject of the preceding clause which is "Ancestors". Ancestors is not the doer of the action suffered so in the modifier sentence "reducing " which is Ancestors suffered an event and thus they greatly reduced their number. This does not make sense.

So there should not be modifier in the sentence.
Hence B is correct

Regards,
Rrsnathan

Kudos [?]: 87 [0], given: 72

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 22 Oct 2013
Posts: 102

Kudos [?]: 38 [0], given: 10

GMAT 1: 750 Q50 V42
Re: Some anthropologists believe that the genetic homogeneity [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 07 Apr 2014, 23:50
B, the correct answer, seems to be much more parallel than D. B has a structure:

our ancestors suffered an event that greatly reduced X (their numbers) and Y (our genetic variation)

D says:

our ancestors suffered an event from which their numbers were greatly reduced and and thus our genetic variation.

The only way to intepret this logically is:

our ancestors suffered an event from which their numbers were greatly reduced and and thus our genetic variation (was greatly reduced).

Also notice that D is a passive voice construction ("their numbers were greatly reduced ..."). Generally if an active voice construction is present, it should be preferred.

Also, "at" seems to be missing in D ("at" some time in the past..).

Kudos [?]: 38 [0], given: 10

Current Student
User avatar
Joined: 03 Feb 2013
Posts: 942

Kudos [?]: 1055 [0], given: 548

Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Strategy
GMAT 1: 760 Q49 V44
GPA: 3.88
WE: Engineering (Computer Software)
Reviews Badge
Re: Some anthropologists believe that the genetic homogeneity [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Apr 2014, 11:03
Some anthropologists believe that the genetic homogeneity evident in the world's people is the result of a "population bottleneck"—at some time in the past our ancestors suffered an event, greatly reducing their numbers and thus our genetic variation.

(A) at some time in the past our ancestors suffered an event, greatly reducing their numbers
(B) that at some time in the past our ancestors suffered an event that greatly reduced their numbers
(C) that some time in the past our ancestors suffered an event so that their numbers were greatly reduced,
(D) some time in the past our ancestors suffered an event from which their numbers were greatly reduced
(E) some time in the past, that our ancestors suffered an event so as to reduce their numbers greatly,

Meaning: Some anthropologists believe that the genetic homogeneity evident in the world's people is the result of a "population bottleneck". Population bottleneck – an event that occurred sometime back in the past which greatly reduced their numbers and thus our genetic variation.

Option A) “greatly reducing their numbers” – Verb-ing modifier comma separated, so presenting (modifying) more information about the preceding clause “at some time in the past our ancestors suffered an event” which is incorrect as the event reduced their numbers.

Option C) so that presents reason which is incorrect.

Option D) “from which” is incorrect. The correct sentence would be “some time in the past our ancestors suffered an event that greatly reduced their numbers”.

Option E) “so as” provides an intent.

My confusion is “that” in Option B)
that should replace “population bottleneck”
So the sentence becomes “population bottleneck at some time in the past our ancestors suffered an event that greatly reduced their numbers” – doesn’t look correct to me.

I know after the hyphen “-” the modifier comes which provides more information about the preceding noun.

Can you please clarify about the usage of hyphen?
_________________

Thanks,
Kinjal
My Debrief : http://gmatclub.com/forum/hardwork-never-gets-unrewarded-for-ever-189267.html#p1449379
My Application Experience : http://gmatclub.com/forum/hardwork-never-gets-unrewarded-for-ever-189267-40.html#p1516961
Linkedin : https://www.linkedin.com/in/kinjal-das/

Please click on Kudos, if you think the post is helpful

Kudos [?]: 1055 [0], given: 548

Expert Post
e-GMAT Representative
User avatar
S
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Posts: 2311

Kudos [?]: 9028 [0], given: 335

Re: Some anthropologists believe that the genetic homogeneity [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 24 Apr 2014, 21:41
Expert's post
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
kinjiGC wrote:
Some anthropologists believe that the genetic homogeneity evident in the world's people is the result of a "population bottleneck"—at some time in the past our ancestors suffered an event, greatly reducing their numbers and thus our genetic variation.

