bb wrote:
Congratulations on your admits and scholarships!
Merry Christmas to you as well. One thing about Foster is that it has a lot of people who come from Seattle Tech background and they go back there. Also being in the city with most tech companies having an office, helps. FB, Google, Dropbox, amazon and microsoft of course. My understanding however, and what's not necessarily transparent on the job reports is that while people who find jobs in tech, they are not as exciting positions as some of the top 10 Schools get to see. The level and caliber of hires is different basically, which is good and bad at the same time. The good is that Amazon hires 1,000 MBA's per year so no matter which school you end up at, you have a shot. The bad is that Foster does not provide any major benefits to open doors beyond just being nearby, allowing more networking opportunities, and being an easy spot for companies to come on campus. I guess it is a benefit afterall
Both Foster and McCombs are regional schools but I feel UT Austin has a stronger national reputation than UW. Then of course if you are planning to live in Seattle area, then UW is the place to go as many people stick around in the area.
The weather in Seattle is pretty similar to the UK, while Austin is hot in the summer and nice most of the other 6 months (Seattle is the opposite, but you are familiar with that weather cycle). I know it is a minor thing but it gets old eventually. In terms of being outdorsy/etc - yes, you can do a lot but it is challenging during bschool and during the 8 months of the rain season but you can ski in the winter in the Cascades and hike in the summer and fall. Winter and Spring are nasty and everyone goes to Hawaii or Mexico to recharge.
P.S. I am not sure it is worth paying $30K for Foster instead of McCombs ultimately. My suggestion would be to head where you may have a network and if you don't have one, 30K will pay for plenty of flights to Bay Area and Seattle. You can still do phone coffee chats and remote off campus recruiting. My take on it.
Hey, Max here from McCombs 2020 class. I was also accepted to Foster with slightly less than full scholarship and to McCombs with full scholarship. Having gone through the first semester, i can say that BB is right in that UT is definitely more nationally recognized that UW. UT is also pretty good with tech recruiting, can't really complain about that. All big tech companies hire and have relations with the school and UT alumni network. This doesn't mean that the competition is not fierce, but people do get jobs at Amazon, Apple, Google, Adobe, etc. Life in Seattle is more expensive from what i know, so you have to factor that into the cost.
UT has a lot of momentum now - new super cool building, tech booming in Austin (Apple recently announced its plan to build huge campus here in addition to existing one, plus Amazon, Google, FB and others have offices in Austin). Another cool thing about UT is its fellows programs, i don't know if UW has anything similar but likely it doesn't. Its really valuable to get into Marketing fellows if you are pursuing prod mgmt roles, essentially the program involves like marketing casing with CMO's of large companies where you try to find solutions to some of the current problems that their companies face. everybody who has gone through fellows says its the best part of the MBA experience by far.