Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 01:35 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 01:35
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
555-605 Level|   Parallelism|   Parallelism|                        
User avatar
EMPOWERgmatVerbal
User avatar
EMPOWERgmat Instructor
Joined: 23 Feb 2015
Last visit: 17 Feb 2025
Posts: 1,694
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 766
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 1,694
Kudos: 15,175
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
AndrewN
avatar
Volunteer Expert
Joined: 16 May 2019
Last visit: 29 Mar 2025
Posts: 3,502
Own Kudos:
7,511
 [1]
Given Kudos: 500
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 3,502
Kudos: 7,511
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
IN2MBB2PE
Joined: 20 Aug 2020
Last visit: 17 Feb 2024
Posts: 130
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 82
Posts: 130
Kudos: 35
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi AndrewN and GMATNinja - I do not understand why D is incorrect, I was thinking it maintains the parallelism -

The foundation works to strengthen local and regional agricultural markets and cooperate with governments and improve accessibility for farmers for their productive resources such as land and credit.

I also thought their is logically referring to the farmers.

works to (strengthen, cooperate and improve) .... how's this wrong?

AndrewN
Asad
Quote:
The foundation works to strengthen local and regional agricultural markets and cooperating with governments, improving access for farmers for productive resources such as land and credit.

(A) cooperating with governments, improving access for farmers for
(B) cooperates with governments to improve access for farmers to
(C) cooperate with governments for improvements of access for farmers to
(D) cooperate with governments and improve accessibility for farmers for their
(E) in cooperation with governments to improve access for farmers for
Hello Experts,
GMATGuruNY, MartyTargetTestPrep, GMATNinja, MentorTutoring
If we choose B as correct choice, 'cooperates' goes with 'works', but if we choose C and D, 'cooperate' goes with 'strengthen'. So, what's the subtle difference in between these 2 choices? Could you help me to comprehend the meaning in between choices B and CD?
Thanks__
Hello, Asad. Although it might seem as if either option could work with some sort of agreement, the grammar calls for a tighter structure than what either (C) or (D) presents. That is, for cooperate to work, we would need another infinitive marker in to to precede it:

The foundation works to strengthen... and to cooperate...

In conversation, it is common to drop the second parallel marker, but on the GMAT™, that is a no-no. Moreover, the incorrect options have further issues that should prevent you from choosing them, or at least make you hesitant to get behind them. For instance, in (C), what does for improvements of access achieve in the way of expressing vital meaning that to improve access in (B) does not? And in (D), we have a colloquially acceptable and improve accessibility when the conjunction should be replaced by to. That is, the cause-and-effect relationship outlined in cooperate(s) with governments calls for an explanatory to, rather than the more casual (and more British) and.

I hope that helps with your question. Remember, if you are uncertain about a particular aspect of an answer choice, it may be helpful to look at other potential pluses and minuses before determining the winner.

- Andrew
User avatar
Mavisdu1017
Joined: 10 Aug 2021
Last visit: 04 Jan 2023
Posts: 360
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 226
Posts: 360
Kudos: 46
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
th23autolink_encode_start_2knien4nW3VybD1odHRwcyYjNTg7Ly9nbWF0Y2x1YiYjNDY7Y29tJiM1ODs0NDMvZm9ydW0vbWVtYmVybGlzdCYjNDY7cGhwP21vZGU9dmlld3Byb2ZpbGUmYW1wO3VuPURtaXRyeUZhcmJlcjoya25pZW40bl0gdGgyM2F1dG9saW5rX2JiY29kZV9zdGFydF9iXzJrbmllbjRuIERtaXRyeUZhcmJlciB0aDIzYXV0b2xpbmtfYmJjb2RlX2VuZF9iXzJrbmllbjRuIFsvdXJsOjJrbmllbjRuXQ==th23autolink_encode_end_2knien4n
TheLordCommander, there's not simple answer to your question. As folks above have mentioned, it can be helpful to have extra markers, such as matched prepositions, to make the parallel items clear, but we won't always have that. Even when those markers do appear, they can shift from one choice to another, forcing us to determine the intended meaning and use that to choose answer.

