Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
Quant Quizzes are back with a Bang and with lots of Prizes. The first Quiz will be on 8th Dec, 6PM PST (7:30AM IST). The Quiz will be Live for 12 hrs. Solution can be posted anytime between 6PM-6AM PST. Please click the link for all of the details.
Join IIMU Director to gain an understanding of DEM program, its curriculum & about the career prospects through a Q&A chat session. Dec 11th at 8 PM IST and 6:30 PST
Enter The Economist GMAT Tutor’s Brightest Minds competition – it’s completely free! All you have to do is take our online GMAT simulation test and put your mind to the test. Are you ready? This competition closes on December 13th.
Attend a Veritas Prep GMAT Class for Free. With free trial classes you can work with a 99th percentile expert free of charge. Learn valuable strategies and find your new favorite instructor; click for a list of upcoming dates and teachers.
Does GMAT RC seem like an uphill battle? e-GMAT is conducting a free webinar to help you learn reading strategies that can enable you to solve 700+ level RC questions with at least 90% accuracy in less than 10 days.
Although early soap operas were first aired on evening radio in the 19
[#permalink]
Show Tags
Updated on: 10 Jan 2019, 04:47
3
14
00:00
A
B
C
D
E
Difficulty:
5% (low)
Question Stats:
84% (01:13) correct 16% (01:17) wrong based on 800 sessions
HideShow timer Statistics
Although early soap operas were first aired on evening radio in the 1920's, they had moved to the daytime hours of the 1930's when the evening schedule became crowded with comedians and variety shows.
(A) were first aired on evening radio in the 1920's, they had moved to the daytime hours of the 1930's
(B) were first aired on evening radio in the 1920's, they were moved to the daytime hours in the 1930's
(C) were aired first on evening radio in the 1920's, moving to the daytime hours in the 1930's
(D) were aired first in the evening on 1920's radio, they moved to the daytime hours of the 1930's
(E) aired on evening radio first in the 1920's, they were moved to the 1930's in the daytime hours
Re: Although early soap operas were first aired on evening radio in the 19
[#permalink]
Show Tags
06 Feb 2012, 20:40
2
3
@teal
Please read this from the given link; it is a rule that we do not use two different voices in sentences containing two clauses that are joined by a conjunction. I have also quoted the relevant part relating to voices. HTH
Quote:
http://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/623/1/
Not Parallel: The salesman expected that he would present his product at the meeting, that there would be time for him to show his slide presentation, and that questions would be asked by prospective buyers. (passive) Parallel: The salesman expected that he would present his product at the meeting, that there would be time for him to show his slide presentation, and that prospective buyers would ask him questions.
_________________
Are you stuck around 630? If you can't pole-vault above 630, spare 30 hours and you can fly on top. "Winners never quit and quitters never win". (+919884544509)
Re: Although early soap operas were first aired on evening radio in the 19
[#permalink]
Show Tags
10 Mar 2012, 19:00
2
The answer I chose was B:
A. It does not make sense to use "had moved" in the past perfect tense because it logically does not make sense and it is not parallel to "were first aired." Also, "of the 1930s" should be "in the 1930s."
B. This sentence is correct because "were aired and were moved" are parallel and they logically make sense given the dates. Also, "in the 1920s and in the 1930s" are parallel.
C. The verb-ing modifier seems to modify the first clause, but that doesn't really make sense. This modifier also creates a sentence fragment.
D. "They moved" is incorrect. It seems to say that they voluntarily moved to the daytime hours when in fact they were "were moved." There is a slight logical difference here. Also, "in the 1920s and in the 1930s" should be used.
E. The verbs are not parallel. Also, it sounds like the soap operas were moved to the 1930s? This does not make any sense at all.
Re: Although early soap operas were first aired on evening radio in the 19
[#permalink]
Show Tags
02 Feb 2013, 06:12
ywilfred wrote:
Although early soap operas were first aired on evening radio in the 1920’s, they had moved to the daytime hours of the 1930’s when the evening schedule became crowded with comedians and variety shows.
