Last visit was: 19 Jul 2025, 16:55 It is currently 19 Jul 2025, 16:55
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
Sub 505 Level|   Comparisons|               
User avatar
BillyZ
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 14 Nov 2016
Last visit: 03 May 2025
Posts: 1,147
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 926
Location: Malaysia
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
GMAT 1: 750 Q51 V40 (Online)
GPA: 3.53
Products:
10
Kudos
Add Kudos
105
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 19 Jul 2025
Posts: 7,359
Own Kudos:
68,584
 [72]
Given Kudos: 1,969
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,359
Kudos: 68,584
 [72]
44
Kudos
Add Kudos
28
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
Valhalla
Joined: 26 Apr 2017
Last visit: 29 Nov 2022
Posts: 39
Own Kudos:
145
 [13]
Given Kudos: 71
Posts: 39
Kudos: 145
 [13]
5
Kudos
Add Kudos
8
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
Hero8888
Joined: 29 Dec 2017
Last visit: 14 Apr 2019
Posts: 301
Own Kudos:
333
 [9]
Given Kudos: 273
Location: United States
Concentration: Marketing, Technology
GMAT 1: 630 Q44 V33
GMAT 2: 690 Q47 V37
GMAT 3: 710 Q50 V37
GPA: 3.25
WE:Marketing (Telecommunications)
GMAT 3: 710 Q50 V37
Posts: 301
Kudos: 333
 [9]
9
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
A tip: For those who struggle to choose between A and B (because of tiny modifiers replacement): get rid of modifiers between commas. In this case option B loses the meaning. Hence A is correct.
User avatar
vasuca10
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 06 Feb 2016
Last visit: 23 Jul 2022
Posts: 239
Own Kudos:
181
 [2]
Given Kudos: 148
Status:On the journey of achieving
Affiliations: Senior Manager, CA by profession, CFA(USA) Level 2
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Finance
GMAT 1: 560 Q44 V23
GMAT 2: 530 Q39 V24
GMAT 3: 580 Q46 V24 (Online)
GMAT 4: 640 Q50 V26
GPA: 3.82
WE:Other (Commercial Banking)
Products:
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
A researcher claims that a tornado of a given size and strength is likely to cause more deaths, both proportionately and in absolute numbers, in the southeastern region of the United States than in the northeastern.

(A) A researcher claims that a tornado of a given size and strength is likely to cause more deaths, both proportionately and in absolute numbers, in the southeastern region of the United States than in the northeastern. CORRECT, both proportionately and in absolute numbers modifies deaths and of a given size and strength modifies tornado

(B) A researcher claims that a tornado, if of a given size and strength, is likely both proportionately and in absolute numbers to cause more deaths in the southeastern region of the United States than in the northeastern.INCORRECT as usage of if which is a clause is incorrect here . "Likely both proportionately and in absolute numbers" is an awkward construction

(C) A researcher claims that, with a tornado of a given size and strength, it is likely to cause more death, both proportionately and in absolute numbers, in the southeastern rather than in the northeastern region of the United States.INCORRECT, as it has no clear antecedent. Also RATHER THAN is used instead of more than. There is a meaning error too

(D) If a tornado is of a given size and strength, a researcher claims, it is more likely, both proportionately and in absolute numbers, to cause death if it is in the southeastern region of the United States rather than in the northeastern region. - INCORRECT, Usage of rather than. Also it does not have clear referent. Additionally there is a meaning change too

(E) Both proportionately and in absolute numbers, a researcher claims that a tornado of a given size and strength is likely to cause more deaths in the southeastern region of the United States rather than in the northeastern. - INCORRECT, Use of RATHER THAN is incorrect.Also there is a meaning change. Modifier Issue is also there as both proportionately and in absolute numbers are misplaced in the beginning of the sentence.
User avatar
rraman
Joined: 22 Apr 2018
Last visit: 03 May 2019
Posts: 25
Own Kudos:
45
 [1]
Given Kudos: 78
Posts: 25
Kudos: 45
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Can someone explain to me why "both proportionately and in absolute numbers" is correct. I went through all the answer choices and can see that it has been used everywhere so it must be right. I just want to understand how? I mean proportionately is a verb and in absolute numbers is a prepositional phrase then how are they parallel to each other?

