GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 17 Aug 2019, 14:01

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

V61-02

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Find Similar Topics 
Founder
Founder
User avatar
V
Joined: 04 Dec 2002
Posts: 17964
Location: United States (WA)
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V42
GPA: 3.5
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member CAT Tests
V61-02  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 04 Sep 2018, 23:56
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

75% (02:56) correct 25% (02:27) wrong based on 4 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

A discovery made by two Australian researchers, Barry Marshall and John Warren, revolutionized the scientific community's understanding of peptic ulcer disease and transformed the illness from a chronic, frequently disabling condition to one that can be cured by a short regimen of antibiotics.
In 1981, the two researchers first began to work together. Their discovery came about after Warren had observed bacteria in the lower part of the stomach of patients, which contradicted the long-held belief that bacteria could not survive in the acidic stomach environment. Warren also noticed that signs of inflammation were always present close to the bacteria. While conducting further studies on more patients, Warren and Marshall found H. pylori bacteria present in almost all patients with stomach inflammation or ulcers in the stomach. The two hypothesized that there was a causal link between H. pylori and ulcers, and that ulcers were not caused by stress, as previously thought. In order to support their controversial claims, they experimented on animals, and when this turned out to be unsuccessful, Marshall took it upon himself to be his own guinea pig. After verifying that he did not already have H. pylori in his stomach, Marshall drank a concoction made from cultured bacteria. Within a few days, he came down with gastritis, and H. pylori were found in his inflamed stomach; he was then cured with the help of antibiotics.
The researchers' findings were so contentious that it took ten years for their work to be accepted. Many researchers tried to disprove their findings, but failed to do so. Despite this, numerous scientists and doctors remained doubtful and refused to believe that any bacteria could live in the acidic environment of the stomach. According to Marshall, the pharmaceutical industry also had a role in preventing their bacteria theory from gaining traction. At the time, the most common treatment for ulcers was antacids, which required constant use, since the symptoms would return immediately after patients stopped taking them. Hence, the notion that ulcers could be permanently cured by taking antibiotics was highly unappealing to the pharmaceutical companies. By 1994, however, the evidence was overwhelming, prompting a change in the treatment of ulcers and establishing antibiotics as the standard approach. Finally, in 2005 Warren and Marshall received the praise they so clearly deserved, winning the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine for their innovative work.

The content of the passage would be LEAST relevant to a long discussion of which of the following topics?

A. Scientific discoveries of the 21st century.
B. Commercial industries and their impact on medicine.
C. Contributions of Western researchers to the field of gastroenterology (the study of the digestive system and its disorders).
D. evolutionary scientific discoveries and how they were received by the scientific community.
E. The long, hard road to a Nobel Prize.

_________________
Founder of GMAT Club

Just starting out with GMAT? Start here...
Want to know application stats & Profiles from last year? Check the Decision Tracker
Founder
Founder
User avatar
V
Joined: 04 Dec 2002
Posts: 17964
Location: United States (WA)
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V42
GPA: 3.5
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member CAT Tests
Re V61-02  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 04 Sep 2018, 23:56
Official Solution:

A discovery made by two Australian researchers, Barry Marshall and John Warren, revolutionized the scientific community's understanding of peptic ulcer disease and transformed the illness from a chronic, frequently disabling condition to one that can be cured by a short regimen of antibiotics.
In 1981, the two researchers first began to work together. Their discovery came about after Warren had observed bacteria in the lower part of the stomach of patients, which contradicted the long-held belief that bacteria could not survive in the acidic stomach environment. Warren also noticed that signs of inflammation were always present close to the bacteria. While conducting further studies on more patients, Warren and Marshall found H. pylori bacteria present in almost all patients with stomach inflammation or ulcers in the stomach. The two hypothesized that there was a causal link between H. pylori and ulcers, and that ulcers were not caused by stress, as previously thought. In order to support their controversial claims, they experimented on animals, and when this turned out to be unsuccessful, Marshall took it upon himself to be his own guinea pig. After verifying that he did not already have H. pylori in his stomach, Marshall drank a concoction made from cultured bacteria. Within a few days, he came down with gastritis, and H. pylori were found in his inflamed stomach; he was then cured with the help of antibiotics.
The researchers' findings were so contentious that it took ten years for their work to be accepted. Many researchers tried to disprove their findings, but failed to do so. Despite this, numerous scientists and doctors remained doubtful and refused to believe that any bacteria could live in the acidic environment of the stomach. According to Marshall, the pharmaceutical industry also had a role in preventing their bacteria theory from gaining traction. At the time, the most common treatment for ulcers was antacids, which required constant use, since the symptoms would return immediately after patients stopped taking them. Hence, the notion that ulcers could be permanently cured by taking antibiotics was highly unappealing to the pharmaceutical companies. By 1994, however, the evidence was overwhelming, prompting a change in the treatment of ulcers and establishing antibiotics as the standard approach. Finally, in 2005 Warren and Marshall received the praise they so clearly deserved, winning the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine for their innovative work.


The content of the passage would be LEAST relevant to a long discussion of which of the following topics?

A. Scientific discoveries of the 21st century.
B. Commercial industries and their impact on medicine.
C. Contributions of Western researchers to the field of gastroenterology (the study of the digestive system and its disorders).
D. evolutionary scientific discoveries and how they were received by the scientific community.
E. The long, hard road to a Nobel Prize.

We’ll look for an answer that describes a subject that the passage doesn’t relate to.
(A) The discovery discussed in the passage was in the 20th century, not the 21st. Looks right!
(B) The (negative) effect of the pharmaceutical industry on the acceptance of a new medicinal treatment is indeed discussed.
(C) Marshall and Warren are indeed one example of Western researchers who contributed to this field.
(D) The passage is a great example of this topic, as the last paragraph is about the reception of the discovery.
(E) The entire passage does describe the challenges faced by the researchers, which culminated in their winning the Nobel Prize.


This question was provided by ExamPal

Answer: A
_________________
Founder of GMAT Club

Just starting out with GMAT? Start here...
Want to know application stats & Profiles from last year? Check the Decision Tracker
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 21 Dec 2016
Posts: 11
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Social Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 730 Q49 V40
GPA: 2.94
WE: Social Work (Investment Banking)
Re: V61-02  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 Feb 2019, 09:42
1
Is it OK to consider Australian researchers as Western researchers?
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 22 May 2019
Posts: 8
Re: V61-02  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 25 Jun 2019, 00:25
Why are Australians considered Westerners?
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 12 Aug 2018
Posts: 1
Re V61-02  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 22 Jul 2019, 11:58
I think this the explanation isn't clear enough, please elaborate.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 10 Aug 2019
Posts: 2
Re: V61-02  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 Aug 2019, 08:29
I think the logic is not clear. It is not mentioned in the passage that Australian researchers as Western?
GMAT Club Bot
Re: V61-02   [#permalink] 10 Aug 2019, 08:29
Display posts from previous: Sort by

V61-02

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  

Moderators: chetan2u, Bunuel






Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne