Last visit was: 13 Dec 2024, 14:00 It is currently 13 Dec 2024, 14:00
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
IanStewart
User avatar
GMAT Tutor
Joined: 24 Jun 2008
Last visit: 13 Dec 2024
Posts: 4,126
Own Kudos:
9,918
 []
Given Kudos: 97
 Q51  V47
Expert reply
Posts: 4,126
Kudos: 9,918
 []
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
EMPOWERgmatRichC
User avatar
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 19 Dec 2014
Last visit: 31 Dec 2023
Posts: 21,807
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 450
Status:GMAT Assassin/Co-Founder
Affiliations: EMPOWERgmat
Location: United States (CA)
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V49
GRE 1: Q170 V170
Expert reply
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V49
GRE 1: Q170 V170
Posts: 21,807
Kudos: 12,059
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Asad
Asad
50 animals competed for prizes at a certain fair. How many of the animals won prizes?
1) Of the animals that competed, 100% of the cows won prizes.
2) Of the animals that competed, 50% of the non-cows won prizes.
Hello Experts,
EMPOWERgmatRichC, VeritasKarishma, IanStewart, chetan2u, ArvindCrackVerbal, GMATinsight

I have a query on this question..
We should never keep our eyes on statement 2 when we check statement 1, right? So, how will someone know that there are 2 segment (i.e., cows VS non-cows) without reading statement 2? Statement 1 directly says that 100%. That means there is nothing "left". So, why do we not consider statement 1 sufficient (apart from statement 2)? I mean: What's the wrong with someone if s/he takes all 50 animals as 'cows' group?
Note: Question prompt did not separate "animals" as 'cows' VS 'non-cows'. If statement 1 use 99% then we can think of another groups (i.e., non-cows). Also What if there is just 1 animal in the question prompt?
Thanks__

Hi Asad,

The prompt tells us that 50 ANIMALS competed for prizes. We're asked how MANY animals won prizes.

At the start, we have no idea what those 50 animals are (maybe all 50 animals are the same type of animal or maybe it's a 'mix' of animals); in addition, we don't know whether an animal can win MORE than one prize or not. Thus, we'll clearly need some really specific information to answer this question.

Fact 1 tells us that 100% OF the COWS won prizes. This tells us very little about the NUMBER of COWS or total winners or total prizes; we know that EVERY COW won at least one prize - but that does NOT mean that all 50 animals were cows (nor does it mean that there were 50 prizes). There could very easily have been OTHER animals competing for prizes. The information in Fact 2 has NO bearing on these deductions.

GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
User avatar
IanStewart
User avatar
GMAT Tutor
Joined: 24 Jun 2008
Last visit: 13 Dec 2024
Posts: 4,126
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 97
 Q51  V47
Expert reply
Posts: 4,126
Kudos: 9,918
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
EMPOWERgmatRichC
in addition, we don't know whether an animal can win MORE than one prize or not.

That is irrelevant; the question asks how many animals won prizes, not how many prizes were awarded.
User avatar
yashikaaggarwal
User avatar
Senior Moderator - Masters Forum
Joined: 19 Jan 2020
Last visit: 09 Dec 2024
Posts: 3,116
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1,510
Location: India
GPA: 4
WE:Analyst (Internet and New Media)
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Asad
50 animals competed for prizes at a certain fair. How many of the animals won prizes?

(1) Of the animals that competed, 100% of the cows won prizes.
(2) Of the animals that competed, 50% of the non-cows won prizes.

I think whole question is based on speculation of "what if". If we exactly don't know what no. Or what constraint is used to define the no. of animals getting awards or how many awards, the question will give no particular answer.
Moreover GMAT never goes with speculation. We can't even state an universal truth as one, if it's not mentioned in question.

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
chetan2u
User avatar
RC & DI Moderator
Joined: 02 Aug 2009
Last visit: 12 Dec 2024
Posts: 11,434
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 333
Status:Math and DI Expert
Products:
Expert reply
Posts: 11,434
Kudos: 38,023
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Asad
Asad
50 animals competed for prizes at a certain fair. How many of the animals won prizes?
1) Of the animals that competed, 100% of the cows won prizes.
2) Of the animals that competed, 50% of the non-cows won prizes.

I have a query on this question..
We should never keep our eyes on statement 2 when we check statement 1, right? So, how will someone know that there are 2 segment (i.e., cows VS non-cows) without reading statement 2? Statement 1 directly says that 100%. That means there is nothing "left". So, why do we not consider statement 1 sufficient (apart from statement 2)? I mean: What's the wrong with someone if s/he takes all 50 animals as 'cows' group?
Note: Question prompt did not separate "animals" as 'cows' VS 'non-cows'. If statement 1 use 99% then we can think of another groups (i.e., non-cows). Also What if there is just 1 animal in the question prompt?
Thanks__

It is not mentioned that animals means just cows, so you cannot make that mistake in DS of reading more than what is given.

A similar case would be when we say..
In a class, 100% of girls passed.
If we were looking for % of total passed, we cannot say that the class consists of only girls.
User avatar
HoneyLemon
User avatar
Stern School Moderator
Joined: 26 May 2020
Last visit: 02 Oct 2023
Posts: 631
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 219
Status:Spirited
Concentration: General Management, Technology
WE:Analyst (Computer Software)
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Asad
50 animals competed for prizes at a certain fair. How many of the animals won prizes?

(1) Of the animals that competed, 100% of the cows won prizes.
(2) Of the animals that competed, 50% of the non-cows won prizes.

Same types question:

LINK 1

E IMO.


Statement 1 : Of the animals that competed, 100% of the cows won prizes. -- we dono how many cows from the animals .. so Insufficient

Statement 2 : Of the animals that competed, 50% of the non-cows won prizes. -- we dono how many non -cows from the animals .. so Insufficient

Combining both also gives no info about COws and non-cows .. We can have 30 cows and 20 non-cows -- Prizes won = 30 + 10 = 40
-----------------------------------------------------------------------Or we can have 20 Cows and 30 non-cows ----- Prizes won = 20 + 15 = 35 .

So Combining also not sufficient . Hence E .
User avatar
bumpbot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 35,810
Own Kudos:
Posts: 35,810
Kudos: 929
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Moderator:
Math Expert
97873 posts