(A) at some time in the past our ancestors suffered an event, greatly reducing their numbers
(B) that at some time in the past our ancestors suffered an event that greatly reduced their numbers
(C) that some time in the past our ancestors suffered an event so that their numbers were greatly reduced,
(D) some time in the past our ancestors suffered an event from which their numbers were greatly reduced
(E) some time in the past, that our ancestors suffered an event so as to reduce their numbers greatly,

Meaning: Some anthropologists believe that the genetic homogeneity evident in the world's people is the result of a "population bottleneck". Population bottleneck – an event that occurred sometime back in the past which greatly reduced their numbers and thus our genetic variation.

Option A) “greatly reducing their numbers” – Verb-ing modifier comma separated, so presenting (modifying) more information about the preceding clause “at some time in the past our ancestors suffered an event” which is incorrect as the event reduced their numbers.

Option C) so that presents reason which is incorrect.

Option D) “from which” is incorrect. The correct sentence would be “some time in the past our ancestors suffered an event that greatly reduced their numbers”.

Option E) “so as” provides an intent.

My confusion is “that” in Option B)
that should replace “population bottleneck”
So the sentence becomes “population bottleneck at some time in the past our ancestors suffered an event that greatly reduced their numbers” – doesn’t look correct to me.

I know after the hyphen “-” the modifier comes which provides more information about the preceding noun.

Can you please clarify about the usage of hyphen?


Dear Kinjal,

Thank you for your query. :)

The punctuation mark referred to by you is technically called a “dash”. Yes, it has a slightly less fancy name than the “hyphen”. :)

Moving on, the dash can be used in multiple ways. In the sentence at hand, it has been used to elaborate on what the author has mentioned before the dash. If you observe, the portion after the dash not only expands on the “bottleneck” bit but also on how the genetic homogeneity is the result of the mentioned bottleneck. Accordingly, if I were to draw a parallel structure it would be something on the following lines:

Mariana believes that altruism exists even in today’s day and age — that people can help others without any selfish motives is not an idea that is too unrealistic to exist in a society that thrives on rewarding individualism.

In the example sentence above, the portion after the dash reiterates the point stated earlier while elaborating a bit more on the same. Not only does it tell you more about the concept of altruism, as perceived by the author, but also about the whole statement made earlier. This is very similar to how the dash has been used in the correct choice of the question referred to by you in your post.

Of course, the above question does not limit the universe of the uses of this punctuation mark. You can also use the dash in various other forms, but the idea remains the same: to separate parts of the sentence while adding information. To enhance your understanding, you could refer to some other OG questions in your research - OG 13: Q#98 & Q#132.

Hope that helps! :)

Regards,
Neeti.
_________________












| '4 out of Top 5' Instructors on gmatclub | 70 point improvement guarantee | www.e-gmat.com


Last edited by egmat on 28 Apr 2014, 00:06, edited 1 time in total.

Kudos [?]: 9028 [0], given: 335

Current Student
User avatar
Joined: 03 Feb 2013
Posts: 942

Kudos [?]: 1055 [0], given: 548

Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Strategy
GMAT 1: 760 Q49 V44
GPA: 3.88
WE: Engineering (Computer Software)
Reviews Badge
Re: Some anthropologists believe that the genetic homogeneity [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 26 Apr 2014, 22:50
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
egmat wrote:
kinjiGC wrote:
Some anthropologists believe that the genetic homogeneity evident in the world's people is the result of a "population bottleneck"—at some time in the past our ancestors suffered an event, greatly reducing their numbers and thus our genetic variation.

