Last visit was: 21 Apr 2026, 03:57 It is currently 21 Apr 2026, 03:57
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
Sub 505 (Easy)|   Science|   Short Passage|                              
User avatar
mendelay
Joined: 21 Jul 2009
Last visit: 17 Oct 2012
Posts: 77
Own Kudos:
625
 [105]
Given Kudos: 23
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 77
Kudos: 625
 [105]
27
Kudos
Add Kudos
78
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
Gmatsaiyan
Joined: 05 Feb 2018
Last visit: 08 Aug 2022
Posts: 749
Own Kudos:
2,797
 [25]
Given Kudos: 139
Location: India
Concentration: Finance
GPA: 2.77
WE:General Management (Other)
19
Kudos
Add Kudos
5
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
kivalo
Joined: 20 Sep 2016
Last visit: 08 Sep 2022
Posts: 90
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 207
GMAT 1: 680 Q49 V35
GPA: 3.99
GMAT 1: 680 Q49 V35
Posts: 90
Kudos: 171
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
AD2GMAT
Joined: 30 Jul 2014
Last visit: 30 Jan 2023
Posts: 84
Own Kudos:
106
 [4]
Given Kudos: 107
Status:MBA Completed
Affiliations: IIM
Products:
Posts: 84
Kudos: 106
 [4]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
kivalo
Can someone explain how do you read a passage like this one (relatively clear structure, but a lot of supporting details to comprehend). I got 7/7 right in 10 mins, but still feel that I haven't built a consistent approach. Can someone who is good at this explain (as I do below) how to do it right, i.e. how to know how much time and attention to develop to specific details ? What do you exactly take from your first read?


Quote:
In addition to conventional galaxies, the universe contains very dim galaxies that until recently went unnoticed by astronomers.
Most important sentence. There are two type of galaxies, conventional and dim. Until recently, scientists did not know about the dim galaxies.
Quote:
Possibly as numerous as conventional galaxies, these galaxies have the same general shape and even the same approximate number of stars as a common type of conventional galaxy, the spiral, but tend to be much larger. Because these galaxies’ mass is spread out over larger areas, they have far fewer stars per unit volume than do conventional galaxies. Apparently these low-surface-brightness galaxies, as they are called, take much longer than conventional galaxies to condense their primordial gas and convert it to stars—that is, they evolve much more slowly.
This is the part I am not sure about. I'd note only that bunch of differences are given, and skim to try to comprehend what the differences are. During my read, I happened to remember the difference in size in density, but what I remembered was not important

Quote:
These galaxies may constitute an answer to the long-standing puzzle of the missing baryonic mass in the universe. Baryons—subatomic particles that are generally protons or neutrons—are the source of stellar, and therefore galactic, luminosity, and so their numbers can be estimated based on how luminous galaxies are. However, the amount of helium in the universe, as measured by spectroscopy, suggests that there are far more baryons in the universe than estimates based on galactic luminosity indicate. Astronomers have long speculated that the missing baryonic mass might eventually be discovered in intergalactic space or as some large population of galaxies that are difficult to detect.
Again, I am not sure how to tackle this para.
Again, here I'd only note that knowledge about dim galaxies might help explain why measures relying on luminosity and helium give different estimates of baryonic mass in the universe However, the paragraph contains a lot more info that requires time to comprehend. What do I do with all that information during the first read?

Though I am not an expert, I say identifying the structure in the first read is good enough to go ahead with the questions. In other words the "minimum" amount of reading that is necessary for you to answer the Primary Purpose question is enough in the first reading.
If some expert reply to this question, then I suppose it would be more fruitful for you and for me also.
User avatar
Skywalker18
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 08 Dec 2013
Last visit: 15 Nov 2023
Posts: 1,974
Own Kudos:
10,158
 [1]
Given Kudos: 171
Status:Greatness begins beyond your comfort zone
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
GPA: 3.2
WE:Information Technology (Consulting)
Products:
Posts: 1,974
Kudos: 10,158
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Decent passage , got all correct except Q96(6th question) in 12 mins , including 3 mins 15 seconds to read .
For Q96 , i was stuck between option D and E and could not eliminate either .

