Last visit was: 23 Apr 2026, 16:42 It is currently 23 Apr 2026, 16:42
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
gmatquant25
Joined: 27 Mar 2013
Last visit: 29 Mar 2016
Posts: 33
Own Kudos:
480
 [171]
Given Kudos: 37
Posts: 33
Kudos: 480
 [171]
7
Kudos
Add Kudos
162
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 23 Apr 2026
Posts: 109,785
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 105,853
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,785
Kudos: 810,870
 [88]
53
Kudos
Add Kudos
35
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
rdoshi
Joined: 08 Sep 2014
Last visit: 22 Mar 2015
Posts: 15
Own Kudos:
39
 [12]
Given Kudos: 7
Posts: 15
Kudos: 39
 [12]
10
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
Manik12345
Joined: 25 Feb 2014
Last visit: 07 Sep 2014
Posts: 8
Own Kudos:
16
 [2]
Given Kudos: 2
Posts: 8
Kudos: 16
 [2]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
If ab ≠ 0, is ab > a/b ?

Is \(ab > \frac{a}{b}\)? --> is \(ab - \frac{a}{b}>0\)? --> \(\frac{a(b^2-1)}{b}>0\)? --> \(\frac{a}{b}*(b^2-1)>0\)?

(1) |b| > 1 --> both sides are non-negative, thus we can square: \(b^2>1\) --> \(b^2-1>0\). We need to know the sign of a/b. Not sufficient.

(2) ab + a/b > 0. Notice that ab and a/b have the same sign. Both of them cannot be negative, because in this case their sum would also be negative, therefore both are positive: a/b > 0. We need to know the sign of b^2-1. Not sufficient.

(1)+(2) \(b^2-1>0\) and \(\frac{a}{b} > 0\), thus their product \(\frac{a}{b}*(b^2-1)>0\). Sufficient.

Answer: C.

Hope it's clear.


Hi Bunell,

Can you please explain this question through plugging in. For (2) , ab>-(a/b) .. So for what values this will give yes and no and for which values after combining 1 and 2 we will get the req answer

Also wanted to add. From (2) a/b and ab has to be of the same signs . i tried plugging in values in 2. a=8,b=4 so ab=32 and a/b=2 . Similarly a=-4,b=-2 , ab=8, a/b=2 and also with a=1/8,b=8 so ab=1, a/b=1/72. So for all values ab>a/b.

Please let me knw what i am doin wrong
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 23 Apr 2026
Posts: 109,785
Own Kudos:
810,870
 [3]
Given Kudos: 105,853
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,785
Kudos: 810,870
 [3]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Manik12345
Bunuel
If ab ≠ 0, is ab > a/b ?

Is \(ab > \frac{a}{b}\)? --> is \(ab - \frac{a}{b}>0\)? --> \(\frac{a(b^2-1)}{b}>0\)? --> \(\frac{a}{b}*(b^2-1)>0\)?

(1) |b| > 1 --> both sides are non-negative, thus we can square: \(b^2>1\) --> \(b^2-1>0\). We need to know the sign of a/b. Not sufficient.

(2) ab + a/b > 0. Notice that ab and a/b have the same sign. Both of them cannot be negative, because in this case their sum would also be negative, therefore both are positive: a/b > 0. We need to know the sign of b^2-1. Not sufficient.

(1)+(2) \(b^2-1>0\) and \(\frac{a}{b} > 0\), thus their product \(\frac{a}{b}*(b^2-1)>0\). Sufficient.

Answer: C.

Hope it's clear.


Hi Bunell,

Can you please explain this question through plugging in. For (2) , ab>-(a/b) .. So for what values this will give yes and no and for which values after combining 1 and 2 we will get the req answer

Also wanted to add. From (2) a/b and ab has to be of the same signs . i tried plugging in values in 2. a=8,b=4 so ab=32 and a/b=2 . Similarly a=-4,b=-2 , ab=8, a/b=2 and also with a=1/8,b=8 so ab=1, a/b=1/72. So for all values ab>a/b.

