Last visit was: 21 Jun 2025, 13:08 It is currently 21 Jun 2025, 13:08
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
souvik101990
Joined: 19 Mar 2012
Last visit: 17 Jan 2025
Posts: 4,321
Own Kudos:
52,688
 [11]
Given Kudos: 2,326
Location: United States (WA)
Concentration: Leadership, General Management
GMAT 1: 760 Q50 V42
GMAT 2: 740 Q49 V42 (Online)
GMAT 3: 760 Q50 V42 (Online)
GPA: 3.8
WE:Marketing (Non-Profit and Government)
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 3: 760 Q50 V42 (Online)
Posts: 4,321
Kudos: 52,688
 [11]
4
Kudos
Add Kudos
7
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Nevernevergiveup
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 18 Sep 2014
Last visit: 20 Aug 2023
Posts: 1,009
Own Kudos:
2,942
 [1]
Given Kudos: 79
Location: India
Products:
Posts: 1,009
Kudos: 2,942
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
kingjamesrules
Joined: 09 Jul 2015
Last visit: 15 Nov 2020
Posts: 42
Own Kudos:
63
 [1]
Given Kudos: 63
Posts: 42
Kudos: 63
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
nincompoop
Joined: 20 Mar 2015
Last visit: 11 Dec 2015
Posts: 6
Own Kudos:
14
 [1]
Given Kudos: 2
Posts: 6
Kudos: 14
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
A. Migrating tundra swans fly through Idaho where they pick up various toxins from the silver mines there. - I don't know

B. Those hunters who continue to defy the hunting ban do not, on average, shoot more birds than did those who hunted in the park before the ban. - I don't know

C. Park rangers have been unable to cite all of the the hunters that enter the park despite the ban. - I don't know, maybe

D. Most swans that have perished in the refuge have died as a result of ingesting pellets scattered about the ground, which introduce lead into their bloodstreams.- I don't know

E. Eventually, there will be so few swan left in the refuge that the overall number of swan dying each month will decrease - I don't know
User avatar
Mascarfi
Joined: 08 May 2015
Last visit: 05 Jul 2024
Posts: 65
Own Kudos:
292
 [2]
Given Kudos: 14
GMAT 1: 630 Q39 V38
GMAT 2: 670 Q44 V38
GMAT 3: 750 Q49 V44
GMAT 3: 750 Q49 V44
Posts: 65
Kudos: 292
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Interesting question. I think both A and D have strong and week spots. I chose A, but D makes sense to me as well.

A. Migrating tundra swans fly through Idaho where they pick up various toxins from the silver mines there. - It does not say lead, but lead might be included in "various toxins". Since these toxins remained at the same level, they might might be the cause of the deaths and therefore explain why the ban on hunting failed to impact the number of deaths from lead poisoning.

D. Most swans that have perished in the refuge have died as a result of ingesting pellets scattered about the ground, which introduce lead into their bloodstreams. - It makes sence, but I think there is a weak spot here: "yet the number of birds that continue to die each month from lead poisoning has not changed". Since they died by eating pellets from the ground, the diminished number of hunters should make the pellets on the ground decrease the more the swans ate them, making it less likely that the swans would eat it in the future and therefore decreasing the deaths over time.
User avatar
Cadaver
Joined: 03 Oct 2014
Last visit: 09 Oct 2018
Posts: 114
Own Kudos:
100
 [1]
Given Kudos: 89
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Technology
GMAT 1: 720 Q48 V40
WE:Engineering (Aerospace and Defense)
Products:
GMAT 1: 720 Q48 V40
Posts: 114
Kudos: 100
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
[quote="souvik101990"]

The number of Tundra swan in an arctic refuge has been steadily dwindling. It has been determined that the majority of the birds have died from lead poisoning, which is contained in the buckshot that hunters use to kill the swan. Local authorities have responded by banning hunting, and the number of hunters cited has since dropped dramatically, yet the number of birds that continue to die each month from lead poisoning has not changed.

