jawele
3. The passage suggests that after conducting the research mentioned in highlighted text, but not before, Robertson would have agreed with which of the following about women’s status and authority in Ghana?
(A) Greater land rights and greater involvement in trade made women in precolonial Ghana less dependent on men than were European women at that time.
(B) Colonialism had a greater impact on the status and authority of Ghanaian women than on Kenyan women.
Relevant text: <...> the evidence regarding central Kenya indicated that
women were legal minors and were sometimes treated as male property,
as were European women at that time. Factors like strong patrilinearity and patrilocality, as well as women’s
inferior land rights and lesser involvement in trade,
made women more dependent on men than was generally the case in Ghana.
Could anybody please explain what's wrong with A in Q3? I highlighted the portions of the text that made me pick A. As the situation of women in Europe was a lot similar to that of women in Kenya, I supposed that it was reasonable to come to such conclusion. Does A provide a stretched idea because we know only that women in Europe were legal minors and were sometimes treated as male property, but we know almost nothing about their land rights and involvement in trade?
Thanks
u1983 GMATNinja SajjadAhmad workout GMATNinjaTwo
GnpthQuestion #3 asks what Robertson would have agreed with
after conducting additional research, but would
not have agreed with
before conducting that research regarding women's status and authority in Ghana. Before jumping into answer choices, let's examine her ideas from before and after the research in question:
Before the research, Robertson believed that:
- In pre-colonial times "age was a more important indicator of status and authority than gender in Ghana and in Africa generally."
- After colonization, "gender became a defining characteristic that weakened women’s power and authority."
After the research, she believed that:
- She had overgeneralized about the role of gender in pre-colonial Africa
- In Ghana, "women had traded for hundreds of years and achieved legal majority." This aligns with Robertson's previous belief that gender was not as important as age as an indicator of status and authority.
- However, in pre-colonial Kenya, "women were legal minors and were sometimes treated as male property, as were European women at that time." This differs from Robertson's previous views, so she revised her hypothesis to say that gender played a more important role in some African locations before colonization.
Notice that Robertson's beliefs about the role of gender in Ghana did not change substantially from before the research to after it -- in both cases, she thought that gender did not play the most important role in determining status and authority. The significant change in her hypothesis concerned Kenya, where women had less power in pre-colonial times than she had previously thought.
Take another look at answer choice (A):
Quote:
(A) Greater land rights and greater involvement in trade made women in precolonial Ghana less dependent on men than were European women at that time.
Remember that we are looking for a statement with which Robertson would have disagreed before her additional research, but with which she would have agreed after that research.
As discussed above, even before the additional research Robertson thought that women in Ghana had a higher status than women in Europe before colonization. So even if the specific factors of land rights and involvement in trade are not discussed in the context of her earlier beliefs, we can't say that she would
disagree with the notion that "women in precolonial Ghana less dependent on men than were European women at that time."
The piece of the passage that you pointed out ("women’s inferior land rights and lesser involvement in trade, made women more dependent on men than was generally the case in Ghana") actually compares women in
Kenya to women in Ghana. This is a much different comparison than the one in answer choice (A), which compares women in
Europe to women in Ghana.
Because there is no evidence that Robertson would have disagreed with (A) before her additional research, it is not the correct answer.
Now look at (B):
Quote:
(B) Colonialism had a greater impact on the status and authority of Ghanaian women than on Kenyan women.
Before completing her additional research, Robertson believed that colonialism "weakened women’s power and authority" in Africa generally. So, she believed that colonialism would have a roughly
equal impact on Kenyan and Ghanaian women. From this, we know that Robertson would have
disagreed with (B) before her additional research. So far, so good.
How about after her research? From the discussion above, we know that Robertson's views on the status of women in pre-colonial Ghana did not change. So, her previous belief that women's power and status were weakened after European colonization holds true.
Her understanding of Kenyan society, however, changed substantially -- she learned that even before colonization, in Kenya "women were legal minors and were sometimes treated as male property, as were European women at that time." So, once the Europeans arrived, Kenyan women didn't have much power for the "European-style male dominant notions" to take away -- they were already relatively powerless in their society. This means that colonial rule would have
less of an impact on the status of Kenyan women than the status of Ghanaian women.
Because Robertson would have disagreed with (B) before her additional research and agreed with it after, (B) is the correct answer to question #3.
I hope that helps!