Please let me knw what i am doin wrong

For (2):

If a=b=1 (ab + a/b > 0), then ab = a/b. Hence in this case the answer to the question whether ab > a/b is NO.

If a=b=2 (ab + a/b > 0), then ab > a/b. Hence in this case the answer to the question whether ab > a/b is YES.

Hope it's clear.
avatar
madn800
Joined: 07 May 2013
Last visit: 11 Aug 2014
Posts: 67
Own Kudos:
67
 [1]
Given Kudos: 1
Posts: 67
Kudos: 67
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Wow! Great approach Buneul. It never occurred to me to simplify the equation in the question.
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
If ab ≠ 0, is ab > a/b ?

Is ab > \frac{a}{b}? --> is ab - \frac{a}{b}>0? --> \frac{a(b^2-1)}{b}>0? --> \frac{a}{b}*(b^2-1)>0?

(1) |b| > 1 --> both sides are non-negative, thus we can square: b^2>1 --> b^2-1>0. We need to know the sign of a/b. Not sufficient.

(2) ab + a/b > 0. Notice that ab and a/b have the same sign. Both of them cannot be negative, because in this case their sum would also be negative, therefore both are positive: a/b > 0. We need to know the sign of b^2-1. Not sufficient.

(1)+(2) b^2-1>0 and \frac{a}{b} > 0, thus their product \frac{a}{b}*(b^2-1)>0. Sufficient.

Hi bunuel,

I did not get the highlighted part of the solution.
Can you please explain why both a and b cannot be negative. I think if we consider values of a and b = -2 and -3 respectively. ab + a/b will remain positive overall.

Thanks in advance for your help.
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 23 Apr 2026
Posts: 109,785
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 105,853
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,785
Kudos: 810,870
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
GmatDestroyer2013
If ab ≠ 0, is ab > a/b ?

Is ab > \frac{a}{b}? --> is ab - \frac{a}{b}>0? --> \frac{a(b^2-1)}{b}>0? --> \frac{a}{b}*(b^2-1)>0?

(1) |b| > 1 --> both sides are non-negative, thus we can square: b^2>1 --> b^2-1>0. We need to know the sign of a/b. Not sufficient.

(2) ab + a/b > 0. Notice that ab and a/b have the same sign. Both of them cannot be negative, because in this case their sum would also be negative, therefore both are positive: a/b > 0. We need to know the sign of b^2-1. Not sufficient.

(1)+(2) b^2-1>0 and \frac{a}{b} > 0, thus their product \frac{a}{b}*(b^2-1)>0. Sufficient.

Hi bunuel,

I did not get the highlighted part of the solution.
Can you please explain why both a and b cannot be negative. I think if we consider values of a and b = -2 and -3 respectively. ab + a/b will remain positive overall.

Thanks in advance for your help.

Both ab and a/b cannot be negative, not a and b.
avatar
ashutoshbarawkar
Joined: 26 Jun 2014
Last visit: 05 Sep 2014
Posts: 4
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1
Posts: 4
Kudos: 55
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Why cant I solve the equation as ab2 > a hence b2>1 hence (a) the ans ???
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 23 Apr 2026
Posts: 109,785
Own Kudos:
810,870
 [9]
Given Kudos: 105,853
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,785
Kudos: 810,870
 [9]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
6
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
ashutoshbarawkar
Why cant I solve the equation as ab2 > a hence b2>1 hence (a) the ans ???

Never multiply (or reduce) an inequality by a variable (or the expression with a variable) if you don't know its sign.

So, we can neither cross-multiply ab > a/b by b nor reduce it by a.

If b is positive, then yes we'll get ab^2 > a but if b is negative, then when multiplying by negative value we should flip the sign of the inequality and in this case we would get ab^2 < a.

The same way if a is positive, then b > 1/b but if it's negative, then b < 1/b.

