Last visit was: 18 Nov 2025, 19:01 It is currently 18 Nov 2025, 19:01
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Sujithz001
Joined: 09 Jun 2024
Last visit: 10 Nov 2025
Posts: 75
Own Kudos:
26
 [1]
Given Kudos: 73
Posts: 75
Kudos: 26
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
FranCifu
Joined: 11 Jun 2024
Last visit: 24 Nov 2024
Posts: 44
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1
Posts: 44
Kudos: 30
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
ThatIndianGuy
Joined: 18 Mar 2020
Last visit: 15 Oct 2025
Posts: 80
Own Kudos:
65
 [1]
Given Kudos: 385
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Technology
WE:General Management (Technology)
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Oppenheimer1945
Joined: 16 Jul 2019
Last visit: 14 Nov 2025
Posts: 784
Own Kudos:
639
 [1]
Given Kudos: 223
Location: India
GMAT Focus 1: 645 Q90 V76 DI80
GPA: 7.81
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
­Economist: A recent survey found that in countries with higher rates of internet censorship, there are also higher rates of internet usage per capita. This seems counterintuitive because one might expect that restrictions on internet content would deter usage.
Prethinking: higher censorship- > higher Rates of usage per capita
Hypothesis-> higher censorship- > lower Rates of usage per capita
Causal Effect relation
Paradoxical explanation->some other reason is causing higher usage rates among people
Which of the following, if true and known by the residents of these countries, would best help explain the paradoxical results of the survey?

(A) Many residents in countries with higher internet censorship use the internet primarily for work-related purposes, which are not affected by censorship policies.
- not related
(B) Residents in countries with high internet censorship often use proxy servers and VPNs, which allow them to bypass restrictions and access a broader range of content online.
-as per pre-thinking (Correct)
(C) There is an observed trend in the data collection methodology where internet usage metrics might include both direct and indirect engagement metrics, which vary significantly between surveyed regions.
-Irrelavant
(D) Countries with high rates of internet censorship often have higher populations, thus naturally leading to a higher total number of internet users.
- higher number is not relevant here, we are concerned about higher %
(E) The survey included responses from a disproportionate number of young people, who tend to use the internet more frequently regardless of censorship levels.
-skewed data , but that would not help, disproportionate could mean either too much of too less.

Hence B)
User avatar
busygmatbee1290
Joined: 27 Dec 2023
Last visit: 18 Mar 2025
Posts: 50
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 116
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Strategy
GMAT Focus 1: 755 Q87 V90 DI86
GPA: 10/10
GMAT Focus 1: 755 Q87 V90 DI86
Posts: 50
Kudos: 73
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
­(A) Many residents in countries with higher internet censorship use the internet primarily for work-related purposes, which are not affected by censorship policies.
Yes, this explains why the censorship does not impact a country's internet usage per capita. 

(B) Residents in countries with high internet censorship often use proxy servers and VPNs, which allow them to bypass restrictions and access a broader range of content online.
Doesn't explain why more people would use it. 

(C) There is an observed trend in the data collection methodology where internet usage metrics might include both direct and indirect engagement metrics, which vary significantly between surveyed regions.
Out of scope. 

(D) Countries with high rates of internet censorship often have higher populations, thus naturally leading to a higher total number of internet users.
The qs gives "per Capita" normalized value. 

(E) The survey included responses from a disproportionate number of young people, who tend to use the internet more frequently regardless of censorship levels.
This doesn't explain the "higher" numbers of users. 
User avatar
xhym
Joined: 11 Jun 2024
Last visit: 20 Oct 2025
Posts: 65
Own Kudos:
83
 [1]
Given Kudos: 7
Location: Canada
Products:
Posts: 65
Kudos: 83
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
­Economist: A recent survey found that in countries with higher rates of internet censorship, there are also higher rates of internet usage per capita. This seems counterintuitive because one might expect that restrictions on internet content would deter usage.

Which of the following, if true and known by the residents of these countries, would best help explain the paradoxical results of the survey?

(A) Many residents in countries with higher internet censorship use the internet primarily for work-related purposes, which are not affected by censorship policies.

(B) Residents in countries with high internet censorship often use proxy servers and VPNs, which allow them to bypass restrictions and access a broader range of content online.

(C) There is an observed trend in the data collection methodology where internet usage metrics might include both direct and indirect engagement metrics, which vary significantly between surveyed regions.

(D) Countries with high rates of internet censorship often have higher populations, thus naturally leading to a higher total number of internet users.

(E) The survey included responses from a disproportionate number of young people, who tend to use the internet more frequently regardless of censorship levels.



­
 


This question was provided by GMAT Club
for the GMAT Club Olympics Competition

Win over $30,000 in prizes such as Courses, Tests, Private Tutoring, and more

 

­
­The right choice imo is B.

It suggests that people in countries with high internet censorship are using methods to bypass restrictions, which would allow them to maintain high levels of internet usage despite the censorship. None of the other answers tackle the paradox of higher overall usage per capita.
User avatar
riturajsingh21
Joined: 12 Aug 2014
Last visit: 11 Jul 2025
Posts: 31
Own Kudos:
38
 [1]
Given Kudos: 165
Posts: 31
Kudos: 38
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Its as paradox question -

Given-

Survey Found -
Higher Internet censorship ---> Higher Internet usages per person

Reason can cab be-

1. Survey can be skewed- but it is the trend of many countries
2. People can bypass site blocker

Let’s review options -

A. Initial reading suggest it can be one of the option, lets hold on it
B. No effect of censorship as people are able to bypass restrictions, lets hold on it

C. Not relevant frankly
D. We are discussing "Per person usages" , so not relevant.
E. Trend for many countries and also let’s not challenge the premise

Left with option-A & B now.

I think B cover the border spectrum and per capaita population better.

Ans-B
User avatar
said.tojiboev
User avatar
PhD Forum Moderator
Joined: 04 Oct 2018
Last visit: 20 Oct 2025
Posts: 65
Own Kudos:
60
 [1]
Given Kudos: 10
Location: Uzbekistan
Concentration: Strategy, General Management
Schools: Stanford '27
GPA: 4.49
WE:Project Management (Education)
Schools: Stanford '27
Posts: 65
Kudos: 60
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
­Economist: A recent survey found that in countries with higher rates of internet censorship, there are also higher rates of internet usage per capita. This seems counterintuitive because one might expect that restrictions on internet content would deter usage.

Which of the following, if true and known by the residents of these countries, would best help explain the paradoxical results of the survey?

(A) Many residents in countries with higher internet censorship use the internet primarily for work-related purposes, which are not affected by censorship policies.

(B) Residents in countries with high internet censorship often use proxy servers and VPNs, which allow them to bypass restrictions and access a broader range of content online.

(C) There is an observed trend in the data collection methodology where internet usage metrics might include both direct and indirect engagement metrics, which vary significantly between surveyed regions.

(D) Countries with high rates of internet censorship often have higher populations, thus naturally leading to a higher total number of internet users.

(E) The survey included responses from a disproportionate number of young people, who tend to use the internet more frequently regardless of censorship levels.



­
 


This question was provided by GMAT Club
for the GMAT Club Olympics Competition

Win over $30,000 in prizes such as Courses, Tests, Private Tutoring, and more

 

­
Higher rates of internet usage PER CAPITA despite higher rates of internet CENSORSHIP,A. Focuses on work-related usage, not overall internet usage.

B. Shows how residents bypass censorship, explaining high usage. CORRECT

C. Focuses on data collection issues, not resident behavior.

D. Relates to population size, not per capita usage.

E. Attributes to survey demographics, not censorship effects.
User avatar
prekshajagetiya
Joined: 11 May 2021
Last visit: 25 Nov 2024
Posts: 2
Own Kudos:
1
 [1]
Given Kudos: 25
Posts: 2
Kudos: 1
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
­Option B directly expalins the reason for paradox

Option A: This is likely ot be possible but does not irectly tell why the internet usage was high. We have limited information on the % of people using internet for work related purposes and it can highly vary.

Option B: This option provides an clear explanation and gives a reason on why there is a high internet usage even though there are high rate of censorship. 

Option C: this option shows that data collected is biased but does not give direct answer to why there was a change in residents behaviour.

Option D: This option is likely the cause of high usage rate but does not give a explanatio on why there was the high usage rate

Option E: This suggest bias in data. Might be possible that data is bias but this option does not directly explain the cause of the change in behaviour.
User avatar
Avicii
Joined: 04 Jul 2024
Last visit: 23 Jul 2024
Posts: 14
Own Kudos:
Posts: 14
Kudos: 15
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
(A) Many residents in countries with higher internet censorship use the internet primarily for work-related purposes, which are not affected by censorship policies.
User avatar
Anugmat740
Joined: 31 Aug 2021
Last visit: 19 Oct 2024
Posts: 97
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 156
Posts: 97
Kudos: 109
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
higher rates of internet censorship (will usually deter internet users), but there are also higher rates of internet usage per capita.

A- Maybe they are using less data in the work. Also, the work-related data usage before and after the internet censorship will usually be same.

B- "Broader range of Content" is not same as "Larger Consumption of data".

c- Whatever the data collection method is used, the result is higher internet usage per capita.

D- High Number of Internet users Means there is no net increase in the Internet usage per capita.

E- disproportionate number of young people (They are either very large or very less in the surveyed population). They use internet more frequently. Therefore, it is due to these young people, the per capita data usage is increased.

Sample- 100, Total Usage 100GB
Now out of these 20 Young users uses 60GB
So, if we remove these young users from samples, the per capita internet usage is decreased.

IMO E.
User avatar
SomeOneUnique
Joined: 17 Mar 2019
Last visit: 26 Dec 2024
Posts: 122
Own Kudos:
117
 [1]
Given Kudos: 41
Location: India
Posts: 122
Kudos: 117
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
­Economist: A recent survey found that in countries with higher rates of internet censorship, there are also higher rates of internet usage per capita. This seems counterintuitive because one might expect that restrictions on internet content would deter usage.

Which of the following, if true and known by the residents of these countries, would best help explain the paradoxical results of the survey?

(A) Many residents in countries with higher internet censorship use the internet primarily for work-related purposes, which are not affected by censorship policies.
(B) Residents in countries with high internet censorship often use proxy servers and VPNs, which allow them to bypass restrictions and access a broader range of content online.
(C) There is an observed trend in the data collection methodology where internet usage metrics might include both direct and indirect engagement metrics, which vary significantly between surveyed regions.
(D) Countries with high rates of internet censorship often have higher populations, thus naturally leading to a higher total number of internet users.
(E) The survey included responses from a disproportionate number of young people, who tend to use the internet more frequently regardless of censorship levels.


A. Work would affect usage equally with or without censorship. INCORRECT
B. Higher rates of internet censorship cause more options for users, so usage increases. This option is a perfect explanation. CORRECT
C. Instead of explaining the paradox, this option weakens the argument by taking trends toward the non-uniformity of the trends "trend vary significantly". INCORRECT
D. The size of the population is constant with or without censorship. This choice presents a mere coincidence and not the required cause-effect. INCORRECT
E. Similar to D, usage of the internet by young people is constant with or without censorship. It does not explain higher usage after higher censorship. INCORRECT
User avatar
HarshaBujji
Joined: 29 Jun 2020
Last visit: 16 Nov 2025
Posts: 695
Own Kudos:
885
 [1]
Given Kudos: 247
Location: India
Products:
Posts: 695
Kudos: 885
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
 
Bunuel
­Economist: A recent survey found that in countries with higher rates of internet censorship, there are also higher rates of internet usage per capita. This seems counterintuitive because one might expect that restrictions on internet content would deter usage.

Which of the following, if true and known by the residents of these countries, would best help explain the paradoxical results of the survey?




­
 


This question was provided by GMAT Club
for the GMAT Club Olympics Competition

Win over $30,000 in prizes such as Courses, Tests, Private Tutoring, and more

 

­
­(A) Many residents in countries with higher internet censorship use the internet primarily for work-related purposes, which are not affected by censorship policies. Ok, but it didn't explain how internet usage has increased. 

(B) Residents in countries with high internet censorship often use proxy servers and VPNs, which allow them to bypass restrictions and access a broader range of content online. Hmm, This seems to be likely. As they get a chance to access border content the usage is increased.

(C) There is an observed trend in the data collection methodology where internet usage metrics might include both direct and indirect engagement metrics, which vary significantly between surveyed regions.Ok, But this is irrelevant  

(D) Countries with high rates of internet censorship often have higher populations, thus naturally leading to a higher total number of internet users. Ok, that Opposes the argument. Percapita is mentioned not absolute figure. 

(E) The survey included responses from a disproportionate number of young people, who tend to use the internet more frequently regardless of censorship levels.Ok, Survey is common in all the countries. Hence cannot be a factor. 

IMO B
User avatar
Sherlock94
Joined: 04 Sep 2022
Last visit: 13 Nov 2025
Posts: 6
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 45
Location: India
Concentration: Sustainability, Entrepreneurship
GPA: 7.5/10
WE:Business Development (Energy)
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
 
Bunuel
­Economist: A recent survey found that in countries with higher rates of internet censorship, there are also higher rates of internet usage per capita. This seems counterintuitive because one might expect that restrictions on internet content would deter usage.

Which of the following, if true and known by the residents of these countries, would best help explain the paradoxical results of the survey?

(A) Many residents in countries with higher internet censorship use the internet primarily for work-related purposes, which are not affected by censorship policies.

(B) Residents in countries with high internet censorship often use proxy servers and VPNs, which allow them to bypass restrictions and access a broader range of content online.

(C) There is an observed trend in the data collection methodology where internet usage metrics might include both direct and indirect engagement metrics, which vary significantly between surveyed regions.

(D) Countries with high rates of internet censorship often have higher populations, thus naturally leading to a higher total number of internet users.

(E) The survey included responses from a disproportionate number of young people, who tend to use the internet more frequently regardless of censorship levels.



­
 


This question was provided by GMAT Club
for the GMAT Club Olympics Competition

Win over $30,000 in prizes such as Courses, Tests, Private Tutoring, and more

 

­
­The paradox here is the high internet usage rate per capita while the internet censorship rate is high despite restrictions imposed.

(A) Many residents in countries with higher internet censorship use the internet primarily for work-related purposes, which are not affected by censorship policies.

Wrong: Internet usage for Work-Related purposes is not affected by Censorship policies, so it shall remain constant everywhere.

(B) Residents in countries with high internet censorship often use proxy servers and VPNs, which allow them to bypass restrictions and access a broader range of content online.

Wrong: If residents use proxy servers and VPNs in countries with high internet censorship, then the usage per capita shall remain more or less similar. Doesn't explain the high internet usage per capita.

(C) There is an observed trend in the data collection methodology where internet usage metrics might include both direct and indirect engagement metrics, which vary significantly between surveyed regions.

Wrong: The significant variation doesn't explain the higher internet usage per capita in countries with higher censorship. 

(D) Countries with high rates of internet censorship often have higher populations, thus naturally leading to a higher total number of internet users.

Wrong: The statement mentions higher internet usage per capita, which will depend on the higher usage rate of internet users rather than the total number of internet users. 

(E) The survey included responses from a disproportionate number of young people, who tend to use the internet more frequently regardless of censorship levels.

Correct: This explains why the per capita internet usage is higher, mainly due to the inclusion of a disproportionately high number of young people using the internet more frequently regardless of censorship.
 
User avatar
Jolex
Joined: 26 Apr 2024
Last visit: 15 Oct 2024
Posts: 20
Own Kudos:
17
 [1]
Given Kudos: 2
Posts: 20
Kudos: 17
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The option B explains the paradoxical survey results by suggesting that, despite the presence of internet censorship, residents in these countries manage to circumvent restrictions using tools such as proxy servers and VPNs. As a result, these censorship policies do not significantly deter internet usage because residents still have ways to access a wide range of online content.
User avatar
MT___
Joined: 31 Oct 2023
Last visit: 26 Jan 2025
Posts: 29
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 241
Posts: 29
Kudos: 20
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
­Economist: A recent survey found that in countries with higher rates of internet censorship, there are also higher rates of internet usage per capita. This seems counterintuitive because one might expect that restrictions on internet content would deter usage.

Which of the following, if true and known by the residents of these countries, would best help explain the paradoxical results of the survey?

(A) Many residents in countries with higher internet censorship use the internet primarily for work-related purposes, which are not affected by censorship policies.

(B) Residents in countries with high internet censorship often use proxy servers and VPNs, which allow them to bypass restrictions and access a broader range of content online.

(C) There is an observed trend in the data collection methodology where internet usage metrics might include both direct and indirect engagement metrics, which vary significantly between surveyed regions.

(D) Countries with high rates of internet censorship often have higher populations, thus naturally leading to a higher total number of internet users.

(E) The survey included responses from a disproportionate number of young people, who tend to use the internet more frequently regardless of censorship levels.



Explaination:

To explain the conclusion:'Countries with higher rates of internet censorship, there are also higher rates of internet usage per capita'

We need to find out among the options, the logical reason, which is not 'a maybe or might be' as there should be a process that's taking place due to which this anomaly happens regularly.



(A) Many residents in countries with higher internet censorship use the internet primarily for work-related purposes, which are not affected by censorship policies.

->This is not a sure shot finding, there might be some, who don't work and use the internet, there can be other scenarios in place. This won't answer the persistant finding

(B) Residents in countries with high internet censorship often use proxy servers and VPNs, which allow them to bypass restrictions and access a broader range of content online.

->Again, this is not a sure shot finding, and can't be applicable to all the people. There might be few, who don't use as much internet inspite of the plathora of choices available through VPN. There can be other scenarios in place. This won't answer the persistant finding.


(C) There is an observed trend in the data collection methodology where internet usage metrics might include both direct and indirect engagement metrics, which vary significantly between surveyed regions.

-> This option, defines the process, due to which the anomaly arises regularly.

(D) Countries with high rates of internet censorship often have higher populations, thus naturally leading to a higher total number of internet users.

->Not compulsory

(E) The survey included responses from a disproportionate number of young people, who tend to use the internet more frequently regardless of censorship levels.

->Not compulsory

 ­
User avatar
LUBABAYIMER
Joined: 01 Jul 2024
Last visit: 23 Sep 2024
Posts: 54
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 3
Posts: 54
Kudos: 16
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Economist: A recent survey found that in countries with higher rates of internet censorship, there are also higher rates of internet usage per capita. This seems counterintuitive because one might expect that restrictions on internet content would deter usage.

Which of the following, if true and known by the residents of these countries, would best help explain the paradoxical results of the survey?

(A) Many residents in countries with higher internet censorship use the internet primarily for work-related purposes, which are not affected by censorship policies.

(B) Residents in countries with high internet censorship often use proxy servers and VPNs, which allow them to bypass restrictions and access a broader range of content online.

(C) There is an observed trend in the data collection methodology where internet usage metrics might include both direct and indirect engagement metrics, which vary significantly between surveyed regions.

(D) Countries with high rates of internet censorship often have higher populations, thus naturally leading to a higher total number of internet users.

(E) The survey included responses from a disproportionate number of young people, who tend to use the internet more frequently regardless of censorship levels.
the answer is C b/c The idea that there is an emerging trend in data collection methods that measures of Internet use may include direct or indirect measures of participation is more plausible than other alternatives.
User avatar
iabhish1509
Joined: 09 Jan 2024
Last visit: 26 Sep 2025
Posts: 121
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 200
Location: India
GPA: 8
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Option D will be best explanation of the paradox.

