proabhinav
Dear All
Help please.
C - Whether 30 years from now the manufacturers’ profit margin for cars that consume BioY will be significantly higher than the profit margin of cars that consume Bio X
D - Whether the resources used to make Bio Y are sustainable to cater to the demand of the fuel in the next thirty years and beyond
I chose C over D, while I did feel that D itself is strong, rationale for choosing C over D was that even if resources are available in the next 30 years to manufacture car Y, if such an enterprise is not profitable to car owners, then they may not go ahead with such plan, even if that is what people and government want.
Please can you help me with a compelling reason to choose C over D ?
proabhinav Greetings Abhinav , please see if this helps
argument : "Since both the government and the people of the country are determined to bring down the pollution levels in the long run," ..
Determined : a very strong word which shows that people are really firm on reducing pollution. If there are certaain concerns where the public would discount their determination then the authro would not have used the word "determined" . There are rare instances when the aurthor makes such strong comments . Also logically , the argumnet wouldnt be much of use if there wouldt have been "determined", as the moemnt we read that therer is aplan we may sya that public will oppose or dislike it so theree isnt mucha strong argument,unless we add "determined "
additionally, you challenged the premise. "people are determined" is not the author's opinion but this is a true fact as in it is infact the case . If the argument said , there is a POSSIBILITY / the governemnt THINKS /the survey THINKS that the people are determined then you could cahllenge the opinion becasue in this case ,the opinion may not be a fact.
Secodnly , you cannot challenge " government THINKS" , WE KNOW FOR A FACT THAT THE GOVERNMENT THINKS, BUT WHAT THE GOVT. THINKS may not be a fact.
Whenever you tackle CRs the first thing before even looking at the question is try to know what are the premises (cannot be challenegd), opinions and conclusion.
The most common wrong answer choices
: 1)opposite (exactly the opposite to whatwe want..for eg: we want a weaknener but the ans choice gives us a strengthener)
2) one word wrong (in this ans choice one single word spolies the choices...and more often that one wprd is at the end ..why?? as we are time bound in exam, we will try to read the first few words and when we think this matches to what we wwant we are in the trap, as we did not read the entire thing.
3)emotional (in this case, the answer choice tries to exploit our meotions or knowledge about something..for eg:if the author is talking about climate change and factors affecting it and concludes that nature is responsble for climate change and not human, we may completely forget about the concklusion and fall for this ans choice becasue we know that it is the humans an not nature that is responsible)
please ask further if you still have any doubts.