(A) at some time in the past our ancestors suffered an event, greatly reducing their numbers
(B) that at some time in the past our ancestors suffered an event that greatly reduced their numbers
(C) that some time in the past our ancestors suffered an event so that their numbers were greatly reduced,
(D) some time in the past our ancestors suffered an event from which their numbers were greatly reduced
(E) some time in the past, that our ancestors suffered an event so as to reduce their numbers greatly,

Meaning: Some anthropologists believe that the genetic homogeneity evident in the world's people is the result of a "population bottleneck". Population bottleneck – an event that occurred sometime back in the past which greatly reduced their numbers and thus our genetic variation.

Option A) “greatly reducing their numbers” – Verb-ing modifier comma separated, so presenting (modifying) more information about the preceding clause “at some time in the past our ancestors suffered an event” which is incorrect as the event reduced their numbers.

Option C) so that presents reason which is incorrect.

Option D) “from which” is incorrect. The correct sentence would be “some time in the past our ancestors suffered an event that greatly reduced their numbers”.

Option E) “so as” provides an intent.

My confusion is “that” in Option B)
that should replace “population bottleneck”
So the sentence becomes “population bottleneck at some time in the past our ancestors suffered an event that greatly reduced their numbers” – doesn’t look correct to me.

I know after the hyphen “-” the modifier comes which provides more information about the preceding noun.

Can you please clarify about the usage of hyphen?


Dear Kinjal,

Thank you for your query. :)

The punctuation mark referred to by you is technically called a “dash”. Yes, it has a slightly less fancy name than the “hyphen”. :)

Moving on, the dash can be used in multiple ways. In the sentence at hand, it has been used to establish more on what the author has mentioned before the dash. If you observe, the portion after the dash not only expands on the “bottleneck” bit but also on how the genetic homogeneity is the result of the mentioned bottleneck. Accordingly, if I were to draw a parallel structure it would be something on the following lines:

Mariana believes that altruism exists even in today’s day and age — that people can help others without any selfish motives is not an idea that is too unrealistic to exist in a society that thrives on rewarding individualism.

In the example sentence above, the portion after the dash reiterates the point stated earlier while elaborating a bit more on the same. Not only does it tell you more about the concept of altruism, as perceived by the author, but also about the whole statement made earlier. This is very similar to how the dash has been used in the correct choice of the question referred to by you in your post.

Of course, the above question does not limit the universe of the uses of this punctuation mark. You can also use the dash in various other forms, but the idea remains the same: to separate parts of the sentence while adding information. To enhance your understanding, you could refer to some other OG questions in your research - OG 13: Q#98 & Q#132.

Hope that helps! :)

Regards,
Neeti.


I have some follow up questions about the following sentence:

Mariana believes that altruism exists even in today’s day and age — that people can help others without any selfish motives is not an idea that is too unrealistic to exist in a society that thrives on rewarding individualism.

1) The sentence after the hyphen modifies "altruism" but also the author adds more information. So "altruism" need not be close to the hyphen as possible. One of the rule which comes to my mind was usage of Noun+Noun modifier. It is very versatile in the application because it can modify any part of the sentence and also modify the whole preceding phrase. Can you please confirm if same is the case with hyphen usage.
2) The reason why I am asking you is because, in OG 13 Question # 138 - Correct Option
"Although heirloom tomatoes, grown from seeds saved during the previous year, appear less appetizing than most of their round and red supermarket cousinsthey are often green and striped, or have plenty of bumps and bruises—heirlooms are more flavorful and thus in increasing demand."
The noun is closest to the hyphen.
OG 13 Question # 98 - Correct Option.
"Ranked as one of the most important of Europe's young playwrights, Franz Xaver Kroetz has written 40 plays; his workstranslated into more than 30 languages—are produced more often than those of any other contemporary German dramatist.
The noun is closest to the hyphen.
_________________

