Vineetk
gmatbull
@Vineetk & Cpanagio,
what are your explanations for choosing B?
I went with B because of below highlighted statement provided in the argument:
Because the presence of older mosquitoes—those ten or more days
old—
is essential to maintaining the life cycle of the malaria parasite, researchers have proposed addressing the
problem of pesticide resistance by searching
for a means of targeting only older mosquitoes for elimination.
Maintenance of life cycle (reproduction) is an important activity that's why older mosquito comes in picture. The pesticide will target the older mosquito (after reproduction) but not on young ones so that young ones become 10 or more days old and reproduce and life cycle can continue. At the same time, older mosquito can be killed by this pesticide, controlling the population.
Supposing the old mosquitoes are eliminated after passing the resistant genes to the younger ones, does it make any sense?
My expectation is that u target the old ones (before breeding starts). That way, u prevent them from passing the stubborn genes
to their young ones. Otherwise, anytime u eliminate the old ones, the younger ones (in possession of the adamant genes) transfer
the genes and the vicious cycle continues...
E, on the other hand, says the adult mosquitoes are less susceptible than their younger ones. So, it becomes easier to eliminate the
re-production cycle. Also, we are guaranteed that the agent (or mechanism) for transfer of the genes-adult mosquitoes- are easily
killed, leaving only the younger but ones who grow old and also become less vulnerable to the insecticide. Malaria is thus easier to control.
Am sorry, OE not available, but What do u think Vineetk?