Which of the following, if true, best resolves the discrepancy above?

A. Migrating tundra swans fly through Idaho where they pick up various toxins from the silver mines there.

B. Those hunters who continue to defy the hunting ban do not, on average, shoot more birds than did those who hunted in the park before the ban.

C. Park rangers have been unable to cite all of the the hunters that enter the park despite the ban.

D. Most swans that have perished in the refuge have died as a result of ingesting pellets scattered about the ground, which introduce lead into their bloodstreams.

E. Eventually, there will be so few swan left in the refuge that the overall number of swan dying each month will decrease

[textarea]Day 24 Question of the Verbal Contest: Race Against the GMAT Club Timer

Left with A and D

A can be eliminated on the grounds that there is no mention of "Lead Poisoning". We can't assume toxins contain lead. So eliminate A

Answer - D
avatar
puneetj88
Joined: 07 Jul 2015
Last visit: 19 Apr 2019
Posts: 32
Own Kudos:
16
 [1]
Given Kudos: 20
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, General Management
GMAT 1: 670 Q50 V30
GMAT 2: 660 Q47 V35
GPA: 3.7
WE:Operations (Manufacturing)
Products:
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
i feel it should be a, as it is clearly stated that the number of birds dying has not dwindled whereas the hunters have dwindled.
if number of hunters have dwindled then the number of pellets lying around will also dwindle leading to a conclusion that there is some outside force causing the deaths and that has to be the poisoning caused by silver mines.
User avatar
GGMU
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 04 Feb 2014
Last visit: 11 Aug 2018
Posts: 184
Own Kudos:
601
 [1]
Given Kudos: 164
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Entrepreneurship
GPA: 3
WE:Project Management (Manufacturing)
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
puneetj88
i feel it should be a, as it is clearly stated that the number of birds dying has not dwindled whereas the hunters have dwindled.
if number of hunters have dwindled then the number of pellets lying around will also dwindle leading to a conclusion that there is some outside force causing the deaths and that has to be the poisoning caused by silver mines.
Dear Puneetj88,
It talks of only the migrating Tundra birds and not all the Tundra birds. So this ans choice can be eliminated. If it would have not been for the word migrating, I would have picked this choice too. 8-)
User avatar
sahil7389
Joined: 03 May 2014
Last visit: 18 Mar 2018
Posts: 43
Own Kudos:
116
 [1]
Given Kudos: 43
Concentration: Operations, Marketing
GMAT 1: 680 Q48 V34
GMAT 2: 700 Q49 V35
GPA: 3.6
WE:Engineering (Energy)
GMAT 2: 700 Q49 V35
Posts: 43
Kudos: 116
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Confused between 2 options, I marked the option, which was considering less of assumptions. Would love to have its OE. Took 45secs and finally a question I gave the answer in less than a min.
avatar
Sateni7628
Joined: 18 Jan 2018
Last visit: 23 Aug 2020
Posts: 47
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 34
Posts: 47
Kudos: 31
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
souvik101990


The number of Tundra swan in an arctic refuge has been steadily dwindling. It has been determined that the majority of the birds have died from lead poisoning, which is contained in the buckshot that hunters use to kill the swan. Local authorities have responded by banning hunting, and the number of hunters cited has since dropped dramatically, yet the number of birds that continue to die each month from lead poisoning has not changed.

Which of the following, if true, best resolves the discrepancy above?

A. Migrating tundra swans fly through Idaho where they pick up various toxins from the silver mines there.

B. Those hunters who continue to defy the hunting ban do not, on average, shoot more birds than did those who hunted in the park before the ban.

C. Park rangers have been unable to cite all of the the hunters that enter the park despite the ban.

D. Most swans that have perished in the refuge have died as a result of ingesting pellets scattered about the ground, which introduce lead into their bloodstreams.

E. Eventually, there will be so few swan left in the refuge that the overall number of swan dying each month will decrease

Day 24 Question of the Verbal Contest: Race Against the GMAT Club Timer
Please make sure to post a brief reply without revealing your solution to enter the contest!

