Not to worry too much
gilahrii - the video questions are supposedly include people but not eliminate people. It's kind of like another opportunity to show your strengths if the application is not your forte, I think they're looking out for people who might be better speakers than writers. I mean, this is what they are officially saying but it's a black box on what is actually happening.
But there is no use in worrying. Remember that everyone is up against the same challenges as you re: the extemporaneous speaking.
I just changed my blog with regards to advising you to go with STAR format on this. I've had a recent epiphany, when helping my clients, to simplify the model to
problem/solution. For essays, do the full STAR, interviews, get right to the problem.
Ideally, problem/solution will defacto encompass all the elements of STAR (situation/task/action/result). The main thing to remember is it still is extremely important for you to give them context before launching into your actions. What is the pain point that makes your actions relevant? But I think problem/solution is the way to go for interviews so you don't get too overprogrammed.
gilahrii
I finished my application last night. Feeling relieved but worried that i may have bombed a question or two on the video interviews. Hard to know what is deemed acceptable for video interviews and its weighting on the whole application. My experience is that try to keep an open mind and not try to think too much about STAR format etc. The questions are unexpected and you need to appear natural. Better to have a conversational approach. Keen to hear other people's experience.