(A) were first aired on evening radio in the 1920’s, they had moved to the daytime hours of the 1930’s (B) were first aired on evening radio in the 1920’s, they were moved to the daytime hours in the 1930’s (C) were aired first on evening radio in the 1920’s, moving to the daytime hours in the 1930’s (D) were aired first in the evening on 1920’s radio, they moved to the daytime hours of the 1930’s (E) aired on evening radio first in the 1920’s, they were moved to the 1930’s in the daytime hours
The intended meaning for the sentence is that in the 1920's was when the early soap operas were first aired on evening radio. This doesn't mean that the early soap operas aired firston evening radio. These are two different things. Thus, we eliminate (C) and (D).
On the verb side, the early soap opera cannot air itself. The usage of "aired" over "were aired" makes the "early soap opera" the doer of the action which is wrong. Thus, we eliminate (E). For the same reason, we also eliminate (A) with its active usage of "moved."
Concentration: General Management, International Business
GMAT 1: 650 Q48 V31
WE: Information Technology (Telecommunications)
Re: Although early soap operas were first aired on evening radio in the 19
[#permalink]
Show Tags
16 Nov 2013, 22:30
daagh wrote:
@teal
Please read this from the given link; it is a rule that we do not use two different voices in sentences containing two clauses that are joined by a conjunction. I have also quoted the relevant part relating to voices. HTH
My understanding is that if there are multiple event , we need to use 'had' or past perfect tense to show sequence clearly. is this understanding correct ?
If yes, why it does not applicable in current case ( is it because 1920 & 1930 have already done this job ?) if no, I will have to dig deeper in some grammar books to clarify my understanding...
Since a long time I am carrying this perception that in subordinate clause and main clause voice parallelism is necessary. I am aware that we can keep different voices in independent clause joined by coordinating conjunction until such usage make sense.
Today I saw a question Q86-OG11, in which this concept is specifically tested.
Although early soap operas were first aired on evening radio in the 1920's, they had moved to the daytime hours of the 1930's when the evening schedule became crowded with comedians and variety shows.
(A) were first aired on evening radio in the 1920's, they had moved to the daytime hours of the 1930's (B) were first aired on evening radio in the 1920's, they were moved to the daytime hours in the 1930's (C) were aired first on evening radio in the 1920's, moving to the daytime hours in the 1930's (D) were aired first in the evening on 1920's radio, they moved to the daytime hours of the 1930's (E) aired on evening radio first in the 1920's, they were moved to the 1930's in the daytime hours
I want to know how much strict is this criterion from GMAT's perspective or how far we can stretch this concept ? Could you please give some valid examples in which we can keep different voices in subordinate and main clause such as in if..., then or Although ..., main clause or any OG problem.
Since a long time I am carrying this perception that in subordinate clause and main clause voice parallelism is necessary. I am aware that we can keep different voices in independent clause joined by coordinating conjunction until such usage make sense.
Today I saw a question Q86-OG11, in which this concept is specifically tested.
Although early soap operas were first aired on evening radio in the 1920's, they had moved to the daytime hours of the 1930's when the evening schedule became crowded with comedians and variety shows.
(A) were first aired on evening radio in the 1920's, they had moved to the daytime hours of the 1930's (B) were first aired on evening radio in the 1920's, they were moved to the daytime hours in the 1930's (C) were aired first on evening radio in the 1920's, moving to the daytime hours in the 1930's (D) were aired first in the evening on 1920's radio, they moved to the daytime hours of the 1930's (E) aired on evening radio first in the 1920's, they were moved to the 1930's in the daytime hours
I want to know how much strict is this criterion from GMAT's perspective or how far we can stretch this concept ? Could you please give some valid examples in which we can keep different voices in subordinate and main clause such as in if..., then or Although ..., main clause or any OG problem.
Thanks & Regards, Piyush
Dear Piyush, I'm happy to help.
I don't think voice parallelism is the issue here. I don't think that's ever an issue. Verbs in parallel do not have to match in tense, in voice, in mood, etc.