AjiteshArun , mikemcgarry ,GMATNinja , ccooley , other experts -- can you please help ?
User avatar
AjiteshArun
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 15 Jul 2015
Last visit: 21 Apr 2026
Posts: 6,074
Own Kudos:
5,137
 [2]
Given Kudos: 743
Location: India
GMAT Focus 1: 715 Q83 V90 DI83
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V169
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
GMAT Focus 1: 715 Q83 V90 DI83
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V169
Posts: 6,074
Kudos: 5,137
 [2]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Skywalker18
Decent passage , got all correct except Q96(6th question) in 12 mins , including 3 mins 15 seconds to read .
For Q96 , i was stuck between option D and E and could not eliminate either .
The passage says astronomers have long speculated that the missing baryonic mass might eventually be discovered in intergalactic space, but option E says astronomers have discovered a substantial amount of baryonic mass in intergalactic space.

According to the passage, the mass might be discovered (in the future). Option E says that the discovery has already happened. Therefore, we'd expect the author to disagree with E.
User avatar
aragonn
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 23 Sep 2015
Last visit: 30 Sep 2019
Posts: 1,170
Own Kudos:
5,939
 [4]
Given Kudos: 416
Products:
Posts: 1,170
Kudos: 5,939
 [4]
4
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
P1- new galaxies; slow; dim; diff with conventional galaxies.
P2 - how it is a missing puzzle. baryons
Main point - about new galaxies - similarity with conventional one and importance of their discovery.

91. According to the passage, conventional spiral galaxies differ from low-surface-brightness galaxies in which of the following ways?
must be in P1

(A) They have fewer stars than do low-surface brightness galaxies. - not true for all
(B) They evolve more quickly than low-surfacebrightness galaxies. - this must be correct.
(C) They are more diffuse than low-surfacebrightness galaxies. - not true for all
(D) They contain less helium than do low-surfacebrightness galaxies. - not true for all
(E) They are larger than low-surface-brightness galaxies. - not true for all
----------------------------------------

92. It can be inferred from the passage that which of the following is an accurate physical description of typical low-surface-brightness galaxies?

(A) They are large spiral galaxies containing fewer stars than do conventional galaxies. - no; the same approximate number of stars
(B) They are compact but very dim spiral galaxies. - dim is true but compact is not.
(C) They are diffuse spiral galaxies that occupy a large volume of space. - has to be this; the same approximate number of stars as a common type of conventional galaxy, the spiral, but tend to be much larger
(D) They are small, young spiral galaxies that contain a high proportion of primordial gas. - too broad.
(E) They are large, dense spirals with low luminosity. - no dense

----------------------------------------

93. It can be inferred from the passage that the “longstanding puzzle” refers to which of the following?
anchor - longstanding puzzle - of the missing baryonic mass in the universe ---- Astronomers have long speculated that the missing baryonic mass might eventually be discovered in intergalactic space or as some large population of galaxies that are difficult to detect.

(B) The discrepancy between estimates of total baryonic mass derived from measuring helium and estimates based on measuring galactic luminosity - correct; best of the lot.

---------------------------------------
94. The author implies that low-surface-brightness galaxies could constitute an answer to the puzzle discussed in the second paragraph primarily because

the missing baryonic mass might eventually be discovered in intergalactic space or as some large population of galaxies that are difficult to detect.

(A) they contain baryonic mass that was not taken into account by researchers using galactic luminosity to estimate the number of baryons in the universe -

---------------------------------------

95. The author mentions the fact that baryons are the source of stars’ luminosity primarily in order to explain

(C) why astronomers can use galactic luminosity to estimate baryonic mass - yes

----------------------------------------

96. The author of the passage would be most likely to disagree with which of the following statements?

(A) Low-surface-brightness galaxies are more difficult to detect than are conventional galaxies. - T
(B) Low-surface-brightness galaxies are often spiral in shape. - T
(C) Astronomers have advanced plausible ideas about where missing baryonic mass might be found. - T
(D) Astronomers have devised a useful way of estimating the total baryonic mass in the universe. - T
(E) Astronomers have discovered a substantial amount of baryonic mass in intergalactic space. - only theory is given here.

