OA is E
The original sentence is problematic in its use of the possessive pronoun “
its.” The antecedent to “
its” is the “
labor market,” which incorrectly and illogically suggests that the labor market is somehow possessing or passing government regulations itself. In addition, the original sentence
incorrectly uses active rather than
passive voice to describe the effects imposed on the "
labor market" by government regulations, thus illogically suggesting that the "
labor market" itself is stifling functioning, rather than being stifled by other forces.
(A) This choice is incorrect as it repeats the original sentence.
(B) This choice incorrectly uses a comma to connect two independent clauses, thus creating a run-on sentence. Two independent clauses must be connected either by a conjunction, such as “and” or “but,” or by a semicolon.
(C) This choice incorrectly uses “stifled” to modify the labor market itself, as opposed to its functioning. Also, “variously restrict” is awkward; various is used more appropriately to modify "government regulations," rather than the manner in which the regulations restrict worker hiring and firing.
(D) In order to properly use a semicolon, both the clause before and after the semicolon must be independent clauses or sentences, and the clauses must be closely related in meaning. In this choice, the underlined portion, though grammatically correct, does not stand alone as an effective independent clause. Also, the pronoun “its” lacks a clear antecedent.
(E) CORRECT. This answer choice correctly uses the
semicolon to connect
two independent but closely related clauses. In addition, the pronoun “
its” clearly and unambiguously refers to the “
labor market.”