Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 16:24 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 16:24
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
Sub 505 Level|   Science|   Short Passage|                              
User avatar
mendelay
Joined: 21 Jul 2009
Last visit: 17 Oct 2012
Posts: 79
Own Kudos:
620
 [101]
Given Kudos: 23
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 79
Kudos: 620
 [101]
26
Kudos
Add Kudos
75
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
Gmatsaiyan
Joined: 05 Feb 2018
Last visit: 08 Aug 2022
Posts: 754
Own Kudos:
2,710
 [24]
Given Kudos: 139
Location: India
Concentration: Finance
GPA: 2.77
WE:General Management (Other)
19
Kudos
Add Kudos
4
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
kivalo
Joined: 20 Sep 2016
Last visit: 08 Sep 2022
Posts: 91
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 207
GMAT 1: 680 Q49 V35
GPA: 3.99
GMAT 1: 680 Q49 V35
Posts: 91
Kudos: 171
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
AD2GMAT
Joined: 30 Jul 2014
Last visit: 30 Jan 2023
Posts: 87
Own Kudos:
104
 [3]
Given Kudos: 107
Status:MBA Completed
Affiliations: IIM
Products:
Posts: 87
Kudos: 104
 [3]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
kivalo
Can someone explain how do you read a passage like this one (relatively clear structure, but a lot of supporting details to comprehend). I got 7/7 right in 10 mins, but still feel that I haven't built a consistent approach. Can someone who is good at this explain (as I do below) how to do it right, i.e. how to know how much time and attention to develop to specific details ? What do you exactly take from your first read?


Quote:
In addition to conventional galaxies, the universe contains very dim galaxies that until recently went unnoticed by astronomers.
Most important sentence. There are two type of galaxies, conventional and dim. Until recently, scientists did not know about the dim galaxies.
Quote:
Possibly as numerous as conventional galaxies, these galaxies have the same general shape and even the same approximate number of stars as a common type of conventional galaxy, the spiral, but tend to be much larger. Because these galaxies’ mass is spread out over larger areas, they have far fewer stars per unit volume than do conventional galaxies. Apparently these low-surface-brightness galaxies, as they are called, take much longer than conventional galaxies to condense their primordial gas and convert it to stars—that is, they evolve much more slowly.
This is the part I am not sure about. I'd note only that bunch of differences are given, and skim to try to comprehend what the differences are. During my read, I happened to remember the difference in size in density, but what I remembered was not important

Quote:
These galaxies may constitute an answer to the long-standing puzzle of the missing baryonic mass in the universe. Baryons—subatomic particles that are generally protons or neutrons—are the source of stellar, and therefore galactic, luminosity, and so their numbers can be estimated based on how luminous galaxies are. However, the amount of helium in the universe, as measured by spectroscopy, suggests that there are far more baryons in the universe than estimates based on galactic luminosity indicate. Astronomers have long speculated that the missing baryonic mass might eventually be discovered in intergalactic space or as some large population of galaxies that are difficult to detect.
Again, I am not sure how to tackle this para.
Again, here I'd only note that knowledge about dim galaxies might help explain why measures relying on luminosity and helium give different estimates of baryonic mass in the universe However, the paragraph contains a lot more info that requires time to comprehend. What do I do with all that information during the first read?

Though I am not an expert, I say identifying the structure in the first read is good enough to go ahead with the questions. In other words the "minimum" amount of reading that is necessary for you to answer the Primary Purpose question is enough in the first reading.
If some expert reply to this question, then I suppose it would be more fruitful for you and for me also.
User avatar
Skywalker18
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 08 Dec 2013
Last visit: 15 Nov 2023
Posts: 2,039
Own Kudos:
9,962
 [1]
Given Kudos: 171
Status:Greatness begins beyond your comfort zone
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
GPA: 3.2
WE:Information Technology (Consulting)
Products:
Posts: 2,039
Kudos: 9,962
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Decent passage , got all correct except Q96(6th question) in 12 mins , including 3 mins 15 seconds to read .
For Q96 , i was stuck between option D and E and could not eliminate either .