--------------------------------------

97. The primary purpose of the passage is to

(A) describe a phenomenon and consider its scientific significance - to the point. P2 defines scientific significance.
(B) contrast two phenomena and discuss a puzzling difference between them - too weak
(C) identify a newly discovered phenomenon and explain its origins - explain its origins ---- seems wrong
(D) compare two classes of objects and discuss the physical properties of each - P1 only
(E) discuss a discovery and point out its inconsistency with existing theory - inconsistency ---- not true
User avatar
Chelsea212
Joined: 16 Dec 2015
Last visit: 18 Nov 2019
Posts: 22
Own Kudos:
85
 [4]
Given Kudos: 17
Location: Canada
Concentration: Strategy, Finance
WE:Corporate Finance (Finance: Investment Banking)
Posts: 22
Kudos: 85
 [4]
4
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
This was a tough one! I unexpectedly found myself struggling with RC after having zero problems doing Manhattan practice exams. When I did the Manhattan Prep test, I can't even recall getting 1 RC question wrong ever...but then when I transitioned to the OG stuff, I found that I was really struggling. That said, I always, always, always suggest that people focus on using reading materials from the science/technology, as well as global business sections from The Economist and the NYTimes as practice, and then testing for improvement by practicing only OG questions. In my personal experience, this has yielded the largest improvement for me.

I think a key part of my improvement thus far has also hinged on the fact that I deliberately pick articles I just do not want to read because (a) the topic is too foreign and (b) the topic seems super boring. Articles about galaxies, stars, and general science typically bring on the ZZzzZs for me so I pick those as they are both boring and incredibly confusing to me.

One of the most basic points you should be able to answer after every practice article is "what was the point of this article?" and being able to articulate it in a very short but succinct sentence. If you're going to keep this question in mind, you'll intuitively find yourself transitioning from reading 'fact, fact, fact' to a sentence by sentence structural understanding of 'introduction, opinion, opposing opinion, explanation etc'. I highly recommend that you read/watch videos done by the GMATNinjas and Mike McGarry if you want a refresher on how to read.

Now on with the RC! I'm going to start with commenting on the final question because it is equally basic as it is difficult question.

Quote:
97. The primary purpose of the passage is to

(A) describe a phenomenon and consider its scientific significance
(B) contrast two phenomena and discuss a puzzling difference between them
(C) identify a newly discovered phenomenon and explain its origins
(D) compare two classes of objects and discuss the physical properties of each
(E) discuss a discovery and point out its inconsistency with existing theory
Step 1. I always, always, always rephrase the passage as I read. - This passage is fairly short, and there isn't much we need to do to organize our thoughts because the writer seems to have done the bulk of it. The first paragraph introduces the topic, comparing and contrasting two types of galaxies. The second paragraph moves into how the 'dim galaxies' may hold answers to a long-standing puzzle.

Step 2. For every question, always go back to the passage. - When I reach this question, I quickly revisit the passage at a very high level to again paraphrase the highlights of the passage. This jogs my memory so that I can get a good handle on what I'm going to be looking out for in the answer choices of a high-level, big picture type of question (i.e. not detail related).

Step 3. Always find 4 wrong answers!
    (A) describe a phenomenon and consider its scientific significance - This sounds promising...not a bingo! straight away in my mind, but I will definitely put this guy on hold. I've returned after eliminating all else, and this now sounds spot on!

