Last visit was: 12 Dec 2024, 08:48 It is currently 12 Dec 2024, 08:48
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 12 Dec 2024
Posts: 97,846
Own Kudos:
685,316
 [2]
Given Kudos: 88,255
Products:
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 97,846
Kudos: 685,316
 [2]
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
TaN1213
Joined: 09 Mar 2017
Last visit: 12 Mar 2019
Posts: 358
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 646
Location: India
Concentration: Marketing, Organizational Behavior
WE:Information Technology (Computer Software)
Posts: 358
Kudos: 858
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
generis
User avatar
Senior SC Moderator
Joined: 22 May 2016
Last visit: 18 Jun 2022
Posts: 5,316
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 9,464
Products:
Expert reply
Posts: 5,316
Kudos: 36,316
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
arvind910619
Joined: 20 Dec 2015
Last visit: 18 Oct 2024
Posts: 854
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 755
Status:Learning
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Marketing
GMAT 1: 670 Q48 V36
GRE 1: Q157 V157
GPA: 3.4
WE:Engineering (Manufacturing)
Products:
GMAT 1: 670 Q48 V36
GRE 1: Q157 V157
Posts: 854
Kudos: 582
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
We more variables than we have equations so this can not be solved
Therefore the answer is E
User avatar
TaN1213
Joined: 09 Mar 2017
Last visit: 12 Mar 2019
Posts: 358
Own Kudos:
858
 [1]
Given Kudos: 646
Location: India
Concentration: Marketing, Organizational Behavior
WE:Information Technology (Computer Software)
Posts: 358
Kudos: 858
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
genxer123
TaN1213
Bunuel

In the figure above, if x = 80 and y = 30, what is the value of k?

(A) 30
(B) 40
(C) 50
(D) 60
(E) cannot be determined

Attachment:
2017-09-01_1837.png
IMO E.

Let 'm' be the third angle of the triangle.
The value of k would depend on value of m. k = 180-(x + m)
To determine the value of m, there should have been some relation between m and y. Also, there is no relation between m and the exterior angle of the triangle(180-m). So, K can possibly take all the values given in options without violating any rule of triangle.

Waiting for OA to know if there is something that I am missing out here.
Thanks for the question.
TaN1213 , I am close to agreeing with your conclusion, that the answer is E.

I don't understand one part of your explanation. You wrote

Also, there is no relation between m and the exterior angle of the triangle(180-m)

I'm a little lost because, perhaps mistakenly, I think there is a relationship between m and the exterior angle = x + k. The relation: y, m and the exterior angle (x + k) lie on a straight line.

(I keep thinking, inaccurately so far, that we can set up two equations, one having to do with the sum of angles on a straight line, and another having to do either with the sum of angles in a triangle, or the sum of two interior angles equaling an exterior angle).

So I'm curious to know what you mean by "no relation" in the quote above? Thanks!

Hey Genxer123,

For now let the angle in the middle of m and y (which looks more like a right angle) be called as "n". So we have a straight line with angles m, n & y.
Would you please explain what you mean by " The relation: y, m and the exterior angle (x + k) lie on a straight line."?
What's unclear to me is since exterior angle(x+k) itself is nothing but (y +n), y shouldn't have been stated explicitly in the expression of straight line.Please provide your inputs if I am missing out something here.

By "there is no relation between m and the exterior angle of the triangle(180-m)", what I mean is the distribution of angles lacks any relation within themselves.
If you read the preceding sentence "To determine the value of m, there should have been some relation between m and y", I am trying to get some relation by m=180-(n+y)
Sure, m+n+y = 180 but there is no way we can relate 'm' in term of 'y' in this equation.
I guess my diction might have got you perplexed.
Thank you.
User avatar
chipsy
Joined: 05 Oct 2014
Last visit: 01 Sep 2021
Posts: 56
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 149
Concentration: Technology, Entrepreneurship
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
As no relation is given between "k" and "y".

No conclusion can be found from the given information.
Thus, the correct option is E.
Moderator:
Math Expert
97846 posts