AjiteshArun , mikemcgarry ,GMATNinja , ccooley , other experts -- can you please help ?
User avatar
AjiteshArun
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 15 Jul 2015
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 5,949
Own Kudos:
5,080
 [2]
Given Kudos: 732
Location: India
GMAT Focus 1: 715 Q83 V90 DI83
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V169
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT Focus 1: 715 Q83 V90 DI83
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V169
Posts: 5,949
Kudos: 5,080
 [2]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Skywalker18
Decent passage , got all correct except Q96(6th question) in 12 mins , including 3 mins 15 seconds to read .
For Q96 , i was stuck between option D and E and could not eliminate either .
The passage says astronomers have long speculated that the missing baryonic mass might eventually be discovered in intergalactic space, but option E says astronomers have discovered a substantial amount of baryonic mass in intergalactic space.

According to the passage, the mass might be discovered (in the future). Option E says that the discovery has already happened. Therefore, we'd expect the author to disagree with E.
User avatar
Aiena
Joined: 11 Sep 2017
Last visit: 04 Sep 2022
Posts: 12
Own Kudos:
50
 [2]
Given Kudos: 133
Posts: 12
Kudos: 50
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
SMD
Can someone please explain Q97-I chose D but correct OA is A,why option D is incorrect.

Thanks!

Hi SMD,

Here's my summary of the passage in very terms-

PARAGRAPH 1: dim galaxies v/s conventional galaxies
PARAGRAPH 2: Missing baryonic mass- a puzzle

My pre-thinking for this main idea question was that it should include the summary of both the paragraphs.

I wasn't very convinced with option A, but I used POE to eliminate other options.

Although option D summarizes the first paragraph (comparison between dim galaxies and conventional galaxies), it does not talk about baryonic mass at all. If option D had a bit more information (how dim galaxies might help explain the missing baryonic mass puzzle), it would have been a better answer choice :-)

I hope this helps.

Aiena.
User avatar
aragonn
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 23 Sep 2015
Last visit: 30 Sep 2019
Posts: 1,230
Own Kudos:
5,890
 [4]
Given Kudos: 416
Products:
Posts: 1,230
Kudos: 5,890
 [4]
4
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
P1- new galaxies; slow; dim; diff with conventional galaxies.
P2 - how it is a missing puzzle. baryons
Main point - about new galaxies - similarity with conventional one and importance of their discovery.

91. According to the passage, conventional spiral galaxies differ from low-surface-brightness galaxies in which of the following ways?
must be in P1

(A) They have fewer stars than do low-surface brightness galaxies. - not true for all
(B) They evolve more quickly than low-surfacebrightness galaxies. - this must be correct.
(C) They are more diffuse than low-surfacebrightness galaxies. - not true for all
(D) They contain less helium than do low-surfacebrightness galaxies. - not true for all
(E) They are larger than low-surface-brightness galaxies. - not true for all
----------------------------------------

92. It can be inferred from the passage that which of the following is an accurate physical description of typical low-surface-brightness galaxies?

(A) They are large spiral galaxies containing fewer stars than do conventional galaxies. - no; the same approximate number of stars
(B) They are compact but very dim spiral galaxies. - dim is true but compact is not.
(C) They are diffuse spiral galaxies that occupy a large volume of space. - has to be this; the same approximate number of stars as a common type of conventional galaxy, the spiral, but tend to be much larger
(D) They are small, young spiral galaxies that contain a high proportion of primordial gas. - too broad.
(E) They are large, dense spirals with low luminosity. - no dense

----------------------------------------

93. It can be inferred from the passage that the “longstanding puzzle” refers to which of the following?
anchor - longstanding puzzle - of the missing baryonic mass in the universe ---- Astronomers have long speculated that the missing baryonic mass might eventually be discovered in intergalactic space or as some large population of galaxies that are difficult to detect.

(B) The discrepancy between estimates of total baryonic mass derived from measuring helium and estimates based on measuring galactic luminosity - correct; best of the lot.

---------------------------------------
94. The author implies that low-surface-brightness galaxies could constitute an answer to the puzzle discussed in the second paragraph primarily because

the missing baryonic mass might eventually be discovered in intergalactic space or as some large population of galaxies that are difficult to detect.

