Last visit was: 23 Apr 2026, 17:52 It is currently 23 Apr 2026, 17:52
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
yashikaaggarwal
User avatar
Senior Moderator - Masters Forum
Joined: 19 Jan 2020
Last visit: 29 Mar 2026
Posts: 3,089
Own Kudos:
3,158
 [2]
Given Kudos: 1,510
Location: India
GPA: 4
WE:Analyst (Internet and New Media)
Posts: 3,089
Kudos: 3,158
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
IanStewart
User avatar
GMAT Tutor
Joined: 24 Jun 2008
Last visit: 17 Apr 2026
Posts: 4,143
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 99
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 4,143
Kudos: 11,274
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Lipun
Joined: 05 Jan 2020
Last visit: 08 Jan 2025
Posts: 143
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 291
Posts: 143
Kudos: 160
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
IanStewart
To find the x-intercept of a line y = mx + b, we replace y with zero and solve for x. So if we solve 0 = mx + b for x, the value of x we'll find is the x-intercept. b is the y-intercept, so if Statement 1 is true, b = 0.5x, and 0 = mx + 0.5x, and since the x-intercept is nonzero (the line does not pass through the origin), we can divide both sides by x to find m = -0.5, and Statement 1 is sufficient.

Statement 2 is not sufficient, as any numerical examples will show. If the x-intercept is 2, say, then the slope of the line will be positive, but if x = 5, say, then it will be negative, so Statement 2 cannot be sufficient.

Hi IanStewart sir,

Can you please explain as to why are we not considering the absolute values of the intercepts while evaluating statement 1? If we consider absolute value of the intercepts, then the slope can be 1/2 or -1/2.

Let me know if my understanding is incorrect.

Regards
Lipun
User avatar
IanStewart
User avatar
GMAT Tutor
Joined: 24 Jun 2008
Last visit: 17 Apr 2026
Posts: 4,143
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 99
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 4,143
Kudos: 11,274
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Lipun

Hi IanStewart sir,

Can you please explain as to why are we not considering the absolute values of the intercepts while evaluating statement 1? If we consider absolute value of the intercepts, then the slope can be 1/2 or -1/2.

I'm not sure I understand your question - why is it that you think we need to use absolute value here? Intercepts can be positive or negative. If Statement 1 is true, then one intercept is half of the other, so they must have the same sign. If a line's x-intercept and y-intercept have the same sign, the line's slope is automatically negative, so the slope cannot be 1/2.
User avatar
Mo2men
Joined: 26 Mar 2013
Last visit: 09 May 2023
Posts: 2,426
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 641
Concentration: Operations, Strategy
Schools: Erasmus (II)
Products:
Schools: Erasmus (II)
Posts: 2,426
Kudos: 1,508
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
IanStewart
Lipun

Hi IanStewart sir,

Can you please explain as to why are we not considering the absolute values of the intercepts while evaluating statement 1? If we consider absolute value of the intercepts, then the slope can be 1/2 or -1/2.

I'm not sure I understand your question - why is it that you think we need to use absolute value here? Intercepts can be positive or negative. If Statement 1 is true, then one intercept is half of the other, so they must have the same sign. If a line's x-intercept and y-intercept have the same sign, the line's slope is automatically negative, so the slope cannot be 1/2.


Hi IanStewart

Actually I had same question. According to statement 1, y intercept is half x intercept. For example, if y =1, then x=2 or y=-1 then x =-2 but why does it have to be same sign. We still could have y =1 and x=-2. I solved it conceptually because nothing in statement 1 indicates we have same sign. Where did I go wrong?

Thanks
User avatar
firas92
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 16 Jan 2019
Last visit: 02 Dec 2024
Posts: 616
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 142
Location: India
Concentration: General Management
GMAT 1: 740 Q50 V40
WE:Sales (Other)
Products:
GMAT 1: 740 Q50 V40
Posts: 616
Kudos: 1,765
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi Lipun Mo2men

I don't understand why absolute values need to come into the picture.

Consider this, if the x-intercept of the line is \(a\), then the y intercept must be \(\frac{a}{2}\)


So the line passes through the points \((a,0)\) and \((0,\frac{a}{2})\)

We have a formula to calculate the slope of a line passing through the points \((x1,y1)\) and \((x2,y2)\)

\(Slope=\frac{y2-y1}{x2-x1}\)

Using this formula,

Slope of line \(l\) = \(\frac{\frac{a}{2}-0}{0-a}=-\frac{1}{2}\)

Hope this is clear

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
IanStewart
User avatar
GMAT Tutor
Joined: 24 Jun 2008
Last visit: 17 Apr 2026
Posts: 4,143
Own Kudos:
11,274
 [1]
Given Kudos: 99
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 4,143
Kudos: 11,274
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Mo2men

Hi IanStewart

Actually I had same question. According to statement 1, y intercept is half x intercept. For example, if y =1, then x=2 or y=-1 then x =-2 but why does it have to be same sign. We still could have y =1 and x=-2. I solved it conceptually because nothing in statement 1 indicates we have same sign. Where did I go wrong?

The solution firas92 posted above is correct. You can't have y = 1 and x = -2, because 1 is not half of -2; -1 is half of -2.

I'm wondering if perhaps you and Lipun are interpreting Statement 1 to mean "the distance from the y-intercept to the origin is half of the distance from the x-intercept to the origin," or something similar. If Statement 1 did say that, then you would both be correct. But that's not what it says - it is describing the intercepts themselves, and intercepts are coordinates, not distances, so they can be positive or negative. If you divide an intercept by 2, the sign won't change.
Moderators:
Math Expert
109785 posts
498 posts
212 posts