Last visit was: 25 Apr 2024, 15:20 It is currently 25 Apr 2024, 15:20

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 92915
Own Kudos [?]: 619017 [1]
Given Kudos: 81595
Send PM
Yale Moderator
Joined: 21 Jan 2020
Posts: 49
Own Kudos [?]: 30 [2]
Given Kudos: 50
Location: India
Concentration: Technology, Sustainability
GMAT 1: 720 Q50 V38
GMAT 2: 660 Q50 V29 (Online)
GPA: 3.2
WE:Engineering (Computer Software)
Send PM
Verbal Chat Moderator
Joined: 20 Mar 2018
Posts: 1999
Own Kudos [?]: 1612 [1]
Given Kudos: 1679
Send PM
Intern
Intern
Joined: 01 Mar 2015
Posts: 45
Own Kudos [?]: 63 [1]
Given Kudos: 108
Location: India
GPA: 4
WE:Consulting (Consulting)
Send PM
Re: Citizens in Country X are frequently complaining that lines in governm [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Citizens in Country X are frequently complaining that lines in government offices are much longer now than they were 15 years ago.[/b] No real measure of the length of the lines in government offices in Country X 15 years ago or today exists, but the citizens' complaints are almost certainly exaggerated, if not altogether unwarranted. The number of government officials in Country X has quadrupled over the past 15 years whereas the number of citizens has only doubled.

Opinion of Citizens - lines in government offices are much longer now than they were 15 years ago
Author counters above opinion with B1- No real measure of the length of the lines in government offices in Country X 15 years ago or today exists
Author's conclusion - the citizens' complaints are almost certainly exaggerated, if not altogether unwarranted
Evidence supporting above conclusion B2 (i.e. complaints are not altogether unwarranted) - The number of government officials in Country X has quadrupled over the past 15 years whereas the number of citizens has only doubled.


B1 = Author partially countering the opinion of Citizen (1st position)
B2 = Evidence supporting Author's conclusion to partially support opinion of Citizens (2nd position)

Thus, we need options that put B1 and B2 on the opposite sides.


In the argument given, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

A. The first is the argument's conclusion; the second is the premise on which this conclusion is based. - 1st is not a conclusion.

B. The first is evidence in favor of a certain position; the second is additional evidence that seems to contradict the first. - This can also be answer. But I feel inclined towards Option D

C. The first is the argument's conclusion; the second is evidence that seems to contradict this conclusion. - 1st is not a conclusion.

D. The first is a report of one side's opinion; the second is the opposite position. - yes 1st is opinion of one side and 2nd is the opposite position.

E. The first is a premise; the second is another premise that contains information that sheds new light on the situation. - 2nd is not shedding new light on the situation.
VP
VP
Joined: 14 Aug 2019
Posts: 1378
Own Kudos [?]: 846 [0]
Given Kudos: 381
Location: Hong Kong
Concentration: Strategy, Marketing
GMAT 1: 650 Q49 V29
GPA: 3.81
Send PM
Re: Citizens in Country X are frequently complaining that lines in governm [#permalink]
Citizens in Country X are frequently complaining that lines in government offices are much longer now than they were 15 years ago. No real measure of the length of the lines in government offices in Country X 15 years ago or today exists, but the citizens' complaints are almost certainly exaggerated, if not altogether unwarranted. The number of government officials in Country X has quadrupled over the past 15 years whereas the number of citizens has only doubled.

In the argument given, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

Position: the citizens' complaints are almost certainly exaggerated, if not altogether unwarranted.

BF1: some fact/statement
BF2: position


A. The first is the argument's conclusion; the second is the premise on which this conclusion is based.

B. The first is evidence in favor of a certain position; the second is additional evidence that seems to contradict the first.

C. The first is the argument's conclusion; the second is evidence that seems to contradict this conclusion.

D. The first is a report of one side's opinion; the second is the opposite position.

E. The first is a premise; the second is another premise that contains information that sheds new light on the situation.

Final answer: E
Intern
Intern
Joined: 08 Jul 2019
Posts: 36
Own Kudos [?]: 31 [1]
Given Kudos: 71
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, General Management
GMAT 1: 650 Q48 V31
WE:Engineering (Transportation)
Send PM
Re: Citizens in Country X are frequently complaining that lines in governm [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Citizens in Country X are frequently complaining that lines in government offices are much longer now than they were 15 years ago. No real measure of the length of the lines in government offices in Country X 15 years ago or today exists, but the citizens' complaints are almost certainly exaggerated, if not altogether unwarranted. The number of government officials in Country X has quadrupled over the past 15 years whereas the number of citizens has only doubled.

Notes:
Statement 1: Conclusion of a report or argument.
Some background,
Statement 2: analysis of the argument (of the author??)


In the argument given, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?


A. The first is the argument's conclusion; the second is the premise on which this conclusion is based. Statement 2 is not a premise, Hence this is not correct.

B. The first is evidence in favor of a certain position; the second is additional evidence that seems to contradict the first. Statement 1 is not an evidence, but conclusion/opinion, Hence this is not correct.

C. The first is the argument's conclusion; the second is evidence that seems to contradict this conclusion. Statement 2 is not an evidence, it is only a position, Hence this is not correct.

D. The first is a report of one side's opinion; the second is the opposite position. Statement 1 can be said as the conclusion/report of opinion. May not be the best but good enough in this context. Statement 2 is definitely the opposite position of Statement 1, need not be true or have evidence but a position. Hence this option is the best Answer.

