Last visit was: 20 Nov 2025, 05:14 It is currently 20 Nov 2025, 05:14
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
avatar
rsh12
Joined: 25 Sep 2015
Last visit: 16 Apr 2021
Posts: 84
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 75
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 700 Q48 V37
GRE 1: Q750 V600
GPA: 3.26
Products:
GMAT 1: 700 Q48 V37
GRE 1: Q750 V600
Posts: 84
Kudos: 123
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
mikemcgarry
User avatar
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Last visit: 06 Aug 2018
Posts: 4,479
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 130
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 4,479
Kudos: 30,537
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
spetznaz
Joined: 08 Jun 2015
Last visit: 14 Jul 2024
Posts: 255
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 147
Location: India
GMAT 1: 640 Q48 V29
GMAT 2: 700 Q48 V38
GPA: 3.33
Products:
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
mikemcgarry
User avatar
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Last visit: 06 Aug 2018
Posts: 4,479
Own Kudos:
30,537
 [2]
Given Kudos: 130
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 4,479
Kudos: 30,537
 [2]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
spetznaz
mikemcgarry , thanks for the question and the OE :). I have understood why e is the OA. I have a doubt about option D though. Is it correct to eliminate d on the grounds that usage of comma + giving is incorrect here ? This option conveys the meaning that giving is an outcome of the previous clause i.e. naming of the equation after him. This meaning is incorrect.

Kindly comment if my reasoning is correct ?

Thanks in advance :)
Dear spetznaz,

My friend, I'm happy to respond. :-)

Actually, comma + "giving" is perfectly correct. In fact, I would say that version (D) is 100% grammatically correct, but it is a rhetorical nightmare. Here's version (D):
(D) Daniel Bernoulli (1700 – 1782) derived the famous fluid equation named for him, giving an explanation of the generation of the lift of an airplane’s wing, and made a discovery that led to an early method of measuring blood pressure.

Notice that version (D) is the longest of the five answer choices: that doesn't automatically mean an answer is wrong, but it's always a red flag that deserves our attention. Notice that version (D) is packed with nouns, nouns that are action words ("explanation," "generation"). As a general rule, a sentence is more compact and direct when the action words are in verb form. Putting action words in noun form is a way to make a choice sound bloated, weak, and indirect. For example, why on earth would we say "giving an explanation" rather than simply "explaining"? Even one action-word-as-noun is problematic, but this choice has two in a row! Holy mackerel! Choice (D) seems as if it is trying to win a contest to be the most rambling, verbose, and mealy-mouthed of the five answer choices. Yes, it's 100% grammatically correct, but rhetorically it's such a disaster that it should be taken out back and shot!

Remember that the GMAT SC is NOT purely a test a grammar. Instead, on the GMAT SC, grammar and logic and rhetoric are three equally important strands, and a student can't afford to ignore any of these.

Does all this make sense?
Mike :-)
User avatar
OreoShake
Joined: 23 Jan 2016
Last visit: 31 Jan 2019
Posts: 136
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 509
Location: India
GPA: 3.2
Posts: 136
Kudos: 82
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
im still unable to understand why A is incorrect. Firstly, isnt it unidiomatic to say 'named for him'? Secondly, DB deriving a formula to explain the generation of lift seems logical to me as a lay man without physics or history background. So the only reason to eliminate A according to me would be the concentrated adjectives in 'airplane's wing's generation of lift', which seems awkward.

Any correction or clarity on the above would be appreciated.
User avatar
mikemcgarry
User avatar
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Last visit: 06 Aug 2018
Posts: 4,479
Own Kudos:
30,537
 [1]
Given Kudos: 130
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 4,479
Kudos: 30,537
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
OreoShake
im still unable to understand why A is incorrect. Firstly, isnt it unidiomatic to say 'named for him'? Secondly, DB deriving a formula to explain the generation of lift seems logical to me as a lay man without physics or history background. So the only reason to eliminate A according to me would be the concentrated adjectives in 'airplane's wing's generation of lift', which seems awkward.

Any correction or clarity on the above would be appreciated.
Dear OreoShake,

I'm happy to respond. :-)

Think about this structure
{person] did X to do Y
That structure is the infinitive of purpose. It implies intentionality. It implies that the person, in undertaking action X, had the explicit purpose of accomplishing Y.