    (B) contrast two phenomena and discuss a puzzling difference between them - The passage compared two types of a single phenomena: galaxies. Although I'm not certain, I don't think I would call the conventional and dim galaxies two separate phenomena, but rather, 2 types of a single phenomena. Also, the primary purpose was not discussing a puzzling difference between these two galaxies. I think the primary purpose was captured in par-graph 2 sentence 1: "These galaxies may constitute an answer to the long-standing puzzle of the missing baryonic mass in the universe." The dim galaxies seem to just have some sort of scientific significance in resolving a long unsolved puzzle.

    (C) identify a newly discovered phenomenon and explain its origins - There is no mention of any 'newly' discovered phenomenon, but rather, a 'long-standing puzzle'.. In addition, the passage never touches on, let alone explains, origins of any phenomena.

    (D) compare two classes of objects and discuss the physical properties of each - Nice, this answer choice gives me more confidence in my justification for answer choice (B). While the first paragraph does exactly what this answer choice states, it is not the primary purpose of the passage. As we can see, the first sentence of the second paragraph introduces the purpose of the passage as it effectively switches the tone of the passage from being explanatory to questioning while using the information from paragraph as context.

    The second paragraph is where the heart of the passage's purpose lies and the first and last sentence of the second paragraph structurally cement this. For the purposes of eliminating this specific answer choice, I think it is enough to recognize that there is a second paragraph and it is not at all doing what this choice states, but instead opening up room for discussion and further exploration.


    (E) discuss a discovery and point out its inconsistency with existing theory - I think that this is a very tempting answer choice because it is very abstract. I do not think I give the best explanation as to how and why I eliminate this choice, but I'll do my best! I actually got this question wrong and chose this after I got down to choosing between (A) and (E) and was feeling like I needed to just pick!

    First point of confusion for me here is that I am uncertain whether I would label these galaxies being discussed as discoveries in present day...they were definitely 'discovered' and i.e. new phenomena at some point.... Even if I call these galaxies a new discovery, the passage does not point out their inconsistency with any existing theory. Instead, the passage discusses the inconsistency on the amount of Baryons are in one of them as measured by two different methods.

    I think that if the purpose of the passage was to discuss a 'discovery', the author would very deliberately mention the word discovery. On this basis, I eliminate this choice.


Main takeaway: Answer choices like (E) are prime examples of abstract thoughts that touch enough on relevant and true portion so the passage that it is a very easy trap to fall into.

Feedback and comment not only welcome, but encouraged!! I think lots of people would benefit from discussion on this one.
avatar
psls
Joined: 27 Jan 2021
Last visit: 12 Dec 2023
Posts: 29
Own Kudos:
10
 [1]
Given Kudos: 131
Posts: 29
Kudos: 10
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
How many galaxies ? i got confused by the "these galaxies" is this referring to conventional or dim galaxies?

It is safe to say all the pronouns used are referring to the subject?


(Because these galaxies’ mass is spread out over larger areas, they have far fewer stars per unit volume than do conventional galaxies.)

"Because these galaxies" Is this referring to dim galaxies?

(Apparently these low-surface-brightness galaxies, as they are called, take much longer than conventional galaxies to condense their primordial gas and convert it to stars—that is, they evolve much more slowly.)

"These low-surface-brightness galaxies": is 3rd galaxies? not Dim or conventional galaxies?

(These galaxies may constitute an answer to the long-standing puzzle of the missing baryonic mass in the universe.)

Is the "These galaxies" here refer to dim galaxies too?
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 21 Apr 2026
Posts: 7,391
Own Kudos:
70,784
 [2]
Given Kudos: 2,126
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,391
Kudos: 70,784
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
psls
How many galaxies ? i got confused by the "these galaxies" is this referring to conventional or dim galaxies?

It is safe to say all the pronouns used are referring to the subject?


(Because these galaxies’ mass is spread out over larger areas, they have far fewer stars per unit volume than do conventional galaxies.)

"Because these galaxies" Is this referring to dim galaxies?

(Apparently these low-surface-brightness galaxies, as they are called, take much longer than conventional galaxies to condense their primordial gas and convert it to stars—that is, they evolve much more slowly.)

"These low-surface-brightness galaxies": is 3rd galaxies? not Dim or conventional galaxies?