E. The first is a premise; the second is another premise that contains information that sheds new light on the situation. Statement 1 is not a premise, Hence this is not correct.
Manager
Manager
Joined: 14 Jun 2020
Posts: 63
Own Kudos [?]: 80 [0]
Given Kudos: 119
Location: India
GMAT 1: 680 Q49 V33 (Online)
GRE 1: Q170 V151
WE:Consulting (Consulting)
Send PM
Re: Citizens in Country X are frequently complaining that lines in governm [#permalink]
A relatively easy one

The first bold statement is premise, and second is the author's conclusion.
So the answer choices should be in opposite direction, with first statement being premise

Only D fits the criteria


Bunuel wrote:
Citizens in Country X are frequently complaining that lines in government offices are much longer now than they were 15 years ago. No real measure of the length of the lines in government offices in Country X 15 years ago or today exists, but the citizens' complaints are almost certainly exaggerated, if not altogether unwarranted. The number of government officials in Country X has quadrupled over the past 15 years whereas the number of citizens has only doubled.
In the argument given, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

A. The first is the argument's conclusion; the second is the premise on which this conclusion is based.
B. The first is evidence in favor of a certain position; the second is additional evidence that seems to contradict the first.
C. The first is the argument's conclusion; the second is evidence that seems to contradict this conclusion.
D. The first is a report of one side's opinion; the second is the opposite position.
E. The first is a premise; the second is another premise that contains information that sheds new light on the situation.


Project CR Butler: Critical Reasoning


For all CR butler Questions Click Here
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 92915
Own Kudos [?]: 619017 [0]
Given Kudos: 81595
Send PM
Re: Citizens in Country X are frequently complaining that lines in governm [#permalink]
Expert Reply
OFFICIAL EXPLANATION

Citizens in Country X are frequently complaining that lines in government offices are much longer now than they were 15 years ago. No real measure of the length of the lines in government offices in Country X 15 years ago or today exists, but the citizens' complaints are almost certainly exaggerated, if not altogether unwarranted. The number of government officials in Country X has quadrupled over the past 15 years whereas the number of citizens has only doubled.

In the argument given, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?


A. The first is the argument's conclusion; the second is the premise on which this conclusion is based.

Incorrect.

To solve this Conclusion Weakening question, first break down the argument. The first and last sentences are premises providing factual data. The middle sentence contains an opinion presented by the author so it's the argument's conclusion:

    Premise A: Country X's citizens complain that lines in government offices are longer than they were 15 years ago
    +
    Premise B: the number of Country X's officials has quadrupled in the last 15 years; the number of citizens has doubled
    =
    Conclusion: the lines are not longer (or only slightly longer) than they were 15 years ago

    Possible assumption: government officials mostly deal with face-to-face service of the citizens

    Weakening Data: ?


You are required to find data that weakens the conclusion that the citizens' complaints about the lines being longer are unwarranted, i.e., supports the citizens complaints. The correct answer could be one that exposes the argument's assumption.

This answer choice neither weakens nor strengthens the conclusion. What's missing in this answer choice in order for it to be correct is information about the current average waiting time, specifically information showing that today's waiting time is shorter than 7 minutes. Without a figure to compare it to, 7 minutes is useless information and cannot help us weaken the conclusion.



B. The first is evidence in favor of a certain position; the second is additional evidence that seems to contradict the first.

Incorrect.

This answer choice strengthens the conclusion by confirming its assumption, showing that there are more service-providing government officials per citizen today than there were 15 years ago. This change in ratio is likely to yield shorter waiting times and shorter lines. However, you were asked to weaken the conclusion that the citizens' complaints are uncalled for (i.e., prove the complaints are justified).



C. The first is the argument's conclusion; the second is evidence that seems to contradict this conclusion.

This answer choice attacks the argument's assumption. Just because more officials are employed does not mean that they are used in positions that will directly shorten the lines.


D. The first is a report of one side's opinion; the second is the opposite position.

Incorrect.

To solve this Conclusion Weakening question, first break down the argument. The first and last sentences are premises providing factual data. The middle sentence contains an opinion presented by the author so it's the argument's conclusion:

    Premise A: Country X's citizens complain that lines in government offices are longer than they were 15 years ago
    +
    Premise B: the number of Country X's officials has quadrupled in the last 15 years; the number of citizens has doubled
    =
    Conclusion: the lines are not longer (or only slightly longer) than they were 15 years ago

    Possible assumption: government officials mostly deal with face-to-face service of the citizens

    Weakening Data: ?


You are required to find data that weakens the conclusion that the citizens' complaints about the lines being longer are unwarranted, i.e., supports the citizens complaints. The correct answer could be one that exposes the argument's assumption.

This answer choice strengthens the conclusion while we're supposed to be weakening it. If the number of all citizens (i.e., the total number of adults and children) has doubled, and the number of children has tripled, the percentage of adult citizens has diminished over the past 15 years. Children do not normally go to government offices so this implies shorter waiting time and shorter lines. However, we should be looking for information that shows that this is not true.



E. The first is a premise; the second is another premise that contains information that sheds new light on the situation.

Incorrect.

This answer choice neither weakens nor strengthens the conclusion. Since the argument deals with a comparison between today's lines and those of 15 years ago, to weaken the conclusion we need an answer choice that will favor one of the two situations. Because this answer choice only gives us data about today's situation, we cannot compare it to that of 15 years ago.
Verbal Chat Moderator
Joined: 20 Mar 2018
Posts: 1999
Own Kudos [?]: 1612 [0]
Given Kudos: 1679
Send PM
Re: Citizens in Country X are frequently complaining that lines in governm [#permalink]
Bunuel, Could you recheck official explanation and correct answer

Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Critical Reasoning (CR) Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
GMAT Club Bot
Re: Citizens in Country X are frequently complaining that lines in governm [#permalink]
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6921 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne