Last visit was: 16 May 2025, 00:06 It is currently 16 May 2025, 00:06
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
Most Helpful Reply
avatar
keerthinutakki
Joined: 20 Apr 2014
Last visit: 26 Nov 2018
Posts: 2
Own Kudos:
11
 [11]
Given Kudos: 33
Posts: 2
Kudos: 11
 [11]
11
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
Sreyoshi007
Joined: 01 Feb 2018
Last visit: 18 Mar 2019
Posts: 82
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 769
Location: India
GMAT 1: 700 Q47 V38
WE:Consulting (Consulting)
GMAT 1: 700 Q47 V38
Posts: 82
Kudos: 220
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
dvishal387
Joined: 01 Jan 2018
Last visit: 12 Jan 2022
Posts: 63
Own Kudos:
56
 [2]
Given Kudos: 26
Posts: 63
Kudos: 56
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Sreyoshi007
Quote:
2. The author most probably stated “Of course, Paretodesirability… world,” in order to emphasize that

A. it is not practical to evaluate only situations in which people are better off because in the real world someone is always worse off as the result of a policy
B. Pareto desirability has a limited use to economists and is only applicable when analyzing monetary systems
C. utilitarianism has more application to the real world because it considers all possible worlds
D. Pareto-desirability can only be used as a theoretical tool because no true alternative worlds exist
E. the Pareto criterion would be more useful if theorists could find a way to use it to compare situations in which some people are better off and some worse off

How is answer option C incorrect? I was confused between A and C and incorrectly marked C.

Quote:
3. Which of the following statements provides the most logical continuation of the ideas expressed in the last paragraph of the passage?

A. When examining the way the world actually is, however, economists use utilitarianism.
B. Due to its considerable shortcomings, Pareto-desirability will likely diminish in importance in economic theory.
C. By examining the rules behind particular policies instead of the policies themselves, economists can determine the properties of the system that created them.
D. All three characteristics of Pareto-desirability are important to economists.
E. Until a more practical tool is developed, Pareto-desirability will continue to be economists’ prime way of understanding the world.

Could someone please explain why answer E is incorrect? The last passage is stating the limitation of Pareto-desirability and stating that economists still use it for analyzing systems on a theoretical level. So, as per my understanding answer E fits well.
Thanks in advance
For question 3 I eliminated the choices based on the passage and marked the correct choice C.
A- Eliminated this as this is discussed in last para of the passage.So, it cannot be the logical continuation.
B- This is too extreme a choice to continue the idea.
C- Keep it
D-This is already already discussed in second para of the passage and continuing with this idea does not look correct.
E-In last para the author states that pareto -desirability is not the prime way of understanding the world by economists(its utilitarianism). So eliminate this choice.

So, C is the best choice as it suggests a conclusion which would go appropriately with the passage.

Hope it helps!

Sent from my Redmi Note 3 using GMAT Club Forum mobile app
avatar
Diwakar003
Joined: 02 Aug 2015
Last visit: 04 Jul 2022
Posts: 121
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 171
Posts: 121
Kudos: 166
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
dvishal387
A- Eliminated this as this is discussed in last para of the passage.So, it cannot be the logical continuation.
B- This is too extreme a choice to continue the idea.
C- Keep it
D-This is already already discussed in second para of the passage and continuing with this idea does not look correct.
E-In last para the author states that pareto -desirability is not the prime way of understanding the world by economists(its utilitarianism). So eliminate this choice.

So, C is the best choice as it suggests a conclusion which would go appropriately with the passage.
Hope it helps!

Hey Vishal,

Could you please let me know where in the passage is this(highlighted above) discussed? I can see discussions only on usage of Pareto and nothing related to usage of Utilitariansm so I choose this. Thanks in advance!

Cheers!
avatar
Diwakar003
Joined: 02 Aug 2015
Last visit: 04 Jul 2022
Posts: 121
Own Kudos:
166
 [2]
Given Kudos: 171
Posts: 121
Kudos: 166
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Sreyoshi007

Quote:
3. Which of the following statements provides the most logical continuation of the ideas expressed in the last paragraph of the passage?

E. Until a more practical tool is developed, Pareto-desirability will continue to be economists’ prime way of understanding the world.

Could someone please explain why answer E is incorrect? The last passage is stating the limitation of Pareto-desirability and stating that economists still use it for analyzing systems on a theoretical level. So, as per my understanding answer E fits well.
Thanks in advance

Hey Sreyoshi,

Though I got this question wrong by choosing A, I'll let you know my thought process behind eliminating E. Nowhere it is mentioned that Pareto-d is the ONLY way to analyze systems on a theoretical level. May be it's used in conjunction with some other method to analyze. There could very well be better methods than Pareto-d to understand the world.

So we cannot say Pareto is the PRIME way of understanding the world. Hope it helped!

Cheers!
avatar
ShubhamRastogi
Joined: 27 Jun 2020
Last visit: 12 Nov 2024
Posts: 13
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 16
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Leadership
Schools: ISB'22 (A)
GMAT 1: 660 Q49 V31
GMAT 2: 670 Q49 V32
GMAT 3: 680 Q49 V32
GPA: 4
WE:Corporate Finance (Computer Hardware)
Schools: ISB'22 (A)
GMAT 3: 680 Q49 V32
Posts: 13
Kudos: 14
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I have a different perspective to Q3.

