Last visit was: 15 Dec 2024, 10:43 It is currently 15 Dec 2024, 10:43
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
avatar
dhruvjain
Joined: 02 Mar 2012
Last visit: 02 Dec 2012
Posts: 1
Own Kudos:
1
 []
Given Kudos: 2
GMAT 1: 720 Q50 V38
Products:
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
vishnuamaram340
Joined: 22 May 2012
Last visit: 23 May 2012
Posts: 7
Own Kudos:
Posts: 7
Kudos: 1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
eitijain
Joined: 30 Jan 2016
Last visit: 19 Dec 2016
Posts: 1
Posts: 1
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Nightmare007
Joined: 26 Aug 2016
Last visit: 05 Aug 2020
Posts: 439
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 204
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, International Business
GMAT 1: 690 Q50 V33
GMAT 2: 700 Q50 V33
GMAT 3: 730 Q51 V38
GPA: 4
WE:Information Technology (Consulting)
Products:
GMAT 3: 730 Q51 V38
Posts: 439
Kudos: 412
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Please review this essay as well. Thank you.

The article states that America is losing its competitive edge relative to other countries because some studies show that on average Americans spend over a quarter of their leisure time shopping. I find this logically in-convincing in several aspects.

First of all America losing its competitive edge relative to other countries is based on questionable assumption that This is happening only through shopping which uses only quarter of leisure time of Americans. Suppose there are other Causes of the America losing its competitive edge relative to other countries such as Economy growth of other countries are higher than the America due to their increase in production and growth in technology. This leads to some other cause rather than the spending time on shopping which is causing America to lose its competitive edge. Hence, This argument is not justified.

Secondly Author uses casual flaw, Where two incidents happen together, the author mistakes for one is the cause of other. Americans, Here, spend over a quarter of their leisure time shopping, and America losing its competitive edge relative to other countries, these two events are happening. The argument assumes that Americans spending on shopping is causing the America to loose its competitive edge over other nationalities. There by making the argument flaw.

Finally, The author conveys himself that shopping is not a productive activity.By stating that Americans spend quarter of their time shopping, instead of spending their time productively.Here, shopping in some cases can be a productive activity such as shopping of personal development materials, books, and more. Thereby, Leading to the fall of conclusion. Therefore the argument is defective.

In conclusion, The argument is flawed and defective, and the argument is not a strong argument.Because depending on the studies which show that Americans spend quarter of their leisure time on shopping and Americans are wasting time through frivolous consumption does not support the conclusion that Spending time on shopping is causing the America to lose its competitive edge relative to other countries. To strengthen the argument the author must, at very least , provide the assumption stated above and correct the flaws mentioned above.
User avatar
klunk
Joined: 21 Feb 2020
Last visit: 08 Aug 2020
Posts: 20
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 6
Location: India
GMAT 1: 730 Q49 V41
GPA: 4
GMAT 1: 730 Q49 V41
Posts: 20
Kudos: 12
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The argument claims that American businesses are performing poorly because Americans are spending a quarter of their leisure time in shopping. According to the argument, American businesses can reverse this loss in global competitive advantage by pursuing personal or communal development activities rather than shopping for non-essential goods. Stated in this way, the argument is weak because it lacks compelling evidence on the basis of which it can be evaluated. The argument draws a strong negative correlation between competitiveness in the global market and shopping for non essential goods by Americans.

Firstly, the argument claims that by diverting a portion of leisure time to personal development will counteract the trend of falling business competitiveness. While it may be true that improving personal skills and developing the community can eventually increase business capabilities in international territories, the lack of poor evidence to back the argument makes it questionable. For instance, it could be possible that Americans are spending significantly less of their leisure time to shop for non-essential goods as compared to earlier yet American businesses are continuing to perform poorly. The argument is weak and unconvincing because it does not take into account other factors that could lead to the drop in performance.

Secondly, some sectors of the population may have caused the average time spent to rise. For instance, retired people and other such outliers spend too much of their time shopping for goods. A decrease in time spent by them may not have the effect the author intends to have. It is probable that other countries that are more competitive that America are improving their production capabilities or are receiving government subsidies that make their products cheaper in the international market. A reduction in the time spent by Americans shopping may not make their products cheaper or competitive. The argument is poorly reasoned because it attributes correlation to causation.

In conclusion, the argument is flawed for the aforementioned reasons. Agreed that spending time to develop yourself and the community is beneficial, however, entertainment and recreation are important to improve productivity. The argument is negligent to several factors, such as political, legal, and environmental factors, that are not controlled by internal factors, for instance, a pandemic. It could be significantly strengthened if the author mentioned the current global environment and the history of American businesses
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7168 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
234 posts