Consider the sentences:
1) Washington crossed the Delaware to stage a surprise attack on the Hessians.
This first is logical and historically accurate. That's precisely what Washington was trying to do that night.
2) Washington crossed the Delaware to look heroic in a painting.
This one is patently absurd. Yes, one of the many consequences of Washington's action is that, much later, he cut a particularly heroic figure in a painting. Nevertheless, phrasing this with an infinitive of purpose is absurd, because the very last thing on Washington's mind on that stressful evening was how some artist would paint it more than half a century later.

Now, if you think that's absurd, consider (A) from this problem.
Daniel Bernoulli (1700 – 1782) derived the famous fluid equation named after him, to explain an airplane’s wing’s generation of lift, and made a discovery that led to an early method of measuring blood pressure.
Yes, the structure "an airplane’s wing’s generation of lift" is less than ideal and probably would not be part of a correct answer, although it's hard to say whether this alone would disqualify an answer choice. The BIG problem with (A) is the absurd implication of intentionality. You don't have to have advanced technical knowledge about the history of science, but you have to have the basic idea that in the eighteenth century, there were no airplanes. To say that Bernoulli was trying to explain something about airplanes, that one of his explicit intentions in deriving the equation was to explain airplanes, is absurd, because the airplane didn't come into existence until more than a century after his death. There is no way he could have know anything about airplanes, so there is no way he could be trying to explain anything about them. That's the big problem with (A).

Remember, on the GMAT SC, an effective sentence is one in which grammar and logic and rhetoric all work together to produce meaning.

Does this make sense?
Mike :-)
User avatar
akshayk
Joined: 06 Jul 2016
Last visit: 21 Sep 2020
Posts: 273
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 99
Location: Singapore
Concentration: Strategy, Finance
Posts: 273
Kudos: 414
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
mikemcgarry
Daniel Bernoulli (1700 – 1782) derived the famous fluid equation named after him, to explain an airplane’s wing’s generation of lift, and made a discovery that led to an early method of measuring blood pressure.
(A) equation named after him, to explain an airplane’s wing’s generation of lift
(B) equation named after him, and this principle explains the lift of an airplane’s wing
(C) equation, named it after himself, explained how an airplane’s wing is generating lift
(D) equation named for him, giving an explanation of the generation of the lift of an airplane’s wing
(E) equation named for him, which explains how an airplane’s wing generates lift


Folks sometimes think of GMAT SC in terms of grammar only, but the SC is as much about logic as it is about grammar. The splits in this question are less about grammatical errors and more about logical problems. For a discussion of logic in GMAT SC questions, more practice questions of this sort, and the OE of this particular question, see:
https://magoosh.com/gmat/2014/logical-sp ... orrection/

Mike :-)

The story of this sentence is about a man named DB, who derived an equation and made a discovery that led to something.

A - Nothing wrong grammatically although the mammoth that are possessive's in this sentence could be avoided. Keep for NOW.
B - 'and this' creates a separate clause, and it's followed by another clause which breaks the entire flow of the sentence. It's better to use a modifier here, to explain what the equation does. OUT.
C - Clearly OUT. I laughed when I read this sentence. He derived an equation, then NAMED it after himself, then explained a phenomena, and finally made a discovery. Fake Parallelism that clearly destroy's the meaning of the sentence. OUT.
D - Extremely verbose. Giving an explanation is redundant. We could just say explains. OUT.
E - Nothing wrong grammatically. KEEP.

Now it's down to A & E.
The comparison is between intention Vs. explanation, so do we need an adverbial phrase to show intent, or a noun-modifier to explain what the equation does.
I chose E because it was more succinct, and later I did realise that airplanes did not exist back in 1700s so there could be no intent on DB's part to explain a wing's lift.

mikemcgarry
My question is with regards to the phrase, "to explain....." in option A. Is that an adverbial modifier?
User avatar
mikemcgarry
User avatar
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Last visit: 06 Aug 2018
Posts: 4,479
Own Kudos:
30,537
 [1]
Given Kudos: 130
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 4,479
Kudos: 30,537
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
akshayk
mikemcgarry
My question is with regards to the phrase, "to explain....." in option A. Is that an adverbial modifier?
Dear akshayk,

I'm happy to respond. :-)

My friend, did you see in the post immediate before yours that I explained that this was an infinitive of purpose. Yes, the infinitive of purpose is one kind of verb modifier, one kind of adverbial modifier. Because it makes clear the purpose of an action, it is always modifying a verb.

It's obvious that you are quite intelligent and have great potential. Before you ask a question on a thread, it's always good to check to what extent that issue already has been discussed. This sort of thoroughness is one of the aspects of asking an excellent question, and of course, that's one of the habits of excellence. Remember: how you do anything is how you do everything.