GMATNinja: Since it is a OG question I hope you will clear the doubt :P

egmat
User avatar
Smitc007
Joined: 28 Dec 2017
Last visit: 19 Jun 2022
Posts: 27
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 159
Posts: 27
Kudos: 7
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
(A) A researcher claims that a tornado of a given size and strength is likely to cause more deaths, both proportionately and in absolute numbers, in the southeastern region of the United States than in the northeastern.

In the above option "Than" is used for comparison ,and comparison is always between two logical things.But here the southeastern region is compared to Northeastern.
Isn't it necessary that "Region" should be followed by Northeastern?
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 19 Jul 2025
Posts: 7,359
Own Kudos:
68,584
 [5]
Given Kudos: 1,969
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,359
Kudos: 68,584
 [5]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Smitc007
(A) A researcher claims that a tornado of a given size and strength is likely to cause more deaths, both proportionately and in absolute numbers, in the southeastern region of the United States than in the northeastern.

In the above option "Than" is used for comparison ,and comparison is always between two logical things.But here the southeastern region is compared to Northeastern.
Isn't it necessary that "Region" should be followed by Northeastern?
In situations like these, you'll want to ask yourself whether removing the word "region" from the second part of the phrase causes any real problems. Here are some stripped-down versions of the sentence:

    1. A tornado causes more deaths in the southeastern region than in the northeastern region.
    2. A tornado causes more deaths in the southeastern region than in the northeastern.

Are these two sentences meaningfully different? Is there any confusion about what the word "northeastern" is referring to? I would argue that the answer to both of these questions is "no." The sentence is perfectly fine, either way. And as we look through all five answer choices, there are far more important issues than this one.

I hope this helps!
avatar
kazup
Joined: 08 Feb 2020
Last visit: 02 May 2020
Posts: 5
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 155
Location: Japan
WE:Marketing (Internet and New Media)
Posts: 5
Kudos: 11
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Could anyone please explain what "to cause more deaths proportionately" means?
Proportionate to what? To the size and strength of a tornado?

(A): A researcher claims that a tornado of a given size and strength is likely to cause more deaths, both proportionately and in absolute numbers, in the southeastern region of the United States than in the northeastern.

I understand how to approach (A), but I don't understand a part of this sentence since English is my foreign language.

Thank you for your great help ;)
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 19 Jul 2025
Posts: 7,359
Own Kudos:
68,584
 [4]
Given Kudos: 1,969
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,359
Kudos: 68,584
 [4]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
3
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
kazup
Could anyone please explain what "to cause more deaths proportionately" means?
Proportionate to what? To the size and strength of a tornado?

(A): A researcher claims that a tornado of a given size and strength is likely to cause more deaths, both proportionately and in absolute numbers, in the southeastern region of the United States than in the northeastern.

I understand how to approach (A), but I don't understand a part of this sentence since English is my foreign language.

Thank you for your great help ;)
Let's start with the easier concept, which is the absolute number of deaths - that just means the total casualty count (i.e., 100 people).

So, what do they mean by "more deaths proportionately"? To be honest, the meaning isn't entirely clear, and if you can answer the question without understanding that meaning, I wouldn't worry too much about it.

That said, this almost certainly refers to the number of deaths PER some number of people (i.e., 1 death out of every 1,000 people). But the meaning isn't explicitly defined, so I would expect anyone, native speaker or not, to be a bit confused here.

Luckily, this doesn't impact our analysis of this question, so we don't need to stress over it. :)

I hope this helps!
avatar
SiddRaj
Joined: 03 Mar 2019
Last visit: 10 Mar 2021
Posts: 1
Own Kudos:
1
 [1]
Given Kudos: 18
Posts: 1
Kudos: 1
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Can someone please clarify when to use "rather than" and when only "than"?
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 19 Jul 2025
Posts: 7,359
Own Kudos:
68,584
 [7]
Given Kudos: 1,969
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,359
Kudos: 68,584
 [7]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
6
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
SiddRaj
Can someone please clarify when to use "rather than" and when only "than"?
Sure! We use "rather than" to express a preference between two options. We use "than" alone when comparing magnitude.

For example:

    "Tim has attempted to cook more than 300 dinners this year, all of which have caused massive intestinal distress for his poor children."


Here, we're talking about a value greater than 300. There's no choice or preference here, so we don't use "rather." However, we could also write this:

    "Rather than subject themselves to another one of Tim's ill-fated concoctions, Tim's daughters opted for dog biscuits instead."


