Diwabag
Out of America's obsession with
all things pet related have grown a market for human-inspired accessories and accoutrements that are bringing forth rhinestone-studded collars, cashmere dog sweaters, and canopied pet beds.
A. things pet related
have grown a
market for human-inspired accessories and accoutrements that are bringing
B. things pet related
has grown a
market for human-inspired accessories and accoutrements
that is bringing
C.
things that are pet related has grown a market for human-inspired accessories and accoutrements that
bringD. pet-related things
have grown a
market for human-inspired accessories and accoutrements that are bringing
E.
pet-related things has grown a market for human-inspired accessories and accoutrements that
bringSource: KAPLAN Q-Bank
It may be difficult to identify the subject, "a market," in this sentence because of the inverted word order. If you spot the verb, "have grown," you can find the subject by asking, What's grown? The market for certain pet supplies, apparently. Be alert to incorrect verb number and tense.
The plural verb "have grown" does not agree with "market," a singular noun. A market has grown, not have grown. That eliminates (A) and (D). "Market" is also the subject of the second verb, which should be "is bringing" rather than "are bringing." (C) and (E) change the verb to "bring," which is certainly more concise. However, this change makes it seem like the accessories and accouterments [sic] bring forth the listed items, which is not logically correct. It should be clear that the growing market is bringing forth those items. That eliminates (C) and (E), leaving (B) as the correct answer.
TAKEAWAY: Be careful of unusual sentence structures. It is not common for the subject to come after the verb. However, when it does, the subject and verb still need to match in number
Diwabag , first, as I said earlier, welcome to GMAT Club!
(Sorry that I mistook your post for a duplicate.)
This Kaplan question is almost identical to
this official question, here. From part of the explanation given (see my highlight under the spoiler), I can see why you might think that there is little difference between
is bringing in B and
bring in C and E.
There are two important differences between B on the one hand, and C and E on the other hand.
The author of the OE does not mention these differences.
1) Options C and E contain subject/verb disagreement.
Market is singular. The verb should be
brings, not
bring.
The point about logic is true. But subject/verb disagreement is easy to spot.
If the S/V disagreement had been explicitly mentioned in the OE, it would have been clear that (C) and (E) contain an error that (B) does not.
2) GMAC usually prefers passive voice if inanimate things have effect
but are paired with a verb such as
bring forth that requires human agency.
-- A market itself cannot "bring forth" anything. People responding to the market bring things forth.
See below.
-- We use the passive voice "is bringing" in (B) as a convention in this kind of situation.
Bring (forth) is a weird verb phrase to be using in this context, but we will work with it.
• Process of Elimination• Split #1 Subject/verb agreementThe subject of the first clause is
market.Options A and D incorrectly pair the singular
market with plural
have grown.
Correct: Out of America's obsession . . . HAS grown a market . . .
Eliminate A and DThe subject of the second clause (a that-clause) in C and E is still
market.
...
market for human-inspired accessories and accoutrements that bringMarket is the antecedent for the relative pronoun
that.
Get rid of the prepositional stuff.
Wrong: ... market ... that
bring. . .
Correct: ... market . . . that brings . . .Eliminate options C and E.• Split #2 - strategically, the answer must be (B) because C and E are the same Options C and E are
almost identical.
Their difference does not make a difference in terms of a decision point.
Tactically, we really have only one choice left from options B, C, and E.
Option (B) is different. Its verb is different.
Options C and E are almost entirely the same, including their that-clause verbs.
Eliminate nearly identical options C and E.
• By POE, the answer is B• Option B also correctly uses the passive voice.In English and on the GMAT, inanimate objects cannot perform human tasks.
When inanimate things "do" the action of a verb that requires agency,
as a matter of convention
we write the sentence in the passive voice, as is the case in (B).
A market is a thing. A market itself cannot bring forth anything.
People responding to the market can create products
that are "brought forth" by the market mechanism.
But the market itself does not tote around cashmere dog sweaters and show them off for purchase,
as professionals at a marketing firm might do with advertisements.
The market itself does not find suppliers who make canopied beds for animals.
We signal that the market does not actively bring forth anything by using passive voice:
the market [passively, passive voice] is bringing forth . . .Option (B) is the best choice because
-- the other four answers have subject-verb disagreement, and
-- the passive voice is usually better when an inanimate object is attached to an action verb
I hope that analysis helps.