plalud
I am confused with e. I thought it was incorrect to have active sentence "x required y to do", instead thought only correct form was "x required that y do". Isn't that true? When is it not the case?
Hi
plalud, an official question where
require does
not take subjunctive:
Section 13(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires anyone who buys more than 5 percent of a company’s stock to make a public disclosure of the purchase.
Of course, the following subjunctive version would have been correct as well:
Section 13(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires that anyone who buys more than 5 percent of a company’s stock make a public disclosure of the purchase.
However, the
absence of a
that (after
requires) in the original sentence is a clear indication that the sentence is
not using subjunctive.
In general, if all the 5 options use Subjunctive (or if all 5 options do
not use Subjunctive), then it's a
moot point to worry about this aspect. Rather than being pedantic about grammar, one should develop an eye in SC, to spot the
differences between the 5 answer choices given, to see what
really matters for that question.
p.s. Our book
EducationAisle Sentence Correction Nirvana discusses
Subjunctive, its application and examples in significant detail. If you or someone is interested, PM me your email-id; I can mail the corresponding section.