Thanks,
Kinjal
My Debrief : http://gmatclub.com/forum/hardwork-never-gets-unrewarded-for-ever-189267.html#p1449379
My Application Experience : http://gmatclub.com/forum/hardwork-never-gets-unrewarded-for-ever-189267-40.html#p1516961
Linkedin : https://www.linkedin.com/in/kinjal-das/

Please click on Kudos, if you think the post is helpful

Kudos [?]: 1055 [0], given: 548

Expert Post
1 KUDOS received
e-GMAT Representative
User avatar
S
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Posts: 2311

Kudos [?]: 9028 [1], given: 335

Re: Some anthropologists believe that the genetic homogeneity [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Apr 2014, 08:28
1
This post received
KUDOS
Expert's post
kinjiGC wrote:
egmat wrote:
kinjiGC wrote:
Some anthropologists believe that the genetic homogeneity evident in the world's people is the result of a "population bottleneck"—at some time in the past our ancestors suffered an event, greatly reducing their numbers and thus our genetic variation.

(A) at some time in the past our ancestors suffered an event, greatly reducing their numbers
(B) that at some time in the past our ancestors suffered an event that greatly reduced their numbers
(C) that some time in the past our ancestors suffered an event so that their numbers were greatly reduced,
(D) some time in the past our ancestors suffered an event from which their numbers were greatly reduced
(E) some time in the past, that our ancestors suffered an event so as to reduce their numbers greatly,

Meaning: Some anthropologists believe that the genetic homogeneity evident in the world's people is the result of a "population bottleneck". Population bottleneck – an event that occurred sometime back in the past which greatly reduced their numbers and thus our genetic variation.

Option A) “greatly reducing their numbers” – Verb-ing modifier comma separated, so presenting (modifying) more information about the preceding clause “at some time in the past our ancestors suffered an event” which is incorrect as the event reduced their numbers.

Option C) so that presents reason which is incorrect.

Option D) “from which” is incorrect. The correct sentence would be “some time in the past our ancestors suffered an event that greatly reduced their numbers”.

Option E) “so as” provides an intent.

My confusion is “that” in Option B)
that should replace “population bottleneck”
So the sentence becomes “population bottleneck at some time in the past our ancestors suffered an event that greatly reduced their numbers” – doesn’t look correct to me.

I know after the hyphen “-” the modifier comes which provides more information about the preceding noun.

Can you please clarify about the usage of hyphen?


Dear Kinjal,

Thank you for your query. :)

The punctuation mark referred to by you is technically called a “dash”. Yes, it has a slightly less fancy name than the “hyphen”. :)

Moving on, the dash can be used in multiple ways. In the sentence at hand, it has been used to establish more on what the author has mentioned before the dash. If you observe, the portion after the dash not only expands on the “bottleneck” bit but also on how the genetic homogeneity is the result of the mentioned bottleneck. Accordingly, if I were to draw a parallel structure it would be something on the following lines:

Mariana believes that altruism exists even in today’s day and age — that people can help others without any selfish motives is not an idea that is too unrealistic to exist in a society that thrives on rewarding individualism.

In the example sentence above, the portion after the dash reiterates the point stated earlier while elaborating a bit more on the same. Not only does it tell you more about the concept of altruism, as perceived by the author, but also about the whole statement made earlier. This is very similar to how the dash has been used in the correct choice of the question referred to by you in your post.

Of course, the above question does not limit the universe of the uses of this punctuation mark. You can also use the dash in various other forms, but the idea remains the same: to separate parts of the sentence while adding information. To enhance your understanding, you could refer to some other OG questions in your research - OG 13: Q#98 & Q#132.

Hope that helps! :)

Regards,
Neeti.


I have some follow up questions about the following sentence:

Mariana believes that altruism exists even in today’s day and age — that people can help others without any selfish motives is not an idea that is too unrealistic to exist in a society that thrives on rewarding individualism.

