Quote:
mcrea
How can you know that by simply looking at 7^3?
For example:
- we cannot say that since 7^4 = 2401, which has a remainder of 7 when divided by 9, also (7^4)^11 = 7^44 has a remainder of 7.
- we can simply say that since 7^2 = 49, which has a remainder of 4 when divided by 9, also (7^2)^22 = 7^44 has a remainder of 4.
As I said in my post, I was using some modular arithmetic principles without explaining them fully (and I wasn't explaining them since they aren't tested on the GMAT, but they're essentially required for questions like this one). I'll explain the principle I was using with division by 9 for illustration, but this would work regardless of what you are dividing by:
If you want to know the remainder you will get when you divide k^x by 9, you can just find the remainder when you divide r^x by 9, where r is the remainder when k is divided by 9.In other words, if we have a large base and an exponent in a remainders question, we can just replace that base with its remainder in questions like this. So, since when we divide 7^3 by 9, the remainder is 1, when we divide (7^3)^14 by 9, we can just replace the base 7^3 with 1, and we'll get the correct remainder if we just divide 1^14 by 9, i.e. if we divide 1 by 9, so the remainder is 1.
Applying this to your examples:
• since 7^4 gives a remainder of 7 when divided by 9, then (7^4)^11 will have the same remainder as 7^11 will have when divided by 9 (we'd still have some work to do then to get a practical calculation)
• since 7^2 gives a remainder of 4 when divided by 9, then (7^2)^22 will have the same remainder as 4^22 will have when divided by 9 (and again, we'd still have some work to do to make 4^22 manageably small)
To use this principle to solve these kinds of problems, you're really looking to find a remainder of 1 (or -1, if you know how to work with negative remainders), because then the remainder calculation becomes very easy, which is why I worked specifically with 7^3.
Your method is also perfect -- it is true (just as with units digits) that if you find the remainders dividing 7^1, 7^2, 7^3 and so on by 9, you'll eventually get a looping pattern, and this always happens no matter what number you're dividing by, so you can then use that pattern to predict the remainder you'll have for large exponents. You are, however, using somewhat advanced modular arithmetic principles, just as I did, to conclude that this pattern will in fact predictably repeat. The only potential problem with that method is the looping pattern can take a long time to emerge. If, say, you try to use this method to find the remainder when 2^120 is divided by 13, you'll see you have to list twelve different values before the pattern begins to repeat (for 2^1, 2^2, all the way up to 2^12, you get different remainders).