Let's start by putting (A) and (B) side-by-side:
Quote:
(A) was more likely to begin as
(B) more than likely began as
The verb tense in (A) is really confusing, and it's definitely not our best option. We have three different verbs in the sentence, all of which describe "the earliest writing", which:
- ..."was probably not a direct rendering of speech"
- "...was more likely to begin..."
- and "...later merged with spoken language."
That middle piece is wacky. All three of these things happened in the past, and need to be in the same version of past tense. So the underlined portion is odd: why would we say "was more likely to begin", when we could just say "more likely began as"? "Begin" is in present tense (i.e., a general characteristic), and "was more likely to begin" doesn't make much sense -- it's almost as if the earliest writing had some probabilistic quality or something, and there was a good chance that it would eventually begin "as a separate and distinct symbolic system."
That's so much messier than (B), which just says that according to scholars, it's likely that the earliest writing
actually began "as a separate and distinct symbolic system."
So we can get rid of (A), and keep (B).
Quote:
(C) more than likely beginning from
There are two little problems with (C), particularly when we compare it with (B).
First, I don't know why we would switch the verb "began" to the participle "beginning", considering that the rest of the sentence features nice, simple, past tense verbs ("the earliest writing
was... and later
merged..." So in this sense, (B) is clearly better than (C).
The other issue is that it doesn't really make sense to say that the earliest writing was beginning "
from a separate and distinct symbolic system." The earliest writing didn't evolve from some other separate and distinct system; the earliest writing WAS the separate and distinct symbolic system.
So we can ditch (C).