I think the issue in this particular question is one of logic. Think about it. Soap operas may be lively and entertaining, but they are not self-aware entities to which we can impute independent intention and rational capacities. They do not actually "move" as self-moving actors. Someone (a network, an executive, etc.) has to move them. The choice of the passive in the second clause is dictated by the logic of the situation, not by some extra constraints on Parallelism.
Re: Although early soap operas were first aired on evening radio in the 19
[#permalink]
Show Tags
26 Sep 2017, 03:26
I have seen in gmat questions that when one event takes place before another of the past, it is generally shown by "had" - past perfect is used. There are plenty of questions in OG 12. For instance, Q19. The Iroquois were primarily planters, although they supplemented their cultivation of maize, squash, and beans with fishing and hunting --- because same time, same tense used. simple past and simple past Q3. Although various 18th and 19th century American poets had professed an interest in Native American poetry and had pretended to imitate Native American forms in their own works, it was not until almost 1900 that scholars and critics seriously began studying traditional Native American poetry in native languages. Here, the OG states that past perfect had professed and had pretended designate a time (18th & 19th C) earlier than simple past tense so the second clause, explaining what happened around 1900, must use the past tense, and so it uses "began studying" Q86. The results of the company's cost-cutting measures are evident in its profits, which increased 5% during first 3 months of this year after they fell over the last 2 years... (here i have changed it to they) The above underlined portion is incorrect because it fails to distinguish between the two sequentially ordered indicators, wherein the first indicator (increase of 5%) occurred after the indicator mentioned next (fell over the last 2 years) Now, the correct option that clearly depicts the sequence of events is which have increased 5% during the first 3 months of this year after falling over the last 2 years. Okay , the sentence seems better to me, but then I could not grasp what was wrong in my modified version, the original option (changed from it to they).
Now, coming to the present question, when soap operas were first aired in 1920s, the event of moving to the daytime hours happens after that in the 1930s. This creates a divide in the two timeframes. Accordingly, had been first aired in 1920s must be used... Therefore, to me, the correct answer must be
Although early soap operas had / had been first aired on evening radio in the 1920's, they were moved to the daytime hours in the 1930's when the evening schedule became crowded with comedians and variety shows.
Even though this option doesnt exist, I do not understand why same tense can be used to modify two events taking place in different times with say approx 10 years between them. Further, had / had been is what I could think.
Re: Although early soap operas were first aired on evening radio in the 19
[#permalink]
Show Tags
26 Sep 2017, 04:51
2
1
talismaaniac wrote:
I have seen in gmat questions that when one event takes place before another of the past, it is generally shown by "had" - past perfect is used. There are plenty of questions in OG 12. For instance, Q19. The Iroquois were primarily planters, although they supplemented their cultivation of maize, squash, and beans with fishing and hunting --- because same time, same tense used. simple past and simple past Q3. Although various 18th and 19th century American poets had professed an interest in Native American poetry and had pretended to imitate Native American forms in their own works, it was not until almost 1900 that scholars and critics seriously began studying traditional Native American poetry in native languages. Here, the OG states that past perfect had professed and had pretended designate a time (18th & 19th C) earlier than simple past tense so the second clause, explaining what happened around 1900, must use the past tense, and so it uses "began studying" Q86. The results of the company's cost-cutting measures are evident in its profits, which increased 5% during first 3 months of this year after they fell over the last 2 years... (here i have changed it to they) The above underlined portion is incorrect because it fails to distinguish between the two sequentially ordered indicators, wherein the first indicator (increase of 5%) occurred after the indicator mentioned next (fell over the last 2 years) Now, the correct option that clearly depicts the sequence of events is which have increased 5% during the first 3 months of this year after falling over the last 2 years. Okay , the sentence seems better to me, but then I could not grasp what was wrong in my modified version, the original option (changed from it to they).
Now, coming to the present question, when soap operas were first aired in 1920s, the event of moving to the daytime hours happens after that in the 1930s. This creates a divide in the two timeframes. Accordingly, had been first aired in 1920s must be used... Therefore, to me, the correct answer must be
Although early soap operas had / had been first aired on evening radio in the 1920's, they were moved to the daytime hours in the 1930's when the evening schedule became crowded with comedians and variety shows.