Theory on Inequalities:
Solving Quadratic Inequalities - Graphic Approach: solving-quadratic-inequalities-graphic-approach-170528.html

inequalities-trick-91482.html
data-suff-inequalities-109078.html
range-for-variable-x-in-a-given-inequality-109468.html
everything-is-less-than-zero-108884.html
graphic-approach-to-problems-with-inequalities-68037.html

Tips on inequalities: inequalities-tips-and-hints-175001.html

All DS Inequalities Problems to practice: search.php?search_id=tag&tag_id=184
All PS Inequalities Problems to practice: search.php?search_id=tag&tag_id=189

700+ Inequalities problems: inequality-and-absolute-value-questions-from-my-collection-86939.html
avatar
AjChakravarthy
Joined: 08 Oct 2013
Last visit: 05 Nov 2017
Posts: 43
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 16
Posts: 43
Kudos: 46
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
ashutoshbarawkar
Why cant I solve the equation as ab2 > a hence b2>1 hence (a) the ans ???

Never multiply (or reduce) an inequality by a variable (or the expression with a variable) if you don't know its sign.

So, we can neither cross-multiply ab > a/b by b nor reduce it by a.

If b is positive, then yes we'll get ab^2 > a but if b is negative, then when multiplying by negative value we should flip the sign of the inequality and in this case we would get ab^2 < a.

The same way if a is positive, then b > 1/b but if it's negative, then b < 1/b.

Hi Bunnel, Considering the above quote, is the below approach correct?

Given that ab>a/b

Case 1: if a > 0 then b > 1/b ; true if b>1
Case 2: if a < 0 then b< 1/b ; true is b <1

State 1 says lbl >1 cant conclude anything from this

State 2 says ab + a/b > 0 so from this we know ab & a/b are both positive which means ab is positive, meaning a & b have same sign.
Cant conclude anything further

From State 1 & 2;
lbl > 1 and ab have same sign so only case 1 valid.

Thanks in advance,
Aj
User avatar
EgmatQuantExpert
User avatar
e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 04 Jan 2015
Last visit: 02 Apr 2024
Posts: 3,657
Own Kudos:
20,872
 [1]
Given Kudos: 165
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 3,657
Kudos: 20,872
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
AjChakravarthy
Bunuel
ashutoshbarawkar
Why cant I solve the equation as ab2 > a hence b2>1 hence (a) the ans ???

Never multiply (or reduce) an inequality by a variable (or the expression with a variable) if you don't know its sign.

So, we can neither cross-multiply ab > a/b by b nor reduce it by a.

If b is positive, then yes we'll get ab^2 > a but if b is negative, then when multiplying by negative value we should flip the sign of the inequality and in this case we would get ab^2 < a.

The same way if a is positive, then b > 1/b but if it's negative, then b < 1/b.

Hi Bunnel, Considering the above quote, is the below approach correct?

Given that ab>a/b

Case 1: if a > 0 then b > 1/b ; true if b>1
Case 2: if a < 0 then b< 1/b ; true is b <1

State 1 says lbl >1 cant conclude anything from this

State 2 says ab + a/b > 0 so from this we know ab & a/b are both positive which means ab is positive, meaning a & b have same sign.
Cant conclude anything further

From State 1 & 2;
lbl > 1 and ab have same sign so only case 1 valid.

Thanks in advance,
Aj

Hi AjChakravarthy,

Few suggestions on your analysis:

Case 1: if a > 0 then b > 1/b ; true if b>1--> b > 1/b is also true when -1 < b < 0. Consider b = -0.5, in this case -0.5 > -2. Hence we can't say that b > 1/b is true for only b > 1.

Case 2: if a < 0 then b< 1/b ; true is b <1 --> b < 1/b is not true for cases when -1 < b < 0. Hence we can't say b < 1/b is true for all values of b < 1.

From State 1 & 2;
lbl > 1 and ab have same sign so only case 1 valid
-- > |b| > 1 can be written as b > 1 if b is +ve or -b > 1 if b is -ve. This can be simplified to b > 1 or b < -1. Hence |b| > 1 can't be inferred as b being always positive.

Hope its clear!