Now there's a preference: Tim's daughters opt for dog food, rather than their father's cooking.

I hope that helps!
User avatar
WeWillGetIn
Joined: 08 Sep 2019
Last visit: 20 Feb 2022
Posts: 39
Own Kudos:
2
 [1]
Given Kudos: 10
Posts: 39
Kudos: 2
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
GMATNinja
SiddRaj
Can someone please clarify when to use "rather than" and when only "than"?
Sure! We use "rather than" to express a preference between two options. We use "than" alone when comparing magnitude.

For example:

    "Tim has attempted to cook more than 300 dinners this year, all of which have caused massive intestinal distress for his poor children."


Here, we're talking about a value greater than 300. There's no choice or preference here, so we don't use "rather." However, we could also write this:

    "Rather than subject themselves to another one of Tim's ill-fated concoctions, Tim's daughters opted for dog biscuits instead."


Now there's a preference: Tim's daughters opt for dog food, rather than their father's cooking.

I hope that helps!

But I think the example should be: Rather than subjected themselves to another one of Tim's ill-fated concoctions, Tim's daughters opted for dog biscuits instead. I think opted and subjected should be parallel?
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 19 Jul 2025
Posts: 7,359
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1,969
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,359
Kudos: 68,584
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Quote:
But I think the example should be: Rather than subjected themselves to another one of Tim's ill-fated concoctions, Tim's daughters opted for dog biscuits instead. I think opted and subjected should be parallel?

"Rather than" functions differently than a parallel marker such as "and." To see why, consider a conventional parallel construction without "rather than."

    Tim danced with his daughter and herniated several disks in his back.

This is the kind of simple parallelism we're accustomed to. "And" connects two parallel actions, "danced" and "herniated." Pretty straight-forward.

But watch what happens when we remove the "and" and introduce a "rather than."

    Rather than dance with his daughter, Tim preserved his back so he could participate in the neighborhood jiu-jitsu tournament.

Now that we've eliminated "and," there's no parallel marker. Moreover, "rather than" changes the tense of the verb. You probably recognize instinctively that "rather than dance" is fine and that "rather than danced" is wrong. There's no need to memorize an obscure rule here. It's enough to see that the above sentence is acceptable and fundamentally different from the first example.

Same deal with the example involving Tim's ill-fated concoctions. Because there's no parallel marker, and "rather than" changes the verb tense, "rather than subject" is correct.

I hope that helps!
User avatar
kadamhari825
Joined: 21 Mar 2019
Last visit: 16 Jan 2022
Posts: 64
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1,049
Location: India
GMAT 1: 640 Q45 V35
GMAT 2: 660 Q47 V34
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
i went through all explanations but could not convince myself why option B is incorrect.
can somebody throw light on it?

Thanks.
User avatar
EducationAisle
Joined: 27 Mar 2010
Last visit: 18 Jul 2025
Posts: 3,876
Own Kudos:
3,574
 [4]
Given Kudos: 159
Location: India
Schools: ISB
GPA: 3.31
Expert
Expert reply
Schools: ISB
Posts: 3,876
Kudos: 3,574
 [4]
4
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
kadamhari825
i went through all explanations but could not convince myself why option B is incorrect.
can somebody throw light on it?
Hi kadamhari825, the intent of the original sentence is to convey that a tornado of (any) given size and strength will likely cause more devastation in the southeastern US than in the northeastern US.

B introduces this structure: if of a given size and strength.

So, B is changing the meaning of the original sentence, to convey that only if a tornado is of (some specific) given size and strength, (only) that tornado will likely cause more devastation in the southeastern US than in the northeastern US.

So, not only does B change the intended meaning, the meaning depicted in B is implausible.
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
(D) If a tornado is of a given size and strength, a researcher claims, it is more likely, both proportionately and in absolute numbers, to cause death if it is in the southeastern region of the United States rather than in the northeastern region.

What is the error in this option?

GMATNinja
egmat
If any of you can explain.
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 19 Jul 2025
Posts: 7,359
Own Kudos:
68,584
 [2]
Given Kudos: 1,969
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,359
Kudos: 68,584
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
sonamlodhi89
(D) If a tornado is of a given size and strength, a researcher claims, it is more likely, both proportionately and in absolute numbers, to cause death if it is in the southeastern region of the United States rather than in the northeastern region.

What is the error in this option?