(A) they contain baryonic mass that was not taken into account by researchers using galactic luminosity to estimate the number of baryons in the universe -

---------------------------------------

95. The author mentions the fact that baryons are the source of stars’ luminosity primarily in order to explain

(C) why astronomers can use galactic luminosity to estimate baryonic mass - yes

----------------------------------------

96. The author of the passage would be most likely to disagree with which of the following statements?

(A) Low-surface-brightness galaxies are more difficult to detect than are conventional galaxies. - T
(B) Low-surface-brightness galaxies are often spiral in shape. - T
(C) Astronomers have advanced plausible ideas about where missing baryonic mass might be found. - T
(D) Astronomers have devised a useful way of estimating the total baryonic mass in the universe. - T
(E) Astronomers have discovered a substantial amount of baryonic mass in intergalactic space. - only theory is given here.

--------------------------------------

97. The primary purpose of the passage is to

(A) describe a phenomenon and consider its scientific significance - to the point. P2 defines scientific significance.
(B) contrast two phenomena and discuss a puzzling difference between them - too weak
(C) identify a newly discovered phenomenon and explain its origins - explain its origins ---- seems wrong
(D) compare two classes of objects and discuss the physical properties of each - P1 only
(E) discuss a discovery and point out its inconsistency with existing theory - inconsistency ---- not true
User avatar
Chelsea212
Joined: 16 Dec 2015
Last visit: 18 Nov 2019
Posts: 24
Own Kudos:
80
 [4]
Given Kudos: 17
Location: Canada
Concentration: Strategy, Finance
WE:Corporate Finance (Finance: Investment Banking)
Posts: 24
Kudos: 80
 [4]
4
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
This was a tough one! I unexpectedly found myself struggling with RC after having zero problems doing Manhattan practice exams. When I did the Manhattan Prep test, I can't even recall getting 1 RC question wrong ever...but then when I transitioned to the OG stuff, I found that I was really struggling. That said, I always, always, always suggest that people focus on using reading materials from the science/technology, as well as global business sections from The Economist and the NYTimes as practice, and then testing for improvement by practicing only OG questions. In my personal experience, this has yielded the largest improvement for me.

I think a key part of my improvement thus far has also hinged on the fact that I deliberately pick articles I just do not want to read because (a) the topic is too foreign and (b) the topic seems super boring. Articles about galaxies, stars, and general science typically bring on the ZZzzZs for me so I pick those as they are both boring and incredibly confusing to me.

One of the most basic points you should be able to answer after every practice article is "what was the point of this article?" and being able to articulate it in a very short but succinct sentence. If you're going to keep this question in mind, you'll intuitively find yourself transitioning from reading 'fact, fact, fact' to a sentence by sentence structural understanding of 'introduction, opinion, opposing opinion, explanation etc'. I highly recommend that you read/watch videos done by the GMATNinjas and Mike McGarry if you want a refresher on how to read.

Now on with the RC! I'm going to start with commenting on the final question because it is equally basic as it is difficult question.

Quote:
97. The primary purpose of the passage is to

(A) describe a phenomenon and consider its scientific significance
(B) contrast two phenomena and discuss a puzzling difference between them
(C) identify a newly discovered phenomenon and explain its origins
(D) compare two classes of objects and discuss the physical properties of each
(E) discuss a discovery and point out its inconsistency with existing theory
Step 1. I always, always, always rephrase the passage as I read. - This passage is fairly short, and there isn't much we need to do to organize our thoughts because the writer seems to have done the bulk of it. The first paragraph introduces the topic, comparing and contrasting two types of galaxies. The second paragraph moves into how the 'dim galaxies' may hold answers to a long-standing puzzle.

Step 2. For every question, always go back to the passage. - When I reach this question, I quickly revisit the passage at a very high level to again paraphrase the highlights of the passage. This jogs my memory so that I can get a good handle on what I'm going to be looking out for in the answer choices of a high-level, big picture type of question (i.e. not detail related).

Step 3. Always find 4 wrong answers!
    (A) describe a phenomenon and consider its scientific significance - This sounds promising...not a bingo! straight away in my mind, but I will definitely put this guy on hold. I've returned after eliminating all else, and this now sounds spot on!