Even though this option doesnt exist, I do not understand why same tense can be used to modify two events taking place in different times with say approx 10 years between them. Further, had / had been is what I could think.
Past perfect tense is used to present sequencing between two past events. The past event that took place before the other past event is written in past perfect tense and the latter event in simple future future tense.
However, sequencing can be established with the usage of past perfect tense only when the two past events are related in some way. If the two past events are not related, then past perfect tense is not used for the earlier event.
Although early soap operas were first aired on evening radio in the 1920's, they had moved to the daytime hours of the 1930's when the evening schedule became crowded with comedians and variety shows.
In the above-mentioned official sentence, the two events - the first opera was aired and later they moved - are not related in any way. These are two independent actions that took place at two different times. This is the reason why use of past perfect tense had moved is incorrect in the context of this sentence.
Both the events must be written in simple past tense verbs as we see in the correct answer choice.
Hope this helps. Thanks. Shraddha
_________________
Past perfect tense is used to present sequencing between two past events. The past event that took place before the other past event is written in past perfect tense and the latter event in simple future future tense.
However, sequencing can be established with the usage of past perfect tense only when the two past events are related in some way. If the two past events are not related, then past perfect tense is not used for the earlier event.
Although early soap operas were first aired on evening radio in the 1920's, they had moved to the daytime hours of the 1930's when the evening schedule became crowded with comedians and variety shows.
In the above-mentioned official sentence, the two events - the first opera was aired and later they moved - are not related in any way. These are two independent actions that took place at two different times. This is the reason why use of past perfect tense had moved is incorrect in the context of this sentence.
Both the events must be written in simple past tense verbs as we see in the correct answer choice.
Hope this helps. Thanks. Shraddha
Thanks! So you mean that the usage of the participle depends upon whether the events are dependent or independent. hmmm.. I get this a little. However, now I will have to start forming an idea about how to ascertain whether there is any relation between the two or not! Phew
Re: Although early soap operas were first aired on evening radio in the 19
[#permalink]
Show Tags
27 Sep 2017, 02:18
4
talismaaniac wrote:
Thanks! So you mean that the usage of the participle depends upon whether the events are dependent or independent. hmmm.. I get this a little. However, now I will have to start forming an idea about how to ascertain whether there is any relation between the two or not! Phew
I know it sounds a bit complicated that past perfect tense can only be used for the earlier related past event.
However, it is not that difficult to figure out if the events presents in a sentence are related or not.
While analyzing the events, we must figure out if the earlier past action has any bearing/effect on the latter past action, that is, if two actions are connected any which way. Following are some situations of related events:
i. Cause-and-Effect relations hip between the two events make them related. ii. For the sake of clear sequencing to express the correct meaning, past perfect tense is used.
Let's begin with some simple examples here.
1. John learned last week that Eutopia, a little-known country, had gotten its independence in 1970.
Use of past-perfect tense had gotten in the above-mentioned sentence is incorrect because the two events are not related.
Eutopia got its independence in 1970. However, John got to know about this fact only last week. But event of his knowledge does not affect the fact when Eutopia got independence. That event took place in 1970 irrespective of John's knowledge.
Hence the correct version of sentence 1. is: John learned last week that Eutopia, a little-known country, had gotten its independence in 1970.
2. Researchers found evidence that the Earth had undergone major changes in the last ice age.
Once again, use of past-perfect tense had undergone in the above-mentioned sentence is incorrect because the two events are not related.
No matter when the researchers found the evidence, the changes took place in the last age irrespective of researcher's knowledge. The changes did not depend upon the event of researchers finding the evidence.
So, the correct version of the sentence is: Researchers found evidence that the Earth underwent major changes in the last ice age.
Now let's evaluate those official sentences that use past perfect tense correctly.
1. Dressed as a man and using the name Robert Shurtleff, Deborah Sampson, the first woman to draw a soldier's pension, joined the Continental Army in 1782 at the age of 22, was injured three times, and was discharged in 1783 because she had become too ill to serve.
In the above-mentioned sentence, the two events in bold are related to each other because one event led to the other (cause-and-effect). Hence, use of past perfect tense is correct in this sentence.