Regards
Harsh
avatar
akirah
Joined: 29 Jul 2015
Last visit: 11 May 2016
Posts: 18
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 102
GMAT 1: 640 Q48 V28
GMAT 1: 640 Q48 V28
Posts: 18
Kudos: 7
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Despite reading the question and explanation again and again I still can't understand " ab + a/b > 0. Notice that ab and a/b have the same sign. Both of them cannot be negative, because in this case their sum would also be negative, therefore both are positive: a/b > 0."

Bunuel could you please help? :(
User avatar
ENGRTOMBA2018
Joined: 20 Mar 2014
Last visit: 01 Dec 2021
Posts: 2,319
Own Kudos:
3,890
 [2]
Given Kudos: 816
Concentration: Finance, Strategy
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V44
GPA: 3.7
WE:Engineering (Aerospace and Defense)
Products:
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V44
Posts: 2,319
Kudos: 3,890
 [2]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
akirah
Despite reading the question and explanation again and again I still can't understand " ab + a/b > 0. Notice that ab and a/b have the same sign. Both of them cannot be negative, because in this case their sum would also be negative, therefore both are positive: a/b > 0."

Bunuel could you please help? :(

Let me try to explain.

When you are given that ab+a/b > 0 ---> \(a* \frac{b^2+1}{b} >0\) , now realise that \(b^2+1\) is ALWAYS > 0 for all values of b and thus for making \(a* \frac{b^2+1}{b} >0\) you only need to worry about a/b > 0

Once you see that the given statement 2 is reduced to a/b > 0 ---> this can only mean that both a and b have the SAME signs. Either both are <0 or both are >0. You can also see it this way:

when a/b >0--> consider 4 cases:

a>0 and b>0 ---> YES for a/b >0
a>0 and b<0 ---> NO for a/b >0
a<0 and b>0 ---> NO for a/b >0
a<0 and b<0 ---> YES for a/b >0

Thus, you get "YES" only when both a and b are of the SAME sign.

You do not have to worry about the actual sign of a or b as shown below:

Once you see that statements need to be combined, you see that the original equation is ab > a/b ? ---> ab-a/b >0 ---> a(b-1/b) > 0 ---> \(\frac{a*(b^2-1)}{b} > 0\)

---> \(\frac{a*(b+1)(b-1)}{b} > 0\), this is ONLY dependent on the sign of (b+1)(b-1) as a/b will ALWAYS be positive for all values of a and b (as both a and b are of the SAME sign).

Statement 1 mentions that |b| >1 --> b>1 or b<-1 , for these ranges, (b+1)(b-1) is > 0 ALWAYS and hence you get a definite "YES", making C as the correct answer.

Hope this helps.
User avatar
MathRevolution
User avatar
Math Revolution GMAT Instructor
Joined: 16 Aug 2015
Last visit: 27 Sep 2022
Posts: 10,063
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 4
GMAT 1: 760 Q51 V42
GPA: 3.82
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 1: 760 Q51 V42
Posts: 10,063
Kudos: 20,000
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Forget conventional ways of solving math questions. In DS, Variable approach is the easiest and quickest way to find the answer without actually solving the problem. Remember equal number of variables and independent equations ensures a solution.

If ab ≠ 0, is ab > a/b ?

(1) |b| > 1

(2) ab + a/b > 0

Modify the original condition and the question and multiply b^2 on the both equations, which becomes ab^3>ab? --> ab^3-ab>0? -->ab(b^2-1)>0?. There are 2 variables(a,b), which should match with the number of equations. So you need 2 equations. For 1) 1 equation, for 2) 1 equation, which is likely to make C the answer.
When 1) &2), |b|>1 -> b^2>1, ab and a/b get to have the same sign in 2). That is, ab>0 -> a/b>0(this is divided by b^2 and as b^2 is a positive number, direction of the sign doesn’t change.) So, 2) becomes ab>0, which is yes and sufficient. Therefore, the answer is C.


 For cases where we need 2 more equations, such as original conditions with “2 variables”, or “3 variables and 1 equation”, or “4 variables and 2 equations”, we have 1 equation each in both 1) and 2). Therefore, there is 70% chance that C is the answer, while E has 25% chance. These two are the majority. In case of common mistake type 3,4, the answer may be from A, B or D but there is only 5% chance. Since C is most likely to be the answer using 1) and 2) separately according to DS definition (It saves us time). Obviously there may be cases where the answer is A, B, D or E.
User avatar
BillyZ
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 14 Nov 2016
Last visit: 24 Jan 2026
Posts: 1,135
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 926
Location: Malaysia
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
GMAT 1: 750 Q51 V40 (Online)
GPA: 3.53
Products:
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
gmatquant25
If \(ab ≠ 0\), is \(ab > \frac{a}{b}\)?

(1) \(|b| > 1\)

(2) \(ab + \frac{a}{b} > 0\)

Solution from "Thursdays With Ron"
Attachments

Untitled.jpg
Untitled.jpg [ 181.2 KiB | Viewed 8664 times ]

avatar
GittinGud
Joined: 18 Feb 2018
Last visit: 18 Mar 2021
Posts: 89
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 90
Location: India
GMAT 1: 750 Q50 V41
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
GmatDestroyer2013
If ab ≠ 0, is ab > a/b ?

Is ab > \frac{a}{b}? --> is ab - \frac{a}{b}>0? --> \frac{a(b^2-1)}{b}>0? --> \frac{a}{b}*(b^2-1)>0?

(1) |b| > 1 --> both sides are non-negative, thus we can square: b^2>1 --> b^2-1>0. We need to know the sign of a/b. Not sufficient.

(2) ab + a/b > 0. Notice that ab and a/b have the same sign. Both of them cannot be negative, because in this case their sum would also be negative, therefore both are positive: a/b > 0. We need to know the sign of b^2-1. Not sufficient.

(1)+(2) b^2-1>0 and \frac{a}{b} > 0, thus their product \frac{a}{b}*(b^2-1)>0. Sufficient.

Hi bunuel,

I did not get the highlighted part of the solution.
Can you please explain why both a and b cannot be negative. I think if we consider values of a and b = -2 and -3 respectively. ab + a/b will remain positive overall.

Thanks in advance for your help.

Both ab and a/b cannot be negative, not a and b.

Bunuel
Can you please explain the highlighted part in detail. From my understanding, even if both a and b are -ve, the answer option would be C. THanks!
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 23 Apr 2026
Posts: 109,785
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 105,853
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,785
Kudos: 810,870
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
GittinGud
Bunuel
GmatDestroyer2013
If ab ≠ 0, is ab > a/b ?

Is ab > \frac{a}{b}? --> is ab - \frac{a}{b}>0? --> \frac{a(b^2-1)}{b}>0? --> \frac{a}{b}*(b^2-1)>0?

(1) |b| > 1 --> both sides are non-negative, thus we can square: b^2>1 --> b^2-1>0. We need to know the sign of a/b. Not sufficient.

(2) ab + a/b > 0. Notice that ab and a/b have the same sign. Both of them cannot be negative, because in this case their sum would also be negative, therefore both are positive: a/b > 0. We need to know the sign of b^2-1. Not sufficient.

(1)+(2) b^2-1>0 and \frac{a}{b} > 0, thus their product \frac{a}{b}*(b^2-1)>0. Sufficient.

Hi bunuel,

I did not get the highlighted part of the solution.
Can you please explain why both a and b cannot be negative. I think if we consider values of a and b = -2 and -3 respectively. ab + a/b will remain positive overall.

Thanks in advance for your help.

Both ab and a/b cannot be negative, not a and b.

Bunuel
Can you please explain the highlighted part in detail. From my understanding, even if both a and b are -ve, the answer option would be C. THanks!

The point is that ab and a/b will have the same sign: either both are positive or both are negative. But if ab and a/b are negative, then their sum will also be negative, thus ab + a/b > 0 means that ab and a/b are both positive.
User avatar
bumpbot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 38,964
Own Kudos:
Posts: 38,964
Kudos: 1,117
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Automated notice from GMAT Club BumpBot:

A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.

This post was generated automatically.
Moderators:
Math Expert
109785 posts
498 posts
212 posts