(These galaxies may constitute an answer to the long-standing puzzle of the missing baryonic mass in the universe.)

Is the "These galaxies" here refer to dim galaxies too?
You're right, "these galaxies" is referring to the subject of the first sentence, the dim galaxies.

This is true throughout this passage -- each time "these galaxies" is used, it's referring to the dim galaxies mentioned in the first sentence.

The "low-surface-brightness galaxies" are also the dim galaxies, this part of the passage just gives another name for them. There are only two types of galaxy in this passage: the conventional galaxies and the dim galaxies.

I hope that helps!
avatar
psls
Joined: 27 Jan 2021
Last visit: 12 Dec 2023
Posts: 29
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 131
Posts: 29
Kudos: 10
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Dear Experts,

GMATNinja
VeritasKarishma
AjiteshArun

In Q6., I got hesitated in choice B,
Quote:
96. The author of the passage would be most likely to disagree with which of the following statements?

(B) Low-surface-brightness galaxies are often spiral in shape.


According to the passage,
Quote:
Possibly as numerous as conventional galaxies, these galaxies have the same general shape and even the same approximate number of stars as a common type of conventional galaxy, the spiral, but tend to be much larger.

Why author would agree with choice(B) with the word "OFTEN"?
Since I cannot see any mentions of the likelihood of galaxy shapes.

How can I eliminate it with confidence?

Appreciate,
-tor
User avatar
AjiteshArun
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 15 Jul 2015
Last visit: 21 Apr 2026
Posts: 6,074
Own Kudos:
5,137
 [2]
Given Kudos: 743
Location: India
GMAT Focus 1: 715 Q83 V90 DI83
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V169
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
GMAT Focus 1: 715 Q83 V90 DI83
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V169
Posts: 6,074
Kudos: 5,137
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
TorGmatGod
Why author would agree with choice(B) with the word "OFTEN"?
Hi TorGmatGod,

The correct answer will be something that the author is (most) likely to disagree with. In the portion of the passage you're looking at, the author clearly says "these galaxies have the same general shape... as a common type of conventional galaxy, the spiral". This means that ~ low-surface-brightness galaxies are spiral in shape. The only difference between what we see in the passage and what option B says is that option B includes the word often.

(1) Low-surface-brightness galaxies are spiral in shape. ← This is what the passage tells us.
(2) Low-surface-brightness galaxies are often spiral in shape. ← This is option B.

Someone who agrees with (1) will most likely also agree with (2). If it helps, we can read B as "many low-surface-brightness galaxies are spiral in shape". If all low-surface-brightness galaxies are spiral in shape, then the statement "many low-surface-brightness galaxies are spiral in shape" is also true, so the author is unlikely to disagree with it. On the other hand, the author would definitely disagree with E, because he or she says that the missing baryonic mass "might eventually be discovered in intergalactic space".
User avatar
KarishmaB
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 21 Apr 2026
Posts: 16,438
Own Kudos:
79,369
 [2]
Given Kudos: 484
Location: Pune, India
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 16,438
Kudos: 79,369
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
TorGmatGod
Dear Experts,

GMATNinja
VeritasKarishma
AjiteshArun

In Q6., I got hesitated in choice B,
Quote:
96. The author of the passage would be most likely to disagree with which of the following statements?

(B) Low-surface-brightness galaxies are often spiral in shape.


According to the passage,
Quote:
Possibly as numerous as conventional galaxies, these galaxies have the same general shape and even the same approximate number of stars as a common type of conventional galaxy, the spiral, but tend to be much larger.

Why author would agree with choice(B) with the word "OFTEN"?
Since I cannot see any mentions of the likelihood of galaxy shapes.

How can I eliminate it with confidence?