Q. Which of the following statements provides the most logical continuation of the ideas expressed in the last paragraph of the passage?

Para : Classic Comparison between Pareto and Utilitarianism. It states that - Pareto-desirability overlaps somewhat with the philosophical theory of utilitarianism, which states that what is best is what causes the most people to be happy.
Difference starts from here : Where Pareto-desirability breaks ranks, however, is in its ranking of the alternative worlds. Utilitarianism considers and ranks all possible worlds, good and bad, but the Pareto criterion ranks only those alternatives in which one’s preference satisfaction is higher. Thus, comparisons between situations in which some people are better off and some worse off are not possible with the Pareto system.
This is part of the conclusion stem : Of course, Pareto desirability is not a practical tool for use in the real world. Economists mainly use the Pareto criterion when analyzing systems on a theoretical level.

The tone is - Ofcourse Pareto is not a practical tool, Economists only use it for XYZ reasons.

What should follow is a reconciliation to the comparison being done above. Which is done in Option A, that yes Pareto has limited usability and we only use it for some particular reason. We will continue to use the other option for better understanding of XYZ reasons.
This essence is captured in Option A

A. When examining the way the world actually is, however, economists use utilitarianism.
B. Due to its considerable shortcomings, Pareto-desirability will likely diminish in importance in economic theory. -- Ignored as the economist still use it. Nothing in para points towards it.
C. By examining the rules behind particular policies instead of the policies themselves, economists can determine the properties of the system that created them. --- cant make this out from the para. Hence eliminated it.
D. All three characteristics of Pareto-desirability are important to economists. --- Not logically following the flow
E. Until a more practical tool is developed, Pareto-desirability will continue to be economists’ prime way of understanding the world. -- Tool is there. Not correct choice.

Please help me understand the flaw in my understanding.

Regards,
Shubham
User avatar
Sajjad1994
User avatar
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Last visit: 15 May 2025
Posts: 15,126
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 6,027
GPA: 3.62
Products:
Posts: 15,126
Kudos: 44,941
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
ShubhamRastogi
I have a different perspective to Q3.

Q. Which of the following statements provides the most logical continuation of the ideas expressed in the last paragraph of the passage?

Para : Classic Comparison between Pareto and Utilitarianism. It states that - Pareto-desirability overlaps somewhat with the philosophical theory of utilitarianism, which states that what is best is what causes the most people to be happy.
Difference starts from here : Where Pareto-desirability breaks ranks, however, is in its ranking of the alternative worlds. Utilitarianism considers and ranks all possible worlds, good and bad, but the Pareto criterion ranks only those alternatives in which one’s preference satisfaction is higher. Thus, comparisons between situations in which some people are better off and some worse off are not possible with the Pareto system.
This is part of the conclusion stem : Of course, Pareto desirability is not a practical tool for use in the real world. Economists mainly use the Pareto criterion when analyzing systems on a theoretical level.

The tone is - Ofcourse Pareto is not a practical tool, Economists only use it for XYZ reasons.

What should follow is a reconciliation to the comparison being done above. Which is done in Option A, that yes Pareto has limited usability and we only use it for some particular reason. We will continue to use the other option for better understanding of XYZ reasons.
This essence is captured in Option A

A. When examining the way the world actually is, however, economists use utilitarianism.
B. Due to its considerable shortcomings, Pareto-desirability will likely diminish in importance in economic theory. -- Ignored as the economist still use it. Nothing in para points towards it.
C. By examining the rules behind particular policies instead of the policies themselves, economists can determine the properties of the system that created them. --- cant make this out from the para. Hence eliminated it.
D. All three characteristics of Pareto-desirability are important to economists. --- Not logically following the flow
E. Until a more practical tool is developed, Pareto-desirability will continue to be economists’ prime way of understanding the world. -- Tool is there. Not correct choice.

Please help me understand the flaw in my understanding.

Regards,
Shubham

Official Explanation

3. Which of the following statements provides the most logical continuation of the ideas expressed in the last paragraph of the passage?

Difficulty Level: 750

Explanation

This is an odd type of applying information question that shows up every once in a while on the GMAT. Still, like all Reading Comprehension questions, the best answer will be based on the information in the passage. The last paragraphs states that Pareto desirability is not a practical tool, but that theorists use it to study systems on a theoretical level.

Choice C continues this idea to show that the theorists don’t look at actual policies (which is a practical consideration) but instead at the rules behind them (a more theoretical consideration).

Choice A doesn’t work because the passage doesn’t state or imply that economists use utilitarianism; it merely contrasts it with Pareto desirability.

Choice B goes against the passage, which states that the concept is a “lasting contribution.” Choice D refers back to the second paragraph and would not logically appear at the end of the passage.

Choice E is wrong because it states that Pareto desirability is the “prime way” of understanding the world, although the passage states that it is used for theoretical investigations only.

Answer: C.
User avatar
VerbalBot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 18,296
Own Kudos:
Posts: 18,296
Kudos: 938
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7305 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
233 posts
GRE Forum Moderator
15123 posts