Applied POE method to arrive at the right answer. I found A & D to be the contenders.

Choice A though could appear to be tempting, it actually speaks about migrating tundra swans but not those in the refuge. It is also not clear in this choice whether lead is one of the various toxins they pick up while flying through Idaho.

Choice D resolves this confusion and clearly says the tundra swans that perished in the refuge ingested pellets that have introduced lead into their bloodstreams.
User avatar
Nightmare007
Joined: 26 Aug 2016
Last visit: 05 Aug 2020
Posts: 438
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 204
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, International Business
GMAT 1: 690 Q50 V33
GMAT 2: 700 Q50 V33
GMAT 3: 730 Q51 V38
GPA: 4
WE:Information Technology (Consulting)
Products:
GMAT 3: 730 Q51 V38
Posts: 438
Kudos: 426
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Nevernevergiveup
The number of Tundra swan in an arctic refuge has been steadily decreasing.

Cause of death: lead poisoning contained in the buckshot that hunters use to kill the swan.

Local authorities have banned hunting, and the number of hunters cited has since dropped dramatically,

yet the number of birds that continue to die each month from lead poisoning has not changed.

A. Migrating tundra swans fly through Idaho where they pick up various toxins from the silver mines there. (There is no mention of lead here. This cannot address the paradox.)

B. Those hunters who continue to defy the hunting ban do not, on average, shoot more birds than did those who hunted in the park before the ban. (this helps to address why the no is not increasing but does not address why the number is decreasing)

C. Park rangers have been unable to cite all of the the hunters that enter the park despite the ban. (Does not address the main concern. Makes one doubt doubt the premise.)




D. Most swans that have perished in the refuge have died as a result of ingesting pellets scattered about the ground, which introduce lead into their bloodstreams. (This explains why swans continue to die because of lead poisoning.)

E. Eventually, there will be so few swan left in the refuge that the overall number of swan dying each month will decrease. (This describes the future concern rather than address the issue.)

D might account for an initial increase in deaths i.e. initial number being the same as number of deaths when hunting was allowed. However, The stimulus states that there had been no change EACH subsequent month. If the question states they couldn't see the change in number the next month, D would have been the best answer out there.

Can you please explain me, where am going wrong here. daagh Sir, abhimahna
User avatar
aragonn
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 23 Sep 2015
Last visit: 30 Sep 2019
Posts: 1,232
Own Kudos:
5,836
 [1]
Given Kudos: 416
Products:
Posts: 1,232
Kudos: 5,836
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post

Official Explanation


Fact #1 – Arctic swan number rapidly declining

Fact #2 – Dying from lead poisoning from buckshot

Fact #3 – Authorities have banned hunting

Paradox: birds are continuing to decline at dramatic rate

(A) is focused on various toxins. The argument clearly says “the number of birds…die each month from lead poisoning”.

(B) only deepens the mystery since the hunters still entering the park aren’t killing more swan than previous hunters. If they were, then that could account for the fact that the number of swans continues to decrease.

(C) doesn’t quite resolve the paradox. It hints at the fact that there might be more hunters than previously thought still entering the park. But just how many? Is that number significant enough to account for the ongoing decrease in the swan’s numbers? Too many questions and no clear answer.

(D) resolves the paradox. The swan is not dying because it is being shot. It is dying because it is eating buckshot that has been lying on the ground all along. Unless, somebody cleans up all the buckshot pellet, the swan will continue to die, even if no more hunters enter the park.

(E) just tells us that the swan’s predicament is dire. It does provide a reason that the swan’s numbers continue to decline despite the ban on hunting.
User avatar
Prakruti_Patil
Joined: 24 May 2023
Last visit: 21 Jun 2025
Posts: 97
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 333
Posts: 97
Kudos: 23
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Is C not the correct answer because even if all the hunters were cited we do not know if the total number is greater than hunters previously frequenting the area?
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7332 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
235 posts