GMATNinja
egmat
If any of you can explain.
There's no clear grammatical error in (D), but if you compare it side-by-side with (A), you can see why (D) is so much more confusing.

First, here's (A) again:

Quote:
(A) A researcher claims that a tornado of a given size and strength is likely to cause more deaths, both proportionately and in absolute numbers, in the southeastern region of the United States than in the northeastern.
Pretty clear what the writer wants to communicate. A researcher is making a claim: big tornados kill more people in the southeast than in the northeast. Certainly good enough to hold on to.

Contrast that with (D):

Quote:
(D) If a tornado is of a given size and strength, a researcher claims, it is more likely, both proportionately and in absolute numbers, to cause death if it is in the southeastern region of the United States rather than in the northeastern region.
As soon as I see that first clause "If a tornado is a given size and strength..." my expectation is that this will be followed by some conditional outcome. For instance, "If a tornado is very big, it may hurl a cow into an adjacent yard where Bill Paxton is trimming his toenails."

But that's not what we get in (D). Instead we get this: "If a tornado is a given size and strength, a researcher claims," Now I'm thrown off. If a tornado is a certain size, a researcher is going to make a claim? But if there were a smaller tornado, the researcher would remain silent? That's certainly weird, but maybe not inherently wrong, so let's keep going to see what the researcher is claiming.

Quote:
If a tornado is of a given size and strength, a researcher claims, it is more likely, both proportionately and in absolute numbers, to cause death, if it is in the southeastern region...
You can feel this sentence going off the rails a little bit, can't you? I guess the "it" refers to "tornado," so now, when we read the part in blue, we basically have the following meaning: If a tornado is big, a researcher will claim that a tornado is more likely. That seems totally incoherent. How can a tornado that already exists be likely? It just is!

You can start to get the gist of the sentence when we get to the phrase, "to cause death," but then we get another 'if' clause! If there's a big tornado, researchers will claim that this tornado is more likely to cause deaths if this tornado is in the southeast. Now we've got two hypotheticals to wrap our heads around. Is the researcher claiming the second hypothetical? Or is the second hypothetical necessary for the researcher to make her initial claim?

This is when I begin to feel my brain melting.

Theoretically, can you make sense of what's happening? Sure. But this construction is awfully confusing and seems utterly incoherent without multiple reads. Inherently wrong? No. But worse than (A), which was crystal clear and logical? Without question.

The takeaway: SC isn't always about definitive errors. Sometimes it's about a side by side comparison in which you're trying to determine what's clearer or more logical.

I hope that helps!
User avatar
Sneha2021
Joined: 20 Dec 2020
Last visit: 10 Jun 2025
Posts: 319
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 523
Location: India
Posts: 319
Kudos: 35
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
GMATNinja egmat KarishmaB
(B) A researcher claims that a tornado, if of a given size and strength, is likely both proportionately and in absolute numbers to cause more deaths in the southeastern region of the United States than in the northeastern.

I agree than A is better than B bcz B has introduced "If" condition
Could you help me with any other reason to reject B?

Thanks in advance!
User avatar
KarishmaB
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 19 Jul 2025
Posts: 16,115
Own Kudos:
74,407
 [1]
Given Kudos: 475
Location: Pune, India
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 16,115
Kudos: 74,407
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Sneha2021
GMATNinja egmat KarishmaB
(B) A researcher claims that a tornado, if of a given size and strength, is likely both proportionately and in absolute numbers to cause more deaths in the southeastern region of the United States than in the northeastern.

I agree than A is better than B bcz B has introduced "If" condition
Could you help me with any other reason to reject B?

Thanks in advance!

In addition to the condition issue in (B), I don't like the "is likely both proportionately and in absolute numbers to cause more deaths" construction in (B).
The flow of the sentence is haywire here. 'likely' is modifying 'to cause'. What is likely? It is likely that it will cause more deaths. But placing 'both proportionately and in absolute numbers' adverbs between 'likely' and 'to cause' is disrupting the flow.
Also, 'both proportionately and in absolute numbers' modifies 'more' and is not essential to the sentence. It is given as an aside, extra information about 'more deaths'. Hence, the structure of (A) is superior in that sense too. In (A), 'both proportionately and in absolute numbers' is given as a non essential modifier that tells us 'more' in what respect. More proportionately as well as more in absolute numbers.

Sneha2021
 1   2   
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7359 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
235 posts