Does all this make sense?
Mike :-)
User avatar
hellosanthosh2k2
Joined: 02 Apr 2014
Last visit: 07 Dec 2020
Posts: 361
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1,227
Location: India
Schools: XLRI"20
GMAT 1: 700 Q50 V34
GPA: 3.5
Schools: XLRI"20
GMAT 1: 700 Q50 V34
Posts: 361
Kudos: 597
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi Mike,
Actually i chose option A, as i didnt know "named for him" is a correct idiom.
Also , "equation named after him, to explain an airplane’s wing’s generation of lift", is n't an example of using inifinity of purpose?, did bernoulli derive the equation to explain the lift. Please help me eliminate option A.
User avatar
mikemcgarry
User avatar
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Last visit: 06 Aug 2018
Posts: 4,479
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 130
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 4,479
Kudos: 30,537
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
hellosanthosh2k2
Hi Mike,
Actually i chose option A, as i didnt know "named for him" is a correct idiom.
Also , "equation named after him, to explain an airplane’s wing’s generation of lift", is n't an example of using inifinity of purpose?, did bernoulli derive the equation to explain the lift. Please help me eliminate option A.
Dear hellosanthosh2k2,

i"m happy to respond. :-)

First of all, "named for him" and "named after him" are both 100% correct idioms. You may find helpful these free GMAT Idiom Flashcards.

Yes, the phrase "to explain an airplane’s wing’s generation of lift" is an infinitive of purpose. It's also a gorgeously awkward phrase--it's hard for two possessives in a row not to be astonishingly awkward. That's problem #1 with (A), a rhetorical problem. Then problem #2 is the logical problem. The infinitive of purpose implies that the actor had conscious intention to so something. Well, the question very conveniently gives Mr. Bernoulli's dates, in the 18th century. You don't need to have a detailed knowledge of history, but you need to have the gist that there were no airplanes in the eighteen century--airplanes didn't come along to the 20th century, so someone two centuries earlier would have had no knowledge of them and therefore could form no purposes regarding them. Thus, the infinitive of purpose is illogical in (A).

Does all this make sense?
Mike :-)
User avatar
chesstitans
Joined: 12 Dec 2016
Last visit: 20 Nov 2019
Posts: 987
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 2,562
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V33
GPA: 3.64
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V33
Posts: 987
Kudos: 1,923
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
mikemcgarry,
why "which" does not refer to fluid?
User avatar
mikemcgarry
User avatar
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Last visit: 06 Aug 2018
Posts: 4,479
Own Kudos:
30,537
 [2]
Given Kudos: 130
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 4,479
Kudos: 30,537
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
chesstitans
mikemcgarry,
why "which" does not refer to fluid?
Dear chesstitans,

I'm happy to respond. :-)

In the construction "fluid equation," we have a pair of nouns in which one is essentially modifying the other. Even though "fluid" is a noun, in a way it is acting like an adjective here. It's subordinate to the second noun, "equation." Because the second noun has rhetorical priority, no modifier would ever pass over it to refer to the first noun.

Rhetorical priority is an underestimated dimension of pronoun-antecedent agreement.

Does all this make sense?
Mike :-)
avatar
as03691
Joined: 10 May 2018
Last visit: 30 Jun 2019
Posts: 30
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1
GMAT 1: 760 Q49 V42
Products:
GMAT 1: 760 Q49 V42
Posts: 30
Kudos: 2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
mikemcgarry
Daniel Bernoulli (1700 – 1782) derived the famous fluid equation named after him, to explain an airplane’s wing’s generation of lift, and made a discovery that led to an early method of measuring blood pressure.


(A) equation named after him, to explain an airplane’s wing’s generation of lift

(B) equation named after him, and this principle explains the lift of an airplane’s wing

(C) equation, named it after himself, explained how an airplane’s wing is generating lift

(D) equation named for him, giving an explanation of the generation of the lift of an airplane’s wing

(E) equation named for him, which explains how an airplane’s wing generates lift



Folks sometimes think of GMAT SC in terms of grammar only, but the SC is as much about logic as it is about grammar. The splits in this question are less about grammatical errors and more about logical problems. For a discussion of logic in GMAT SC questions, more practice questions of this sort, and the OE of this particular question, see:
https://magoosh.com/gmat/2014/logical-sp ... orrection/

Mike :-)