1) The sentence after the hyphen modifies "altruism" but also the author adds more information. So "altruism" need not be close to the hyphen as possible. One of the rule which comes to my mind was usage of Noun+Noun modifier. It is very versatile in the application because it can modify any part of the sentence and also modify the whole preceding phrase. Can you please confirm if same is the case with hyphen usage.
2) The reason why I am asking you is because, in OG 13 Question # 138 - Correct Option
"Although heirloom tomatoes, grown from seeds saved during the previous year, appear less appetizing than most of their round and red supermarket cousinsthey are often green and striped, or have plenty of bumps and bruises—heirlooms are more flavorful and thus in increasing demand."
The noun is closest to the hyphen.
OG 13 Question # 98 - Correct Option.
"Ranked as one of the most important of Europe's young playwrights, Franz Xaver Kroetz has written 40 plays; his workstranslated into more than 30 languages—are produced more often than those of any other contemporary German dramatist.
The noun is closest to the hyphen.


Dear Kinjal,

Since you have cited your analysis for the mentioned two official questions to raise a query about the example sentence, let me address your analysis first:

Your analysis:
in OG 13 Question # 138 - Correct Option
"Although heirloom tomatoes, grown from seeds saved during the previous year, appear less appetizing than most of their round and red supermarket cousins—they are often green and striped, or have plenty of bumps and bruises—heirlooms are more flavorful and thus in increasing demand."
The noun is closest to the hyphen.

My comments:
Per your analysis, the portion between the two dashes — they are often green and striped, or have plenty of bumps and bruises— modifies red supermarket cousins. My question is does this modification make logical sense? If we take this modification in to consideration, we are effectively saying that the comparatively appealing, red supermarket cousins are:
1. green and striped
2. and have plenty of bumps and bruises

Please reconsider the structure of the sentence, keeping in mind the logical meaning that the author wants to convey. I am sure you’ll be able to see the role dash plays in this sentence and the example sentence then. :)

Your analysis:
OG 13 Question # 98 - Correct Option.
"Ranked as one of the most important of Europe's young playwrights, Franz Xaver Kroetz has written 40 plays; his works—translated into more than 30 languages—are produced more often than those of any other contemporary German dramatist.
The noun is closest to the hyphen.

My comments:

In the above sentence, the purpose of the author is indeed to modify “his works” and this is the precise reason that the author has inserted the modifier here. There is nothing else before the dash here (taking in to account only the portion after the semi-colon). So, the point about the noun being closest to the dash is not relevant in this case.

In all, as pointed to you in my earlier post, the idea behind using the dash is the same: separating parts of a sentence while adding more information. :)

Hope the above discussion helps!

Regards,

Neeti.
_________________












| '4 out of Top 5' Instructors on gmatclub | 70 point improvement guarantee | www.e-gmat.com

Kudos [?]: 9028 [1], given: 335

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 24 Oct 2013
Posts: 10

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 10

Location: India
Concentration: Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 590 Q44 V30
GPA: 3.08
GMAT ToolKit User Reviews Badge
Re: Some anthropologists believe that the genetic homogeneity [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 15 Jul 2014, 23:11
Some anthropologists believe that the genetic homogeneity evident in the world's people is the result of a "population bottleneck"---at some time in the past our ancestors suffered an event, greatly reducing their numbers and thus our genetic variation.

(A)at some time in the past our ancestors suffered an event, greatly reducing their numbers

(B)that at some time in the past our ancestors suffered an event that greatly reduced their numbers

(C)that some time in the past our ancestors suffered an even so that their numbers were greatly reduced,

(D)some time in the past our ancestors suffered an event from which their numbers were greatly reduced

(E)some time in the past, that our ancestors suffered an even so as to reduce their numbers greatly



i have 2 doubts in this question
1)that greatly reduced their numbers and thus our genetic variation.
how is this parallel ?? that.... numbers is an IC, clause while the 2nd part is a phrase.
please help.

2)OG says that at some time or adverb sometime is needed and some time in option c is incorrect.

can u please explain why is it so ??

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 10

Expert Post
e-GMAT Representative
User avatar
S
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Posts: 2311

Kudos [?]: 9028 [0], given: 335

Re: Some anthropologists believe that the genetic homogeneity [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 16 Jul 2014, 08:18
SidKaria wrote:
Some anthropologists believe that the genetic homogeneity evident in the world's people is the result of a "population bottleneck"---at some time in the past our ancestors suffered an event, greatly reducing their numbers and thus our genetic variation.

(A)at some time in the past our ancestors suffered an event, greatly reducing their numbers

(B)that at some time in the past our ancestors suffered an event that greatly reduced their numbers

(C)that some time in the past our ancestors suffered an even so that their numbers were greatly reduced,

(D)some time in the past our ancestors suffered an event from which their numbers were greatly reduced

(E)some time in the past, that our ancestors suffered an even so as to reduce their numbers greatly



i have 2 doubts in this question
1)that greatly reduced their numbers and thus our genetic variation.
how is this parallel ?? that.... numbers is an IC, clause while the 2nd part is a phrase.
please help.

2)OG says that at some time or adverb sometime is needed and some time in option c is incorrect.

can u please explain why is it so ??


Hi Sid,

Thanks for your posting your doubt here. :-)

This is the structure of Choice B: ...at some time in the past our ancestors suffered an event that greatly reduced
a. their numbers and
b. thus our genetic variation

The noun entities "their numbers" and "our genetic variation" are grammatically parallel to each other. Now, "thus" is an adverb, a modifier, that presents the effect of an action. It's placement before the second entity DOS NOT violate the grammatical parallelism in any way. Hence, the parallelism is all correct in Choice B.

Now, "sometime" is not the same as "some time". The former means "at some point in time" while the other means "a little time". Let's take two very simple examples here:

1. Sometimes, i visit the public library.
2. Please give me some time to finish this question.

That's the reason why "some time" is incorrect in Choice C.

Hope this helps. :-)
Thanks.
SJ
_________________












| '4 out of Top 5' Instructors on gmatclub | 70 point improvement guarantee | www.e-gmat.com

Kudos [?]: 9028 [0], given: 335

Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 10 Mar 2013
Posts: 593

Kudos [?]: 459 [0], given: 200

Location: Germany
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 580 Q46 V24
GPA: 3.88
WE: Information Technology (Consulting)
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Some anthropologists believe that the genetic homogeneity [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Jan 2015, 14:52
PUNEETSCHDV wrote:
COMMA + VERBing should refer to the SUBJECT of the preceding clause. In A, reducing seems to refer to our ancestors, implying that OUR ANCESTORS were greatly reducing their numbers. The intended meaning here is that an EVENT greatly reduced their numbers. Eliminate A.

So that (in C) and so as (in E) imply PURPOSE. The result is a strange meaning: that our ancestors suffered for the PURPOSE of reducing their numbers. Not the intended meaning. Eliminate C and E.

In D, which seems to refer to an event, implying that our ancestors' numbers were reduced FROM an event -- a nonsensical meaning. Eliminate D.

The correct answer is B.



I agree with in all points, that's a great explanation. But regarding D, I think, that both D and B have the same meaning -> from which and that actually have the same meaning, and both sentences explain that an Event reduced the numbers of ..... D is just wordier than B, it also lacks THAT and AT before some time.
_________________

When you’re up, your friends know who you are. When you’re down, you know who your friends are.

Share some Kudos, if my posts help you. Thank you !

800Score ONLY QUANT CAT1 51, CAT2 50, CAT3 50
GMAT PREP 670
MGMAT CAT 630
KAPLAN CAT 660

Kudos [?]: 459 [0], given: 200

Re: Some anthropologists believe that the genetic homogeneity   [#permalink] 08 Jan 2015, 14:52

Go to page    1   2    Next  [ 40 posts ] 

Display posts from previous: Sort by

Some anthropologists believe that the genetic homogeneity

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.