If a, b, and c are prime numbers, do (a+b) and c have a common factor

Question

If a, b, and c are prime numbers, do  (a+b)  and  c  have a common factor that is greater than 1?

(1) a, b, and c are all different prime numbers
(2)  c
eq{2}

chetan2u · Answer

Hi,
 lets analyze the Q 
 1) If all three are same prime ans will be YES..  -- (3+3)=6 and 3-- factors 1 and 3

2) If all are different, and c is 2.. ans is YES  -- (3+7) = 10, always be EVEN and 2--- 2 will be factor

3) If all are different and a or b is 2, ans can be both YES or NO.. 
(2+3) = 5 and c=5..YES
(2+7) =9 and c=11..NO

4) If all are different and none of them is 2.. ans will be again YES or NO.. 
(3+5)=8... c=7..NO
(3+7) = 10.. c=5.. YES

lets see the statements
 (1) a,b, and c are all different prime numbers 
Any of the above 3 conditions can exist -(2),(3)and (4)
Insuff

(2)  c
eq{2}  
any of the above cases (1), (3) and (4) can exist.. 
Insuff

Combined- 
3 and 4 cases still exist
Insuff
E

RussianDude · Answer

chetan2u, can you please explain why the answer is no when the primes are all the same. 3 is the common factor of 3 and 6, so the answer should be yes. What am I missing? Sorry if the question is confusing, my brain is fried right now.

mitko20m · Answer

Each statement alone is not sufficient. Combined, two possibilities:
If (a+b) = (2+3) and c is 5 (c must be different from 2) they will have a common factor of 5
If (a+b) = 11+7 and c is 5, they will NOT have a common factor.

For Yes/No DS questions, we need to have a definitive Yes or a definitive No. Combined - not sufficient. Answer E.

Divyadisha · Answer

(1) a,b, and c are all different prime numbers
if a=3, b=2 and c=5, then no

if a = 3, b= 5 and c=7, then yes.

Not sufficient

(2)  c
eq{2}  
if a=3, b=2 and c=5, then no

if a = 3, b= 5 and c=7, then yes.

Not sufficient.

Combining both statements is also not sufficient.

E is the answer

stonecold · Answer

taking a=2 b=3 and c=7 we can discard both the statements as well as there combination
SMASH that E

toby001 · Answer

Hi Banuel,

I got this question right, but I was wondering if statement 2 said that neither a, b, or c could be 2, that would be sufficient, right?

Thank you!

lalitmach22 · Answer

Example 17 , 19, 3
17+19= 36 which is divisible by 3
But 19+3 = 22 , not divisible by 17
Therefore statement 2 is not sufficient
Correct answer is E

Sent from my Coolpad 3600I using  GMAT Club Forum mobile app

stonecold · Answer

Nopes.
The answer would still be E.

Let us modify the question =-->
 
  If a,b, and c are prime numbers, do (a+b) and c have a common factor that is greater than 1?
(1) a,b, and c are all different prime numbers
(2) c≠2

Statment 1 --> 2,3,5 => YES
3,5,13 => NO

Hence not sufficient,

Statment 2 --> What if the primes are equal ?
We need to consider the possibility when a=b=c
Say z=b=c=7
So a+b=14
c=7
Clearly GCD≠1
Hence not sufficient.

Now combing the two statements => as a,c,b≠2 
They are all odd primes.
Still -> 3,5,7 => YES
3,5,11 => NO

Hence not sufficient.

BillyZ · Answer

If you only know that they're all prime

You could have c = 2, a + b = 3 + 5 = 8

So they'd have a common factor

When S2 says c ≠ 2, that's a clue to try c = 2 in S1.

You could also try c = 3, a = 2, b = 7

Since c is prime, the question is whether c is a factor of ( a+b ), so you want to try to find ways to make c a factor of a+b.

If a = 2, b = 7, c = 3, then the answer is YES.

If a = 2, b = 11, c = 3, then the answer is NO.

So even with both statements you can't say.

Answer :  E

CAMANISHPARMAR · Answer

The two statements individually are not sufficient. When we combine the two statements, no additional information is provided.

Straightforward option E!!

RashedVai · Answer

would you please explain this question without number picking? I mean using some theory and logic.  Bunuel

Posted from my mobile device

dcummins · Answer

It's easier to step through this and test numbers.

We are asked whether the GCF between (a+b) and c is greater than 1.

Theory: if the GCF between (a+b) and c = 1 then (a+b) and c are consecutive integers
4,5 = GCF 1
5,6 = GCF 1 and so on...

Statement (1) a, b, c are all different primes
Firstly, take note of statement 2 as it gives us a reason for us to suspect that when c=2 different outcomes occur, so lets test c= 2 first
a= 3
b=5
c= 2
GCF (3+5), 2 
GCF 8,2 = 2

is the GCF > 1? Yes

Now, lets test either a=2 or b=2
a= 2
b=3
c=5
GCF (a+b), c
= GCF (2+3), 5
= GCF 5,5 = 5 --- another Yes

What about
a=2
b=5
c=3

GCF(a+b),c 
GCF(7,3) = 1 
GCF > 1? NO

Therefore A is insufficient

Statement (2)
Just tells us that C is not equal to 2. There are heaps of possibilities for a, b and c, including repetitions since we don't have the restrictions of statement 1

Combined we know that when c is not equal 2 and a, b, and c are all different primes, then the two scenarios from above can occur:
GCF(7,3) = 1 
OR
GCF (5,5) = 5

Producing NO and Yes answers respectively. Therefore E -->combined insufficient.

nhatanh811 · Answer

Bunuel , just to confirm that this is on GMATPrep, please add a tag, thanks!

Bunuel · Answer

______________________
Added the tag. Thank you.

BansalT · Answer

Hi experts

If in this question we have CAN instead of DO then C can be the answer?

If a, b, and c are prime numbers,  CAN   (a+b)  and  c  have a common factor that is greater than 1?

bumpbot · Answer

Automated notice from GMAT Club BumpBot: 

A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.

 This post was generated automatically.

If a, b, and c are prime numbers, do (a+b) and c have a common factor

Prep Toolkit

Top 5 GMAT Debrief Videos

615 to 715 in 15 Days (Ria's Strategies)

More than Quant/Verbal Abilities: Speed vs. Accuracy

745 with Only Self-Prep and GMAT Club

From 555 to 765: 210-point Improvement

Perfect 805 Score Debrief by Julia

My Rewards