GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 17 Oct 2018, 00:57

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

The number of undergraduate degrees in engineering awarded by colleges

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 27 May 2009
Posts: 220
The number of undergraduate degrees in engineering awarded by colleges  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post Updated on: 13 Oct 2017, 19:39
1
1
37
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  25% (medium)

Question Stats:

60% (00:48) correct 40% (01:04) wrong based on 1080 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

The number of undergraduate degrees in engineering awarded by colleges and universities in the United States increased by more than twice from 1978 to 1985.

(A) increased by more than twice

(B) increased more than two times

(C) more than doubled

(D) was more than doubled

(E) had more than doubled

Originally posted by rohansherry on 25 Aug 2009, 01:33.
Last edited by hazelnut on 13 Oct 2017, 19:39, edited 2 times in total.
Edited the question.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 28 Jul 2009
Posts: 114
Location: India
Schools: NUS, NTU, SMU, AGSM, Melbourne School of Business
Re: The number of undergraduate degrees in engineering awarded by colleges  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 25 Aug 2009, 03:31
6
8
rohansherry wrote:
The number of undergraduate degrees in engineering awarded by colleges and universities in the United States increased by more than twice from 1978 to 1985.
(A) increased by more than twice
(B) increased more than two times
(C) more than doubled
(D) was more than doubled
(E) had more than doubled



OA: c.....i doubt it has no verb..pls explain


The trick here is to skip the "not so important" part of the sentence. We can then write the sentence as The number of undergraduate degrees ...from 1978 to 1985

Lets find error in each of the options-
A) increased by more than twice - It should be either "increased by more than two times" or "increased more than twice". A is unidiomatic.
B) increased more than two times - Similarly, B is unidiomatic.
D) was more than doubled - Unneccessary form of "to be"
E) had more than doubled - Unnecessary change in tense to Past Perfect.

C) more than doubled - Best Answer choice since it is precise and conveys the message in the simplest way. "doubled" is the verb.

Hope this helps. :)
_________________

GMAT offended me. Now, its my turn!
Will do anything for Kudos! Please feel free to give one. :)

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 24 Jun 2009
Posts: 35
Re: The number of undergraduate degrees in engineering awarded by colleges  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 25 Aug 2009, 05:21
'by' never modifies twice or we can say that adverb twice is never used with preposition 'by'
so A and B are out

since the action took place and completed in the past past tense is correct i.e. doubled.

so the correct option is C
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 01 Aug 2008
Posts: 584
Re: The number of undergraduate degrees in engineering awarded by colleges  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 25 Aug 2009, 06:04
I agree with all of you on C.

But what exactly is wrong in D? is passive voice saying that some one else doubled the number?
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 27 May 2009
Posts: 220
Re: The number of undergraduate degrees in engineering awarded by colleges  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 25 Aug 2009, 07:26
i still doubt between c and d....imo c dsnt have a verb...............but d has it.....need more minds???
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 27 May 2009
Posts: 220
Re: The number of undergraduate degrees in engineering awarded by colleges  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 26 Aug 2009, 02:08
@ sudeep, I am sorry for asking again and again but the below sentence seems to be missing something

The number of undergraduate degrees more than doubled from !!!!!!

but i am unable to create anther sentence meaning tha same so .....wont argue now....
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 01 Oct 2006
Posts: 49
Re: The number of undergraduate degrees in engineering awarded by colleges  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 26 Aug 2009, 05:21
2
the question here is whether to attach a helping verb (like a be verb (is, was, were) or auxillary verb (has, have, had)).
so do we say "number was more than doubled" or "number more than doubled"

Here is my understanding, generally you attach helping verb to put a specific time frame to the verb, by putting "was" in the sentence you will be saying that this action happened in the past, but even with out using "was" we are getting that meaning because we have a specific time period 1975 -1989.
So no need to use "was"

hope this makes sense
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 16 Nov 2010
Posts: 17
Re: The number of undergraduate degrees in engineering awarded by colleges  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 24 Feb 2011, 14:00
The number of undergraduate degrees in engineering awarded by colleges and universities in the United
States increased by more than twice from 1978 to 1985.
(A) increased by more than twice
(B) increased more than two times
(C) more than doubled
(D) was more than doubled
(E) had more than doubled


I wanted to know why answer choice "E" is wrong. Is it just because it is longer than choice "C" or is there an error in "E" ? Doesn't choice "E" make it clear that the increase happened in the past ?
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 19 Nov 2010
Posts: 84
Re: The number of undergraduate degrees in engineering awarded by colleges  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 24 Feb 2011, 16:04
Past perfect is used to show the timing of an event that happened in the past before another past event. It would be like "The numbers... had more than doubled before engineering market crashed in 1986" Also, we don't use past perfect with a specific time frame. We don't say "The numbers...had more than doubled in 1985." The tense is the issue with E.
SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 06 Sep 2013
Posts: 1764
Concentration: Finance
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: The number of undergraduate degrees in engineering awarded by colleges  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 05 Jan 2014, 16:12
2
rohansherry wrote:
The number of undergraduate degrees in engineering awarded by colleges and universities in the United
States increased by more than twice from 1978 to 1985.
(A) increased by more than twice
(B) increased more than two times
(C) more than doubled
(D) was more than doubled
(E) had more than doubled



OA: c.....i doubt it has no verb..pls explain


More than doubled... GMAC's favorite
Current Student
User avatar
G
Joined: 28 Nov 2014
Posts: 867
Concentration: Strategy
Schools: Fisher '19 (M)
GPA: 3.71
Reviews Badge CAT Tests
Re: The number of undergraduate degrees in engineering awarded by colleges  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 26 Oct 2015, 03:39
Can we have an expert opinion on this question ? Or can anyone throw light on A, B and C in detail.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 12 Sep 2015
Posts: 86
Re: The number of undergraduate degrees in engineering awarded by colleges  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Oct 2015, 07:05
deepaksharma1986 wrote:
The number of undergraduate degrees in engineering awarded by colleges and universities in the United
States increased by more than twice from 1978 to 1985.
(A) increased by more than twice
(B) increased more than two times
(C) more than doubled
(D) was more than doubled
(E) had more than doubled


I wanted to know why answer choice "E" is wrong. Is it just because it is longer than choice "C" or is there an error in "E" ? Doesn't choice "E" make it clear that the increase happened in the past ?