So yes, there's no reason why the parallel items can't be "strengthen" and ”cooperate," at least in theory. How do we know which way to go?

1) The choices that do this are wrong for other reasons. C is a mess of stacked modifiers. D gives us this structure: "The foundation works to strengthen and cooperate and improve." That would need to be a list! In fact, that double "and" is a clue that the second and third items in this list (cooperate and improve) are meant to be a pair, separate from the first.

2) The items need to be logically parallel. When we say that the foundation works to strengthen markets, we mean that strengthening markets is a goal. If we make "cooperate" parallel with "strengthen," we are saying that cooperation with governments is also a goal--something that the foundation is trying to do. It makes more sense to see cooperation as a means to an end. The foundation cooperates in order to improve access.

DmitryFarber hello expert, I was really confused that “cooperate” is parallel with “strengthen” or “work”, and I think both the two seem to be logical in meaning. I think the foundation itself can’t directly improve the access for farmers cuz maybe some new policies are needed to be made, so it must have to cooperate with the government together to do so. Anyway, I mean it’s hard to rule out the choice only by meaning. I picked B finally though just because I think improve(verb form) is superior than improvement(noun form).
avatar
AndrewN
avatar
Volunteer Expert
Joined: 16 May 2019
Last visit: 29 Mar 2025
Posts: 3,502
Own Kudos:
7,511
 [3]
Given Kudos: 500
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 3,502
Kudos: 7,511
 [3]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
IN2MBB2PE
Hi AndrewN and GMATNinja - I do not understand why D is incorrect, I was thinking it maintains the parallelism -

The foundation works to strengthen local and regional agricultural markets and cooperate with governments and improve accessibility for farmers for their productive resources such as land and credit.

I also thought their is logically referring to the farmers.

works to (strengthen, cooperate and improve) .... how's this wrong?
Notice what you did right there at the end, IN2MBB2PE. You wrote strengthen, cooperate and improve (no Oxford comma). I agree that that sentence would be tenable. But strengthen and cooperate and improve creates a run-on in the sentence at hand. Although it is true that an element in a list may branch—e.g., X is A and B while Y is C—in this case, there are three separate verbs, and the grammatical structure suffers with all these ands in the absence of any commas.

The foundation works to strengthen X and Y and cooperate with Z and improve accessibility...

Certainly, there will be a better way to write that sentence, I think you would agree.

Perhaps it makes more sense now why answer choice (D), despite its parallel structure, is not the best of the five options. Thank you for thinking to ask.

- Andrew
User avatar
Mavisdu1017
Joined: 10 Aug 2021
Last visit: 04 Jan 2023
Posts: 360
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 226
Posts: 360
Kudos: 46
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
AndrewN
Asad
Quote:
The foundation works to strengthen local and regional agricultural markets and cooperating with governments, improving access for farmers for productive resources such as land and credit.

(A) cooperating with governments, improving access for farmers for
(B) cooperates with governments to improve access for farmers to
(C) cooperate with governments for improvements of access for farmers to
(D) cooperate with governments and improve accessibility for farmers for their
(E) in cooperation with governments to improve access for farmers for
Hello Experts,
GMATGuruNY, MartyTargetTestPrep, GMATNinja, MentorTutoring
If we choose B as correct choice, 'cooperates' goes with 'works', but if we choose C and D, 'cooperate' goes with 'strengthen'. So, what's the subtle difference in between these 2 choices? Could you help me to comprehend the meaning in between choices B and CD?
Thanks__
Hello, Asad. Although it might seem as if either option could work with some sort of agreement, the grammar calls for a tighter structure than what either (C) or (D) presents. That is, for cooperate to work, we would need another infinitive marker in to to precede it:

The foundation works to strengthen... and to cooperate...