    (B) contrast two phenomena and discuss a puzzling difference between them - The passage compared two types of a single phenomena: galaxies. Although I'm not certain, I don't think I would call the conventional and dim galaxies two separate phenomena, but rather, 2 types of a single phenomena. Also, the primary purpose was not discussing a puzzling difference between these two galaxies. I think the primary purpose was captured in par-graph 2 sentence 1: "These galaxies may constitute an answer to the long-standing puzzle of the missing baryonic mass in the universe." The dim galaxies seem to just have some sort of scientific significance in resolving a long unsolved puzzle.

    (C) identify a newly discovered phenomenon and explain its origins - There is no mention of any 'newly' discovered phenomenon, but rather, a 'long-standing puzzle'.. In addition, the passage never touches on, let alone explains, origins of any phenomena.

    (D) compare two classes of objects and discuss the physical properties of each - Nice, this answer choice gives me more confidence in my justification for answer choice (B). While the first paragraph does exactly what this answer choice states, it is not the primary purpose of the passage. As we can see, the first sentence of the second paragraph introduces the purpose of the passage as it effectively switches the tone of the passage from being explanatory to questioning while using the information from paragraph as context.

    The second paragraph is where the heart of the passage's purpose lies and the first and last sentence of the second paragraph structurally cement this. For the purposes of eliminating this specific answer choice, I think it is enough to recognize that there is a second paragraph and it is not at all doing what this choice states, but instead opening up room for discussion and further exploration.


    (E) discuss a discovery and point out its inconsistency with existing theory - I think that this is a very tempting answer choice because it is very abstract. I do not think I give the best explanation as to how and why I eliminate this choice, but I'll do my best! I actually got this question wrong and chose this after I got down to choosing between (A) and (E) and was feeling like I needed to just pick!

    First point of confusion for me here is that I am uncertain whether I would label these galaxies being discussed as discoveries in present day...they were definitely 'discovered' and i.e. new phenomena at some point.... Even if I call these galaxies a new discovery, the passage does not point out their inconsistency with any existing theory. Instead, the passage discusses the inconsistency on the amount of Baryons are in one of them as measured by two different methods.

    I think that if the purpose of the passage was to discuss a 'discovery', the author would very deliberately mention the word discovery. On this basis, I eliminate this choice.


Main takeaway: Answer choices like (E) are prime examples of abstract thoughts that touch enough on relevant and true portion so the passage that it is a very easy trap to fall into.

Feedback and comment not only welcome, but encouraged!! I think lots of people would benefit from discussion on this one.
User avatar
Chelsea212
Joined: 16 Dec 2015
Last visit: 18 Nov 2019
Posts: 24
Own Kudos:
80
 [1]
Given Kudos: 17
Location: Canada
Concentration: Strategy, Finance
WE:Corporate Finance (Finance: Investment Banking)
Posts: 24
Kudos: 80
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I think that the official explanation for Q96 is spot-on; however, I thought I would contribute my perspective because I found this question challenging.

Quote:
96. The author of the passage would be most likely to disagree with which of the following statements?

(A) Low-surface-brightness galaxies are more difficult to detect than are conventional galaxies.
(B) Low-surface-brightness galaxies are often spiral in shape.
(C) Astronomers have advanced plausible ideas about where missing baryonic mass might be found.
(D) Astronomers have devised a useful way of estimating the total baryonic mass in the universe.
(E) Astronomers have discovered a substantial amount of baryonic mass in intergalactic space.
Step 1. I always, always, always rephrase the passage as I read. - This one is for before starting the questions =)

Step 2. For every question, always go back to the passage. - This is an inference question, but since it is a 'big picture' kind, I'll be going back to the passage for each answer choice as I eliminate, as opposed to going straight to a point in the passage from the beginning.

Step 3. Always find 4 wrong answers!
    (A) Low-surface-brightness galaxies are more difficult to detect than are conventional galaxies. - Paragraph 1, sentence 1 - "In addition to conventional galaxies, the universe contains very dim galaxies that until recently went unnoticed by astronomers" The underlined portion of the passage lets me infer, yes, the author would agree with this statement. Next.

    (B) Low-surface-brightness galaxies are often spiral in shape. - Paragraph 1, sentence 2 - "Possibly as numerous as conventional galaxies, these galaxies have the same general shape and even the same approximate number of stars as a common type of conventional galaxy, the spiral...etc" The underlined portion of the passage lets me infer, yes, the author would agree with this statement. Next.

    (C) Astronomers have advanced plausible ideas about where missing baryonic mass might be found. - Paragraph 2 final sentence, "Astronomers have long speculated that the missing baryonic mass might eventually be discovered in intergalactic space or as some large population of galaxies that are difficult to detect"

    (D) Astronomers have devised a useful way of estimating the total baryonic mass in the universe. - Paragraph 2 talks about how there are two different methods for estimating the total Baryonic mass. Although they do not come to the same conclusion, it doesn't say that the methods are not useful. I can understand why this would be a very tempting choice, because if two methods don't come to the same conclusion, it seems like they're both inaccurate and i.e. not useful. However, it could very well be that one of them is bang on and the other useless, and as a result, we can't infer that the author would disagree with this.

    (E) Astronomers have discovered a substantial amount of baryonic mass in intergalactic space. - Paragraph 2, final sentence states that "Astronomers have long speculated that the missing baryonic mass might eventually be discovered in intergalactic space or as some large population of galaxies that are difficult to detect." Bingo! Says out right that the missing baryonic mass 'might eventually' i.e. has not yet been discovered.
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 7,443
Own Kudos:
69,787
 [2]
Given Kudos: 2,060
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,443
Kudos: 69,787
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
waihoe520
How many galaxies ? i got confused by the "these galaxies" is this referring to conventional or dim galaxies?

It is safe to say all the pronouns used are referring to the subject?


(Because these galaxies’ mass is spread out over larger areas, they have far fewer stars per unit volume than do conventional galaxies.)

"Because these galaxies" Is this referring to dim galaxies?

(Apparently these low-surface-brightness galaxies, as they are called, take much longer than conventional galaxies to condense their primordial gas and convert it to stars—that is, they evolve much more slowly.)

"These low-surface-brightness galaxies": is 3rd galaxies? not Dim or conventional galaxies?

(These galaxies may constitute an answer to the long-standing puzzle of the missing baryonic mass in the universe.)

Is the "These galaxies" here refer to dim galaxies too?
You're right, "these galaxies" is referring to the subject of the first sentence, the dim galaxies.

This is true throughout this passage -- each time "these galaxies" is used, it's referring to the dim galaxies mentioned in the first sentence.

The "low-surface-brightness galaxies" are also the dim galaxies, this part of the passage just gives another name for them. There are only two types of galaxy in this passage: the conventional galaxies and the dim galaxies.

I hope that helps!
User avatar
brains
Joined: 30 May 2017
Last visit: 22 Sep 2024
Posts: 91
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 169
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Strategy
GPA: 3.73
WE:Engineering (Consulting)
Products:
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Got 4 correct out of 7. Very disappointing and took 7 mins also to solve.. Incorrect responses in
Q4- My response B
Q5- My response B
Q6- My response A

I still have to figure out why i marked this response. Can experts shed some light into the flow of analysis that one should adopt while trying to find out the errors committed. I tried to find out where i went wrong but then ultimately could not conclude whether it was due to not attending to details and then making inference or the comprehension problem.

Should i not bother about the time factor that i am taking or should i go along with time factor. I have my Gmat scheduled next month.
GMATNinja and VeritasKarishma
User avatar
KarishmaB
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 16,267
Own Kudos:
77,001
 [1]
Given Kudos: 482
Location: Pune, India
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 16,267
Kudos: 77,001
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
brains
Got 4 correct out of 7. Very disappointing and took 7 mins also to solve.. Incorrect responses in
Q4- My response B
Q5- My response B
Q6- My response A

I still have to figure out why i marked this response. Can experts shed some light into the flow of analysis that one should adopt while trying to find out the errors committed. I tried to find out where i went wrong but then ultimately could not conclude whether it was due to not attending to details and then making inference or the comprehension problem.