2. Government officials announced that restrictions on the use of water would continue because no appreciable increase in the level of the river had resulted from the intermittent showers that had fallen throughout the area the day before.
Per the above-mentioned sentence, it is necessary to use past perfect tense had resulted to clarify the sequence of events. Use of past perfect tense had resulted makes it clear that the announcement took place only after the water level in the river had not increased to a satisfactory level.
Use of had fallen is related to the event had resulted because it is the intermittent showers because of which the water level did not increase.
So, all we need to do is just spend some time with the original sentence to understand the context and intended meaning of the sentence so that we ascertain if the events mentioned in the sentence are related in any way.
Hope this helps. Thanks. Shraddha
_________________
Re: Although early soap operas were first aired on evening radio in the 19
[#permalink]
Show Tags
28 Sep 2018, 21:46
egmat wrote:
talismaaniac wrote:
Thanks! So you mean that the usage of the participle depends upon whether the events are dependent or independent. hmmm.. I get this a little. However, now I will have to start forming an idea about how to ascertain whether there is any relation between the two or not! Phew
I know it sounds a bit complicated that past perfect tense can only be used for the earlier related past event.
However, it is not that difficult to figure out if the events presents in a sentence are related or not.
While analyzing the events, we must figure out if the earlier past action has any bearing/effect on the latter past action, that is, if two actions are connected any which way. Following are some situations of related events:
i. Cause-and-Effect relations hip between the two events make them related. ii. For the sake of clear sequencing to express the correct meaning, past perfect tense is used.
Let's begin with some simple examples here.
1. John learned last week that Eutopia, a little-known country, had gotten its independence in 1970.
Use of past-perfect tense had gotten in the above-mentioned sentence is incorrect because the two events are not related.
Eutopia got its independence in 1970. However, John got to know about this fact only last week. But event of his knowledge does not affect the fact when Eutopia got independence. That event took place in 1970 irrespective of John's knowledge.
Hence the correct version of sentence 1. is: John learned last week that Eutopia, a little-known country, had gotten its independence in 1970.
2. Researchers found evidence that the Earth had undergone major changes in the last ice age.
Once again, use of past-perfect tense had undergone in the above-mentioned sentence is incorrect because the two events are not related.
No matter when the researchers found the evidence, the changes took place in the last age irrespective of researcher's knowledge. The changes did not depend upon the event of researchers finding the evidence.
So, the correct version of the sentence is: Researchers found evidence that the Earth underwent major changes in the last ice age.
Now let's evaluate those official sentences that use past perfect tense correctly.
1. Dressed as a man and using the name Robert Shurtleff, Deborah Sampson, the first woman to draw a soldier's pension, joined the Continental Army in 1782 at the age of 22, was injured three times, and was discharged in 1783 because she had become too ill to serve.
In the above-mentioned sentence, the two events in bold are related to each other because one event led to the other (cause-and-effect). Hence, use of past perfect tense is correct in this sentence.
2. Government officials announced that restrictions on the use of water would continue because no appreciable increase in the level of the river had resulted from the intermittent showers that had fallen throughout the area the day before.
Per the above-mentioned sentence, it is necessary to use past perfect tense had resulted to clarify the sequence of events. Use of past perfect tense had resulted makes it clear that the announcement took place only after the water level in the river had not increased to a satisfactory level.
Use of had fallen is related to the event had resulted because it is the intermittent showers because of which the water level did not increase.
So, all we need to do is just spend some time with the original sentence to understand the context and intended meaning of the sentence so that we ascertain if the events mentioned in the sentence are related in any way.
Past perfect tense is used to present sequencing between two past events. The past event that took place before the other past event is written in past perfect tense and the latter event in simplefuture future tense. However, sequencing can be established with the usage of past perfect tense only when the two past events are related in some way. If the two past events are not related, then past perfect tense is not used for the earlier event.
Although early soap operas were first aired on evening radio in the 1920's, they had moved to the daytime hours of the 1930's when the evening schedule became crowded with comedians and variety shows.