In conversation, it is common to drop the second parallel marker, but on the GMAT™, that is a no-no. Moreover, the incorrect options have further issues that should prevent you from choosing them, or at least make you hesitant to get behind them. For instance, in (C), what does for improvements of access achieve in the way of expressing vital meaning that to improve access in (B) does not? And in (D), we have a colloquially acceptable and improve accessibility when the conjunction should be replaced by to. That is, the cause-and-effect relationship outlined in cooperate(s) with governments calls for an explanatory to, rather than the more casual (and more British) and.

I hope that helps with your question. Remember, if you are uncertain about a particular aspect of an answer choice, it may be helpful to look at other potential pluses and minuses before determining the winner.

- Andrew

This is a useful point cuz I think it’s hard to eliminate C only by meaning. And I just think of verb form(improve) is superior than noun form(improvement).
User avatar
sanjayparihar16
Joined: 12 Apr 2018
Last visit: 03 Dec 2024
Posts: 158
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 426
Posts: 158
Kudos: 145
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Parallelism needs to be maintained -----> Works || Cooperates

Correct idiom ----> Access to

Accessibility is wrong because it has different meaning
Attachments

the foundation answer.png
the foundation answer.png [ 86.79 KiB | Viewed 2123 times ]

avatar
targetgmatjai
Joined: 23 Jun 2021
Last visit: 16 Nov 2024
Posts: 8
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 357
Location: India
Posts: 8
Kudos: 2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
ERRORS:

1. "and" is a Parallelism Marker.

"and cooperating.." is not parallel with anything before "and" . Eliminate A.
"and in cooperation.." nothing with this too.... Eliminate E.

2. in option D,

"and cooperate... and improve..." double "and" means two list....

List - 1: The foundation works to.... "strengthen...." and "cooperate.."

List - 2: "cooperate..." and... " improve"

Now in List 2, since "and improve" is not infinitive, then "and cooperate.." should can not be infinitive...If that's the case... then List -1 breaks parallelism...
or if you say "and cooperate.." is parallel with "works", then "and cooperate" breaks S-V agreement.

3. In option C, there are a lot of Prepositional Phrase stacked on the top on one another.

Between B and C, B is definitely a better choice.

4. "their" in option D, can refer to "farmers" and "governments",,, may another reason to eliminate D.
User avatar
SebaRaffa
Joined: 17 Jul 2022
Last visit: 07 Apr 2023
Posts: 14
Given Kudos: 5
Location: United Kingdom
GPA: 4
Posts: 14
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
the foundation works (verb)… and(parallel marker) cooperates (verb)
Only B fits this classic parallel structure
User avatar
Aishyk97
Joined: 13 Sep 2021
Last visit: 14 Nov 2025
Posts: 85
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 77
Posts: 85
Kudos: 34
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
DmitryFarber
TheLordCommander, there's not simple answer to your question. As folks above have mentioned, it can be helpful to have extra markers, such as matched prepositions, to make the parallel items clear, but we won't always have that. Even when those markers do appear, they can shift from one choice to another, forcing us to determine the intended meaning and use that to choose answer.

So yes, there's no reason why the parallel items can't be "strengthen" and "cooperate," at least in theory. How do we know which way to go?

1) The choices that do this are wrong for other reasons. C is a mess of stacked modifiers. D gives us this structure: "The foundation works to strengthen and cooperate and improve." That would need to be a list! In fact, that double "and" is a clue that the second and third items in this list (cooperate and improve) are meant to be a pair, separate from the first.

2) The items need to be logically parallel. When we say that the foundation works to strengthen markets, we mean that strengthening markets is a goal. If we make "cooperate" parallel with "strengthen," we are saying that cooperation with governments is also a goal--something that the foundation is trying to do. It makes more sense to see cooperation as a means to an end. The foundation cooperates in order to improve access.