Should i not bother about the time factor that i am taking or should i go along with time factor. I have my Gmat scheduled next month.
GMATNinja and VeritasKarishma

While attempting the questions, keep the timer on. Make sure you practice solving under pressure. Later, while evaluating your mistakes, there should be no time limit. Once you find the questions you answered incorrectly, you should attempt them again without the timer. See if you get the right answer this time around. It will tell you what exactly went wrong.
User avatar
custodio
Joined: 25 Jun 2018
Last visit: 03 Feb 2023
Posts: 39
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 46
Posts: 39
Kudos: 10
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I have a general question about the passage.

"Astronomers have long speculated that the missing baryonic mass might eventually be discovered in intergalactic space or as some large population of galaxies that are difficult to detect."

What's the point of saying "have long speculated" here?

As far as I understood:
- Dim galaxies are one of the two possible explanations of the missing baryonic mass (the other explanation is that missing baryonic mass is in intergalactic space).

Shouldn't we say just "Astronomers speculate"? Or in the worst case scenario, "Astronomers have speculated" (without "long")?

Additionally, the passage is in present tense, therefore I see no reason to use present perfect (have speculated).

Thanks.
User avatar
mSKR
Joined: 14 Aug 2019
Last visit: 10 Mar 2024
Posts: 1,290
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 381
Location: Hong Kong
Concentration: Strategy, Marketing
GMAT 1: 650 Q49 V29
GPA: 3.81
GMAT 1: 650 Q49 V29
Posts: 1,290
Kudos: 938
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
custodio
I have a general question about the passage.

"Astronomers have long speculated that the missing baryonic mass might eventually be discovered in intergalactic space or as some large population of galaxies that are difficult to detect."

What's the point of saying "have long speculated" here?

As far as I understood:
- Dim galaxies are one of the two possible explanations of the missing baryonic mass (the other explanation is that missing baryonic mass is in intergalactic space).

Shouldn't we say just "Astronomers speculate"? Or in the worst case scenario, "Astronomers have speculated" (without "long")?

Additionally, the passage is in present tense, therefore I see no reason to use present perfect (have speculated).

Thanks.


Their speculation started a long ago and it is still going on.
have long speculated is correct here


Dim galaxies are one of the two possible explanations of the missing baryonic mass (the other explanation is that missing baryonic mass is in intergalactic space).- WRONG
Dim galaxies are one of the two possible SOURCE of the missing baryonic mass (the other source is that missing baryonic mass is in intergalactic space).
avatar
psls
Joined: 27 Jan 2021
Last visit: 12 Dec 2023
Posts: 32
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 131
Posts: 32
Kudos: 9
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Dear Experts,

GMATNinja
VeritasKarishma
AjiteshArun

In Q6., I got hesitated in choice B,
Quote:
96. The author of the passage would be most likely to disagree with which of the following statements?

(B) Low-surface-brightness galaxies are often spiral in shape.


According to the passage,
Quote:
Possibly as numerous as conventional galaxies, these galaxies have the same general shape and even the same approximate number of stars as a common type of conventional galaxy, the spiral, but tend to be much larger.

Why author would agree with choice(B) with the word "OFTEN"?
Since I cannot see any mentions of the likelihood of galaxy shapes.

How can I eliminate it with confidence?

Appreciate,
-tor
User avatar
AjiteshArun
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 15 Jul 2015
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 5,949
Own Kudos:
5,080
 [2]
Given Kudos: 732
Location: India
GMAT Focus 1: 715 Q83 V90 DI83
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V169
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT Focus 1: 715 Q83 V90 DI83
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V169
Posts: 5,949
Kudos: 5,080
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
TorGmatGod
Why author would agree with choice(B) with the word "OFTEN"?
Hi TorGmatGod,

The correct answer will be something that the author is (most) likely to disagree with. In the portion of the passage you're looking at, the author clearly says "these galaxies have the same general shape... as a common type of conventional galaxy, the spiral". This means that ~ low-surface-brightness galaxies are spiral in shape. The only difference between what we see in the passage and what option B says is that option B includes the word often.

(1) Low-surface-brightness galaxies are spiral in shape. ← This is what the passage tells us.
(2) Low-surface-brightness galaxies are often spiral in shape. ← This is option B.