In the above-mentioned official sentence, the two events - the first opera was aired and later they moved - are not related in any way. These are two independent actions that took place at two different times. This is the reason why use of past perfect tense had moved is incorrect in the context of this sentence.
Both the events must be written in simple past tense verbs as we see in the correct answer choice.
Hope this helps. Thanks. Shraddha
Hi egmat, A few errors in your posts above have been highlighted in yellow.
John learned last week that Eutopia, a little-known country, got its independence in 1970.
Past perfect tense is used to present sequencing between two past events. The past event that took place before the other past event is written in past perfect tense and the latter event in simple past tense.
_________________
When everything seems to be going against you, remember that the airplane takes off against the wind, not with it. - Henry Ford The Moment You Think About Giving Up, Think Of The Reason Why You Held On So Long
Re: Although early soap operas were first aired on evening radio in the 19
[#permalink]
Show Tags
29 Sep 2018, 01:46
egmat wrote:
talismaaniac wrote:
I have seen in gmat questions that when one event takes place before another of the past, it is generally shown by "had" - past perfect is used. There are plenty of questions in OG 12. For instance, Q19. The Iroquois were primarily planters, although they supplemented their cultivation of maize, squash, and beans with fishing and hunting --- because same time, same tense used. simple past and simple past Q3. Although various 18th and 19th century American poets had professed an interest in Native American poetry and had pretended to imitate Native American forms in their own works, it was not until almost 1900 that scholars and critics seriously began studying traditional Native American poetry in native languages. Here, the OG states that past perfect had professed and had pretended designate a time (18th & 19th C) earlier than simple past tense so the second clause, explaining what happened around 1900, must use the past tense, and so it uses "began studying" Q86. The results of the company's cost-cutting measures are evident in its profits, which increased 5% during first 3 months of this year after they fell over the last 2 years... (here i have changed it to they) The above underlined portion is incorrect because it fails to distinguish between the two sequentially ordered indicators, wherein the first indicator (increase of 5%) occurred after the indicator mentioned next (fell over the last 2 years) Now, the correct option that clearly depicts the sequence of events is which have increased 5% during the first 3 months of this year after falling over the last 2 years. Okay , the sentence seems better to me, but then I could not grasp what was wrong in my modified version, the original option (changed from it to they).
Now, coming to the present question, when soap operas were first aired in 1920s, the event of moving to the daytime hours happens after that in the 1930s. This creates a divide in the two timeframes. Accordingly, had been first aired in 1920s must be used... Therefore, to me, the correct answer must be
Although early soap operas had / had been first aired on evening radio in the 1920's, they were moved to the daytime hours in the 1930's when the evening schedule became crowded with comedians and variety shows.
Even though this option doesnt exist, I do not understand why same tense can be used to modify two events taking place in different times with say approx 10 years between them. Further, had / had been is what I could think.
Past perfect tense is used to present sequencing between two past events. The past event that took place before the other past event is written in past perfect tense and the latter event in simple future future tense.
However, sequencing can be established with the usage of past perfect tense only when the two past events are related in some way. If the two past events are not related, then past perfect tense is not used for the earlier event.
Although early soap operas were first aired on evening radio in the 1920's, they had moved to the daytime hours of the 1930's when the evening schedule became crowded with comedians and variety shows.
In the above-mentioned official sentence, the two events - the first opera was aired and later they moved - are not related in any way. These are two independent actions that took place at two different times. This is the reason why use of past perfect tense had moved is incorrect in the context of this sentence.
Both the events must be written in simple past tense verbs as we see in the correct answer choice.
Hope this helps. Thanks. Shraddha
Hi EGMAT team, while solving this question, I realized it is one of those exceptions where Active Voice can be parallel to Passive voice. I chose D in this context. C1-passive, C2-Active. Even though it has prepositional phrase error of 'aired in', I found D to exhibit parallelism. Please let me know where I did mistake
gmatclubot
Re: Although early soap operas were first aired on evening radio in the 19
[#permalink]
29 Sep 2018, 01:46
close
84% (01:13) correct 
I will have to dig deeper in some grammar books to clarify my understanding...