Because countries with high censorship is directly proportional to higher population.
Hence that would increase the per capita internet consumption.
avatar
DG1989
Joined: 16 Feb 2023
Last visit: 24 Dec 2024
Posts: 140
Own Kudos:
303
 [1]
Given Kudos: 9
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Technology
Schools: Kellogg '26
GPA: 4
Schools: Kellogg '26
Posts: 140
Kudos: 303
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
­Economist: A recent survey found that in countries with higher rates of internet censorship, there are also higher rates of internet usage per capita. This seems counterintuitive because one might expect that restrictions on internet content would deter usage.

Which of the following, if true and known by the residents of these countries, would best help explain the paradoxical results of the survey?

Explanation: We need to identify a reason why residents in countries with higher rates of internet censorship would still have higher rates of internet usage per capita, despite the restrictions.

(A) Many residents in countries with higher internet censorship use the internet primarily for work-related purposes, which are not affected by censorship policies.
Reasoning: Even though this reason could contribute to internet usage, it does not fully explain the high usage rates per capita. Also, internet censorship typically affects a wide range of internet activities and not just work-related purposes. Hence it is insufficient to explain the paradoxical results. INCORRECT
 

(B) Residents in countries with high internet censorship often use proxy servers and VPNs, which allow them to bypass restrictions and access a broader range of content online.
Reasoning: This option addresses the paradox by suggesting that the residents in censored countries have found ways to bypass the restrictions by using proxy servers and VPNs. As such they can access the internet more freely, which could explain the high rates of internet usage despite the censorship. CORRECT


(C) There is an observed trend in the data collection methodology where internet usage metrics might include both direct and indirect engagement metrics, which vary significantly between surveyed regions.
Reasoning: This option suggests a potential issue with data collection but does not provide a clear reason why internet usage would be high in censored countries. It points to a methodological issue rather than a behavioral explanation. INCORRECT


(D) Countries with high rates of internet censorship often have higher populations, thus naturally leading to a higher total number of internet users.
Reasoning: Higher populations could lead to a higher total number of internet users, but the survey focuses on usage per capita. This means the average usage per person, not the total number of users. Misleading. INCORRECT


(E) The survey included responses from a disproportionate number of young people, who tend to use the internet more frequently regardless of censorship levels.
Reasoning: This statement indicates a demographic issue in the survey but does not provide a specific reason related to censorship and usage behavior. It explains a higher response rate among young people but not the overall high usage per capita in censored countries. INCORRECT

Option B is the correct answer­
User avatar
meet459
User avatar
Goizueta / Scheller Moderator
Joined: 03 Jun 2024
Last visit: 29 May 2025
Posts: 85
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 32
Location: India
GMAT Focus 1: 675 Q90 V81 DI79
GPA: 8.55
Products:
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Economist: A recent survey found that in countries with higher rates of internet censorship, there are also higher rates of internet usage per capita. This seems counterintuitive because one might expect that restrictions on internet content would deter usage.

Which of the following, if true and known by the residents of these countries, would best help explain the paradoxical results of the survey?

(A) Many residents in countries with higher internet censorship use the internet primarily for work-related purposes, which are not affected by censorship policies. -> this still doesn't explain higher consumption, we can't assume it. 

(B) Residents in countries with high internet censorship often use proxy servers and VPNs, which allow them to bypass restrictions and access a broader range of content online. -> giving access to broader range of content doesn't imply higher rate of usage, hence not the answer. 

(C) There is an observed trend in the data collection methodology where internet usage metrics might include both direct and indirect engagement metrics, which vary significantly between surveyed regions. -> Some random information which seems irrelevant. 

(D) Countries with high rates of internet censorship often have higher populations, thus naturally leading to a higher total number of internet users. -> Not all the people will use internet, can be ignored as an answer. 

(E) The survey included responses from a disproportionate number of young people, who tend to use the internet more frequently regardless of censorship levels.­ -> this is good, explains that the pool contained majorly young people who use internet frequently hence high usage. 

Hence acc to me, the answer should be E. 
   1   2   3   4   5   6   
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7445 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
234 posts
188 posts