Appreciate,
-tor

"same general shape" and "often have the same shape" are not very different.
"Same general shape" means that most have this shape but there could be some exceptions. "Often have the same shape" is also the same idea. When you are talking about galaxies, there is a lot we don't know. So making definitive statements is not possible.
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
AjiteshArun
TorGmatGod
Why author would agree with choice(B) with the word "OFTEN"?
Hi TorGmatGod,

The correct answer will be something that the author is (most) likely to disagree with. In the portion of the passage you're looking at, the author clearly says "these galaxies have the same general shape... as a common type of conventional galaxy, the spiral". This means that ~ low-surface-brightness galaxies are spiral in shape. The only difference between what we see in the passage and what option B says is that option B includes the word often.

(1) Low-surface-brightness galaxies are spiral in shape. ← This is what the passage tells us.
(2) Low-surface-brightness galaxies are often spiral in shape. ← This is option B.

Someone who agrees with (1) will most likely also agree with (2). If it helps, we can read B as "many low-surface-brightness galaxies are spiral in shape". If all low-surface-brightness galaxies are spiral in shape, then the statement "many low-surface-brightness galaxies are spiral in shape" is also true, so the author is unlikely to disagree with it. On the other hand, the author would definitely disagree with E, because he or she says that the missing baryonic mass "might eventually be discovered in intergalactic space".
AjiteshArun
Thanks for the nice explanation, but it confused a bit me.
Quote:
these galaxies (dim galaxies) have the same general shape and even the same approximate number of stars as a common type of conventional galaxy, the spiral
It seems that Low-surface-brightness galaxies is same as dim galaxies, right? From the above quote, the conventional galaxy is the spiral as the spiral has been used as the modifier of conventional galaxy. So, from the quote, it seems that conventional galaxy (not Low-surface-brightness galaxies/ dim galaxies) are spiral in shape.
Am I missing anything here?
Thank you very much.
User avatar
AjiteshArun
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 15 Jul 2015
Last visit: 21 Apr 2026
Posts: 6,074
Own Kudos:
5,137
 [1]
Given Kudos: 743
Location: India
GMAT Focus 1: 715 Q83 V90 DI83
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V169
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
GMAT Focus 1: 715 Q83 V90 DI83
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V169
Posts: 6,074
Kudos: 5,137
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
TheUltimateWinner
It seems that Low-surface-brightness galaxies is same as dim galaxies, right? From the above quote, the conventional galaxy is the spiral as the spiral has been used as the modifier of conventional galaxy. So, from the quote, it seems that conventional galaxy (not Low-surface-brightness galaxies/ dim galaxies) are spiral in shape.
Am I missing anything here?
Thank you very much.
Hi TheUltimateWinner,

Let's look at that part of the passage again:
mendelay
Possibly as numerous as conventional galaxies, these galaxies have the same general shape and even the same approximate number of stars as a common type of conventional galaxy, the spiral, but tend to be much larger.
This is where the author tells us that very dim galaxies have the same general shape as spiral galaxies do.
User avatar
Sneha2021
Joined: 20 Dec 2020
Last visit: 10 Jun 2025
Posts: 294
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 522
Location: India
Posts: 294
Kudos: 38
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi Experts,
KarishmaB GMATNinja

I was confused btw D & E in Q96.
96. The author of the passage would be most likely to disagree with which of the following statements?
(D) Astronomers have devised a useful way of estimating the total baryonic mass in the universe.
(E) Astronomers have discovered a substantial amount of baryonic mass in intergalactic space.

"Astronomers have long speculated that the missing baryonic mass might eventually be discovered in intergalactic space or as some large population of galaxies that are difficult to detect"
From these 2 lines, we can infer that Astronomers might discover baryonic mass in future. So author doesn't completely disagree with the idea that baryonic mass can be discovered or would have been discovered. Author has shared hints about the discovery in a positive way.
The reason I rejected D bcz author didn't share any perspective on devising a useful way of estimating baryonic mass. We don't know author's perspective regarding this new way.

95. The author mentions the fact that baryons are the source of stars’ luminosity primarily in order to explain
(E) how astronomers know bright galaxies contain more baryons than do dim galaxies
Why E is incorrect?