Hi, I also wanted to know that if strengthen and coorperate were parallel, wouldnt the sentence read as 1. The foundation works to strengthen and 2. the foundation works to coorperate (Logically does not make sense)
This why I eliminated options C and D.
User avatar
DmitryFarber
User avatar
Manhattan Prep Instructor
Joined: 22 Mar 2011
Last visit: 08 Nov 2025
Posts: 3,020
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 57
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT Focus 1: 745 Q86 V90 DI85
Posts: 3,020
Kudos: 8,563
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Aishyk97

Yes, that's what I was getting at in my point #2. It's not completely illogical--one might have a goal to cooperate--but it doesn't seem right in this context.
User avatar
Addu.23
Joined: 04 Jul 2017
Last visit: 18 Jul 2025
Posts: 17
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 102
Posts: 17
Kudos: 5
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
OreoShake
How are we supposed to tell where the parallel structure begins? Apparently the parallel structure begins from 'works', so 'works' and 'cooperates'. However the parallel structure could might as well have began from 'to strengthen' ---- the only reason i think 'cooperate' cannot be parallel to 'strengthen' is that 'cooperate' is NOT preceded by a 'to'.

Experts please confirm whether my reasoning above is right. Thank you for your insights.

I also have the same question, can someone help in explaining this please?

ExpertsGlobal5
User avatar
rickyric395
Joined: 07 Mar 2020
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 113
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 65
GMAT 1: 680 Q49 V34
GMAT 1: 680 Q49 V34
Posts: 113
Kudos: 100
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
sayantanc2k
Keats
sayantanc2k


The foundation works to strengthen local and regional agricultural markets and cooperating with governments, improving access for farmers for productive resources such as land and credit.

A) cooperating with governments, improving access for farmers for
B) cooperates with governments to improve access for farmers to
C) cooperate with governments for improvements of access for farmers to
D) cooperate with governments and improve accessibility for farmers for their
E) in cooperation with governments to improve access for farmers for

Foundation is an organization ( such as Charity Organization),and an organization can cooperate with government. E is wrong because "and" is supposed to join two elements, here two verbs, "works" and another one ("cooperates"). However there is nothing after "and" that could serve the purpose of an element that is joined by the conjunction "and".

Moreover "access for resources" is idiomatically incorrect.

sayantanc2k
Can we say that sentence E is a fragment? We expect a verb after the "and" part, where as there isn't any?

The foundation works to strengthen local and regional agricultural markets and in cooperation with governments to improve access for farmers for productive resources such as land and credit.

Yes, that is one way of eliminating the option. Another way may be:

The conjunction "and" needs to join two items. If we consider "works" the first item, then we need a verb. If we consider "to strengthen" the first item, then we need an infinitive. Instead of either of these two, we see a prepositional phrase ( in cooperation with), which has no element to be matched with.

So the problem can be viewed as a parallelism issue as well.

Hi sayantanc2k, KarishmaB, EMPOWERgmatVerbal, AndrewN
In E, apart from idiom issue, wouldn't the sentence be read as "The foundation works to strengthen .... and in cooperation with...." . Here parallel structure is there i.e "The foundation works 'to strengthen' and 'in cooperation'". Since 'to strengthen' is infinitive verb serving as object to verb 'works' and 'in cooperation' is noun too, thus both parts are noun phrase. What am I thinking wrong?
User avatar
KarishmaB
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 16,267
Own Kudos:
76,986
 [2]
Given Kudos: 482
Location: Pune, India
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 16,267
Kudos: 76,986
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
rickyric395


Hi sayantanc2k, KarishmaB, EMPOWERgmatVerbal, AndrewN
In E, apart from idiom issue, wouldn't the sentence be read as "The foundation works to strengthen .... and in cooperation with...." . Here parallel structure is there i.e "The foundation works 'to strengthen' and 'in cooperation'". Since 'to strengthen' is infinitive verb serving as object to verb 'works' and 'in cooperation' is noun too, thus both parts are noun phrase. What am I thinking wrong?

The foundation works to strengthen A
The foundation works in cooperation with governments to improve B

'in cooperation with governments' is a modifier telling us how it works. This modifier is not present in the first part.

The elements actually parallel are:
The foundation works to strengthen A...
The foundation works to improve B...

I may accept this parallelism depending on what other options I have. Since I have a cleaner (B), I will prefer that. Also option (E) has the idiom issue so that's that then.
   1   2 
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7445 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
234 posts
188 posts