Past perfect is normally used to distinguish clearly the series of at least 2 events. In this case, we only deal with one event. So past simple should suffice.
SC Moderator
User avatar
D
Joined: 13 Apr 2015
Posts: 1693
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, General Management
GMAT 1: 200 Q1 V1
GPA: 4
WE: Analyst (Retail)
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member
Re: The number of undergraduate degrees in engineering awarded by colleges  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 Jul 2016, 11:04
2
shonakshi wrote:
The number of undergraduate degrees in engineering awarded by colleges and universities in the united states increased by more than twice from 1978 to 1987.

A)Increased by more than twice
B)increased more than two times
C)more than doubled
D)was more than doubled
E)had more than doubled


Please refer the following link for the explanation: https://www.manhattanprep.com/gmat/foru ... t7028.html
Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 08 Nov 2015
Posts: 72
GMAT 1: 460 Q32 V22
Re: The number of undergraduate degrees in engineering awarded by colleges  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Jul 2016, 00:35
rohansherry wrote:
The number of undergraduate degrees in engineering awarded by colleges and universities in the United
States increased by more than twice from 1978 to 1985.
(A) increased by more than twice
(B) increased more than two times
(C) more than doubled
(D) was more than doubled
(E) had more than doubled



OA: c.....i doubt it has no verb..pls explain



Correct answer in this case i C. D and E are straightaway out.
Senior SC Moderator
User avatar
V
Joined: 14 Nov 2016
Posts: 1315
Location: Malaysia
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member CAT Tests
Re: The number of undergraduate degrees in engineering awarded by colleges  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 Nov 2017, 04:55
2
rohansherry wrote:
The number of undergraduate degrees in engineering awarded by colleges and universities in the United States increased by more than twice from 1978 to 1985.

(A) increased by more than twice

(B) increased more than two times

(C) more than doubled

(D) was more than doubled

(E) had more than doubled


Choice A is faulty because an adverb such as twice cannot function as an object of the preposition by.

B distorts the sentence’s meaning, stating that the number of engineering degrees conferred increased on more than two distinct occasions.

D’s passive verb was…doubled suggests without warrant that some unnamed agent increase the number of engineering degrees.

The past perfect tense in E, had… doubled, is inappropriate unless the increase in engineering degrees is specifically being viewed as having occurred further back in the past than some subsequent event.

Choice C is best.
_________________

"Be challenged at EVERY MOMENT."

“Strength doesn’t come from what you can do. It comes from overcoming the things you once thought you couldn’t.”

"Each stage of the journey is crucial to attaining new heights of knowledge."

Rules for posting in verbal forum | Please DO NOT post short answer in your post!

Advanced Search : https://gmatclub.com/forum/advanced-search/

Manager
Manager
User avatar
S
Joined: 04 Dec 2016
Posts: 110
Re: The number of undergraduate degrees in engineering awarded by colleges  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 30 Nov 2017, 17:56
rohansherry wrote:
The number of undergraduate degrees in engineering awarded by colleges and universities in the United States increased by more than twice from 1978 to 1985.

(A) increased by more than twice

(B) increased more than two times

(C) more than doubled

(D) was more than doubled

(E) had more than doubled



Answer choice C - The number of undergraduate degrees in engineering awarded by colleges and universities in the United States more than doubled from 1978 to 1985. - sounds weird :?
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 17 Apr 2018
Posts: 34
CAT Tests
Re: The number of undergraduate degrees in engineering awarded by colleges  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Jun 2018, 07:19
rohansherry wrote:
i still doubt between c and d....imo c dsnt have a verb...............but d has it.....need more minds???


"Awarded" acts as verb here.
-ed modifiers can be verb and adjectives and it is working as verb here.
_________________

Let's share some kudos together.

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
P
Joined: 17 Mar 2014
Posts: 383
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge CAT Tests
Re: The number of undergraduate degrees in engineering awarded by colleges  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 25 Aug 2018, 08:00
1
mikemcgarry,

Hello Mike, Could you please clarify this SC. I am confused between A, C and D.

What is the difference between twice, two times and doubled.
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 04 Aug 2018
Posts: 2
CAT Tests
Re: The number of undergraduate degrees in engineering awarded by colleges  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 Sep 2018, 04:18
awarded should be modifier here, and "more than doubled" need some verb so D should be the right ans.
can anyone explain what is the sentence structure here?
Intern
Intern
avatar
S
Joined: 10 Feb 2017
Posts: 37
Location: Viet Nam
GPA: 3.5
WE: General Management (Education)
Re: The number of undergraduate degrees in engineering awarded by colleges  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 03 Sep 2018, 06:28
Hi, can someone explain more about this OA? If the OA is D, so where is the verb of this sentence?
GMAT Club Bot
Re: The number of undergraduate degrees in engineering awarded by colleges &nbs [#permalink] 03 Sep 2018, 06:28
Display posts from previous: Sort by

The number of undergraduate degrees in engineering awarded by colleges

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


Copyright

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.