Based on luminosity, we can calculate no of baryons. So astronomers can say bright galaxies will have more no. of baryons compared to dim. Why E is incorrect then?

Thank you very much.
User avatar
AjiteshArun
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 15 Jul 2015
Last visit: 21 Apr 2026
Posts: 6,074
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 743
Location: India
GMAT Focus 1: 715 Q83 V90 DI83
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V169
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
GMAT Focus 1: 715 Q83 V90 DI83
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V169
Posts: 6,074
Kudos: 5,137
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Sneha2021
"Astronomers have long speculated that the missing baryonic mass might eventually be discovered in intergalactic space or as some large population of galaxies that are difficult to detect"
From these 2 lines, we can infer that Astronomers might discover baryonic mass in future. So author doesn't completely disagree with the idea that baryonic mass can be discovered or would have been discovered. Author has shared hints about the discovery in a positive way.
Hi Sneha2021,

Let's take a look at some of the important words in that part of the passage.
mendelay
Astronomers have long speculated that the missing baryonic mass might eventually be discovered in intergalactic space or as some large population of galaxies that are difficult to detect.
Option E tells us that astronomers have (already) discovered a substantial amount of baryonic mass in intergalactic space. If they've already discovered so much baryonic mass in intergalactic space, why are they still speculating that intergalactic space would be a good place to go looking for the missing baryonic mass? The passage certainly doesn't tell us that they've already found lots of baryonic mass there and now want to look for even more, so it's more likely that they haven't found any (or much) baryonic mass in intergalactic space yet, and that's why they think intergalactic space may where the missing baryonic mass is. Even the second candidate ("some large population of galaxies that are difficult to detect") is something that we wouldn't expect astronomers to already know a great deal about.
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 21 Apr 2026
Posts: 7,391
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 2,126
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,391
Kudos: 70,784
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post

Question 6 (or 96)


Sneha2021
Hi Experts,
KarishmaB GMATNinja

I was confused btw D & E in Q96.
96. The author of the passage would be most likely to disagree with which of the following statements?
(D) Astronomers have devised a useful way of estimating the total baryonic mass in the universe.
(E) Astronomers have discovered a substantial amount of baryonic mass in intergalactic space.

"Astronomers have long speculated that the missing baryonic mass might eventually be discovered in intergalactic space or as some large population of galaxies that are difficult to detect"
From these 2 lines, we can infer that Astronomers might discover baryonic mass in future. So author doesn't completely disagree with the idea that baryonic mass can be discovered or would have been discovered. Author has shared hints about the discovery in a positive way.
The reason I rejected D bcz author didn't share any perspective on devising a useful way of estimating baryonic mass. We don't know author's perspective regarding this new way.
Starting with (E):
Quote:
(E) [the author would disagree that] Astronomers have discovered a substantial amount of baryonic mass in intergalactic space.
The words "have discovered" very specifically tell us that astronomers already discovered a substantial amount of baryonic mass in intergalactic space. The last line of the passage tells us that astronomers have speculated that this mass exists, but nothing indicates that it has already been discovered, as written in (E).

Additionally, the same line discusses two possible answers to the long-standing puzzle of extra mass: matter in intergalactic space, or extra galaxies that are difficult to detect.

The passage provides ample support for the second answer: these difficult-to-detect galaxies HAVE been detected. They may well account for the entirety of the missing mass. By contrast, the author doesn't provide any evidence to support the idea that there is a substantial amount of baryonic mass in intergalactic space.

The author would disagree that astronomers have discovered a substantial amount of baryonic mass in intergalactic space, so (E) is the correct answer.

Here's (D):
Quote:
(D) Astronomers have devised a useful way of estimating the total baryonic mass in the universe.
The author discusses two ways of estimating baryonic mass: luminosity, and "the amount of helium in the universe, as measured by spectroscopy." This second method is used to estimate the total baryonic mass in the universe, so that's the method (D) is talking about.

There is a gap between the two measures -- the measured luminosity of galaxies is low compared to measured amount of helium. From this, the author says that there is "missing" matter. This means that the author trusts the higher number given by the helium method, and is searching for a reason to explain why the luminosity is lower than it should be.

Because the author trusts the helium method of measuring the total baryonic mass in the universe, the author would agree with (D).

(D) is out.


Question 5 (or 95)


Sneha2021

95. The author mentions the fact that baryons are the source of stars’ luminosity primarily in order to explain
(E) how astronomers know bright galaxies contain more baryons than do dim galaxies
Why E is incorrect?

Based on luminosity, we can calculate no of baryons. So astronomers can say bright galaxies will have more no. of baryons compared to dim. Why E is incorrect then?

Thank you very much.
Here's the exact wording of question 5:
Quote:
95. The author mentions the fact that baryons are the source of stars’ luminosity primarily in order to explain...
To answer this question, we're not just looking for something that's true about the "fact." We're looking for the primary reason WHY the author included the fact in the passage. What role does it play in the author's overall point?

In the second paragraph, the author talks about a "long-standing puzzle" : there is "missing" baryonic mass in the universe. We know about this missing mass because of a gap between two different ways to measure baryonic mass -- helium and luminosity.

So, the author mentions the fact that baryons are the source of stars’ luminosity to connect these dots. That's a great fit with (C):
Quote:
(C) why astronomers can use galactic luminosity to estimate baryonic mass
(C) is the correct answer to question 5.

Here's (E):
Quote:
(E) how astronomers know bright galaxies contain more baryons than do dim galaxies
Again, when the author mentions the "fact," he/she is primarily trying to show how luminosity plays into the puzzle of the missing mass. He/she is not concerned with comparing the masses of different types of galaxies.

Additionally, the author would not agree that dim galaxies have fewer baryons than bright galaxies do -- in fact, we know from the first paragraph that they have the "same approximate number of stars as a common type of conventional galaxy." It's just that dim galaxies are more spread out, making it tough to detect the luminosity of those galaxies. In other words, the luminosity measure was off because it failed to detect the baryons in the dim galaxies.

Eliminate (E) for question 5.

I hope that helps!
User avatar
Sajjad1994
User avatar
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Last visit: 20 Apr 2026
Posts: 16,842
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 6,333
GPA: 3.62
Products:
Posts: 16,842
Kudos: 51,864
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Official Explanation

7. The primary purpose of the passage is to

Difficulty Level: 600

Explanation

Main idea

This question requires understanding, in broad terms, the purpose of the passage as a whole. The first paragraph describes a phenomenon: the discovery of dim galaxies and some of their general attributes. The second paragraph describes how this discovery may help astronomers to solve a long-standing puzzle about the baryonic mass of the universe.

A. Correct. The passage describes the phenomenon of dim galaxies and describes their significance in solving the long-standing puzzle of the missing baryonic mass in the universe.

B. Although the passage discusses the puzzling difference between the two estimates of baryonic mass, this option does not account for the broader topic of dim galaxies.

C. While the passage identifies the newly discovered phenomenon of dim galaxies, it does not offer a significant explanation for these galaxies’ origins.

D. Although the passage compares dim and conventional galaxies in the first paragraph, this option does not account for the important detail that dim galaxies may help solve a long-standing puzzle.

E. The discovery of dim galaxies discussed in the passage is not said to be inconsistent with any existing scientific theory.

Answer: A
Gmatguy007
Joined: 31 Dec 1969
Last visit: -
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
In the second question (It can be inferred from the passage that which of the following is an accurate physical description of typical low-surface-brightness galaxies?) I chose (A) since in the first paragraph says 'they have far fewer stars per unit volume than do conventional galaxies' and in combination with the fact that they are larger than conventional galaxies I inferred that they have fewer stars in total (for instance 10 stars per unit volume instead of 15, so they have 5 few per unit volume). 

Where am I mistaken?? GMATCoachBen GMATNinja avigutman chetan2u

Thanks in advance­
 1   2   
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7391 posts
494 posts
358 posts