Someone who agrees with (1) will most likely also agree with (2). If it helps, we can read B as "many low-surface-brightness galaxies are spiral in shape". If all low-surface-brightness galaxies are spiral in shape, then the statement "many low-surface-brightness galaxies are spiral in shape" is also true, so the author is unlikely to disagree with it. On the other hand, the author would definitely disagree with E, because he or she says that the missing baryonic mass "might eventually be discovered in intergalactic space".
User avatar
KarishmaB
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 16,267
Own Kudos:
77,001
 [2]
Given Kudos: 482
Location: Pune, India
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 16,267
Kudos: 77,001
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
TorGmatGod
Dear Experts,

GMATNinja
VeritasKarishma
AjiteshArun

In Q6., I got hesitated in choice B,
Quote:
96. The author of the passage would be most likely to disagree with which of the following statements?

(B) Low-surface-brightness galaxies are often spiral in shape.


According to the passage,
Quote:
Possibly as numerous as conventional galaxies, these galaxies have the same general shape and even the same approximate number of stars as a common type of conventional galaxy, the spiral, but tend to be much larger.

Why author would agree with choice(B) with the word "OFTEN"?
Since I cannot see any mentions of the likelihood of galaxy shapes.

How can I eliminate it with confidence?

Appreciate,
-tor

"same general shape" and "often have the same shape" are not very different.
"Same general shape" means that most have this shape but there could be some exceptions. "Often have the same shape" is also the same idea. When you are talking about galaxies, there is a lot we don't know. So making definitive statements is not possible.
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
AjiteshArun
TorGmatGod
Why author would agree with choice(B) with the word "OFTEN"?
Hi TorGmatGod,

The correct answer will be something that the author is (most) likely to disagree with. In the portion of the passage you're looking at, the author clearly says "these galaxies have the same general shape... as a common type of conventional galaxy, the spiral". This means that ~ low-surface-brightness galaxies are spiral in shape. The only difference between what we see in the passage and what option B says is that option B includes the word often.

(1) Low-surface-brightness galaxies are spiral in shape. ← This is what the passage tells us.
(2) Low-surface-brightness galaxies are often spiral in shape. ← This is option B.

Someone who agrees with (1) will most likely also agree with (2). If it helps, we can read B as "many low-surface-brightness galaxies are spiral in shape". If all low-surface-brightness galaxies are spiral in shape, then the statement "many low-surface-brightness galaxies are spiral in shape" is also true, so the author is unlikely to disagree with it. On the other hand, the author would definitely disagree with E, because he or she says that the missing baryonic mass "might eventually be discovered in intergalactic space".
AjiteshArun
Thanks for the nice explanation, but it confused a bit me.
Quote:
these galaxies (dim galaxies) have the same general shape and even the same approximate number of stars as a common type of conventional galaxy, the spiral
It seems that Low-surface-brightness galaxies is same as dim galaxies, right? From the above quote, the conventional galaxy is the spiral as the spiral has been used as the modifier of conventional galaxy. So, from the quote, it seems that conventional galaxy (not Low-surface-brightness galaxies/ dim galaxies) are spiral in shape.
Am I missing anything here?
Thank you very much.
User avatar
AjiteshArun
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 15 Jul 2015
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 5,949
Own Kudos:
5,080
 [1]
Given Kudos: 732
Location: India
GMAT Focus 1: 715 Q83 V90 DI83
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V169
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT Focus 1: 715 Q83 V90 DI83
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V169
Posts: 5,949
Kudos: 5,080
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
TheUltimateWinner
It seems that Low-surface-brightness galaxies is same as dim galaxies, right? From the above quote, the conventional galaxy is the spiral as the spiral has been used as the modifier of conventional galaxy. So, from the quote, it seems that conventional galaxy (not Low-surface-brightness galaxies/ dim galaxies) are spiral in shape.
Am I missing anything here?
Thank you very much.
Hi TheUltimateWinner,

Let's look at that part of the passage again:
mendelay
Possibly as numerous as conventional galaxies, these galaxies have the same general shape and even the same approximate number of stars as a common type of conventional galaxy, the spiral, but tend to be much larger.
This is where the author tells us that very dim galaxies have the same general shape as spiral galaxies do.
 1   2   
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7443 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
231 posts
GRE Forum Moderator
17304 posts
189 posts