Economist: A recent survey found that in countries with higher rates of internet censorship, there are also higher rates of internet usage per capita. This seems counterintuitive because one might expect that restrictions on internet content would deter usage.
Which of the following, if true and known by the residents of these countries, would best help explain the paradoxical results of the survey?
(A) Many residents in countries with higher internet censorship use the internet primarily for work-related purposes, which are not affected by censorship policies.
(B) Residents in countries with high internet censorship often use proxy servers and VPNs, which allow them to bypass restrictions and access a broader range of content online.
(C) There is an observed trend in the data collection methodology where internet usage metrics might include both direct and indirect engagement metrics, which vary significantly between surveyed regions.
(D) Countries with high rates of internet censorship often have higher populations, thus naturally leading to a higher total number of internet users.
(E) The survey included responses from a disproportionate number of young people, who tend to use the internet more frequently regardless of censorship levels.
Explaination:
To explain the conclusion:'Countries with higher rates of internet censorship, there are also higher rates of internet usage per capita'
We need to find out among the options, the logical reason, which is not 'a maybe or might be' as there should be a process that's taking place due to which this anomaly happens regularly.
(A) Many residents in countries with higher internet censorship use the internet primarily for work-related purposes, which are not affected by censorship policies.
->This is not a sure shot finding, there might be some, who don't work and use the internet, there can be other scenarios in place. This won't answer the persistant finding
(B) Residents in countries with high internet censorship often use proxy servers and VPNs, which allow them to bypass restrictions and access a broader range of content online.
->Again, this is not a sure shot finding, and can't be applicable to all the people. There might be few, who don't use as much internet inspite of the plathora of choices available through VPN. There can be other scenarios in place. This won't answer the persistant finding.
(C) There is an observed trend in the data collection methodology where internet usage metrics might include both direct and indirect engagement metrics, which vary significantly between surveyed regions.
-> This option, defines the process, due to which the anomaly arises regularly.
(D) Countries with high rates of internet censorship often have higher populations, thus naturally leading to a higher total number of internet users.
->Not compulsory
(E) The survey included responses from a disproportionate number of young people, who tend to use the internet more frequently regardless of censorship levels.
->Not compulsory