Last visit was: 18 Nov 2025, 18:27 It is currently 18 Nov 2025, 18:27
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
505-555 Level|   Word Problems|                  
User avatar
Walkabout
Joined: 02 Dec 2012
Last visit: 30 Oct 2025
Posts: 172
Own Kudos:
28,184
 [36]
Given Kudos: 35
Products:
Posts: 172
Kudos: 28,184
 [36]
5
Kudos
Add Kudos
31
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,355
Own Kudos:
778,078
 [7]
Given Kudos: 99,964
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,355
Kudos: 778,078
 [7]
5
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
Temurkhon
Joined: 23 Jan 2013
Last visit: 06 Apr 2019
Posts: 412
Own Kudos:
314
 [1]
Given Kudos: 43
Schools: Cambridge'16
Schools: Cambridge'16
Posts: 412
Kudos: 314
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
appleid
Joined: 22 Oct 2014
Last visit: 28 Jan 2022
Posts: 22
Own Kudos:
18
 [1]
Given Kudos: 103
Posts: 22
Kudos: 18
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel

Given that (price in 1989) = (price in 1970)*3.65.

(1) The price of the Model K mixer was $102.40 more in 1989 than in 1970 --> (price in 1989) = (price in 1970) + 102.4, We have two distinct linear equations with two unknowns, thus we can solve for both.Sufficient.

(2) The price of the Model K mixer was $142.40 in 1989 --> (price in 1989) = 142.4 --> (price in 1970) = (price in 1989)/3.65 = 142.4/3.65. Sufficient.

Answer: D.

Hi,
I didn't understand this part, is there any theory behind two distinct linear equation with two unknowns?
Please feel free to share any resources :)
User avatar
minwoswoh
Joined: 10 May 2014
Last visit: 17 Nov 2021
Posts: 115
Own Kudos:
392
 [1]
Given Kudos: 28
Posts: 115
Kudos: 392
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Let´s call
a = 1970
b = 1989

Given information
b/a = 3.56/1

Statement 1
b - a = 102.4
We have 2 different, linear equations. Therefore, we can solve. Sufficient.

Statement 2
b = 142.4
We have 2 different, linear equations. Therefore, we can solve. Sufficient.

OA = D
User avatar
ScottTargetTestPrep
User avatar
Target Test Prep Representative
Joined: 14 Oct 2015
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 21,712
Own Kudos:
26,989
 [4]
Given Kudos: 300
Status:Founder & CEO
Affiliations: Target Test Prep
Location: United States (CA)
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 21,712
Kudos: 26,989
 [4]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Walkabout
The inflation index for the year 1989 relative to the year 1970 was 3.56, indicating that, on the average, for each dollar spent in 1970 for goods, $3.56 had to be spent for the same goods in 1989. If the price of a Model K mixer increased precisely according to the inflation index, what was the price of the mixer in 1970 ?

(1) The price of the Model K mixer was $102.40 more in 1989 than in 1970.
(2) The price of the Model K mixer was $142.40 in 1989.

Solution:

We are given that the inflation for the year 1989 relative to the year 1970 was 3.56, which means the price of an item in 1989 was 3.56 times the price of the same item in 1970. We are also given that the price of a Model K mixer increased according to the given inflation index, and from that we must determine the price of the mixer in 1970.

If we let x = the price of the Model K mixer in 1970, then the price of the Model K mixer in 1989 is 3.56x. Thus, we must determine the value of x.

Statement One Alone:

The price of the Model K mixer was $102.40 more in 1989 than in 1970.

Using the information in statement one, we can create the following equation:

3.56x = 102.40 + x

We see that we have enough information to determine the value of x. Statement one alone is sufficient to answer the question. We can eliminate answer choices B, C, and E.

Statement Two Alone:

The price of the Model K mixer was $142.40 in 1989.

Using the information in statement two we can create the following equation:

3.56x = 142.40

We see that we have enough information to determine the value of x.

Answer: D
User avatar
fskilnik
Joined: 12 Oct 2010
Last visit: 03 Jan 2025
Posts: 885
Own Kudos:
1,801
 [1]
Given Kudos: 57
Status:GMATH founder
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 885
Kudos: 1,801
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Walkabout
The inflation index for the year 1989 relative to the year 1970 was 3.56, indicating that, on the average, for each dollar spent in 1970 for goods, $3.56 had to be spent for the same goods in 1989. If the price of a Model K mixer increased precisely according to the inflation index, what was the price of the mixer in 1970 ?

(1) The price of the Model K mixer was $102.40 more in 1989 than in 1970.
(2) The price of the Model K mixer was $142.40 in 1989.
\({{{\rm{pric}}{{\rm{e}}_{\,70}}} \over {{\rm{price}}{\,_{89}}}} = {1 \over {3.56}}\,\,\,\,\,\,\left( * \right)\)


\(?\,\, = {\rm{pric}}{{\rm{e}}_{\,70}}\)


\(\left( 1 \right)\,\,\,{\rm{pric}}{{\rm{e}}_{\,89}} - {\rm{pric}}{{\rm{e}}_{\,70}} = 102.40\,\,\,\,\,\mathop \Rightarrow \limits^{\left( * \right)} \,\,\,\,3.56 \cdot {\rm{pric}}{{\rm{e}}_{\,70}} - {\rm{pric}}{{\rm{e}}_{\,70}} = 102.40\,\,\,\,\, \Rightarrow \,\,\,\,{\rm{SUFF}}.\,\)


\(\left( 2 \right)\,\,\,{\rm{pric}}{{\rm{e}}_{\,89}} = 142.40\,\,\,\,\,\mathop \Rightarrow \limits^{\left( * \right)} \,\,\,\,\,3.56 \cdot {\rm{pric}}{{\rm{e}}_{\,70}}\, = 142.40\,\,\,\,\, \Rightarrow \,\,\,\,\,{\rm{SUFF}}.\,\)


This solution follows the notations and rationale taught in the GMATH method.

Regards,
Fabio.
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Walkabout
The inflation index for the year 1989 relative to the year 1970 was 3.56, indicating that, on the average, for each dollar spent in 1970 for goods, $3.56 had to be spent for the same goods in 1989. If the price of a Model K mixer increased precisely according to the inflation index, what was the price of the mixer in 1970 ?

(1) The price of the Model K mixer was $102.40 more in 1989 than in 1970.
(2) The price of the Model K mixer was $142.40 in 1989.



One query:
Could you explain the highlighted part, please? What do these 2 same figure (one is dollar figure, the other has no $ sign) mean, actually?
Thanks__
User avatar
prateekchugh
Joined: 05 Aug 2017
Last visit: 27 Sep 2021
Posts: 358
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 277
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Marketing
WE:Engineering (Energy)
Posts: 358
Kudos: 560
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
TheUltimateWinner
Walkabout
The inflation index for the year 1989 relative to the year 1970 was 3.56, indicating that, on the average, for each dollar spent in 1970 for goods, $3.56 had to be spent for the same goods in 1989. If the price of a Model K mixer increased precisely according to the inflation index, what was the price of the mixer in 1970 ?

(1) The price of the Model K mixer was $102.40 more in 1989 than in 1970.
(2) The price of the Model K mixer was $142.40 in 1989.



One query:
Could you explain the highlighted part, please? What do these 2 same figure (one is dollar figure, the other has no $ sign) mean, actually?
Thanks__


Hi....

First understand the meaning of "The inflation index for the year 1989 relative to the year 1970 was 3.56"


This is telling us that \(\frac{(Inflation Index 1989 Let suppose in dollars)}{(Inflation Index 1970 Let suppose in dollars)}=\frac{3.56}{1}\) (Dollars to dollars cancel out)

means $1 in 1970 = $ 3.56 in 1989

Now the second sentence, "indicating that, on the average, for each dollar spent in 1970 for goods, $3.56 had to be spent for the same goods in 1989"

Now if u read closely, it start with 'indicating that'---means supporting the sentence before it. This above telling us the same thing but in dollars

each dollar spent in 1989 for goods = each dollar spent in 1970 for goods * $ 3.56


Hope this helps....

Thanks

User avatar
ueh55406
Joined: 19 Dec 2020
Last visit: 31 Aug 2021
Posts: 149
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 316
Posts: 149
Kudos: 48
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Walkabout
The inflation index for the year 1989 relative to the year 1970 was 3.56, indicating that, on the average, for each dollar spent in 1970 for goods, $3.56 had to be spent for the same goods in 1989. If the price of a Model K mixer increased precisely according to the inflation index, what was the price of the mixer in 1970 ?

(1) The price of the Model K mixer was $102.40 more in 1989 than in 1970.
(2) The price of the Model K mixer was $142.40 in 1989.


1. The price of the Model K mixer was $102.40 more in 1989 than in 1970

let the price of Model K be x$ in the 70's then price in 1980 = x+ 102.40 $

therefore, we get the following relation:

\(1/3.56=x/x+102.40\)----- clearly, we can find x from this. suff.

(2) The price of the Model K mixer was $142.40 in 1989

this one is straight forward, we got the rate in the '89, we also know every dollar in '70= 3.56$ in '89

thus, \(142.40/3.56= $cost\) in '70. Also, sufficient.

D
User avatar
bumpbot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 38,588
Own Kudos:
Posts: 38,588
Kudos: 1,079
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Moderators:
Math Expert
105355 posts
496 posts