altairahmad
daagh generis GMATNinjaHi,
in option (E) The electronics company has unveiled what it claims is the world???s smallest network digital camcorder, the length of which is that of a handheld computer, weighing less than 11 ounces.
if we remove the non essential modifier, the option (E) reads as,
The electronics company has unveiled what it claims is the world???s smallest network digital camcorder weighing less than 11 ounces.
Here weighing correctly appears to be modifying camcorder, so does this mean that there is no modifier error related to weighing in this option ?
Hi
altairahmad .
No, I think there IS modifier error in E. Removing the modifier changes the core meaning of the sentence.
The sentence with (E) inserted:
• The electronics company has unveiled what it claims
is the world’s smallest network digital camcorder, the length of which is that of a handheld computer, weighing less than 11 ounces.
Meaning? The company has unveiled what it claims is the world's smallest camcorder.
The camcorder is the length of a handheld computer and weighs less than 11 ounces.
Commas do not always signal "nonessential."
Sometimes we need them for clarity.
Your edited sentence says,
• The electronics company has unveiled what it claims is
the world's smallest network digital camcorder weighing less than 11 ouncesFocus on the highlighted part.
The group is different: what "smallest" is measured against has been restricted.
Removing the clause changes the core meaning of the sentence.
The edited option E says that the company has unveiled the world's smallest camcorder [out of all those camcorders] weighing less than 11 ounces.
Without the clause, the group to which this camcorder belongs is more restricted than what the sentence means.
The sentence without the clause says that
The company has unveiled the world's smallest camcorder
out of all those camcorders that weigh less than 11 ounces.
I hope that helps. If not, ask another question. I'm happy to try to help.