Okay there a few different things to consider here. I can tell that C is wrong because there is inappropriate parallelism. A is awkward sounding. ‘airplane’s wing’s generation of lift’ sounds strange. In D ‘giving an explanation…’ is modifying ‘named after him, I am pretty sure that it is not correct. Between E and B, E sounds more natural, since B has two ands. I am going to say E is correct.
avatar
stonepam
Joined: 17 Oct 2012
Last visit: 30 Mar 2025
Posts: 6
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 108
Location: Ghana
GRE 1: Q167 V166
GRE 1: Q167 V166
Posts: 6
Kudos: 3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Is "named for him" a correct idiom?
User avatar
rashwiniyer
Joined: 18 Aug 2012
Last visit: 09 Jan 2024
Posts: 65
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 78
Posts: 65
Kudos: 6
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Sorry I don't get it. How "named for him" is correct. It has to be "named after him" isn't it ? Or we choose E just because rest are more wrong?
User avatar
AjiteshArun
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 15 Jul 2015
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 5,949
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 732
Location: India
GMAT Focus 1: 715 Q83 V90 DI83
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V169
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT Focus 1: 715 Q83 V90 DI83
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V169
Posts: 5,949
Kudos: 5,080
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
rashwiniyer
Sorry I don't get it. How "named for him" is correct. It has to be "named after him" isn't it ? Or we choose E just because rest are more wrong?
Both name X after Y and name X for Y are correct.
avatar
AKSU2020
Joined: 05 Feb 2020
Last visit: 25 Aug 2020
Posts: 5
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Technology
Posts: 5
Kudos: 5
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
mikemcgarry
Daniel Bernoulli (1700 – 1782) derived the famous fluid equation named after him, to explain an airplane’s wing’s generation of lift, and made a discovery that led to an early method of measuring blood pressure.


(A) equation named after him, to explain an airplane’s wing’s generation of lift

(B) equation named after him, and this principle explains the lift of an airplane’s wing

(C) equation, named it after himself, explained how an airplane’s wing is generating lift

(D) equation named for him, giving an explanation of the generation of the lift of an airplane’s wing

(E) equation named for him, which explains how an airplane’s wing generates lift



Folks sometimes think of GMAT SC in terms of grammar only, but the SC is as much about logic as it is about grammar. The splits in this question are less about grammatical errors and more about logical problems. For a discussion of logic in GMAT SC questions, more practice questions of this sort, and the OE of this particular question, see:
https://magoosh.com/gmat/2014/logical-sp ... orrection/

Mike :-)

I don't agree with Mike's argument that "named for him" is a vital modifier. I have solved many official GMAT questions with "vital modifier" and "which" construction, and in all those questions the modifier held information that added value. In the case above, modifier "named for him" adds no such value.
User avatar
AjiteshArun
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 15 Jul 2015
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 5,949
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 732
Location: India
GMAT Focus 1: 715 Q83 V90 DI83
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V169
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT Focus 1: 715 Q83 V90 DI83
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V169
Posts: 5,949
Kudos: 5,080
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
AKSU2020
I don't agree with Mike's argument that "named for him" is a vital modifier. I have solved many official GMAT questions with "vital modifier" and "which" construction, and in all those questions the modifier held information that added value. In the case above, modifier "named for him" adds no such value.
Hi AKSU2020,

But don't you think that we need the named for him bit in order to recognize which "famous fluid equation" the sentence refers to?
avatar
AKSU2020
Joined: 05 Feb 2020
Last visit: 25 Aug 2020
Posts: 5
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Technology
Posts: 5
Kudos: 5
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
AjiteshArun
AKSU2020
I don't agree with Mike's argument that "named for him" is a vital modifier. I have solved many official GMAT questions with "vital modifier" and "which" construction, and in all those questions the modifier held information that added value. In the case above, modifier "named for him" adds no such value.
Hi AKSU2020,

But don't you think that we need the named for him bit in order to recognize which "famous fluid equation" the sentence refers to?

Hi Ajitesh,

Thanks for your reply!

I think that the use of "the famous equation" and "discovery" made me think more about what the equation does than who it is named for.

Regards
User avatar
emcheeks
Joined: 28 Jun 2020
Last visit: 22 Dec 2024
Posts: 119
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 78
Posts: 119
Kudos: 111
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello mikemcgarry


Thank you for your great problem and your explanation!

However, I still have a question about the correct answer choice E: doesn't it change the original meaning?

The original version is "explain an airplane’s wing’s generation of lift" --> it could be: explain what it is, how it is done, why it needs to be done, when it is done, how significant it is, and so on.

But in E, "explains how an airplane’s wing generates lift" changes the meaning to: explain how it is done.

Could you please explain this as I got really confused. Thank you so much!
   1   2   3   
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7443 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
231 posts
189 posts